15 समीक्षाएं
Somewhat interesting cautionary tale(or tail if you prefer) about a young couple leaving the barrenness of their humdrum lives behind in a small English village and going to the big city - a really swinging London in the late 1960s. What they find is that work is hard to come by unless you are really willing to shed your inhibitions and your clothes. While the story probably resonates much of the real-life atmosphere of the culture of that time, the film bogs down really into one sexual scene after another - none of them particularly effective or redeeming in any way. And though the film is considered a black comedy - I think of it really more as a bleak one. I found so little humor in the film. Director Pete Walker - who would go on to do some pretty expressive and decent films of the horror/exploitation genres in the 70s - has obvious skill with the camera. The pace, sets, and dialog are all generally well-conceived for a film of this kind. The two primary acting leads are actually pretty good too as is most of the supporting cast. Watch for Stubby Kaye in a small role! But the end comes on so hard-handed and without warning as to be any bit believable though the film does try to have some moral to this constant parade of sexual encounters surrounding a youngish Carol and her openness to sleep with virtually anyone for a few bob.
- BaronBl00d
- 1 दिस॰ 2007
- परमालिंक
COOL IT CAROL! is a low budget sexploitation epic from British director Pete Walker, although even at this stage of his career he can't resist making the material as dark and uncomfortable as it can be. Made in 1970, it proves a fitting tribute of its era, complete with sleazy porn producers, dirty old men, and all manner of outlandish fashions and hairstyles.
The production values are typically excellent as this looks and feels like your usual above-average Walker production. Robin Askwith and Janet Lynn are a good fit as the out-of-their-depth young couple who move to London with hopes of hitting the big time, only to find themselves drawn into a world of sleaze. The grubby atmosphere is spot on and there's plenty of tasty nudity for male viewers to enjoy (particularly from the delectable Lynn), but it's all rather seedy and depressing.
In many ways this film is an offshoot of the old 'sensation' genre of the 1930s, about pretty young girls finding themselves exploited by perverted older men. There are indications at comedy with the presence of Askwith and some funny dialogue, but as mentioned, it's rather depressing overall with a storyline that never really goes anywhere. I much prefer Walker when he has a story to tell, as in his later film HOME BEFORE MIDNIGHT.
The production values are typically excellent as this looks and feels like your usual above-average Walker production. Robin Askwith and Janet Lynn are a good fit as the out-of-their-depth young couple who move to London with hopes of hitting the big time, only to find themselves drawn into a world of sleaze. The grubby atmosphere is spot on and there's plenty of tasty nudity for male viewers to enjoy (particularly from the delectable Lynn), but it's all rather seedy and depressing.
In many ways this film is an offshoot of the old 'sensation' genre of the 1930s, about pretty young girls finding themselves exploited by perverted older men. There are indications at comedy with the presence of Askwith and some funny dialogue, but as mentioned, it's rather depressing overall with a storyline that never really goes anywhere. I much prefer Walker when he has a story to tell, as in his later film HOME BEFORE MIDNIGHT.
- Leofwine_draca
- 15 जन॰ 2016
- परमालिंक
Carol is quite something when you see her in lingerie or nude. She leaves her boring existence to pursue her modelling career, taking off with childhood friend, Robin Askwith, mostly still filling the boots of his Timmy Lea character in the Confession films. Though the story is supposedly true in this film, one wouldn't really care. A lot of people will do anything to survive. Askwith and co need money in London. Food, like that delectable pastry in the window and accommodation costs money. Someone talent spots Askwith's better half, and soon she's doing some pretty weird photographic nude shoots, and offering sexual services, where may'be a bit of her likes it. She becomes hooked, finding it hard to turn offers down, where Askwith starts getting annoyed. Jealousy? He has a thing for her? She doesn't decline at first. Some tasty nudity, provide momentary erotic entertainment from our title lead, doing it with some 60+ men, some moments of it getting nasty, if demeaning to our lead, despite it being a comedy, that didn't have me laughing. This movie isn't anything special. Bits of it are truly pathetic, and I wonder if the words, "acting lessons", mean anything to Askwith.
- PeterMitchell-506-564364
- 6 मार्च 2013
- परमालिंक
Part black comedy, part cautionary tale, "Cool it Carol!" is the frank story of a sometime-couple of teens from the Midlands who hope to make the big move to London, circa 1969. She to be a model, he to be a delivery driver for an auto company. Carol is played by the fresh and quite pretty Janet Lynn, who unfortunately did almost no other films. The boy, played by Robin Askwith, brings a modestly charming goofiness. The rest of the cast is made up mostly of unknowns who do a pretty good job, and the sets and costuming are quite characterful. The music is unfortunately bland and heavy-handed. The plot is fairly standard potboiler stuff, relieved somewhat by the rather blase' attitude of the teens. Supposedly it is based upon a true story, as reported by that paragon of reportage -- The News of the World(!) Considering how often such situations must've occurred, it is not too wild a claim.
In all, a good addition to the catalog of youth films set in London in the late 1960s, and made more watchable by the appeal of "Carol" herself. Where is she now?
In all, a good addition to the catalog of youth films set in London in the late 1960s, and made more watchable by the appeal of "Carol" herself. Where is she now?
- peteryates-38805
- 25 मार्च 2017
- परमालिंक
- BandSAboutMovies
- 30 मार्च 2021
- परमालिंक
This is not what you expect from a Robin Askwith film. It's actually a charming, thought provoking little drama about a young naïve couple trying to make it in the big bad nasty city.
This story is exactly the sort of story which was the staple of dozens of pre-code movies in the early thirties. A young couple leave their quiet rural existence to make a life for themselves in the metropolis - how difficult can it be? As any fan of pre-codes will know, the only career choices for a pretty young lady in the big city is posing for saucy photos and becoming a prostitute! In the thirties, she'd have been someone like Miriam Hopkins. Maybe Spencer Tracy may have been the young man but here it's Robin Askwith.
For those of us used to seeing Robin Askwith in those dreadful "sex comedies", it takes a while to accept that this serious young actor is the same person. To confuse us further, he also used his own accent which isn't cockney! He's ok but not brilliant - it was probably a good career move for him to switch to those smutty comedies. The girl is the unknown Janet Lynn whose untrained, raw natural acting ability makes her fascinatingly complex character completely believable. The normally of her girl-next-door character really hooks you.
Underground director Pete Walker infuses a distinctive style to his picture ensuring that you know one hundred percent that this could only have been made in the late sixties. For an independent British production it's also got higher production values than you'd expect. The sumptuous classical score for example, swelling and ebbing with emotion is more reminiscent of a big budget 1950s biblical epic. This is a big score!
Just like in a thirties movie, as time progresses, it dawns on our young couple that they are not living at the bottom of the rainbow. Their new life is not what they wanted and the people they've become aren't really them. She becomes more trusting and subservient, he becomes more selfish and controlling. It's a simple but intelligent little morality tale.
If you want a fabulous taste of the real (un)swinging sixties, you should give this a go. That sixties, just like the thirties was a dirty, unsavoury and cruel place but also bursting with blind optimism.
This story is exactly the sort of story which was the staple of dozens of pre-code movies in the early thirties. A young couple leave their quiet rural existence to make a life for themselves in the metropolis - how difficult can it be? As any fan of pre-codes will know, the only career choices for a pretty young lady in the big city is posing for saucy photos and becoming a prostitute! In the thirties, she'd have been someone like Miriam Hopkins. Maybe Spencer Tracy may have been the young man but here it's Robin Askwith.
For those of us used to seeing Robin Askwith in those dreadful "sex comedies", it takes a while to accept that this serious young actor is the same person. To confuse us further, he also used his own accent which isn't cockney! He's ok but not brilliant - it was probably a good career move for him to switch to those smutty comedies. The girl is the unknown Janet Lynn whose untrained, raw natural acting ability makes her fascinatingly complex character completely believable. The normally of her girl-next-door character really hooks you.
Underground director Pete Walker infuses a distinctive style to his picture ensuring that you know one hundred percent that this could only have been made in the late sixties. For an independent British production it's also got higher production values than you'd expect. The sumptuous classical score for example, swelling and ebbing with emotion is more reminiscent of a big budget 1950s biblical epic. This is a big score!
Just like in a thirties movie, as time progresses, it dawns on our young couple that they are not living at the bottom of the rainbow. Their new life is not what they wanted and the people they've become aren't really them. She becomes more trusting and subservient, he becomes more selfish and controlling. It's a simple but intelligent little morality tale.
If you want a fabulous taste of the real (un)swinging sixties, you should give this a go. That sixties, just like the thirties was a dirty, unsavoury and cruel place but also bursting with blind optimism.
- 1930s_Time_Machine
- 7 जुल॰ 2025
- परमालिंक
- ArtfulLodger
- 15 जन॰ 2023
- परमालिंक
As I write these words, 'Cool it, Carol!', directed by Pete Walker who is perhaps better known for his horror films, is close to its silver anniversary. It's sobering to remember that 25 years before the film came out, World War 2 had just come to an end.
A lot changes in 25 years. This story, sometimes known as 'The Dirtiest Girl I Ever Met' stars Janet Lynn as the titular strumpet - and she isn't a strumpet at all. Demure, shy even, she tells her wannabe boyfriend Joe (Robin Asquith) that she just doesn't see sex as a big deal. This comes in handy when the two of them try to make their fortune in London. In other circumstances, Joe becoming her pimp and managing her earnings might portray him as a bit of a git, but that doesn't seem to be the case here.
We're never really witnesses to the various sex acts, but rather Joe's reaction as a number of old men disappear into the bedroom with Carol. When she wanders out after it's over for a nice cup of tea, she's not remotely fazed by the ordeal.
Based on real-life events, this slice of exploitation is both naïve and eye-watering in its depiction of the ambitions of these young people, both of whom are well portrayed.
While Askwith became a household name with a series of bawdy comedies, Lynn settled down to a life of domesticity away from the cameras. Jess Conrad, Stubby Kaye and DJ Pete Murray bolster the cast with a series of cameos.
I found this an enjoyable slice of what is now 'period drama'. My score is 7 out of 10.
A lot changes in 25 years. This story, sometimes known as 'The Dirtiest Girl I Ever Met' stars Janet Lynn as the titular strumpet - and she isn't a strumpet at all. Demure, shy even, she tells her wannabe boyfriend Joe (Robin Asquith) that she just doesn't see sex as a big deal. This comes in handy when the two of them try to make their fortune in London. In other circumstances, Joe becoming her pimp and managing her earnings might portray him as a bit of a git, but that doesn't seem to be the case here.
We're never really witnesses to the various sex acts, but rather Joe's reaction as a number of old men disappear into the bedroom with Carol. When she wanders out after it's over for a nice cup of tea, she's not remotely fazed by the ordeal.
Based on real-life events, this slice of exploitation is both naïve and eye-watering in its depiction of the ambitions of these young people, both of whom are well portrayed.
While Askwith became a household name with a series of bawdy comedies, Lynn settled down to a life of domesticity away from the cameras. Jess Conrad, Stubby Kaye and DJ Pete Murray bolster the cast with a series of cameos.
I found this an enjoyable slice of what is now 'period drama'. My score is 7 out of 10.
One of a mass of soft-porn films produced by the British industry at that time, catering to the semi-pissed young blokes set who needed somewhere to go between the pub and an early-hours curry, with cinemas showing them suitably late in that 'slot'.
Robin Askwith got typecast in the 'Confessions' films of that 'genre', but those films had a comedy air, and THIS one just seemed to be telling a morality tale, with the main couple returning to the country having got fed-up with debauchery in sex-mad London.
Lots of nudity, as you'd expect, with quite a few shots of female pubic hair, to keep the audience suitably excited.
The film looked like it had been butchered by the editor, and/or the studio, as some scenes didn't seem to follow from the previous one, and the ending looked like it had been glued on in a hurry?
My total admiration goes to the train-spotter geek who noted (see 'goofs') that the couple boarded their original 'to London' train on the Kent/Sussex border, had sex in the carriage (but such rolling stock was used on the Pompey line!), and arrived in London at Paddington, despite supposedly coming from the East Midlands - from where trains do NOT go to Paddington! Clearly he wasn't overly entranced by the gorgeous pert breasts, firm peachy bum and nubile body of the lead actress, let alone the other models on view in the film?!
The lead actress made very few films - as someone said - a shame as she had some talent, and was certainly very attractive. Her character's name (Carol Thatcher) was presumably a coincidence, not a sad jibe at her eventual PM mother Margaret?!
Robin Askwith got typecast in the 'Confessions' films of that 'genre', but those films had a comedy air, and THIS one just seemed to be telling a morality tale, with the main couple returning to the country having got fed-up with debauchery in sex-mad London.
Lots of nudity, as you'd expect, with quite a few shots of female pubic hair, to keep the audience suitably excited.
The film looked like it had been butchered by the editor, and/or the studio, as some scenes didn't seem to follow from the previous one, and the ending looked like it had been glued on in a hurry?
My total admiration goes to the train-spotter geek who noted (see 'goofs') that the couple boarded their original 'to London' train on the Kent/Sussex border, had sex in the carriage (but such rolling stock was used on the Pompey line!), and arrived in London at Paddington, despite supposedly coming from the East Midlands - from where trains do NOT go to Paddington! Clearly he wasn't overly entranced by the gorgeous pert breasts, firm peachy bum and nubile body of the lead actress, let alone the other models on view in the film?!
The lead actress made very few films - as someone said - a shame as she had some talent, and was certainly very attractive. Her character's name (Carol Thatcher) was presumably a coincidence, not a sad jibe at her eventual PM mother Margaret?!
- Tony-Holmes
- 30 अप्रैल 2025
- परमालिंक
An absolute gem! This is possibly Walker's finest film, although it is a bit unfair to compare it to his 'terror' pictures. England, particularly, London 1970 and things are changing and this little film captures something of the very essence. Janet Lynn is fantastic as the wide eyed innocent who is more than happy to shed her clothes and have some fun. 'I don't mind people looking at my body. I quite like it actually.' This she says as she changes her dress and gets rid of her bra, in a railway compartment. Robin Askwith is also very good as the young guy who pretends to have all the connections but in reality is nowhere near as resourceful as the delightful Lynn. There are sleazy sessions with elderly men in high positions ready to take her on for a fiver when the young couple find their finances dwindle. Plenty of location shooting, some marvellous cinematography, humour and flesh and an insightful glimpse of London's underbelly c1970.
- christopher-underwood
- 24 मार्च 2009
- परमालिंक
Pete Walker is famous primarily for the superlative horror films he made during the 70's like "Frightmare" and "House of the Whipcord" and secondarily for the sex comedies he churned out in the late 60's like "I Like Birds" and "School for Sex". This film, made during the transition between the two periods, doesn't really fit either category. It is more of a serious, realistic drama with occasional comic elements. It tells the story of two naive but extremely amoral young people who leave their boring small town lives for swinging London. After many humiliating experiences--having to resort to pimping, prostitution, and performing in stag films--against all odds (and all plausibility), they achieve their dream of a success, but it proves to be less than what they hoped for.
For much of the running time this is pretty serious and believable movie, but it goes off the rails at the end. The female character, Carol (played by Janet Lynn), is apparently meant to be a homage to Christine Keeler (who the actress uncannily resembles), but while it was easy to see how a liberal-minded party girl like Keeler could find fame and fortune (or infamy and fortune) in the repressed Britain of the early 60's, it seems a lot less likely that this would happen ten years later when all the girls were pretty much giving it away for free. It also seems unlikely that these two shallow grasping characters would suffer all this humiliation only to grow a conscience AFTER they finally find wealth and success.
In some ways this film resembles "Midnight Cowboy", but the characters are much more amoral and insensitive, so the film doesn't really achieve the same tragic, emotional depths. Still the two leads are very charismatic. I always liked Robin Askwith (even if his bare butt often logged more screen time in his movies than his face). Janet Lynn was unbelievably sexy as a schoolgirl who gets felt up by a lecherous schoolmaster in a brief scene in "Assault", so you can imagine what she is like in a meatier role that requires her to shed her clothes every five minutes. Mostly though it is nice to see a British sex film that is not preachy and moralistic, on one hand, or given over to horrible sub-Benny Hill style "comedy" on the other. Pete Walker does it again.
For much of the running time this is pretty serious and believable movie, but it goes off the rails at the end. The female character, Carol (played by Janet Lynn), is apparently meant to be a homage to Christine Keeler (who the actress uncannily resembles), but while it was easy to see how a liberal-minded party girl like Keeler could find fame and fortune (or infamy and fortune) in the repressed Britain of the early 60's, it seems a lot less likely that this would happen ten years later when all the girls were pretty much giving it away for free. It also seems unlikely that these two shallow grasping characters would suffer all this humiliation only to grow a conscience AFTER they finally find wealth and success.
In some ways this film resembles "Midnight Cowboy", but the characters are much more amoral and insensitive, so the film doesn't really achieve the same tragic, emotional depths. Still the two leads are very charismatic. I always liked Robin Askwith (even if his bare butt often logged more screen time in his movies than his face). Janet Lynn was unbelievably sexy as a schoolgirl who gets felt up by a lecherous schoolmaster in a brief scene in "Assault", so you can imagine what she is like in a meatier role that requires her to shed her clothes every five minutes. Mostly though it is nice to see a British sex film that is not preachy and moralistic, on one hand, or given over to horrible sub-Benny Hill style "comedy" on the other. Pete Walker does it again.
Two bored teenagers leave their small town and travel to London to try and live the dream. Soon, it becomes apparent that the boy's claims of a good job waiting for him are false and, so, before long they are destitute. To make money, the girl gets involved in the sex industry, starting with modelling and ending in porn films via prostitution, all of this actively encouraged by her boyfriend. Needless to say, life in the big city does not turn out to be very glamorous.
This is an early film from British director Pete Walker, who is now known mainly on account of his horror movies, such as the impressive Frightmare (1974). In the earlier part of his career he seemed to be more focused on sexploitation, of which this is a pretty obvious example. It is a pretty good film of this type though, especially when you consider how terrible British entries in this category usually are. Funnily enough, a lot of the later atrocious 70's examples seemed to star Robin Askwith, who appears here in the role of the rather unsympathetic boyfriend. Janet Lynn stars opposite him as the girl who the story essentially revolves around and I thought she was pretty good. The film itself is basically a cautionary tale, which is fairly downbeat a lot of the time. The heavier elements actually make it a better film though, as it is sexploitation with at least some substance. A story which looks at the grim reality of aspects of the sexual revolution. Like in all the other Walker films I have seen it has unpleasant members of the older generation interfering aggressively with the young. On the whole, it can certainly be considered another very worthwhile film from Walker.
This is an early film from British director Pete Walker, who is now known mainly on account of his horror movies, such as the impressive Frightmare (1974). In the earlier part of his career he seemed to be more focused on sexploitation, of which this is a pretty obvious example. It is a pretty good film of this type though, especially when you consider how terrible British entries in this category usually are. Funnily enough, a lot of the later atrocious 70's examples seemed to star Robin Askwith, who appears here in the role of the rather unsympathetic boyfriend. Janet Lynn stars opposite him as the girl who the story essentially revolves around and I thought she was pretty good. The film itself is basically a cautionary tale, which is fairly downbeat a lot of the time. The heavier elements actually make it a better film though, as it is sexploitation with at least some substance. A story which looks at the grim reality of aspects of the sexual revolution. Like in all the other Walker films I have seen it has unpleasant members of the older generation interfering aggressively with the young. On the whole, it can certainly be considered another very worthwhile film from Walker.
- Red-Barracuda
- 7 मार्च 2018
- परमालिंक
"London? At your age!?" Teenagers Joe (Robin Askwith) and Carol (Janet Lynn) leave their rather boring lives in rural Norwich and go to swinging London to make their fortune. Things do not go to plan and when they run out of money Carol turns to prostitution. She doesn't seem too bothered about selling herself to dirty old men but Joe is obviously jealous - that is until big money starts rolling in. However riches don't always bring happiness and I think that there is a moral in this tale (allegedly based on a true story). Director Pete Walker made a series of very British horror movies but before that he was making sexploitation films, this being the second one that I have so far watched. And I have to say that I thoroughly enjoyed it. It is a delightful snapshot of England, both rural and urban, in 1970. I loved seeing the fashions, the old vehicles, the music and listening to what would now be considered dated language. Apparently the film courted much controversy in the UK at the time but viewed now the sex side of it is pretty tame. Carol and Joe do have sex a few times, including on the train to London, but very little is seen. Janet Lynn was a very attractive young actress, she is seen topless quite a few times plus one brief full frontal shot. Askwith, who went on to star in the British sex comedy "Confessions of.." movies, is seen naked from the rear. Fair amount of sex talk, ranging from the f word to the very British "have it off". I noticed one goof, the couple agree to be filmed having sex for money, the reflection of the real crew cameraman can be seen in a mirror next to the character cameraman with his 8mm handheld camera. Cool It, Carol isn't exactly red hot as a sex movie but I found it to be an enjoyable and charming romp that has as much humour as it does sex.
- Stevieboy666
- 27 जुल॰ 2024
- परमालिंक