Week-end à Zuydcoote

I found myself distracted by the background of the continual movements of squads of soldiers, aimlessly marching backwards & forwards, in opposite directions, for no obvious reasons & completely oblivious to the presence of the three principal characters.

The 1964 film, though today largely unknown outside of specialized circles, stands as a quietly monumental work within the WWII combat subgenre. While it may not reach the lofty heights of general cinematic masterpieces, it undoubtedly earns its place as an iconic entry in war cinema-an essential reference point for those seriously interested in the micro-histories of retreat, disillusionment, and psychological collapse during the Second World War.

At the helm of this rigorously composed narrative is Henry Verneuil, whose directorial precision orchestrates every element of the film with disciplined clarity. Known also for his work in The Vultures (1967) with Belmondo, The 25th Hour (1967) with Anthony Quinn, and the tragicomedy The Cow and I (La Vache et le Prisonnier, 1959) with Fernandel, Verneuil brings to this project a deep familiarity with WWII as cinematic material. His direction is not flamboyant but exacting: every scene calibrated, every moment weighted, yet never forced. He avoids the self-indulgence of spectacle, opting instead for a control that supports the atmosphere of entropic desperation. What might easily become bombastic under a less restrained hand remains grounded, tense, and narratively honest.

Much of this effect is achieved through a production design of remarkable ambition and detail. The film's mise-en-scène is rigorous in its materiality. Uniforms are rumpled, gear is missing, firearms often seem useless or ornamental. There's no fetishization of military paraphernalia, and the usual iconography of the war film-the helmet, the rifle, the rucksack-appears worn to the point of farce. This isn't a war fought by professionals but endured by individuals ill-prepared, psychologically and materially, for the collapse of order. The visual texture of decay is pervasive: sand clogging weapons, mud blending into blood, smoke blurring the horizon. The visual field itself becomes unreliable.

Within this visual disintegration, the scale of the production asserts itself with a kind of functional elegance. This is clearly a large-scale undertaking: a generous deployment of military vehicles, well-managed crowd scenes, elaborate stunt choreography, and frequent, well-timed explosions that never tip into gratuitous excess. The abundance of extras and the convincing replication of chaos serve not as an indulgence in spectacle, but as a reinforcement of thematic disarray. These elements are executed with such balance and control that they become organic to the narrative's internal logic. This is large-scale filmmaking without triumphalism-a vision of wartime collapse rendered with logistical precision.

Verneuil's orchestration of this notorious chapter-the chaotic withdrawal at Dunkirk and the perilous maneuvers that characterized it-is nothing short of masterful. It's a depiction that refuses to mythologize the moment, and instead captures the exacting disintegration of structure and morale. In doing so, the film distances itself from the celebratory narratives that often attend portrayals of this event, especially in Anglophone cinema. This is not Dunkirk (1958), where adversity ultimately underscores collective endurance. Here, the fragmentation is total, and Verneuil ensures that every stylistic and material choice drives that point home.

Through a subdued yet uncompromising aesthetic, and a narrative architecture that refuses the comforts of clarity or closure, the film makes its mark not by shouting, but by eroding the very ground beneath its characters. It is in this erosion-meticulously framed, meticulously rendered-that Verneuil's vision finds its most haunting expression. The result is a film that, while never straining to impress, leaves a deep and persistent impression: a work of remarkable craft, rare thematic discipline, and lasting resonance within the canon of WWII cinema.

It is a film deserving be loved like the novel inspiring it. The motif is more than simple - the cast and the cinematography and the brilliant simplicity , proposing fair reactions , nice dialogues, answers to the challenges, inspired portraits of love and comradery becoming friendship, precise definition of death and a great work of Jean Paul Belmondo.

Few scenes as the boats to the ships or as the horse toy in wave.

Very simple, must see it. Because it is more than a war film. It propose, in admirable manner, just simple war stories of ordinary people, out of recipes of heroism.

This an important, interesting movie depicting Battle of Dunkirk , this was an important battle that took place in Dunkirk, France, during the Second World War between the Allies and Germany . As part of the Battle of France on the Western Front, the Battle was the defence and evacuation of British and allied forces in Europe from 26 May–4 June 1940 , being shot with monumental logistics and means of effecting the landings to rescue escaped soldiers . This spectacular adventure about one of the most difficult campaign of war detailing the epic feats of some brave heroes contains noisy action , German raids , idealism , romance , unlimited courage , breathtaking battles and impressive sandy outdoors . Set during World War II, and stuck on the beaches near Dunkirk , Julien Maillat (Jean Paul Belmondo) attempts to join Great Britain by boat with the English Army , but cannot succeed . He , then , attempts to organize the life for him and his soldiers friends as Pinot (Georges Géret) , Pierson (Jean-Pierre Marielle) and Dhéry (Pierre Mondy) between shells , plane attacks on the beaches , bombings , and mayhem . Meanwhile , he meets a beautiful girl (Catherine Spaak) who is about to be raped .

This spectacular war movie contains thrills , exciting battles , aerial raids , dogfighting , romance and historical events . It is an enjoyable movie about friendship , warlike feats , courage and good feeling . This War movie packs crossfire , large-scale action , battles , shots of troops , landings and many other things . This film's source novel "Weekend at Zuydcoote" by Robert Merle won the 1949 Prix Goncourt, a prestigious French literary award . Acceptable movie pulls things together enough to rise thanks to continuous images of military marches , explosions , smoke and shootouts . This would-be blockbuster is not a description of such an important event but it is a context in which the battle offers the concrete development , life and death , a few men , Belmondo and his friends , being surrounded on the beaches of Dunkirk . The pic is well starred by Jean Paul Belmondo , a likable actor who has performed all kinds of genres as adventure : ¨Swashbuckler¨, ¨Le Magnifique¨, ¨The man from Rio¨, Cartouche¨, Polar : ¨Le Professionnel¨, ¨Stavisky¨, ¨Borsalino¨ , Comedy caper : ¨¨The brain¨ , Wartime : ¨Is Paris burning ?¨, ¨Two women¨ and Nouvelle Vague : ¨Pierrot Le Fou¨ "Breathless" . The movie broke box office records after bringing in a lot of money at the French box office . Colorful and evocative cinematography by Henri Decae , being shot at the actual location of one of the operation Dynamo evacuations, on the beaches of Bray-Dunes near Dunkirk . Rousing and thrilling musical score by the great composer Maurice Jarre . The film is magnificently produced with big budget by Raymond and Robert Hakim . This famous event from how was orchestrated the notorious battle and the dangerous , risky landings maneuvers was professionally directed by Henry Verneuil who also made other WWII films : "The Vultures" with Belmondo , "The 25th Hour" with Anthony Quinn and "The Cow and I" with Fernandel .

The picture was well based on historical events , these are the followings : General Von Kuechler assumed command of all the German forces at Dunkirk. His plan was simple: he would launch an all-out attack across the whole front . Strangely, he ignored a radio intercept telling him the British were abandoning the eastern end of the line to fall back to Dunkirk itself. Although Churchill had promised the French that the British would cover their escape, on the ground it was the French who held the line while the last remaining British were evacuated. Enduring concentrated German artillery fire and Luftwaffe strafing and bombs, the French stood their ground. On 2 June (the day the last of the British units embarked onto the ships), the French began to fall back slowly, and by 3 June the Germans were about two miles (3 km) from Dunkirk. The night of 3 June was the last night of evacuations. On 4 June , the Germans hoisted the swastika over the docks from which so many British and French troops had escaped under their noses The War Office made the decision to evacuate British forces on 25 May. In the nine days from 27 May–4 June, 338,226 men escaped, including 139,997 French, Polish, and Belgian troops, together with a small number of Dutch soldiers, aboard 861 vessels -of which 243 were sunk during the operation-. British Fighter Command lost 106 aircraft dogfighting over Dunkirk, and the Luftwaffe lost about 135 – some of which were shot down by the French Navy and the Royal Navy . The docks at Dunkirk were too badly damaged to be used, but the East and West Moles or sea walls were intact. Captain William Tennant —in charge of the evacuation— decided to use the beaches and the East Mole to land the ships. This highly successful idea hugely increased the number of troops that could be embarked each day, and indeed at the rescue operation's peak, on 31 May, over 68,000 men were taken off. The last of the British Army left on 3 June and all of them returning to Dover. However, Churchill insisted on coming back for the French, so the Royal Navy returned on 4 June in an attempt to rescue as many as possible of the French rearguard. Over 26,000 French soldiers were evacuated on that last day, but between 30,000 and 40,000 more were left behind and forced to surrender to the Germans .

After just finishing reading the novel, which I regard now as one of the best war time books and which for me spoke about poignancy, faith, sexuality, believes (not as per faith itself) and manhood, I have decided to watch the movie as well.

The movie mostly faithfully depicts the events in the novels and mostly stays true to it. Unfortunately though the movie lacks the heart and soul of the novel and rather gives (for me) a third person view of the main character as we follow him and the events in contrast to the source material.

The cast for the most part is good, though obviously Belmondo excels in his role. Set design, atmosphere and looks are incredibly good, even in 2022, if you are used to 60 - 70s era movies.

Overall, it's an entertaining movie,IF YOU HAVENT READ THE NOVEL BY NOW, THEN GO AND WATCH THE MOVIE, but for someone regarding the source material in a high esteem, unfortunatelly its a disapointment.

Cheers, David from Hungary.