अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA wealthy young man from Yorkshire visits a London nightclub and meets a performer. She decides to take him for every penny he is worth, and he lets her.A wealthy young man from Yorkshire visits a London nightclub and meets a performer. She decides to take him for every penny he is worth, and he lets her.A wealthy young man from Yorkshire visits a London nightclub and meets a performer. She decides to take him for every penny he is worth, and he lets her.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- Arkwright
- (as John Glyn Jones)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
In Value for Money, Dors plays glamourous singer and actress Ruthine West who gets enticed up to Batley to open a children's play area.
The cause for her relocation from chic London is Chayley Broadbent (John Gregson) who has inherited his father's textile fortune. Like his later father Chayley is a miser who watches the pennies. His long suffering fiancée Ethel, a local journalist wants Chayley to go to London to enjoy himself and find a purpose away from his father's penny pinching ways. He finds Ruthine in a show instead and instantly falls in love with her.
So Chayley, Ruthine and Ethel are in Batley. Ruthine hates the grim Yorkshire industrial town but likes Chayley's money. Ethel hangs around patiently for Chayley to come to his senses.
Value for Money is a colourful light romantic comedy, with a couple of nice musical numbers.
Chayley is a shallow fool who is always hearing his late father's muttering about not driving a hard enough bargain. It is a bit of froth and fun. Dors does look slim and sexy. It is a mildly entertaining movie with dated views on women.
Miss Dors (who at one point dives into a swimming pool in a bikini, plainly doubled for the dive itself, and emerging from the water her blonde mane still dry & set) demonstrates she sure knew how to spend money in those long-ago days when a seven-bedroom timbered house in the North of England cost a eye-watering £5,800.
Gregson's accent is not that of a Batley (Barfield) resident but whether he could have managed it or not, the real thing might have been too much for most UK audiences leave alone those in the rest of the world.
The film portrays a few stereotypes; the Yorkshire folk who are pretty straightforward but 'careful' with money and those in London, many of whom are little better than two-faced thieves by comparison. They could easily have gone further, but they went far enough as it was. I found the interjections of Chaley's deceased father rather funny, but not that much else was any more than pleasantly amusing. The scenes in which Diana Dors (real name 'Fluck', which was understandably changed "should one of the bulbs go out when my name is in lights") appears in public and generates a major stir are probably quite realistic; at the time she was a star/sex symbol on the up (amongst other things there were 3-D nude photos of her published the previous year) and this film was one of five she did that was released in 1955.
If you like Britsh comedies of the period, have a local connection to Batley, or are a big Gregson or Dors fan, this should certainly be seen. For others it is still well worth viewing just for Unsworth's excellent photography and as something of a period piece.
I think that they need to relax a bit.
The film is a comedy that pokes fun on males, females, northerners and southerners alike.
Beautifully photographed and well acted, but really not to be taken seriously.
Two scenes stand out.
Firstly when the errant husband's return from their jolly in the capital and the wives await.
The camera pans along the coach as one by one the male passengers wipe the condensation from the window and view the reception committee.
Dramatic irony at its finest, followed by a wide panoramic shot as each emerging man is seized by the collar and frog marched away like naughty children, with the attending threat:Wait till I get you home!
The second is the scene later that day when Chayley proclaims to Ethel that Ruthin is the most "beautiful woman he has ever seen" ;followed by reassuring his fiance that She (Ruth in) is not for me. She is an ideal placed upon a pedestal.
One does not have to be Einstein to figure out what the reaction will be.
Enjoy John Gregson as the hapless Chayley, Diana Dors in her dazzling prime with great support from the ever excellent and sadly underrated Susan Stephen.
And wallow in world long gone.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThird feature film of Donald Pleasence.
- भाव
[at the mill, before Broadbent's funeral, the employees are speculating on the size of his estate]
Mr. Hall: How much d'you think he's left?
Duke Popplewell: Well, if he'd been in shoddy, I should have said about...
Duke Popplewell: [whispers, confidentially] ... a hundred and fifty thousand.
Duke Popplewell: But seeing as how he were only a rag merchant...
Duke Popplewell: [whispers, confidentially] ... not more than forty thousand.
Mr. Hall: Get away with you! I bet it's not a penny less than...
Mr. Hall: [whispers, confidentially] fifty thousand.
Duke Popplewell: No, never!
Mr. Hall: Eh, Limpy?
Limpy: I'm with the family. I'm not saying anything. But...
[Limpy checks that he can't be overheard]
Limpy: ...I'll wager young Chayley'll double it before his turn comes to lie there.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटOpening credits prologue: BARFIELD, YORKSHIRE, IS NO BEAUTY. ITS PRIDE ARE ITS "RAG AND SHODDY" WOOL TRADES
IT FIRMLY BELIEVES THAT WHERE THERE'S MUCK THERE'S MONEY
IT HAS PLENTY OF BOTH
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Remembering John Gregson (2019)
- साउंडट्रैकToys for Boys
Music by John Pritchett
Words by Peter Myers and Alec Grahame
Arranged and Danced by Paddy Stone Irving Davies
टॉप पसंद
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Lieber reich - aber glücklich
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 30 मिनट