अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंAn examination of Czech-Austrian psychologist Sigmund Freud's career when he began to treat patients diagnosed with hysteria, using the radical technique of hypnosis.An examination of Czech-Austrian psychologist Sigmund Freud's career when he began to treat patients diagnosed with hysteria, using the radical technique of hypnosis.An examination of Czech-Austrian psychologist Sigmund Freud's career when he began to treat patients diagnosed with hysteria, using the radical technique of hypnosis.
- 2 ऑस्कर के लिए नामांकित
- 9 कुल नामांकन
- Herr Jacob Koertner
- (as Joseph Furst)
- Student Doctor
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
- Dr. Guber
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
- Wilkie, Student in Paris
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Clift gives a sobering, troubled performance as Freud -- perhaps because Clift, like Freud, was haunted by his own demons.
The film is in black and white which is very effective, especially in the night and dream sequences. The music and atmosphere suggest vintage TWILIGHT ZONE. This is a fascinating film which reveals Freud in a new light and makes us look at ourselves also in a new light.
which is a pity. It is much better than "The Young Freud" which has
recently been showing on PBS. It captures in some depth the
creativity and uniqueness of Freud's early discoveries, which were
amplified by him and others throughout the 20th century and into
the 21st. We see him doggedly and devotedly looking for the root
causes of a psychological illness which masqueraded as a
physical (neurological) illness for centuries. His discoveries,
stemming from this time, have greatly influenced modern thinking,
such that we call our times "The Age of Anxiety." They have led to
the appreciation of childhood sexuality and abuse and have taken
psychological abuse out from under the carpet, where these
pivotal events have been hidden for centuries. Freud was able to
see the classic appeal of the Greek tragedies and interpret why
they retain their power and are performed today, 3000 years later!
Just the mere fact that when you mention psychology and ask who is the person most associated with the field and Freud is the answer 99% of the time qualifies him to be the first man of his field. Those theories which he expounds have been challenged down through the years, but more often than not his peers are building on what he started and not just outrightly dismissing Freud.
The subject is probably too complex a one to bring to the screen for the lay person, but Huston makes a valiant effort. Huston also had Code parameters to deal with in 1962. Huston is also helped along by a great performance he coaxed out of Montgomery Clift and God knows Clift was a man by that time beset with his own demons of the mind and had seen enough of psychology as well as more addicting methods of pain control. Huston had the devil's own time with Clift, but Clift responded greatly. It was a miracle this film was finished at all.
This was Montgomery Clift's last really great film. He did a rather pedestrian spy novel The Defector four years later as his last film. That was like a tune up film for him to do before he was to start Reflections In A Golden Eye. Monty was way too gone by then and essentially just walked through that one. He should have gone out with Freud.
There are a couple of other performances of note. Sussanah York as the girl who Clift treats that really gets him thinking along the lines of sex and David McCallum as well as a mental patient who shows some interesting subliminal sexual behavior under hypnosis. Larry Parks also makes an appearance as Freud's colleague, friend, but critic in the end Joseph Breuer.
Essentially Freud is Clift's show all the way and a grand show it is. And this review is dedicated to my father Leonard S. Kogan who was most prominent in this field and had a bust of Freud along with Einstein and Washington among the bric a brac in our house as people he admired.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाJean-Paul Sartre wrote the original script at the request of director John Huston, but it was unused as it was too long. Many key elements from Jean-Paul Sartre's script survive in the finished film, such as the creation of the composite patient Cecily, who combines features of Freud's patients Anna O., Elisabeth von R., Dora, and others. After Sartre's death, his screenplay was published separately as "The Freud Scenario."
- भाव
Narrator: Since ancient times there have been three great changes in man's idea of himself. Three major blows dealt us in our vanity. Before Copernicus, we thought we were the centre of the universe, that all the heavenly bodies revolved around our Earth. But the great astronomer shattered that conceit and we were forced to admit our planet is but one of many which swing around the sun, that there are other systems beyond our solar system in myriad worlds. Before Charles Darwin man believed he was a species unto himself separate and apart from the animal kingdom. But the great biologist made us see that our physical organism is the product of a vast evolutionary process whose laws are no different for us than for any other form of animal life. Before Sigmund Freud, man believed that what he said and did were the products of his conscious will alone. But the great psychologist demonstrate the existence of another part of our mind, which functions in darkest secrecy and can even rule our lives. This is the story of Freud's descent into a region almost as black as hell itself: Man's unconscious, and how he let in the light.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनOriginally prepared at 140 minutes; cut to 120 minutes for theatrical release. Some older TV prints still use the cut version; full-length version is now available on DVD in the UK (as of 2015 there has been no domestic Region 1 DVD release.)
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Discovering Huston (2012)
टॉप पसंद
- How long is Freud?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $40,00,000(अनुमानित)
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $6,388
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 20 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1