Genbaku no ko

Takako Ishikawa (Nobuko Otowa), a young kindergarten teacher, reconnects with pupils and friends in Hiroshima four years after the city was demolished by an atomic bomb*. The film is a moving commentary of the consequences of nuclear weapons, especially on children, and wisely that is where the emphasis lies - not on the moral and strategic debates pertaining to their use in 1945. There is a brief recreation of the detonation of the bomb, with searing images of people and animals dying, but most of the film is about the people Ishikawa visits as she wanders through the slowly rebuilding city, such as an scarred and blind beggar who was a former employee of her father, a former pupil dying of radiation-induced illness, a young woman crippled in the explosion, and another young woman sterilized by ionizing radiation. Directed by Kaneto Shindo (who would later direct the creepy 'Onibaba' (1964)) with music by Akira Ifukube (of 'Gojira' (1954) fame), the film is touching and tragic. Otowa is excellent as the sweet, soft-spoken young teacher who serves to connect the stories. 'Children of Hiroshima' was the first of two 'anti-war' films sponsored by The Japan Teachers Union. Apparently not satisfied with the product, the union commissioned the second film, simply entitled 'Hiroshima' (1953) and directed by Hideo Sekigawa, which is much more epic, with many scenes of crowds of badly burned survivors stumbling through devastated streets to the river and the final shots of tens of thousands of people congregating in The Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park. Shindo's film is much more low-key and personal, as the camera follows the young teacher as she vicariously experiences the suffering of the survivors. Both are excellent 'docu-dramas' but I found Shindo's film to be more affecting, perhaps because the interactions between Ishikawa and the piteous survivors were so well done. Like most films intended to deliver a message, 'Children of Hiroshima' is not subtle, but it is beautifully made, memorable, and well worth watching. Perhaps films like this contributed to the fact that, despite their proliferation, nuclear weapons have never again been used in a military conflict. *Comments pertain to the English-subtitled version shown on TCM in 2020 (the 75th anniversary of the bombing).

Nobuko Otowa lives on a small, beautiful island in the house of her uncle, but she grew up in Hiroshima and taught kindergarten there. She returns to her home town to lay flowers on the graves of her parents in the blasted cemetery and see the children she taught. She encounters Osamu Takizawa. Once he was her father's employee. Now, scarred and blinded by the A-Bomb, he ekes out a living, caring only about his parentless grandson.

Confronted with a movie about the consequences of the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima, my urge is to write about Operation Downfall, its US armed forces casualties estimated at between half a million and a million dead, and two to four million wounded; Japan's Operation Ketsugo, its propaganda campaign of "One Hundred Million Deaths For The Emperor!"; and other factors that made dropping the Bomb not just a political necessity, but an issue of saving lives.

However, Kaneto Shindô's film isn't about the big picture. It's about the tragedy of a small boy who refuses to leave his grandfather. The A-bomb isn't a racist plot by Americans to kill Japanese. It, like war, are monsters that kill people for no reason whatsoever. Blinded old men, fatherless children, women rendered sterile are the lucky ones.

It's been six years since teacher "Takako Ishiwaka" (Nobuko Otowa) lost her parents in the Hiroshima blast and she is now planning on returning to the city to visit friends and to remember her family. On arrival, she stays with "Natsue Morikawa" (Miwa Saitô) who has been rendered infertile by the toxic after-effects of the explosion. This is where this emotionally heart-rending story starts. She explores what's left of the city only to discover that in many areas, a remarkable regeneration has occurred. In others, though, people are living an hand-to-mouth existence and that includes her father's former colleague "Iwakichi" (Osamu Takizawa) who is all but blind and living amongst the ruins whilst his grandchild lives in a nearby orphanage. She is informed that a few of her own fellow school pupils have also survived and so visits them - providing director Kaneto Shindô with an opportunity to present us with three different examples of post-war life and of the resignation, stoicism and maybe even slight optimism of those starting to rebuild - whilst they all turn nervously to the sky when they hear an aircraft overhead. Accompanied by some flashbacks to happier times, this tells a touching story of people whose lives, and in many cases beliefs, have been utterly destroyed. Their infrastructure is gone - physically and psychologically, yet she epitomises a decency and the imagery cannot help but engender a sense of pity from anyone watching. No, it doesn't put this into any form of context with the abhorrent behaviour of the troops who fought in their name elsewhere, so no real attempt is made to politicise the situation. It's more a series of personal tales that do quite succinctly bring home the true horrors of the original weapon of mass destruction and of human resilience.

Largely overlooked today, this was one of the first films made during the Allied occupation after WW2.

Very powerful in its content, it shows the devastation caused by the Atomic bomb, and by use of a fictional storyline, portrays the struggle of the ordinary Japanese people in dealing with the aftermath.

I last saw this film in 1976 and it is still vivid in my memory.

As a narrative this film is not particularly strong, but its context is of course extraordinary. Made seven years after the war just after the American occupation had ended, it dramatizes, and more importantly humanizes, the horrible consequences of the bombing of Hiroshima. It has a kindergarten teacher returning to that city to see the three students of her old class who survived, and paying her respects to family members who perished. The scenes where she is standing in ruins, remembering bygone events of happier times, or looking up into the sky or down at the river, are particularly poignant. To see the city itself in 1952 is fascinating, to see the people (even dramatized by actors) heartbreaking. The film wisely steers clear of the complicated question of whether dropping the bomb was necessary, and I think that's how it ought to be viewed; it simply shows us that in war, innocent people suffer, and in the new atomic age, in unprecedented ways, far larger and more monstrous than ever before. It's stunning to me that this was not seen in America until 2011.