IMDb रेटिंग
7.2/10
3.6 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंAn injured thief on the run finds sanctuary within a brothel of united, ruthless women.An injured thief on the run finds sanctuary within a brothel of united, ruthless women.An injured thief on the run finds sanctuary within a brothel of united, ruthless women.
Jô Shishido
- Shintaro Ibuki
- (as Joe Shishido)
Chico Lourant
- Black Pastor
- (as Chico Roland)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
The story revolves around a female prostitution clan (Komasa of Kanto) and their newest arrivals, Maya and Shintaro (Jo "Cheek Implants" Shishido). It takes places in a shantytown located outside of a US military base, immediately after the end of WW2. They survive by selling their bodies and protecting each other, in other words : pimp-less. This is based on a novel by Taijiro Tamura.
We see the story from mostly Maya's perspective. When the story starts out she is a street urchin stealing food to survive. When she is caught by a local pimp and almost peddled to a couple of US servicemen, she inadvertently falls into the hands of the leader of the Komasa (the tattooed, Sen). From there the story revolves about the daily occurrences of street walking, finding food, laying about, singing and various methods of getting money, food and "johns" (lots of petty pickpocketing mostly).
The Komasa of Kanto are identified mostly by the color of their dresses than their names. It is funny to know that the color of the dresses in correspondence with the characters did not have any significant meaning (according to Seijun). The dressed adopted those colors because initially all the dresses and styles looked nearly identical. The colors were used (in typical anime fashion) to differentiate the characters. Mino - purple ; Roku - yellow ; Sen - red ; Maya - green ; Ofuku - white and Machiko - traditional kimono. The group have a few rules, but the most important is not to give up sex for free. We are subjected to the first incident of this with Ofuku. She is tied up, her hair is cut off and she is tied naked to a row boat and left in the harbor for all to see.
After Maya's arrival and adaptation, in comes Jo Shishido. He plays and ex Japanese soldier who goes around committing petty crimes and basically just trying to survive. His introduction is as the sole survivor of a failed raid on the military base supplies. He lives by a simple theory : eat, drink and have as much sex as you can. All the rest are pointless without these basic needs, so forget the higher ideals. He becomes part of Komasa when he stumbles into their "home" after he gets shot because he stabbed a US serviceman (who was involved in the theft at the base and "had it coming"). There is a brief power struggle between him and Sen, but his strength and power make for a natural leader. From then on, everyone defers to him. There also is an attraction for Shishido by both Sen and Maya and the entire groups tries to appease him.
There are elements of the baser and basic survival instincts of man. Those few things that try to elevate above it are crushed and extinguished. Seijun has some personal prejudices when it comes to this movie. He actually served in the Japanese army, stationed in the Phillipines. His military career started and ending with the Japanese retreating. At the time he still felt a bit angry at the US. This is represented in many fashions throughout the movie : the US GI rape of Maya, the MP's not caring, soup/ramen with a condom in it (merchant calls it healthy and nutritious food) and the appearance of the American flag. The flag is used every time something bad happens. It only has negative connotations, especially at the end where it is the last thing we see as the camera pans over the town. There also seems to be some mild capitalist vs communist debate going. At one instant one can hear the song of the international communist brotherhood being sung over all the dealings.
The movie is quite visually stunning. Takeo Kimura (the production designer) designed the sets. He was quite limited with funds. The movie need good sets but they were working with a B-movie budget. He used his theater background to create non-realistic surreal sets (theatre-like). They bring the movie (along with the costumes) to life. It gives the entire movie a theatrical feel. The bridge was even built with stolen used plywood from the props department. To make the paint go a long way, they would dilute the paint with water and add saw dust for thickening. This isn't a documentary. It is not suppose to emulate real life. It is an extreme look at life. Extreme characters in extreme circumstances. The movie also contains numerous scenes of nudity, female on female beatings, numerous sex scenes, plenty of violence and the butchering of a cow (which looks way too life-like). What more can one expect from the grandfather of the exploitation genre ?? I've seen numerous of Seijun's movies prior to this (the most recent being the Beast of Youth), but I was not expecting such a great movie. The Japanese cast and main actors do an excellent job. By the end you really care what happens to them. Seijun also included many American's in the cast as well, so expect to hear some English in the movie. I can't say enough about this movie. What are you still doing reading this, go out and see it for yourself.
-Celluloid Rehab
We see the story from mostly Maya's perspective. When the story starts out she is a street urchin stealing food to survive. When she is caught by a local pimp and almost peddled to a couple of US servicemen, she inadvertently falls into the hands of the leader of the Komasa (the tattooed, Sen). From there the story revolves about the daily occurrences of street walking, finding food, laying about, singing and various methods of getting money, food and "johns" (lots of petty pickpocketing mostly).
The Komasa of Kanto are identified mostly by the color of their dresses than their names. It is funny to know that the color of the dresses in correspondence with the characters did not have any significant meaning (according to Seijun). The dressed adopted those colors because initially all the dresses and styles looked nearly identical. The colors were used (in typical anime fashion) to differentiate the characters. Mino - purple ; Roku - yellow ; Sen - red ; Maya - green ; Ofuku - white and Machiko - traditional kimono. The group have a few rules, but the most important is not to give up sex for free. We are subjected to the first incident of this with Ofuku. She is tied up, her hair is cut off and she is tied naked to a row boat and left in the harbor for all to see.
After Maya's arrival and adaptation, in comes Jo Shishido. He plays and ex Japanese soldier who goes around committing petty crimes and basically just trying to survive. His introduction is as the sole survivor of a failed raid on the military base supplies. He lives by a simple theory : eat, drink and have as much sex as you can. All the rest are pointless without these basic needs, so forget the higher ideals. He becomes part of Komasa when he stumbles into their "home" after he gets shot because he stabbed a US serviceman (who was involved in the theft at the base and "had it coming"). There is a brief power struggle between him and Sen, but his strength and power make for a natural leader. From then on, everyone defers to him. There also is an attraction for Shishido by both Sen and Maya and the entire groups tries to appease him.
There are elements of the baser and basic survival instincts of man. Those few things that try to elevate above it are crushed and extinguished. Seijun has some personal prejudices when it comes to this movie. He actually served in the Japanese army, stationed in the Phillipines. His military career started and ending with the Japanese retreating. At the time he still felt a bit angry at the US. This is represented in many fashions throughout the movie : the US GI rape of Maya, the MP's not caring, soup/ramen with a condom in it (merchant calls it healthy and nutritious food) and the appearance of the American flag. The flag is used every time something bad happens. It only has negative connotations, especially at the end where it is the last thing we see as the camera pans over the town. There also seems to be some mild capitalist vs communist debate going. At one instant one can hear the song of the international communist brotherhood being sung over all the dealings.
The movie is quite visually stunning. Takeo Kimura (the production designer) designed the sets. He was quite limited with funds. The movie need good sets but they were working with a B-movie budget. He used his theater background to create non-realistic surreal sets (theatre-like). They bring the movie (along with the costumes) to life. It gives the entire movie a theatrical feel. The bridge was even built with stolen used plywood from the props department. To make the paint go a long way, they would dilute the paint with water and add saw dust for thickening. This isn't a documentary. It is not suppose to emulate real life. It is an extreme look at life. Extreme characters in extreme circumstances. The movie also contains numerous scenes of nudity, female on female beatings, numerous sex scenes, plenty of violence and the butchering of a cow (which looks way too life-like). What more can one expect from the grandfather of the exploitation genre ?? I've seen numerous of Seijun's movies prior to this (the most recent being the Beast of Youth), but I was not expecting such a great movie. The Japanese cast and main actors do an excellent job. By the end you really care what happens to them. Seijun also included many American's in the cast as well, so expect to hear some English in the movie. I can't say enough about this movie. What are you still doing reading this, go out and see it for yourself.
-Celluloid Rehab
10zetes
I was under the impression when I rented this film that it was
directed by Sezuki Seijun, but the credits gave a different name. It
still might be him (it was something else Sezuki), and I am
assuming it was as I write this review.
Having totally fallen in love with Branded to Kill and, to a slightly
lesser extant, but not too much lesser, with Tokyo Drifter, I was
overjoyed to find this at the video store (I remembered having
heard at one point of its being on video). And I was even more
overjoyed to watch it. It's an amazing film which I would place
slightly ahead of Tokyo Drifter and Branded to Kill, giving it a 9/10.
The film opens right after the end of WWII with a young woman
starving in the street (not something I would expect from the two
previous yakuza films I've seen of Seijun's). She meets up with a
group of four prostitutes who allow her to work with them. They are
self-sufficient and need no pimp. They keep themselves in line
with the threat of torture if any one of them ever sleeps with a man
without accepting money. Of course, you can see the possibility for
exploitation, and there is exploitation, believe me. After a while, a
robust thug (Jo Shishido of Branded to Kill, cheekbones and all)
shows up in their crumbling household. They respect him
because he resists the GIs who try to keep the law in their city
(never specified) and those Japanese people who cooperate with
them. They're also all attracted to him. After this is developed, there
isn't much more plot - only a couple of events happen afterwards.
More or less, it is a character study and also a sociological study.
The anti-Americanism is very interesting to see. Seijun was a
soldier in the Japanese army himself and, although I could easily
point out that, hey, you started it, it's easy to understand what he
must have felt after he and his comrades lost a war, what it would
have done to the male psyche as well as the female (this film was
made about twenty years afterwards).
Some people would naturally hate this film because it mixes its
styles, often very harshly. It's really nothing that Godard wouldn't
have done - in fact, it's actually something that Godard, despite my
great affection for him and his films, could never have achieved; he
was far too interested in subverting filmic conventions and too
unconcerned with making interesting films at times. It is filmed in
color, and its art design/cinematography/costuming, everything
technical, is color coordinated in a way akin to something like a
1950s musical. Four of the five prostitutes are color-coated and
there is, for instance, an amazing scene where these four color- specific hookers muse over Shishido alone against a set
designed only in their colors. Often the film is quite melodramatic,
almost like a Douglas Sirk film. At other times, it is something like
sado-masochistic porno, especially during the torture scenes.
There are scenes akin to the brutality in Tokyo Drifter and Branded
to Kill; there is some major brutality to women (sometimes
inflicted by women), so if you're particularly sensitive to that, you
might want to avoid this. Also, if that's a problem with you, take
special measures to avoid Branded to Kill. You might want to skip
over this next description tot he next paragraph if you very easily get
sick or if you're a militant animal rights activist, but there is a
stunning scene where Jo Shishido slaughters a live cow. I'm pretty
sure it's a real scene of slaughter. If not, then it's a damned good
facsimile. If you were horrified at the real scenes of sacrifice in
Apocalypse Now, you might just want to avoid this film altogether.
The bottom line for me is that this film is a masterpiece. An insane
one, to be sure, but this film, as well as Tokyo Drifter and Branded
to Kill, demonstrate just how gorgeous insanity can be
sometimes. Janus Films, whose logo you see on the videotapes
before just about 90% of all foreign films that were made before
1970, and Home Vision Cinema, who distributes about everything
made after 1970, collaborated on the videotape that I watched,
which recently went out of print. Those two companies should be
ringing tons of bells for anyone who collects videos. Yup, those are
the two companies who produce DVDs' (and Laserdiscs') Criterion Collection, the only DVDs, in the long run, which are really
worth owning. This company has already released both Branded
to Kill and Tokyo Drifter. I pray to God - I'd even sell my soul to the
devil - so that Criterion will release Gate of Flesh and - please,
please God! (or Satan!) - other Seijun films, or even other films
which generally resemble his, if such other artists do exist, that I
have not seen or even heard of. Think about it Criterion. I know that
Branded to Kill and Tokyo Drifter aren't your most popular DVDs,
but, having talked to so many people who are discovering them
and having never resisted an opportunity to spread his name and
reputation to any other film buff I have met (and others who are
familiar with him do the same), I know that he is becoming a huge
cult item. In my mind, judging only by the three films of his that I've
seen, I prefer him even to Akira Kurosawa (I cannot comment on
Ozu or Mizoguchi; unfortunately, I have only ever seen one Ozu and
no Mizoguchis, merely based on availability), whom I generally
prefer to nearly every filmmaker with whom I am very familiar.
directed by Sezuki Seijun, but the credits gave a different name. It
still might be him (it was something else Sezuki), and I am
assuming it was as I write this review.
Having totally fallen in love with Branded to Kill and, to a slightly
lesser extant, but not too much lesser, with Tokyo Drifter, I was
overjoyed to find this at the video store (I remembered having
heard at one point of its being on video). And I was even more
overjoyed to watch it. It's an amazing film which I would place
slightly ahead of Tokyo Drifter and Branded to Kill, giving it a 9/10.
The film opens right after the end of WWII with a young woman
starving in the street (not something I would expect from the two
previous yakuza films I've seen of Seijun's). She meets up with a
group of four prostitutes who allow her to work with them. They are
self-sufficient and need no pimp. They keep themselves in line
with the threat of torture if any one of them ever sleeps with a man
without accepting money. Of course, you can see the possibility for
exploitation, and there is exploitation, believe me. After a while, a
robust thug (Jo Shishido of Branded to Kill, cheekbones and all)
shows up in their crumbling household. They respect him
because he resists the GIs who try to keep the law in their city
(never specified) and those Japanese people who cooperate with
them. They're also all attracted to him. After this is developed, there
isn't much more plot - only a couple of events happen afterwards.
More or less, it is a character study and also a sociological study.
The anti-Americanism is very interesting to see. Seijun was a
soldier in the Japanese army himself and, although I could easily
point out that, hey, you started it, it's easy to understand what he
must have felt after he and his comrades lost a war, what it would
have done to the male psyche as well as the female (this film was
made about twenty years afterwards).
Some people would naturally hate this film because it mixes its
styles, often very harshly. It's really nothing that Godard wouldn't
have done - in fact, it's actually something that Godard, despite my
great affection for him and his films, could never have achieved; he
was far too interested in subverting filmic conventions and too
unconcerned with making interesting films at times. It is filmed in
color, and its art design/cinematography/costuming, everything
technical, is color coordinated in a way akin to something like a
1950s musical. Four of the five prostitutes are color-coated and
there is, for instance, an amazing scene where these four color- specific hookers muse over Shishido alone against a set
designed only in their colors. Often the film is quite melodramatic,
almost like a Douglas Sirk film. At other times, it is something like
sado-masochistic porno, especially during the torture scenes.
There are scenes akin to the brutality in Tokyo Drifter and Branded
to Kill; there is some major brutality to women (sometimes
inflicted by women), so if you're particularly sensitive to that, you
might want to avoid this. Also, if that's a problem with you, take
special measures to avoid Branded to Kill. You might want to skip
over this next description tot he next paragraph if you very easily get
sick or if you're a militant animal rights activist, but there is a
stunning scene where Jo Shishido slaughters a live cow. I'm pretty
sure it's a real scene of slaughter. If not, then it's a damned good
facsimile. If you were horrified at the real scenes of sacrifice in
Apocalypse Now, you might just want to avoid this film altogether.
The bottom line for me is that this film is a masterpiece. An insane
one, to be sure, but this film, as well as Tokyo Drifter and Branded
to Kill, demonstrate just how gorgeous insanity can be
sometimes. Janus Films, whose logo you see on the videotapes
before just about 90% of all foreign films that were made before
1970, and Home Vision Cinema, who distributes about everything
made after 1970, collaborated on the videotape that I watched,
which recently went out of print. Those two companies should be
ringing tons of bells for anyone who collects videos. Yup, those are
the two companies who produce DVDs' (and Laserdiscs') Criterion Collection, the only DVDs, in the long run, which are really
worth owning. This company has already released both Branded
to Kill and Tokyo Drifter. I pray to God - I'd even sell my soul to the
devil - so that Criterion will release Gate of Flesh and - please,
please God! (or Satan!) - other Seijun films, or even other films
which generally resemble his, if such other artists do exist, that I
have not seen or even heard of. Think about it Criterion. I know that
Branded to Kill and Tokyo Drifter aren't your most popular DVDs,
but, having talked to so many people who are discovering them
and having never resisted an opportunity to spread his name and
reputation to any other film buff I have met (and others who are
familiar with him do the same), I know that he is becoming a huge
cult item. In my mind, judging only by the three films of his that I've
seen, I prefer him even to Akira Kurosawa (I cannot comment on
Ozu or Mizoguchi; unfortunately, I have only ever seen one Ozu and
no Mizoguchis, merely based on availability), whom I generally
prefer to nearly every filmmaker with whom I am very familiar.
An exploitation film with a brain. We see nude women tastefully lit, kinky violence - women beating other women and the low life of Tokyo outdoing each other in even more dastardly acts of treachery and heartless thuggery. The intelligence comes with the strong impact of the women dressing in vibrant red, purple, yellow and green to reflect their characters. Having the prostitutes live in a building that is an analogy for post-war Japan is even smarter. The building is bombed out, its occupants desperate, many have lost family in the war and for some the sight of people burned to death has made them individually heartless, desperate and mad. The fact that most of them live in the basement indicates that they have plummeted into the depths of hell. For cinema goers in Japan in 1964, just enjoying the fruits of the boom years for their rebuilt economy and also a new found pride and respectability, this must have been a sobering but also satisfying reminder of where they had been and how far they had come.
This film proves that good directors are able to make first-rate films in spite of very modest budgets if they have the desire and creativity necessary to succeed. Essentially, this movie concerns the plight of a small number of prostitutes who are trying to survive in post-World War II Tokyo during the American occupation. With food, medicine, shelter and employment in scarce supply those without any resources became like animals just trying to stay alive. So 5 or 6 young prostitutes take refuge in a bombed out basement and agree to live by a very strict code which forbids, among other things, sex without payment. Those who fail to comply are tortured and then thrown back onto the cold streets without any means of protection or support. At any rate, things are going well for this small group until a war-weary Japanese soldier arrives suffering from a gunshot wound. Now, rather than giving away the entire plot I will just say that the director, Seijun Suzuki, uses various techniques (like different colors to differentiate the women) to create something quite impressive out of almost nothing. Just be advised that there is some nudity and violence that wasn't usual for this period in time. But even here he uses symbolism in many cases so that it doesn't seem crass or vulgar. In short, this is a picture that I recommend to those who can appreciate artistry and ingenuity and don't depend on special effects and CGI for their film entertainment. But it's not for the squeamish.
Suzuki is the master! He has made the greatest examples of 60's low budget exploitation cinema. The way he uses a different color to represent each of the prostitutes almost makes them appear like demons in that underground lair of theirs. But who is the real monster of the film? The occupying Americans who use the prostitutes? The prostitutes themselves? Or is it the hate filled ex-soldier (played by the great Joe Shishido!) who controls the women?
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाIn an interview Seijun answered the question of the uniqueness of this film in relation to other B/Program pictures he made in the time: "The studio wanted to make a skin flick, that's all. We couldn't make a real porno back then, though."
- गूफ़A downward shot pans across a crowd following a stretcher. When straight down, you see the shadow of the camera, crane and the camera operator.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in From the Ruins: Making 'Gate of Flesh' (2005)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Gate of Flesh?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 30 मिनट
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें