Vechera na khutore bliz Dikanki

In the best tradition of Soviet fantasy, Dikanka is entertaining from start to finish. There isn't much a plot (hijinks during the night), but the practical effects are charming, and I laughed harder than I had in a long time.

The best element is the Devil himself. Rather than a figure of fear and evil, the Devil is a hairy, silly fellow who keeps busy by tormenting a blacksmith who drew a religious picture that the Devil found particularly offensive. In addition, there are a horde of lusty and/or drunken townsmen, and a cameo by the Tsarina herself. Also, a "Three's Company"-esquire set piece where character after character must hide out in the local witch's hut.

It has been a great pleasure re-starting my "watching Soviet/Russian films" quest (especially fantasy and animation) and becoming acquainted with ones not yet seen, the same going for the original stories that some are adapted from. Did it a lot in 2013 and 2014, a great way of coping with stress, and wanted to relive those fond memories. A lot of the Soviet films seen recently have been fantasy and often the surreal kind with touches of comedy. This has been especially true in the films of Aleksandr Rou.

Have seen almost all of them and have really liked to loved them all, though there will be those who will find them too weird. Not me, find them very imaginatively done, they are charming, the surrealism is a healthy dose but not excessive and the comedy touches in his films genuinely amuse. His most atypical and accessible, and also one of his best, is his adaptation of Prokoviev's ballet with the involvement of Bolshoi 'Cinderella'. It is a shame that non-Russian viewers know him best from the riffing of 'Morozko' ('Frosty'), to me that was not a bad film at all but to say that the dubbing doesn't do it justice is an understatement, very similar to the films of Aleksandr Ptushko.

'The Night Before Christmas' is another Rou adaptation based on the stories of Nikolai Gogol, having seen 1952's 'May Nights' recently and loving it. The film is based on Gogol's first story in the second volume of his "Evenings on a Farm Near Dikanka", known as both 'Christmas Eve' and 'The Night Before Christmas'. Although it is higher rated than 'May Nights', there is actually a preference for that film, which to me was a little better paced and more focused in story. Not that 'The Night Before Christmas' does either badly, just that 'May Nights' does it a little better for my tastes.

Getting the short-comings out of the way, the story is a slight one anyway in the first place and there are times in the film where one can tell where at times the pace feels a little draggy and padded.

Some of the sound effects are on the overwrought side and the latter parts of the film is not always as easy to follow as what came before.

Conversely, 'The Night Before Christmas' holds up well visually. Even if the sky is obviously painted, the sets are handsome enough and still evoke a sense of wonder, whether dreamy or macabre. Really made me want to be there, and this is complemented by the quite lavish photography, that is never too flashy or overblown nor simplistic or static and beautiful use of colour. The practical effects similarly are imaginatively done, have a charm and don't look cheap, the film doesn't overuse them and uses them when necessary. The music score is a mix of eccentric, whimsical, romantic and haunting, while not being at odds with what is going on.

The comedy is generally very funny and at its best hilarious, without being overdone to the point of being cartoony, while the quieter moments are charming even if they slow the film down slightly. It never feels over-complicated, yet never feels simplistic at the same time. Rou's direction is controlled and doesn't feel too heavy while also keeping things engaging. 'The Night Before Christmas' is not always easy to follow in the latter stages, but the surrealism didn't feel over the top and the more macabre elements are darkly unsettling while not being too scary. Didn't feel that the film was too stagy.

Found myself enjoying the characters, with the Devil being the most enjoyable and entertaining, a very memorable creation. The acting suits them well, on the theatrical side at times (not uncommon in a Rou film, or Russian fantasy), but didn't find them irritating or bland in any way.

In summary, very nice fantasy if not quite a classic, also feel that Rou has done better films. 8/10

It's hard not to fall in love with the visual aesthetics here. Yes, they're right in line with those of similar titles - works of fantasy from central and eastern Europe in the 60s, 70s, or even early 80s - but in some capacity one is also reminded of the whimsical creations of French pioneer Georges Méliès. The sets alone are terrific with some lovely fine detail, to say nothing of the costume design, hair, and makeup. The stunts and effects are very simple, betraying the inauthenticity, yet there's a charming whimsy to them that's magical and endearing. This pointedly goes even for Kseniya Blinova's editing, and for Arkadi Filippenko's flavorful music, and the use of lighting at select times is just as delightful. Not to be outdone, the whole cast give spirited, animated performances that accentuate the fancifulness. With all this firmly in mind, the storytelling in 'Evenings on a farm near Dikanka,' alternatively known as 'The night before Christmas,' is largely visual. By all means, one will be stymied if one isn't fluent in Russian, or has the benefit of subtitles, or at least has Nikolai Gogol's original story as a point of reference. Yet between Aleksandr Rou's scene writing and direction, and the players' expressive acting, the dialogue almost serves as a rounding facet and finishing touch, like a song that can be appreciated by considering the vocals as another instrument rather than as purveyor of lyrics.

The narrative, meanwhile, is a minor joy, and distinctly follows Gogol's 'Christmas Eve' very closely. What we're given is a fantastical tale stirring together the mischief of The Devil, sorcery, the goings-on and social dynamics of a small rural village - and, of course, love - all at Christmastime. It's not a fiercely gripping saga that demands our eyes and ears, yet it's quite enchanting in and of itself, with clear influence from and reference to the culture in which it was written, and associated folklore. With that short story serving as solid foundation, all those working on this 1961 adaptation had the chance to let their creativity flourish, and the result is ever richer for the splendid work that all turned in, even down to Dmitri Surensky's smart cinematography. This won't appeal to all comers, and as suggested there are certain limitations on who will get the most out of it, but it remains an inviting, duly absorbing picture that's as enjoyable as it is lighthearted. Whether one has a particular interest in Russian cinema, Gogol, atypical holiday flicks, or is just looking for something good to watch, 'Evenings on a farm near Dikanka' is an excellent little movie that's worth checking out.

A very atmospheric movie. In Russia, it is always shown on New Years. Real Russian winter. Great acting and storyline.

The name of film was taken from Mykola Hohol's famous tales collection. The story chosen by Aleksandr Rou exist originally in that collection under the name of "Evening before Christmas".

The tale is beautifully made to show the amazing verity of traditions in culture in the middle between Europe and Eastern part of the world. How does people managed to have fun, love, laugh and be open to each other as well as to cherish the holiday's sacred meaning . And it is obvious how Hohol wanted to show it in the best light he imagined it to be while reading story-letters from his Ukraine - rooting mother.

Disappointment hit me hard when I took a look on the most funny moments of the tale filmed by Aleksandr Rou and found it made up disgusting. So than you can't normally relate yourself to most of the characters. Maybe that is why no empathy towards characters was born in me. Speaking about actors - none of the filmed personalities hadn't found their piece of fame through the life of their . The visual part of the movie correspondingly to the era it was filmed in - nothing special behalf a Devil and man who manipulates varenyky with the help of mindforce.

Director knows how to work with hyperbola. It goes out of the picture that Ukrainians are drinking 24/7 , loud, rude people who are always hungry. It grew into nowadays stereotypes.

To sump I would rather recommend to watch it without presumption that all depicted is true but to enjoy the tradition. As for me it interesting to compare how my homeland was seen by land over the border and how I was hearing and feeling it was.