दो बाइकर्स खुले देश और रेगिस्तानी भूमि के माध्यम से ला से न्यू ऑरलियन्स तक जाते हैं, और रास्ते में वे एक आदमी से मिलते हैं।दो बाइकर्स खुले देश और रेगिस्तानी भूमि के माध्यम से ला से न्यू ऑरलियन्स तक जाते हैं, और रास्ते में वे एक आदमी से मिलते हैं।दो बाइकर्स खुले देश और रेगिस्तानी भूमि के माध्यम से ला से न्यू ऑरलियन्स तक जाते हैं, और रास्ते में वे एक आदमी से मिलते हैं।
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- 2 ऑस्कर के लिए नामांकित
- 10 जीत और कुल 14 नामांकन
- Joanne
- (as Sandy Wyeth)
- Jack
- (as Robert Walker)
- Mime #3
- (as Ellie Walker)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
And now, over 30 years later....it's one of my favorite movies of all time. Peter Fonda tries to be Everyman....but he's really the most insecure individual of the group. His cathartic trip at the cemetary in New Orleans is embarrassingly honest to watch. His search is not for individual freedom...his search is for a family. And yet, he is always the outsider, the observer.
Dennis Hopper is the sidekick, the fool. And like a fool, he cannot hide his thoughts behind a socially acceptable demeanor. He constantly says exactly what he thinks. He has little patience for flower children, pretentious intellectuals, coy women, law officers, drunks in jail, or rednecks passing him on the road. Like a fool, he is doomed. Jack Nicholson is the core of the film. He does not appear until halfway through the bikers' odyssey, but the trip will not make sense until his face rises up from the jailhouse cot to peer bleary-eyed at his surroundings. He is the innocent man of this group....he is the AMERICAN. This movie is just another road picture, the way ON THE ROAD by Kerouac was just another travel book. This little counterculture movie is an American Classic.
The American Dream has always been about freedom. But like George Hanson says; it's one thing to talk about being free, but something else entirely to actually be it. That's the theme of the entire movie, and the way that it plays out, and the ending especially, aptly portray the difference between saying something and actually doing it. The acting performances are a big part of the movie, and the two leads; Peter Fonda and Dennis Hopper stick out the most. The two actors brilliantly get into their characters, and after a while you forget that you're watching actors and start to think that these people really are these characters. Jack Nicholson turns up halfway through and steals the show. It's not hard to see why this actor went on to become one of the best of all time. Even here, he shows his charisma and ability to steal the show and that is what he would go on to become famous for doing later in his career. Last but not least, another great thing about Easy Rider is the music. Music was, of course, a big thing in the sixties; and it's a big thing about this movie. Classic rock accompanies the pictures of the two men rider their bikes, and it's very cool indeed. On the whole, this film is an out and out classic.
Easy Rider is a 1969 road drama directed and co-written by Dennis Hopper who also stars in the film alongside co-writer and producer Peter Fonda. During the 1960s thanks to the success of AIP films such as The Wild Angels, this led to the creation of the subgenre of the Biker film. Both Fonda and Hopper had appeared in AIP produced Biker films as well as the Roger Corman directed LSD film The Trip (written by Jack Nicholson who'd end up with a prominent role in the film). While initially intended to be an AIP film the company wanted the option to replace Hopper if the film went over budget and rejecting that condition Fonda took the project to Columbia Pictures who backed the project. The film became a sleeper hit not only scoring solid critical reviews and earning Academy Award nominations for Best Original Screenplay and Best Supporting Actor for Jack Nicholson (in his mainstream breakout performance), but the film became a sizable financial success as the fourth highest grossing film that year and along with that year's Midnight Cowboy is credited with jumpstarting the New Hollywood era of 70s filmmaking. The historical value of Easy Rider is something to be admired, even if I feel the movie works better as a time capsule of its time better more than a movie.
In terms of its subject matter, Easy Rider from its opening is very loose in terms of structure and flow operating with a more avant garde approach that's less focused on story and more on experience. With a very documentary-like approach to the material Hopper for the first ten minutes or so doesn't even have any introduction to the characters of Wyatt and Billy and it feels very much like we're dropped into the middle of things with the two going about their business as the audience is along for the ride. There is a sense of character and history between the two with Wyatt being more sentimental and optimistic in comparison to Billy's more cynical outlook on the world and the two function as sounding boards for which the various vignettes to play off against. Hopper captures the beauty of the roads in the American Southwest and South as well as the contemporary social attitudes of both the counterculture and the traditionalists who react to the two with contempt at best or violence at worst.
Easy Rider is one of those movies where you can't dispute its historical and artistic value because without its influence it's a sure bet the landscape of film would be considerably different. While I found the film fascinating for capturing a portrait of a certain time and place in a cinema verite fashion, the film itself ultimately left me somewhat cold by the end. I think it is still worth a viewing however especially for its historical value both for its contributions to cinema as well as its portrait of 1960s America.
In 1969 I was eighteen and a freshman at Cambridge University. I was also a near-fundamentalist and a member of the Christian Union. Its officials decreed that Easy Rider was unsuitable for Christian viewing; I'd seen some enthusiastic reviews which made me curious. Moral and spiritual dilemma followed. To view or not to view? I prayed about it - look, this is a long time ago, right - and decided that if it had been OK for the Christian Union's leaders to see it, if only to realise it was morally dubious, then it was OK for me. They hadn't been corrupted, presumably; the Lord would see that I wasn't either.
So I went and it blew me away. I thought then and think now, that this is a magnificently perceptive commentary on hippie culture and one that only the medium of film can deliver. Naive idealism is weighed against the squalid reality of drugs (and indeed alcohol). Freedom is portrayed as often aimless, self-indulgent and downright boring. The underlying morality could be seen as puritanical: a celebration of the free-lovin' drop-out Sixties it ain't, more a weary end-of-decade critique thereof. I would have thought there was much to commend it to the Christian Union moralisers, yet as ever they couldn't see past the surface - drug abuse, loose women. Yet it has its high moments, in more ways than one, and is always a treat for the eyes.
My decision to defy the Christian Union by seeing the film was an early step out of my fundamentalist prison and I haven't stopped walking yet. No-one's ever going to tell me what I can and can't watch again: nor will I censor anyone else's viewing. I'm still a believer, but not of the kind that the Christian Union would have thought will ever go to heaven. Guess I'll have to live with that.
Outside of the deeply rooted themes of this film, I felt that Hopper (who also directed) knew exactly what he was doing behind the camera. He kept the talking short, the music loud and symbolic, and allowed the background to do the explaining. I loved the fact that we really knew nothing about Fonda or Hopper's characters. It allowed us to relate to them. You could easily add your story into their characters and have the life that you lead and wish to escape. Hopper was able to transform this film from a drug movie to a film about humanity. Fonda, who also helped write the film with Hopper, did a superb job of adding Nicholson's character into the mix.
Nicholson represented us, the American public and our love of liquor, football, and lies. I viewed Nicholson as the average American. He drank too much, was the product of a wealthy upbringing, but did not know much about the world. He was sheltered. He never smoked weed (in fact didn't even know what it was when presented to him), never left the state line, and never lived life. He constantly used the expression, 'I have always wanted to '. How many times do you hear this a day from either a family member or a co-worker? If you always wanted to do it, why haven't you? So, here we have Hanson, dreaming a dream but never following through, who is traveling with two guys that live the ultimate life and live by their own rules. They are complete opposites, but Hanson's words seemed to remain in my mind for a long time. He reminded me of one of my wife's students today that spoke about freedom. He knew exactly what it was, but never practiced it. Hopper and Fonda were walking (driving most of the time) representations of the word 'freedom'. It is tragic what happens to Harmon, because he (unfortunately) experienced the negative side of freedom hatred and fear of the unknown.
There was one scene that just jumped out at me. It occurs in the diner before the incident later that night where our travelers experience hatred in the country they admire so much. They go from peace and love to fear and hate. It is as if they witnessed night and day. It was frightening to hear the words coming from people in that restaurant. It was not only scary to wonder what was going to happen to our narrators, but mainly that people were speaking that way to fellow citizens. I know that it still occurs today, and it is surprising to me. We bomb a country because they do not follow the same principles that we do, but we need to start asking ourselves this question do we need another United States?
Grade: ***** out of *****
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाDennis Hopper and Peter Fonda did not write a full script for the movie, and made most of it up as they went along. They didn't hire a crew, but instead picked up hippies at communes across the country, and used friends and passers-by to hold the cameras, and were drunk and stoned most of the time.
- गूफ़In the whorehouse scene, Karen enters through the door wearing black stockings. When she moves to the couch with Billy, she is instead wearing fishnet stockings.
- भाव
George Hanson: You know, this used to be a helluva good country. I can't understand what's gone wrong with it.
Billy: Man, everybody got chicken, that's what happened. Hey, we can't even get into like, a second-rate hotel, I mean, a second-rate motel, you dig? They think we're gonna cut their throat or somethin'. They're scared, man.
George Hanson: They're not scared of you. They're scared of what you represent to 'em.
Billy: Hey, man. All we represent to them, man, is somebody who needs a haircut.
George Hanson: Oh, no. What you represent to them is freedom.
Billy: What the hell is wrong with freedom? That's what it's all about.
George Hanson: Oh, yeah, that's right. That's what's it's all about, all right. But talkin' about it and bein' it, that's two different thangs. I mean, it's real hard to be free when you are bought and sold in the marketplace. Of course, don't ever tell anybody that they're not free, 'cause then they're gonna get real busy killin' and maimin' to prove to you that they are. Oh, yeah, they're gonna talk to you, and talk to you, and talk to you about individual freedom. But they see a free individual, it's gonna scare 'em.
Billy: Well, it don't make 'em runnin' scared.
George Hanson: No, it makes 'em dangerous. Buhhhh! Neh! Neh! Neh! Neh! Neh! Neh! Swamp!
- कनेक्शनFeatured in NBC Experiment in Television: This Is Al Capp (1970)
टॉप पसंद
- How long is Easy Rider?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
- What is 'Easy Rider' about?
- Is "Easy Rider" based on a book?
- What kind of drugs were they buying and selling?
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Easy Rider
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- Las Vegas, न्यू मैक्सिको, यूएसए("parade without a permit" parade)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $3,60,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $1,23,276
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $74,448
- 14 जुल॰ 2019
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $1,24,600
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 35 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1