...And Justice for All

1979
R
1 घं 59 मि

IMDb रेटिंग

7.4/10

43 हज़ार

आपकी रेटिंग

लोकप्रियता

3,325

2,084

Al Pacino in ...And Justice for All (1979)

trailer प्ले करें2:24

1 वीडियो

99+ फ़ोटो

Legal Drama Legal Thriller Crime Drama Thriller

एक वकील को अन्य निर्दोष ग्राहकों का बचाव करते हुए, एक दोषी न्यायाधीश का बचाव करने के लिए मजबूर किया जाता है, और दोषी के लिए सजा पाने और निर्दोष को न्याय प्रदान करने की कोशिश की जाती है.एक वकील को अन्य निर्दोष ग्राहकों का बचाव करते हुए, एक दोषी न्यायाधीश का बचाव करने के लिए मजबूर किया जाता है, और दोषी के लिए सजा पाने और निर्दोष को न्याय प्रदान करने की कोशिश की जाती है.एक वकील को अन्य निर्दोष ग्राहकों का बचाव करते हुए, एक दोषी न्यायाधीश का बचाव करने के लिए मजबूर किया जाता है, और दोषी के लिए सजा पाने और निर्दोष को न्याय प्रदान करने की कोशिश की जाती है.

IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें

IMDb रेटिंग

7.4/10

43 हज़ार

आपकी रेटिंग

लोकप्रियता

3,325

2,084

IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें

2 ऑस्कर के लिए नामांकित
- 1 जीत और कुल 3 नामांकन

वीडियो1

Trailer 2:24

...And Justice for All.

फ़ोटो104

+ 98

उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं180

7.442.7K

फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं

sllovejoy

Better now than when I was 11

I remember this movie from when I was a kid. I remembered it fondly, and always pictured Pacino giving the big "This whole courtroom's out of order!!" speech.

I just rented it again after not seeing it for about twenty years, and WOW! There's a lot more to remember than that one speech. I absolutely loved this movie! I always like Pacino, but sometimes he just plays a similar character over and over. In this one, young Pacino got to play everything from scared to sad to funny to furious... and I thought he did great. I haven't felt for a character so much in quite a while.

The relationship between Pacino and his "leading lady" was a good one, especially for the '70's. I thought those two characters were interesting together.

The music sucked, but every movie soundtrack at that time sounded like a porno flick, didn't it?

It's a story where one bad thing after another happens in a short period of time, in very unrealistic (we all hope!) fashion - but that's a whole movie genre in itself (although I don't know what you'd call it), to make us think of lots of different things and to push the main character over the edge. Without all the subplots, I don't think the ending would have made as much sense.

I'd like a copy for my video library, and I don't say that often.

9rockman-imdb

Final courtroom soliloquy by Pacino's character at the end of the movie says it all

As a student in 1968 I worked in my father's law office when 20 years of age running errands and picking up clients and other attorneys at the airport. I once thought I wanted to become a lawyer like the old man. After that experience it never crossed my mind again. It was then I recognized that lawyers were merely another "mob" with public sanction. My father ultimately had to give it up because of all the disingenuous people he had to deal with in that arena. Justice is difficult to come by under the best of circumstances and courtrooms present an intellectual environment one notch above that of an alley.

For me this movie should be required viewing by all prospective attorneys. Especially the criminal variety for eventually they shall be exposed to all that they have seen in this movie in one form or another and very likely much, much worse.

Oh, and I liked the movie.

8pulasien

Pacino's Best Role

When we think of the great roles over Al Pacino's career, we automatically conjure up images of The Godfather I and II, Scent of A Woman, Carlito's Way and Serpico among many others. What gets little mention and is oft forgotten is Al Pacino's performance as Arthur Kirkland in "And Justice for All." From days past and as I would watch Pacino classics, I always think back to 1979 and his portrayal of an ethical lawyer fighting for truth and justice in a not so ethical legal morass.

Thanks to AMC for bringing this movie back for new generation of movie watchers and also for a reminder of how great an actor Al Pacino is. If you have not seen "And Justice for All," you are in for a treat. Far and away this was Al Pacino's best film role and possibly one of the greatest film roles of all time.

Too bad Hollywood was so engrossed in the morbidly depressing and cynical Kramer vs. Kramer in 1980. Head to head, Dustin Hoffman's role in Kramer vs. Kramer could not hold Al Pacino's water, but alas, the Hollywood types on most occasions vote with their backsides and not their heads.

See this Movie!!!!!

10shuba

A Gem!!!

This movie stands out among the hundreds I've seen; It is exactly what it was initially marketed as; an inditement of the late 70's (and I suspect little has changed) legal system. This is accomplished magnificently.. Imagine an over-worked court appointed defender with a heart of gold.. in a corrupt web of compromise, and over-stressed beauro-crats. If you have ever enjoyed a court/lawyer movie give this one a chance!!! Look out for one of the funniest and yet reasonably plausible situations I've ever seen in a movie.

TheNick2

...And Pacino proves my point

In this movie Al Pacino once again proves my point that he (Al Pacino) is one of the greatest actors off all time. By 1979 he had already pretty much proven this but never the less this is one of his best films yet. Even without Al Pacino this movie would be great.(Not near as great but never the less)I mean it is also very well directed and the screen play alone is magnificently written. So if you are a Pacino fan, or even if your not a Pacino fan i am telling you, that to die without seeing this movie is a sin.

इस तरह के और

8.0

Dog Day Afternoon

7.7

Serpico

5.8

Bobby Deerfield

7.1

The Panic in Needle Park

7.9

6.8

7.2

8.0

7.7

6.7

7.8

7.7

कहानी

बदलाव करें

क्या आपको पता है

बदलाव करें

ट्रिविया
When Al Pacino was cast he had been considering the lead role in Kremar Banaam Kremar (1979) which he rejected in order to do this movie. Ironically, when Pacino was Oscar nominated for the Best Actor Academy Award, Dustin Hoffman won for Kremar Banaam Kremar (1979).

गूफ़
When Gail and Arthur are eating Chinese takeout, Gail opens the same container twice.

भाव
Arthur Kirkland: The one thing that bothered me, the one thing that stayed in my mind and I couldn't get rid of it, that haunted me, was 'why?' Why would she lie? What was her motive for lyin'? If my client is innocent, she's lying. Why? Was it blackmail? No. Was it jealousy? No. Yesterday, I found out why. She doesn't have a motive. You know why? Because she's not lying. And ladies and gentlemen of the jury, the prosecution is not gonna get that man today. No! Because I'm gonna get him! My client, the Honorable Henry T. Fleming, should go right to fuckin' jail! The son of a bitch is guilty! This man is guilty! That man, there, that man is a slime! He is a slime! If he's allowed to go free, then something really wrong is goin' on here! That man is guilty! That man, there, that man is a slime! he is a *slime*! If he's allowed to go free, then something really wrong is goin' on here!
Judge Rayford: Mr. Kirkland you are out of order!
Arthur Kirkland: You're out of order! You're out of order! The whole trial is out of order! They're out of order! That man, that sick, crazy, depraved man, raped and beat that woman there, and he'd like to do it again! He *told* me so! It's just a show! It's a show! It's "Let's Make A Deal"! "Let's Make A Deal"! Hey Frank, you wanna "Make A Deal"? I got an insane judge who likes to beat the shit out of women! Whaddya wanna gimme Frank, 3 weeks probation?
Frank Bowers: *DAMMIT!*
Arthur Kirkland: [to Judge Fleming] You, you sonofabitch, you! You're supposed to *stand* for somethin'! You're supposed to protect people! But instead you fuck and murder them!
[dragged out of court by bailiffs]
Arthur Kirkland: You killed McCullough! You killed him! Hold it! Hold it! I just completed my opening statement!