1 9 10 के दशक के लंदन में, स्नोबिश ध्वन्यात्मकता प्रोफेसर हेनरी हिगिंस एक दांव से सहमत हैं कि वह कच्चे फूलों की लड़की, एलिजा डूलिटिल को उच्च समाज में प्रस्तुत करने योग्य बना सकते हैं।1 9 10 के दशक के लंदन में, स्नोबिश ध्वन्यात्मकता प्रोफेसर हेनरी हिगिंस एक दांव से सहमत हैं कि वह कच्चे फूलों की लड़की, एलिजा डूलिटिल को उच्च समाज में प्रस्तुत करने योग्य बना सकते हैं।1 9 10 के दशक के लंदन में, स्नोबिश ध्वन्यात्मकता प्रोफेसर हेनरी हिगिंस एक दांव से सहमत हैं कि वह कच्चे फूलों की लड़की, एलिजा डूलिटिल को उच्च समाज में प्रस्तुत करने योग्य बना सकते हैं।
- 8 ऑस्कर जीते
- 26 जीत और कुल 13 नामांकन
Elizabeth Aimers
- Cockney
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Helen Albrecht
- Ascot Extra
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
John Alderson
- Jamie - Doolittle's crony
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Mary Alexander
- Cockney
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Gertrude Astor
- Cockney
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
LaWana Backer
- Ad Lib at Church
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Walter Bacon
- Ball Guest
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Oscars Best Picture Winners, Ranked
Oscars Best Picture Winners, Ranked
See the complete list of Oscars Best Picture winners, ranked by IMDb ratings.
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाCostume designer Cecil Beaton created 1,500 costumes for this movie, with the exception of the pearl white gown Hepburn wears to the Embassy Ball, an original Edwardian specimen Beaton found in an antique shop.
- गूफ़When Prof. Higgins sings "An Ordinary Man" he turns on several phonographs, seconds later he turns off one of them but all of the sounds stop.
- भाव
Eliza Doolittle: The difference between a lady and a flower girl is not how she behaves, but how she is treated.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटIn the posters, playbills and the original cast album for the stage version of "My Fair Lady", the credits always read "based on Bernard Shaw's 'Pygmalion' ", letting the audience know what play "My Fair Lady" was actually adapted from. The movie credits simply read "from a play by Bernard Shaw".
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनIn the remastered version of the film, some of the scene changes are changed from sudden cuts to wipe outs, as they probably were when the film was released. When CBS Fox released it on video originally, they were changed to sudden cuts.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Toast of the Town: एपिसोड #18.17 (1965)
- साउंडट्रैकWhy Can't the English?
(1956) (uncredited)
Music by Frederick Loewe
Lyrics by Alan Jay Lerner
Performed by Rex Harrison, Wilfrid Hyde-White, and Audrey Hepburn
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
I first saw this film when I was eight years old, after receiving it as a first communion present from my mother. For months I watched the movie on an almost daily basis, and it was quickly a favorite. I thought it was absolute perfection.
Now that I am a bit older.. I notice that is does have quite a few flaws. It doesn't really capture the essence of Shaw's Pygmalion, but I don't think that should really take away from the movie; they should be treated as separate entities. Some of the sets are a little, well, cramped, but consider what they had to work with, they did a pretty good job.
And then there is the dubbing issue. I recently special on MFL on AMC, and they showed "Wouldn't It Be Loverly" and "Show Me" with Audrey's voice, and though Audrey may not have the perfect melodic voice of Marni Nixon, her voice was much more "Eliza". I really do think they should have just used her voice. If you watch "Funny Face", you get a good feel for voice, which I think is beautiful in a unconventional way.
Then, there is the question of whether Julie Andrews should have played Eliza in the film version of MFL. I've gone back and forth on this issue. Now, Audrey Hepburn is my favorite actress of all time, and Julie Andrews is a close runner-up, so it really is hard to "choose". Of course Julie's voice is much better than even Marni Nixon's... but like I said before, I don't think a perfect singing voice really would suit Eliza. And as for which would play a better Eliza overall.. I really don't know. I wasn't alive to see MFL on Broadway, so I really can't compare the two. What I do know is that Audrey gave an amazing performance. Anyway, as someone else said, if Julie had played Eliza, who would have played Mary Poppins? ;)
Now that I am a bit older.. I notice that is does have quite a few flaws. It doesn't really capture the essence of Shaw's Pygmalion, but I don't think that should really take away from the movie; they should be treated as separate entities. Some of the sets are a little, well, cramped, but consider what they had to work with, they did a pretty good job.
And then there is the dubbing issue. I recently special on MFL on AMC, and they showed "Wouldn't It Be Loverly" and "Show Me" with Audrey's voice, and though Audrey may not have the perfect melodic voice of Marni Nixon, her voice was much more "Eliza". I really do think they should have just used her voice. If you watch "Funny Face", you get a good feel for voice, which I think is beautiful in a unconventional way.
Then, there is the question of whether Julie Andrews should have played Eliza in the film version of MFL. I've gone back and forth on this issue. Now, Audrey Hepburn is my favorite actress of all time, and Julie Andrews is a close runner-up, so it really is hard to "choose". Of course Julie's voice is much better than even Marni Nixon's... but like I said before, I don't think a perfect singing voice really would suit Eliza. And as for which would play a better Eliza overall.. I really don't know. I wasn't alive to see MFL on Broadway, so I really can't compare the two. What I do know is that Audrey gave an amazing performance. Anyway, as someone else said, if Julie had played Eliza, who would have played Mary Poppins? ;)
- lauriebeth
- 3 नव॰ 2001
- परमालिंक
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Mi bella dama
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनी
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $1,70,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $7,25,60,711
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $3,54,764
- 17 फ़र॰ 2019
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $7,26,85,970
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 50 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.20 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें