अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंStory of the legendary trotting horse Dan Patch.Story of the legendary trotting horse Dan Patch.Story of the legendary trotting horse Dan Patch.
Stanley Blystone
- Chris - Work Crew Foreman
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Everett Brown
- Stablehand
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Bill Cartledge
- Telegram Boy
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Jack Cheatham
- Minnesota State Fair Racing Official
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Earle Hodgins
- Driver
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Ralph Montgomery
- Driver
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Davis Roberts
- Smiler
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Douglas Spencer
- Boswell County Fair Racing Official
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
A good family film with a lovely performance from Gail Russell. It is a fine film for race fans. It will entertain the younger set also.
Surprisingly good.
Gail Russell is always wonderful and she's fine in this. She's one of the best. When you think how she died at such a young age from alcoholism, it's tragic. (For more details on her life, see the 12-minute documentary about her on the DVD release of Seven Men from Now.)
She's the main reason I went looking for this movie, and I wasn't disappointed.
Any movie with some of my favorite actors all working in the same scene is worth watching. Seeing John Hoyt, Henry Hull, and Gail Russell in several scenes together...a delight.
The movie's also got Ruth Warrick (the wife in Citizen Kane), Charlotte Greenwood, Dennis O'Keefe, Arthur Honeycutt, Clarence Muse, Harry Lauter, Davis Roberts, and Earle Hodgins in a tiny role (one line)--all of them among my favorites and all of them highly enjoyable.
The story's not bad and those performances are first rate.
One of the only drawbacks is a typical one of the times when this was made: the black characters are all subservient, but they were at least treated by the other characters and by the story itself with respect and they've got some depth of character to play.
The script gets a little preachy toward the end, laying in a message about a mismatched marriage, and it's a message we've already gotten in this story well before the ending.
One thing really stands out in the performances, something true to the era the story's set in, the late 1890s and early 1900s. People in those days held a lot back, they didn't just gush their emotions out. And the actors are subtle. They hold back a lot. The first scene between father and son (Hull and O'Keefe) is impressive. The joy at their reunion is there, but they keep it inside and don't make a show of it. Same with the relationship between the trainer and his daughter (Hoyt and Russell): restrained, but full of unspoken words and emotions. All the characters perform with the same restraint, the same modulation. The director, Joseph Newman, must've had a hand in that.
Satisfying family fare.
Gail Russell is always wonderful and she's fine in this. She's one of the best. When you think how she died at such a young age from alcoholism, it's tragic. (For more details on her life, see the 12-minute documentary about her on the DVD release of Seven Men from Now.)
She's the main reason I went looking for this movie, and I wasn't disappointed.
Any movie with some of my favorite actors all working in the same scene is worth watching. Seeing John Hoyt, Henry Hull, and Gail Russell in several scenes together...a delight.
The movie's also got Ruth Warrick (the wife in Citizen Kane), Charlotte Greenwood, Dennis O'Keefe, Arthur Honeycutt, Clarence Muse, Harry Lauter, Davis Roberts, and Earle Hodgins in a tiny role (one line)--all of them among my favorites and all of them highly enjoyable.
The story's not bad and those performances are first rate.
One of the only drawbacks is a typical one of the times when this was made: the black characters are all subservient, but they were at least treated by the other characters and by the story itself with respect and they've got some depth of character to play.
The script gets a little preachy toward the end, laying in a message about a mismatched marriage, and it's a message we've already gotten in this story well before the ending.
One thing really stands out in the performances, something true to the era the story's set in, the late 1890s and early 1900s. People in those days held a lot back, they didn't just gush their emotions out. And the actors are subtle. They hold back a lot. The first scene between father and son (Hull and O'Keefe) is impressive. The joy at their reunion is there, but they keep it inside and don't make a show of it. Same with the relationship between the trainer and his daughter (Hoyt and Russell): restrained, but full of unspoken words and emotions. All the characters perform with the same restraint, the same modulation. The director, Joseph Newman, must've had a hand in that.
Satisfying family fare.
"The Great Dan Patch" is not the sort of film I would normally watch. While some people absolutely adore horses and movies about them, I really don't care much for them one way or the other. I mostly watched it because I like Dennis O'Keefe and he stars in this one.
I had never heard of Dan Patch and didn't realize what an amazing horse he was. Apparently, he had the distinction of being an unbeaten horse in trotting races....something that seems impossible. He was so dominant that after a while they couldn't get horses to race against him! This movie is a biography which plays a bit fast and loose with the facts....with about as much truth as Hollywood in the story. So, if you only want the full and true story, read up on Dan Patch...don't watch the movie!
The story is essentially about the horse but told much more about the horse's owner and the owner's son, David (O'Keefe). Most of the story centers not on Patch's life and career but on David's marriage to an ornery woman (Ruth Warrick)...and another woman (Gail Russell) who secretly loved him. In support are some excellent actors--Henry Hull, John Hoyt and Clarence Muse.
So is it any good? Well, it is entertaining and the acting is nice....but it IS about horses. So, if you love 'em, see the film. If you're more ambivalent (like me), it's pretty skippable.
I had never heard of Dan Patch and didn't realize what an amazing horse he was. Apparently, he had the distinction of being an unbeaten horse in trotting races....something that seems impossible. He was so dominant that after a while they couldn't get horses to race against him! This movie is a biography which plays a bit fast and loose with the facts....with about as much truth as Hollywood in the story. So, if you only want the full and true story, read up on Dan Patch...don't watch the movie!
The story is essentially about the horse but told much more about the horse's owner and the owner's son, David (O'Keefe). Most of the story centers not on Patch's life and career but on David's marriage to an ornery woman (Ruth Warrick)...and another woman (Gail Russell) who secretly loved him. In support are some excellent actors--Henry Hull, John Hoyt and Clarence Muse.
So is it any good? Well, it is entertaining and the acting is nice....but it IS about horses. So, if you love 'em, see the film. If you're more ambivalent (like me), it's pretty skippable.
What Man O' War was to flat thoroughbred racing Dan Patch was to the sport of harness racing. During the Teddy Roosevelt era in our history this horse was a much a sports hero as Christy Mathewson or John L. Sullivan. He retired undefeated and as the film shows many of his races were simply against the clock as he tried to beat his own pacing speed records which stood for many years.
But the film The Great Dan Patch is about his original owners who bred and trained him and the trouble that one of them had with the women in his life. Dennis O'Keefe who was raised on an Indiana farm by father Henry Hull and aunt Charlotte Greenwood had a love of horses, but also a love of science. He patented some chemistry formulas and became wealthy. However two women are in love with O'Keefe. Gail Russell who is the daughter of Dan Patch's original trainer John Hoyt and Ruth Warrick who is the town school teacher.
O'Keefe's life would have been real simple had he married Russell who shares his interest in horses. But Warrick marries a man who will allow her to live and circulate in high society. She's got an interesting part, it's almost like O'Keefe married the grandmother of Harriet Craig.
If you're expecting a Secretariat like movie with the emphasis on the horse, this will not be the film for you. The Great Dan Patch just keeps on winning harness races as the humans around him make great big mistakes in their personal lives.
It's a decent film, but I would like to have seen more of the horse.
But the film The Great Dan Patch is about his original owners who bred and trained him and the trouble that one of them had with the women in his life. Dennis O'Keefe who was raised on an Indiana farm by father Henry Hull and aunt Charlotte Greenwood had a love of horses, but also a love of science. He patented some chemistry formulas and became wealthy. However two women are in love with O'Keefe. Gail Russell who is the daughter of Dan Patch's original trainer John Hoyt and Ruth Warrick who is the town school teacher.
O'Keefe's life would have been real simple had he married Russell who shares his interest in horses. But Warrick marries a man who will allow her to live and circulate in high society. She's got an interesting part, it's almost like O'Keefe married the grandmother of Harriet Craig.
If you're expecting a Secretariat like movie with the emphasis on the horse, this will not be the film for you. The Great Dan Patch just keeps on winning harness races as the humans around him make great big mistakes in their personal lives.
It's a decent film, but I would like to have seen more of the horse.
I got this movie in a package and thought that it did not look like anything that I would like. I'd never seen Dennis O'Keefe, who is quite watchable... He plays a pretty good role, as does Ruth Warwick as his highly unlikeable, social climbing wife... Lots of good character parts, although the woman that Dennis thinks of leaving his wife for is a bit on the boring side, tho true blue. This is no Seabiscuit, and there are no huge surprises; however, for a fluff movie, the issues of divorce and possible adultery are quite intriguing (for the era). So you see, I thought the movie was much more about the people. I can't quite tell if my comments look as if I liked the movie or not... I did like the movie.
क्या आपको पता है
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Ride a Reckless Mile
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनी
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 34 मि(94 min)
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.37 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें