अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंSpurned by the married county attorney she loves, the wife of a newspaperman tries every trick to lift her husband into a political career at the expense of her would-be lover and the she-la... सभी पढ़ेंSpurned by the married county attorney she loves, the wife of a newspaperman tries every trick to lift her husband into a political career at the expense of her would-be lover and the she-lawyer he illicitly falls for.Spurned by the married county attorney she loves, the wife of a newspaperman tries every trick to lift her husband into a political career at the expense of her would-be lover and the she-lawyer he illicitly falls for.
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 1 जीत
Erville Alderson
- Sam
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Brandon Beach
- Party Guest
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Guy Beach
- Hack Driver
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Oliver Blake
- Mr. Reynolds
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Chet Brandenburg
- Juror
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
John Breen
- Trial Spectator
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Holy Marcel! What a soap opera! Going into this film, you would think this was a film with Cornel Wilde and Kirk Douglas battling each other. Not at all. Its about the ladies - and they are magnificent.
First there is dipsomaniac Ann Dvorac. She is stuck in an unhappy marriage with Wilde, but won't let him go.
Then there is Anne Baxter. She has loved Wilde since childhood. Wilde falls in love with her. Its 1910. They can't do anything about it.
Then there is Linda Darnell. She is married to Kirk Douglas. He is Wolfe's former best friend and thanks to his ambitious wife, his political rival. She also loves Wilde, but when he rebufs her advances she wants revenge. She does this through ambition, gossip and slander. She accomplishes all this with subtlety, which makes her twice as dangerous.
Of course this all ends up going in circles. What do they do in soap operas to keep the drama going? Throw in a murder trial and a shooting!
All three ladies are stunning in appearance, style and performances. Kirk Douglas doesn't bother fighting for a place or even seem to question, "What's Cornell got that I haven't?"
First there is dipsomaniac Ann Dvorac. She is stuck in an unhappy marriage with Wilde, but won't let him go.
Then there is Anne Baxter. She has loved Wilde since childhood. Wilde falls in love with her. Its 1910. They can't do anything about it.
Then there is Linda Darnell. She is married to Kirk Douglas. He is Wolfe's former best friend and thanks to his ambitious wife, his political rival. She also loves Wilde, but when he rebufs her advances she wants revenge. She does this through ambition, gossip and slander. She accomplishes all this with subtlety, which makes her twice as dangerous.
Of course this all ends up going in circles. What do they do in soap operas to keep the drama going? Throw in a murder trial and a shooting!
All three ladies are stunning in appearance, style and performances. Kirk Douglas doesn't bother fighting for a place or even seem to question, "What's Cornell got that I haven't?"
In spite of the title ,the movie has nothing to do with Joshua and the Bible ;it's closer to film noir than to melodrama ,like "leave her to heaven " which already featured Cornel Wilde ; but in spite of its high rating , it cannot be mentioned in the same breath as the Stahl /Wilde/Gene Tierney's tour de force in 1946 ;even "the foxes of Harrow (1947) had a better screenplay .
It pits Wilde /Baxter 's idealism against Darnell/Douglas' careerism ;in consequence,the movie really takes place in the second part of the movie, when poor Marjorie might be sacrificed to political ambitions : here the movie thoroughly belongs to Anne Baxter ,who alone against the world of the high and the mighty ,shows an unexpected stamina and strength of character :at a time when ,most of the time, women had minor roles in the courts of justice ,the movie can be considered ,from that point of view, a successful effort.
It pits Wilde /Baxter 's idealism against Darnell/Douglas' careerism ;in consequence,the movie really takes place in the second part of the movie, when poor Marjorie might be sacrificed to political ambitions : here the movie thoroughly belongs to Anne Baxter ,who alone against the world of the high and the mighty ,shows an unexpected stamina and strength of character :at a time when ,most of the time, women had minor roles in the courts of justice ,the movie can be considered ,from that point of view, a successful effort.
Cornel Wilde is a county attorney married to alcoholic Ann Dvorak. Wilde's best friend is firebrand newspaper editor Kirk Douglas. Kirk returns to town after a lengthy trip with new bride Linda Darnell in tow. She's a gorgeous society lady who immediately takes a liking to Cornel, but those affections aren't returned by the stoic Wilde. Linda doesn't appreciate the rebuff and sets out to undermine Cornel in any way she can, pushing him away from his friendship with Douglas, and even sabotaging his nascent political career. Cornel is also falling for nice-girl attorney Anne Baxter, but they won't consummate their affair due to Cornel's marriage.
This was based on a novel by Paul Wellman, and it has that slightly clunky feel of a larger work having been whittled down to fit a feature-length script. Certain secondary characters, like those of Henry Hull and Marjorie Rambeau, don't amount to much in the finished work. That being said, I liked this more than most soapy dramas of the time, and all of the leads turn in excellent work. Darnell gives one of her best performances as the scheming manipulator. She's sporting lighter-than-usual hair (blonde? redhead? It's B&W), but she's still beautiful. Dvorak's role is complicated, and while it's smaller than the others, it, too, is one of her best. Wilde is broad-shouldered and quietly dignified, and Douglas, in only his second film, does what he can with a slightly secondary part.
This was based on a novel by Paul Wellman, and it has that slightly clunky feel of a larger work having been whittled down to fit a feature-length script. Certain secondary characters, like those of Henry Hull and Marjorie Rambeau, don't amount to much in the finished work. That being said, I liked this more than most soapy dramas of the time, and all of the leads turn in excellent work. Darnell gives one of her best performances as the scheming manipulator. She's sporting lighter-than-usual hair (blonde? redhead? It's B&W), but she's still beautiful. Dvorak's role is complicated, and while it's smaller than the others, it, too, is one of her best. Wilde is broad-shouldered and quietly dignified, and Douglas, in only his second film, does what he can with a slightly secondary part.
Cornell Wilde is the county attorney in the small Kansas town of Jericho. His best friend is Kirk Douglas, the editor of the local newspaper. Wilde is running for Congress, but the appearance of Anne Baxter, who left town a child and has come back a lawyer, stops Wilde from running. He does not wish to go to Washington with his always angry wife, Ann Dvorak. Instead, Douglas and his gossipy wife, Linda Darnell go to Congress, and Miss Baxter leaves for Kansas City rather than begin a "tawdry, backstreet affair." But when Colleen Townsend is accused of murdering a man in Jericho. Miss Baxter calls in Wilde to get her back to Jericho and assist in the defense.... despite the gossip.
It's director John Stahl's last tear jerker, a genre he excelled in in the 1930s. He would round off his career with two light comedies and die in 1950 at the age of 63. At first I wondered why Stahl had been the choice for this movie, instead of 20th Century-Fox's resident master of small-town life, Henry King. The answer soon became clear. The set pieces that open the movie are looks at the neighborhoods and relationships during the Mauve Decade that offer edgy, disapproving looks at the small-minded and evilly gossipy people who make the venue a purgatory, even as sentimental songs come out of Victrolas and pianolas. Stahl excelled in the portrayal of nastiness under the calm facade. King liked small towns.
I didn't enjoy the movie much. This sort of weeper has never been my cup of tea, and the big ending with a trial, a shooting, and Wilde lying in a hospital bed, possibly dying (surely not in a Hollywood movie!) was way over the top for me. But there's no arguing that Stahl's acerbic attitude toward the "nice" people is on full display here.
It's director John Stahl's last tear jerker, a genre he excelled in in the 1930s. He would round off his career with two light comedies and die in 1950 at the age of 63. At first I wondered why Stahl had been the choice for this movie, instead of 20th Century-Fox's resident master of small-town life, Henry King. The answer soon became clear. The set pieces that open the movie are looks at the neighborhoods and relationships during the Mauve Decade that offer edgy, disapproving looks at the small-minded and evilly gossipy people who make the venue a purgatory, even as sentimental songs come out of Victrolas and pianolas. Stahl excelled in the portrayal of nastiness under the calm facade. King liked small towns.
I didn't enjoy the movie much. This sort of weeper has never been my cup of tea, and the big ending with a trial, a shooting, and Wilde lying in a hospital bed, possibly dying (surely not in a Hollywood movie!) was way over the top for me. But there's no arguing that Stahl's acerbic attitude toward the "nice" people is on full display here.
This is a very local soap opera in a small town in the midwest where everyone knows everybody and boredom is escaped by garden parties and rural balls with pianolas, while there is some trouble brewing under the surface. The county attorney Cornel Wilde is married to Ann Dvorak, an alcoholic, and the leading town nespaper man Kirk Douglas brings a bombshell beauty for a wife to town called Linda Darnell. She outshines everyone else and is the most dangerous of all. Gradually Anne Baxter sails up to challenge her in the last moment, but then this surprisingly good film has already advanced into high gear drama ending up in a murder trial.
At first you will suspect that the argument will be about drinking problems, especially as Kirk makes an issue of it in his paper and Cornel's wife never shows herself except when drunk. Neither couple has any children. Kirk is the one who at an early stage wonders why any man should ever marry a woman, and his question proves reasonable, when it is all too late.
Alfred Newman provides the music, always amazingly reliably excellent, and the environment of a small midwest very conventional town around 1910 is endearingly charming. You will be surprised to find such a small local world being able to come up with such a very intriguing drama.
At first you will suspect that the argument will be about drinking problems, especially as Kirk makes an issue of it in his paper and Cornel's wife never shows herself except when drunk. Neither couple has any children. Kirk is the one who at an early stage wonders why any man should ever marry a woman, and his question proves reasonable, when it is all too late.
Alfred Newman provides the music, always amazingly reliably excellent, and the environment of a small midwest very conventional town around 1910 is endearingly charming. You will be surprised to find such a small local world being able to come up with such a very intriguing drama.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाGene Tierney was originally cast as Julia Norman.
- भाव
Julia Norman: You do a lot of things well, David. Lying is not one of them.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is The Walls of Jericho?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Zidovi Jerihona
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनी
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 46 मि(106 min)
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.37 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें