लंदन में जो और उनके तीसरे पति जेक अपने छह बच्चों के साथ रहते हैं लेकिन उनकी शादी कई कारणों से तनावपूर्ण है. उसके डॉक्टर को लगता है कि जो बच्चे के जन्म को सेक्स के लिए तर्क के रूप में इस्तेमा... सभी पढ़ेंलंदन में जो और उनके तीसरे पति जेक अपने छह बच्चों के साथ रहते हैं लेकिन उनकी शादी कई कारणों से तनावपूर्ण है. उसके डॉक्टर को लगता है कि जो बच्चे के जन्म को सेक्स के लिए तर्क के रूप में इस्तेमाल करती है. जो के मुद्दे उसे एक नाजुक मानसिक स्थिति में छोड़ देते हैं.लंदन में जो और उनके तीसरे पति जेक अपने छह बच्चों के साथ रहते हैं लेकिन उनकी शादी कई कारणों से तनावपूर्ण है. उसके डॉक्टर को लगता है कि जो बच्चे के जन्म को सेक्स के लिए तर्क के रूप में इस्तेमाल करती है. जो के मुद्दे उसे एक नाजुक मानसिक स्थिति में छोड़ देते हैं.
- 1 ऑस्कर के लिए नामांकित
- 6 जीत और कुल 6 नामांकन
- Waitress at Zoo
- (as Leslie Nunnerley)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Admittedly, the movie is difficult to understand on a first viewing -- both because of its intricate flashback structure and its complexities of tone and attitude. It took me several viewings to fully sort out the plot, and several more to realize what I was actually seeing -- a very, very black comedy. In this respect it's worth placing with the darkest works of Evelyn Waugh or Henry Green.
The film catches its participants at the top of their form: Pinter never wrote a better screenplay, Anne Bancroft (arguably) never gave a better performance, Peter Finch certainly didn't, and Maggie Smith and James Mason are deliciously evil in supporting roles. There are too many marvelous moments to list them all, but watch especially for the zoo scene between Bancroft and Mason (who are clearly having a great time) and for the slyly-written scene where Finch learns that his wife is pregnant -- again.
So why is it no longer my favorite movie? My admiration for its technique is unabated, but as I get older I find the film's nasty tone harder and harder to take. There's not an admirable human being in the whole movie -- they're all foolish, duplicitous, or vindictive. I can't live with these people, much as I've enjoyed eavesdropping on them over the years.
The title refers to the nursery rhyme Peter Peter Pumpkin Eater. Jo is a perplexing character. She is struggling but she is not crazy. It is an interesting character but I am of two minds about it. It allows Bancroft to do some good acting but it is also hard to fully invest in her. There is an attempt at surrealism with the cigarette smoke going backwards. Maybe more of that surrealism would allow the audience to feel her troubled mind.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThis movie never explains its title, which refers to a traditional children's rhyme: "Peter, Peter, pumpkin eater/Had a wife, but couldn't keep her/So he put her in a shell/And there he kept her very well." This serves as the epigraph of Penelope Mortimer's original novel.
- गूफ़In the shot after Jake pours out his drink on Conway, the film is being run backwards for some reason, as the smoke from the cigarette clearly indicates.
- भाव
[last lines]
Jo Armitage: Yes. I'll have one.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in James Mason: The Star They Loved to Hate (1984)
टॉप पसंद
- How long is The Pumpkin Eater?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Schlafzimmerstreit
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- Turville, Buckinghamshire, इंग्लैंड, यूनाइटेड किंगडम(Cobstone Windmill - the Armitage's country house with views of town below)
- उत्पादन कंपनी
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 58 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1