Il generale Della Rovere

The story of the film concerns "Colonelo" Bertone a self-appointed community intercessor and thief in World War II Italy, passing on bribes from families to the Germans in order to help their sons (or gambling away the bribes and eating their food parcels). It's definitely a film of two halves, the first half of the movie to me feeling decidedly Pasolinian. Bertone, though undoubtedly a scoundrel does his best to keep people happy, is a character that spreads a certain amount of charm in the world. For some people who have never known love or had anyone to look up to, he provides a show, his charisma is like ambrosia. Having been brought up with Protestant vales it has been a revelation to me in life how people value charm as most precious, a Veblen good, more prized when it is most demanding, how a charming person is valued above all others even when they live in a moral vacuum.

The second half of the movie is, in structure, a more conventional prison movie where Bertone, working for the Germans in order to save his skin, becomes an impostor pretending to be Generale della Rovere. Whilst pretending to be the general he begins to assume many of the general's characteristics. This part of the film is very patriotic, and contains a beautiful fresco of Italian cities on the prison wall. The ideology of this part of the movie is all about recognising the efforts of the largely Communist, Partito d'Azione and Socialist partisan resistance, bodies who were largely excluded from the post-fascist Italian government, which was dominated by the Christian Democrats, who many felt to have been tainted by association with fascism.

Pontecorvo's movie Kapò was released contemporaneously, and features a similarly caricatured version of the Teutonic gaoler and slightly ebullient view of World War II, that would become refined in future decades. That said, Il Generale della Rovere, is undoubtedly a masterpiece.

I have little to add to what the first two commentators have written.

Rossellini has a penchant for melodrama and rhetoric, but, fortunately, he keeps this tendency for the most part in check in this case. This film is dry and sober, and yet touching in the way it describes the transformation of a petty swindler, who manages to survive by cheating those who are unlucky enough to have their loved ones arrested by the Nazis and try everything they can in order to save them from execution or deportation to Germany, into a man who realises that, when faced with the choice between right and wrong, he ultimately has to take sides. And, when the time comes, he will do what his conscience will tell him to do, even though this will mean his own death.

Vittorio De Sica is great, as usual, in this dramatic role as well as in his comic ones. Non-Italians may find interesting the fact that Vittorio De Sica was himself an unrepentant gambler in real life as well, to the point that, if I'm not mistaken, his dead left his family saddled with debts. The film also gives a good idea of what life was like for ordinary Italians under the German occupation between 1943 and 1945. Many had to make difficult choices in a confused situation, and they reacted differently. Some took sides and risks, on both sides; others tried to survive. Some came to accept humiliating compromises in order to save their loved ones from death (consider the character of Borghesio, the old, retired lawyer who mortgages his house in order to gather the money that is needed in order to buy the German officer responsible for choosing the prisoners who are bound to be sent to Germany as forced labourers, which often meant death, or of Ms Fassio, the wife who ends up humiliating herself in a desperate and vain attempt to rescue his husband and is torn between her inner contempt for the Nazis and the urge to do everything possible to save his husband). Some others tried to profit from the situation. Some others made different choices in different moments, sometimes cynical parasites, sometimes heroes. However, everyone faced dilemmas, often about their very survival.

Filmed in thirty-three days and edited in ten, this is the first of Rossellini's films post 'Rome, Open City' to be both critically and commercially successful on its release which irked the director no end. Although it lacks the immediacy of the earlier film and its location shooting has been replaced by studio sets whilst being sluggishly directed at times, it remains both gripping and exciting due to the splendid performances by Vittorio de Sica as charlatan Bardone and Hannes Messemer as SS Colonel Mueller whose relationship provides the linchpin of the piece.

Unlike Rossellini, de Sica had no qualms regarding commercialism and as a director excelled in neo-realism and when that genre went out of fashion, Commedia all'Italiana, at the same time creating an artiste from the raw material that was Sophia Loren. He actually logged more time as a actor, mainly to pay off his gambling debts. Had he not been a first class director/actor he would undoubtedly have been a magnificent snake-oil salesman and this, combined with his compulsive gambling, makes his casting here a masterstroke. Hannes Messemer is called upon to be cruel and calculating but is able to imbue his character with a certain nobility and is probably best known to English speaking viewers as the 'decent' German in 'The Great Escape'. As a self-sacrificing partisan Aristide Belchelli gives a fine performance whilst on the distaff side there are touching turns by Sandra Milo and Anne Vernon with Giovanna Ralli looking incredibly edible.

It has been adapted from the story by Indro Montanelli who himself served time in San Vittore and based Bardone on a fellow inmate named Bertone who was killed by firing squad. Upon the film's release Bertone's family filed a defamation suit against the director.

From being out of favour, Rossellini has regained some of his prestige by returning to his origins of war and resistance. Although he felt that by making this film he had 'sold out', this more conventional piece remains by far his most accessible and one of his most powerful.

Though I've only seen this film once, when I was actually young, it has remained one of my lifetime 'greatest' films. It deals with how each of us has a self image, and how that self image, and the lives we lead, may be influenced by how others view us. This is, I think, one of the great common themes of our lives - and this movie examines it beautifully. Though I saw it so long ago, I still remember it each time I see an example of its theme played out in today's events. Most notably, in the U.S., it has been shown in the direction that many (but not all) of our Supreme Court justices take once they receive their lifetime posts. Their thoughts, no matter how narrow they had been, become wider and wiser once that mantle of office settles onto their personalities. This great movie prepared me to see and understand this miraculous process - and others like it.

I was astounded watching this movie. It is less known compared to Rossellini's war trilogy ... but it left a deeper impact on me. One of the best anti war movies ever made .. helped by a towering performance by De Sica ...