IMDb रेटिंग
7.0/10
35 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA noted professor and his dim-witted apprentice fall prey to their inquiring vampires, while on the trail of the ominous damsel in distress.A noted professor and his dim-witted apprentice fall prey to their inquiring vampires, while on the trail of the ominous damsel in distress.A noted professor and his dim-witted apprentice fall prey to their inquiring vampires, while on the trail of the ominous damsel in distress.
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 1 नामांकन
Vladek Sheybal
- Herbert
- (वॉइस)
Roy Evans
- Vampire at Ball
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Dido Plumb
- Old Man Smoking Pipe at the Inn
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Winifred Sabine
- Deaf Vampire at Ball
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
When I first saw this film on TV in the early 70s, I thought it was so cheesy I gave it very little attention. Then in the early 90s it was released on laserdisc in a letterboxed version and I bought it on a lark. After I viewed in the first time I still didn't think much of it and thought maybe I wasted my money. But then, as the years passed, I would look at it every so often and now I love the film. It is an acquired taste. You first have to love vampire films -- the old-fashioned, Gothic kind. Next, you need to appreciate Polanski's style and his understated approach. It's also best to watch this film late at night with the lights off, and especially with a snow storm outside. Give it a chance and this film will creep up on you. Hopefully it will come to DVD soon.
Brilliant movie - beautifully shot and with Polanski's eye for detail. Very funny/quirky and atmospheric. I loaned it to a work colleague who thought Polanski only made horror films like 'Rosemary's Baby', she was amazed when confronted with this one. She thought it was great. Everyone is always very impressed with the ballroom scene with all the mirrors and the vampires dancing. The colours are fabulous and the outside scenes remind one of s Christmas card. If it's ever on t.v. it's always on around midnight or after, so I had to buy the DVD. Definitely one to watch late at night when you're alone!! It took me years to find it on DVD. I think the one I eventually bought was an import.
A horror comedy, a parody film about vampire films, with all the clichés of the genre and the scathing humour to boot.
Great art, fresh but claustrophobic, joyful but scary, ending well but maybe not really.
A testament to an era when filmmakers knew how to have fun - and Sharon Tate is a beautiful girl to chew on.
A good moment of cinematographic humour to share in the dark ... but maybe not so dark.
Great art, fresh but claustrophobic, joyful but scary, ending well but maybe not really.
A testament to an era when filmmakers knew how to have fun - and Sharon Tate is a beautiful girl to chew on.
A good moment of cinematographic humour to share in the dark ... but maybe not so dark.
This film by Roman Polanski is a comedy, but it is not a broad comedy, like Mel Brooks' "Young Frankenstein". The characters don't speak in funny voices or camp it up. The action is played fairly straight and the comedy arises from its physical elements and the antics of the two main characters: Professor Abronsius (Jack MacGowran) and his assistant Alfred (Roman Polanski).
Abronsius is an expert on vampires, though he is roundly derided by his colleagues for his theories. He and Alfred arrive at a Transylvania inn, hoping to locate the castle of Count von Krolock (Ferdy Mayne). The locals try to hide the truth from the duo, but the Count reveals his presence and the two are taken to his sanctum.
Watch for Sharon Tate as Sarah Shagal.
It is Polanski, himself, who proves to be the best part of this film, playing an innocent, fearful assistant who falls for the comely Sarah.
The production values are very high. And they more than compensate for the sections of the film that move rather slowly. Polanski's skills as a director are undeniable. He would follow this film with "Rosemary's Baby".
Abronsius is an expert on vampires, though he is roundly derided by his colleagues for his theories. He and Alfred arrive at a Transylvania inn, hoping to locate the castle of Count von Krolock (Ferdy Mayne). The locals try to hide the truth from the duo, but the Count reveals his presence and the two are taken to his sanctum.
Watch for Sharon Tate as Sarah Shagal.
It is Polanski, himself, who proves to be the best part of this film, playing an innocent, fearful assistant who falls for the comely Sarah.
The production values are very high. And they more than compensate for the sections of the film that move rather slowly. Polanski's skills as a director are undeniable. He would follow this film with "Rosemary's Baby".
Dance of the Vampires isn't a very typical offering from Roman Polanski. This is his first colour feature film and up until this point his films were decidedly left-field and arty. This one is a considerably more commercial offering. It's effectively a parody of the British Hammer horror films that had been very popular up to this point. So its cultural references were fairly mainstream in the 60's. Set in the 19th century, it's about a professor and his assistant who travel to Eastern Europe seeking vampires. Before long they find themselves at the castle of the mysterious Count von Krolock.
The problem I have with this film is fairly straightforward – I don't find it very funny. The humour is very broad and present throughout. It ranges from the clever (a Jewish vampire who is unafraid of a crucifix) to the low-brow (lots of slapstick). It's occasionally amusing but rarely properly funny. So this is a bit of a problem in a film that is first and foremost a comedy. On the plus side it does look pretty, with nice snowbound landscapes and a Gothic castle to look at. The vampire's ball is also very good. But, for me, the single best aspect of Dance of the Vampires is easily Sharon Tate. She is achingly beautiful and provides a very welcome sensuality to proceedings. Her horrible murder two years later at the hands of the Manson Family clearly robbed the film world of someone quite considerable.
The problem I have with this film is fairly straightforward – I don't find it very funny. The humour is very broad and present throughout. It ranges from the clever (a Jewish vampire who is unafraid of a crucifix) to the low-brow (lots of slapstick). It's occasionally amusing but rarely properly funny. So this is a bit of a problem in a film that is first and foremost a comedy. On the plus side it does look pretty, with nice snowbound landscapes and a Gothic castle to look at. The vampire's ball is also very good. But, for me, the single best aspect of Dance of the Vampires is easily Sharon Tate. She is achingly beautiful and provides a very welcome sensuality to proceedings. Her horrible murder two years later at the hands of the Manson Family clearly robbed the film world of someone quite considerable.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाOriginally Roman Polanski wanted to shoot his film on location in and around a castle in Switzerland which he saw during a vacation, but as this was impossible, other locations in the Alps were found, along with studio shoots in England. While on location, Polanski employed dozens of local artisans to make the large numbers of coffins needed in the film. Unfortunately tourists were rather unnerved by the sight of these, and hotels had to erect signs to assure their guests that the area hadn't been struck by plague.
- गूफ़Abronsius and Alfred attempt to enter Count Von Krolock's crypt through an entrance on the ground floor, the crypt itself being located in the cellar. However, when apprehended by Koukol the Hunchback, they decide to go for a window entrance instead. To do this they scale the castle wall and enter a top floor window, with the crypt itself magically relocated to the top floor.
- भाव
Shagal, the Inn-Keeper: [Magda tries to fend off Shagal, a Jewish Vampire, with a cross] Oy yoy! Have you got the wrong vampire!
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटIn the opening credits the MGM-lion transforms into a vampire.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनFor the original UK cinema release heavy cuts were made by the BBFC to the scene of Von Krolock attacking Sarah in her bath in order for the film to receive an 'A' certificate. Later video and DVD releases restored the cuts and were upgraded to '15'.
- कनेक्शनEdited into The Kid Stays in the Picture (2002)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is The Fearless Vampire Killers?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
- Is Count Von Krolock's castle a real castle, and where is it located?
- Is this movie based on a book?
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- The Fearless Vampire Killers
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $20,00,000(अनुमानित)
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 48 मिनट
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें