I See a Dark Stranger

I SEE A DARK STRANGER depends heavily on the central performance of DEBORAH KERR to carry its story about a naive young Irish woman who has grown up hating the British, thanks to her father's romanticized view of the Irish rebellion. She travels to Ireland to volunteer her services as a spy for the IRA, is promptly rebuffed and reminded that "things are neutral now", but is spotted by RAYMOND HUNTLEY who wants to use her services for his own espionage purposes.

What's so wonderful about the film, called THE ADVENTURESS in the U.S., is that it combines humor with drama, mystery and suspense, always with Kerr's strong performance as Bridie Quilty as the center of attention. Kerr uses her facial expressions expertly, especially in close-ups where we can actually see what she is thinking. It's a performance on par with her work in BLACK NARCISSUS, where close-ups allowed her to fully reveal a character's intentions and motivations.

TREVOR HOWARD is the Englishman instantly attracted to her who gradually comes to understand that she's involved in something way beyond her scope and is soon just as involved in all the intrigue as she is. There are unexpected twists and turns throughout and some very droll moments of comedy when a funeral procession turns out to be something quite unexpected.

The weaknesses only are apparent during the last fifteen minutes with an extended fight scene that borders on slapstick before Kerr and Howard are allowed a quieter moment of romance. And then the final zinger involving a hotel sign that infuriates Kerr--but I'll let that remain hidden so you can enjoy the moment.

Summing up: Highly satisfactory British film which won Deborah Kerr a N.Y. Film Critics Award as Best Actress in 1947--also for BLACK NARCISSUS.

Trivia note: David TOMLINSON and JOAN HICKSON both have brief roles, but you have to be awfully quick to catch a glimpse of Hickson.

'I See a Dark Stranger' was another film that sounded right up my alley, really loved the idea for the story and the film's genre mix sounded like the genres would go well together and not clash. Also have always really liked Deborah Kerr, two of my favourite performances of hers being in 'The King and I' and 'Black Narcissus' and wanted to see how she would fare in an early role. Trevor Howard has also been good in other things, 'Brief Encounter' is still a favourite and one of the most moving films ever made.

Although a lot of things work here, 'I See a Dark Stranger' doesn't completely succeed. It is not a waste of potential, a long way from that, but it is a case of great potential not being fully realised. Which was a little disappointing but not in a way that frustrated me massively. If you like Kerr, you'll like it. If you like the idea for the story and this mix of genres, you should mostly like it with reservations. If you like Howard, it's best to look elsewhere as to me this was not a great representation of him.

Will start with the good, which are many, quite big and outweigh the not so good. 'I See a Dark Stranger' is a very well made film visually, especially the photography which is both luminous and atmosphere. Which particularly excels in the more suspenseful scenes and how it captures Kerr, who the camera clearly loves. William Alwyn's score is typically moody without being too melodramatic while the direction is mostly very skilled until petering out at the end. The script is mostly quite sophisticated and thoughtful, with touches of witty humour.

The story generally compels, with some nice suspense, no over-obviousness and turns that aren't too convoluted. Plausibility is not always a strong suit but it is on the most part diverting and solidly paced. Kerr looks beautiful and is both feisty and dignified. The supporting cast are solid.

For all those good things, there are things that could have been better. Am going to agree with those disappointed in the final 20 minutes, which were too farcical and didn't fit with the tone of the rest of the film. Another big problem for me was Howard, who is disappointingly taciturn.

His romantic chemistry with Kerr wasn't really there either and lacked spark, and a big part of it was down to Howard and his character being underdeveloped. A shame because all the other tones are there and balanced quite well.

Concluding, well done generally but there was room for it to have been better. 7/10

This movie has something for every taste and could fall into several classifications. In addition to the website heading of Drama, Thriller and War it could also be a Comedy, Adventure or even a Film Noir. It is very entertaining and characteristically well done under the Launder-Gilliat banner.

I think, though, that it could have a higher rating if it could have decided exactly which genre it should fall under. It is an absorbing picture until, at a very inopportune moment it decides to inject a bit of humor into a scene, thereby killing the mood as well as the tension. I wished it had taken itself seriously as it could have been and excellent WWII spy picture. As is, it is a good enough as a comedy/drama which goes about its business with tongue firmly planted in cheek.

Deborah Kerr is the central character as Bridie Quilty, an idealistic Irish lass who wants to work for the IRA. She carries the picture and Trevor Howard along with her. There is also a wonderful cast of supporting actors who boost the proceedings immeasurably, and I wonder if some are from Dublin's Abbey Theatre, so capable are they in their roles. No other complaints, and I would recommend it to film fans who enjoy a potpourri of genres in their movies.

Deborah Kerr is an Irish country lass brought up on her father's romanticised view of his heroic struggle against the English.

She leaves home for Dublin, where she wants to join the IRA, but is recruited by the Germans.

She gets entangled with Trevor Howard, a British officer, and conflicting loyalties ensue for both.

It's a classy piece, finely acted, atmospherically shot. There's suspense, humour, romance, and a strong plot. Kerr lives up to the three-dimensional role, and the rest of the cast give sterling support.

Well worthwhile.

Most of the things I felt about the film were nicely expressed by the favorable reviewers I read, especially the ones from the U.K.. I remember Deborah Kerr from "the King and I," and sort of remember Trevor Howard from "Mutiny on the Bounty," the excellent 1962 version with Marlon Brando. It was nice to see them much younger in this 1946 film. I agree with the viewers that said this movie was witty, full of surprises and twists and turns and had a beautiful performance from a younger and very beautiful Deborah Kerr. I agreed with the negative criticism of the film that it is a bit long and the plot gets muddled a few times. In its defense, the movie does manage to unmuddle itself the numerous times that it strays from the beaten path. If you like movies that break formulas so much that you can't trust the narration, this is a joy. Actually the narrator tells you in the very beginning of the movie what to expect from the film when he says that he has chosen the wrong place to start his tale and restarts it at a completely different place. Thanks to all the U.K. and other reviewers who filled us in on the many historical and other references in the film.