अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंThe former partner of an underworld boss turns himself in to Scotland Yard. The criminal, a master of disguise, plots to kill his partner, but must first get through the wall of security Sco... सभी पढ़ेंThe former partner of an underworld boss turns himself in to Scotland Yard. The criminal, a master of disguise, plots to kill his partner, but must first get through the wall of security Scotland Yard has thrown around him.The former partner of an underworld boss turns himself in to Scotland Yard. The criminal, a master of disguise, plots to kill his partner, but must first get through the wall of security Scotland Yard has thrown around him.
- Minor Role
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
- Sniffy Offer
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
- Number 39
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
- Cadet with Question
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
- Number 23
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
- Policeman
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
- Waiter
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
- Customer in Night Club
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
It was too bad that they decided to inject humor into the movie. I dislike the 30's and 40's habit of mixing mystery and comedy on both sides of the Atlantic, but Hollywood does it better. Harker's mumbled asides were extremely funny (listen for them), but the film's sight gags were too obvious and poorly timed.
The story involves a mysterious figure known as The Frog who has a gang of criminals to pull off his villainy, and whose identity is unknown until 15 minutes to go in the film. By the way, disregard the plot synopsis at the top of the IMDb credits, as it isn't even close to the real story. It begins as an American detective from Chicago arrives at the Yard to learn about new police work techniques, and becomes an assistant to Elk. You take it from there. There were no noteworthy actors to my knowledge, save for Una O'Connor but without her trademark shrieking scene.
Return of the Frog was a very worthwhile 75 minutes. Allow for its age and feeble attempts at humor and you have a rating of 7 - and you might not guess the identity of the Frog.
It's a sequel to The Frog, and may strike you as similar to the trio of "Inspector Hornleigh" movies that Harker also starred in, albeit without Alastair Sim for comic relief. There's a simple reason for that relationship: they're all based on works by Edgar Wallace. If you're familiar with the Edgar Wallace series from the 1960s, you'll find this one a bit cozier, with fewer of the gothic elements from the German film makers later on. Director Maurice Elvey reuses sequences from his Sherlock Holmes movies from the 1920s, most obviously in a long sequence set on the Thames.
The copy I saw has a slightly compromised soundtrack that made a lot of the chitchat difficult to follow.
Mum Oak's riverside bar is a great setting with it's stable door type entrance a few feet away from the lapping water of the River Thames. Inside is a cupboard safe and a back door that leads to a yard and a cellar convenient to carry out secret activities. Mum Oaks (Una O'Connor) is a fence who is well known to Inspector Elk and she is in with other dubious characters like Captain Dutchy and Dandy Lane. She treats her brother Golly in a harsh manner and all of the people at Mum Oaks' place come across as 1930s contemporary updates of Dickensian characters.
Inspector Elk is usually attired in a grubby raincoat and carries a brolly which he uses to rap on doors. He never knows whether he can trust Chicago Dale or not. He is under constant threat from such things as an exploding phone box and poison gas vapors disguised as London fog and a booby-trapped river police boat. Fortunately he carries a gas mask when he is trapped in Mum Oaks' cellar that is filling with poison gas. This is a good entertaining mystery filled with incidents.
I maybe over selling this movie by giving it a ten out of ten, but few of the mysteries of the time make me laugh, smile and sit on the edge of my seat the way this one does. This one has everything in abundance, chases, fights, smart ass lines, romance, and best of all genuine mystery, something most mysteries of the period are lacking. There is only one false note in the entire film and that is the performance of the Frog when he's revealed in the final moments.
No, its not the best movie ever made, there are "problems" with it that would keep it from being a "perfect" film, but I'm not looking for a perfect film. I, like most people I know, tend to watch the old mysteries for a feel that they engender, its not the mystery or acting but a place that they take you to and this one has it in spades. It feels like an old friend even when you're only just seeing it. Its a movie from a simpler time when the heroes were good, and the villains were bad and even though you know in the back of your head it will come out okay, you still sense that anything can and will happen. Its the old mystery you might have made had you had the chance to do so way back when.
Put this on my list of all time favorites, its destined to become a well worn DVD.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाFirst film of Charles Victor.
- भाव
Maggs: There's a bloke been waiting to see you for over an hour.
Inspector Elk: Who is it?
Maggs: Sanford's the name - from Chicago. Place in America near that there 'Ollywood.
टॉप पसंद
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- The Return of the Frog
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनी
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 13 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.37 : 1