Hon dansade en sommar

This is a simple "boy meets girl" "parents/adults don't understand us" film, but a very well done one. Ulla Jacobsson is captivating in the lead. I like her performance here better than in "Smiles of a Summer Night", although the latter is the better film. I also found "One Summer of Happiness" interesting for what it said about post-war Sweden. Well done.

This film was upon it´s release subject to much attention, not only in Sweden, but across most of Europe. This perhaps not due to any particular cineastic greatness but rather the rather candid nude swimming scene (perhaps the first in a non-adult feature film making it past the scissors of the censors) which sparked somewhat of an outcry amongst morality watchdogs.

In short, this film acted as sort of a springbord for a new wave of filmmaking in nothern Europe.

I saw the movie in Hungary with my girl friend in 1955. I was 21 years old and she was 19. My girl friend was a simple little girl who never was yet in love with anybody. She loved me very much and I started to love her after the ending of a previous affair with a girl who left me for a wealthy man. She was so similar to Kerstin. She became my Kerstin. I even called her in my mind Kerstin and those who knew us and saw the movie also called her Kerstin. (It was a very popular movie in Hungary and many people saw it). The movie had the greatest impression on us, ..even more so on me.. The story of true love. I fall in love with my Kerstin and married her a year later....49 years ago. I still love my Kerstin. I would love to buy the movie in DVD or in any other format. Could anybody help? Is it available?

Not pretentious, no loud message - just a candid slice of life at just that crucial stage when things can go very sweet and warm... or just the opposite. Ulla Jacobsson's presence carries a large slice of credit for the success of this film. Much like in 'Smiles of a summer night' (which as a musical left its own imprint via 'Send in the clowns'). Unforgettable sound track with charming folk songs. Cast very appropriately portray hypocrisy, be it social or religious - without falling into trite clichés or advocating the chaotic attack against acceptable moral norms soon to spread throughout. With due respect to those who might find it offensive, the original 'shock' caused by the brief scene of skinny dipping pales in comparison with the avalanche of loud, explicit productions that surged in the decades to follow.

As someone pointed out, it is a simple summer romance story, a college boy goes to a rural area (uncle's farm), where he falls in love with a girl. And to put spoke in their path are girl's guardians (boy's uncle is almost encouraging), and the various orthodox people, including the village Priest.

The web tells this movie was roundly condemned and even banned for nudity and anti-religious portrayal.

The nudity aspect is, at least on today's age, less than negligible, and anyway it isn't for the purpose what today's nudity, including exposures by 'A' rated actors, are meant to (titilation), so that aspect, if any one tries to watch it for, is going to be disappointed.

The other aspect, probably what gave rise to its allround condemnation (compounded by the nudity) was its portrayal of Church/ Clergy in negative light and making the Priest as the Villain of the story.

This on surface seems to be merited, but isn't really. Though one must note that in all the major accidents in the movie, the Priest was involved. But it would be wrong to say that he deliberately engineered them.

Here the clash was between, Freedom and Bondage. The right to live and love is freedom. Love need not necessarily be sin, as one of the protagonists mentions. The aspect of morality IMHO makes the difference - heart and flesh. The Bondage on the life is put by Religion - and in fact not really by it, but by the orthodox and pedagogical misinterpretations, which really the movie tried to depict. These misinterpretations - the pedagogical part, is due to the Priest (and in fact in real life many of them) didn't understand the underlying message and took it by word values, and the orthodoxy comes many times due to the complexity of the persons (the cousin who is slowly crossing the age) or the aunt (probably due to the child-lessness?) and as a result, not only the sermons are wrongly delivered, but also wrongly interpreted (which led to barn burning, despite the Priest never intended anything like that to happen, the 'fire and damnation' in the mind of the mentally challenged disciple led to that). The movie still provokes thoughts even in today's society, since the orthodoxy and bonds put by various widely misinterpreted religions are still there and are still making sins of virtue, victims of innocents., even condoning murders (e.g. case of Dr. Savita Halappanavar - death or murder ?) - the defense logic is always the same, as in this movie, some times harsh decisions are taken by Him, or examples made of, so that the flock don't stray - only the question remains, was that decision by Him, or his mis-ministers ?