Necromancy

A young couple from Los Angeles (Pamela Franklin & Michael Ontkean) gets an offer they can't refuse and move to a town several hours up north. But why does the dubious mogul of the exclusive community (Orson Welles) want them so bad? Something sinister is going on.

"Necromancy" was made in 1970, but not released until 1972 (although copyrighted 1971). It combines elements of "Carnival of Souls" (1962), "Rosemary's Baby" (1968) and "The Devil Rides Out" (1968); plus it would influence the future "Satan's School for Girls" (1973).

In some ways it's better than those films and in others worse. For one thing, the editing is sometimes off-kilter or inconsistent, especially in the first half, which I don't know if it was done intentionally or if it's simply sloppy filmmaking. A good example is the girl's lighthearted disposition in the car after just being involved in an accident and witnessing firsthand an unconscious person burning alive.

Due to Welles' involvement, the flick was reissued in 1983 under the title "The Witching" with added scenes of full frontal nudity during a ritual featuring Brinke Stevens, plus other changes and a tacked-on ending.

I've seen Pamela Franklin in about six films and she easily looks her best here with a full brunette mane. She was 20 during shooting and would meet her near-future husband on set, the young doctor played by Harvey Jason. They remain married today, over fifty years later.

Pamela didn't speak well of working with Welles, who obviously took the gig for easy cash (and tries unsuccessfully to hide behind a prosthetic nose and fake beard). She said he was dismissive of other actors, summing up her feelings with: "He was not a nice person." By contrast, she worked with Marlon Brando two years earlier on "The Night of the Following Day" and said he treated everyone equal.

Director Bert I. Gordon (known for 1965's entertaining "Village of the Giants") was concerned that he'd have serious issues with Welles when his secretary informed him that he didn't work before 10:00 or after 4:00. So Gordon assuaged Welles with a decadent chef and all his preferred foods & drinks; thus the imposing thespian was quite agreeable, yet this didn't eliminate Pamela's criticisms.

The flick scores well in the feminine department. Besides Franklin in her prime, there's Lee Purcell, who was 23 during shooting, and petite redhead Sue Bernard, best known for her role as the winsome bikini girl in "Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill!" (1965).

The movie runs 1 hour, 23 minutes, and was shot at Los Gatos, California, which is about 35 miles southeast of San Francisco; as well as Samuel Goldwyn Studios in Hollywood.

GRADE: B-/C+

When you're making a thriller about witchcraft, I believe you should do everything you can to help the audience suspend its disbelief in order for the movie to work. Some pictures ("Rosemary's Baby", for example) have accomplished this; others (like "Necromancy") haven't and the potentially scary material comes across as corny and goofy. This film does have some atmospheric moments, but about half the dialogue is hard to make out (sometimes it's poorly recorded, at other times just incomprehensible) and Orson Welles, who gets top billing, has a role that is so BENEATH him that you have to assume he was desperate for the work. Or maybe he was simply having fun.....(*1/2)

The film "Necromancy" (1972) was considerably altered for a re-released version which I'm not sure was ever shown in theaters (it may have been a straight-to-video release). This altered version, re-titled "The Witching"(1981, if I'm not mistaken) is apparently only one of several such versions. Since they are under other titles ("A Life For A Life", "Rosemary's Disciples", etc.), I'm assuming (though I'm not certain) that these have been altered further. However, I have seen both "Necromancy" & "The Witching". While the original film (which is next to impossible to find anywhere-though I was able to track down a copy) is a suspenseful, gothic horror film, various key elements were removed for "The Witching", including: the final scene, which clears up some plot points while adding a final twist to the story; both the opening & closing titles, which were replaced with painfully ordinary sequences; & the original music score, which included a memorable song entitled "The Morning After" (not to be confused with the Oscar-winning song of the same title used in "The Poseidon Adventure", released the same year).The new (completely different) music score is horribly, embarassingly cheesy. The sequence of scenes, in some places, was also changed slightly & there was additional (& badly misplaced) footage added. I can only imagine what liberties have been taken with the more recent altered versions, since seeing for myself what else has been done to the original film would be much scarier than "Necromancy" itself.

I saw an extended version of "Necromancy" that is available to watch on YouTube. The introduction claims that deleted footage was restored in this version--making the film more complete and coherent. So, when you see some reviews that hated the movie, it is possible they saw the shorter version. As for me, the film I saw was MUCH better than the current 4.2 and this could be because it's more the director or writer's original vision.

Pamela Franklin stars as Lori. While Orson Welles gets top billing, she was clearly the focus of the film...and I assume they billed Welles first to improve marketing or as part of the contract to get Welles to appear in the movie. Lori recently had a miscarriage and her husband Frank (Michael Ontkean) has taken a job near the town of Lillith. However, the folks offering the job had a lot of strange questions--questions about his and his wife's religious beliefs. While these sort of questions are illegal to ask, he responds that they are both atheists and that seemed to make the employer happy...or so Frank says.

When they get to Lillith, they find the place is a hellhole....and that really isn't an exaggeration! The folks are all members of a Satanic cult led by Mr. Cato (Welles) and Lori naturally wants to leave. But Frank inexplicably blows off her worries and seems to like the place and the strange people. So why did they REALLY come here and why are the folks so interested in Lori?

This movie is above all, creepy...with a dark, brooding atmosphere throughout. The story, though sometimes confusing, was also pretty interesting...but suffers some because of its close similarity to "Rosemary's Baby". In other words, if you've already seen this earlier film it's pretty easy to guess what's going on in "Necromancy". Not a great film but food if you would like a few chills.

There are two versions of this movie: the original (1971) and a 1983 version ("The Witching"), the latter of which is not worth watching. If you stick to the original, you will find a flawed, but surprisingly effective and dark, horror movie.

While some of the writing and editing is a bit heavy-handed and, frankly, clumsy at points, Pamela Franklin manages to carry this movie admirably. Frankly, the director could have cast just about anyone in the other parts, and I'm not certain it would have mattered. She is at all points the focal point of this film. As such, Welles is just an audience draw. He was by no means essential.

In terms of subject matter, I would put it in the class of movies that came out immediately after "Rosemary's Baby." It is not that movie's equal by any standard. (Stylistically, it is perhaps closer to Romero's "Season of the Witch.") There are many of the same themes: child-birth used for "unnatural" or potentially evil ends; secretive societies within "normal" settings; an alternately naive, sweet/doe-eyed female who is also intelligent, strong-willed and quite perceptive; the often "absent" and not entirely trustworthy husband.

In the end, while this film is not nearly as focused and sharp as RB, the choppy, low-budget feel to the camera work and editing in Necromancy actually works to keep it somewhat phantasmagoric and nightmarish. The ending sequences, with the twist, are actually quite good.

As an aside, the film does appear to have been filmed in part in Los Gatos, California. The funeral scenes appear to have been shot near the Lexington Reservoir, and the exterior shots are likely of houses near the downtown that still stand unchanged, as Los Gatos has retained its "preserve the past" zoning standards --a not unimportant point given the theme of the movie.