Identity Unknown

I enjoyed this film quite a bit. There were really some poignant moments as a GI suffering from amnesia goes AWOL to figure out who he is. He has a list with four names on it and it appears that he is actually one of the names on that list. As he visits several homes traumatized by war it soon becomes apparent that the odyssey isn't just about him but about everyone suffering from the deaths of their loved ones in the military.

Richard Arlen isn't the greatest actor ever but his downbeat style works almost perfectly here. He plays a really decent man who is confused and a bit dazed. Some of the incidents could have used a tiny bit more craft to fulfill their potential. The part where a young boy thinks his dead father has come home could have been real dramatic dynamite. That sequence is realized OK but not great here. Otherwise, this is a good film that held my interest all the way. The ending was a tad anti-climatic but not terrible. Good little film here about the sometimes hidden devastation of war and the healing that hopefully occurs later.

Recently a funeral procession passed my house. It was for a young man killed in Afghanistan. He had a young child that I don't believe he ever saw. It was a very solemn moment.

There were four corpses in the farmhouse, burned and dismembered beyond recognition, their dog tags scattered, because they were -- had been -- American soldiers fighting in France. There was also a fifth man, Richard Arlen, and he was alive, but he couldn't remember who he was. So when he was being transferred to a military hospital, he left the train, went AWOL, with the names and addresses off the dog tags, hoping that he was one of them, that familiar places and people would jog his memory, and he could return home and get on with his life.

It's a nice idea for a movie, and Arlen's low-key acting is spot on, as is the way that as he goes along, being disappointed in turn, he leaves the survivors of the dead soldiers a little better off in four vignettes. Of course, this is a Republic picture, and it's the first directorial job of Walter Colmes, so the subtext is pounded out pretty hard in four vignettes and an epilogue.

Still, there are good roles in it for Roger Pryor, as a patriotic hoodlum, as well as Forrest Taylor and Sarah Padden as an old farm couple trying to come to terms with the death of their son. It's all rather unsubtle for my taste, but its heart is so clearly in the right place that I willingly forgive that.

This film was surprisingly good as evidenced by the other user comments shown here.I know how frustrating it is to know you know someone's name but cannot bring it readily out of the brain archive into the live active part.Some time ago I could not think of the name of that great Victorian art critic, John Ruskin, even though I knew of his identity so that I used a mnemonic trick to always remember his name in case I needed to quote him at my art class.

The script was intelligent highlighting the unmentionable things soldiers have to witness in wartime.As the WW1 song lyric goes, "...they'll never believe us , they'll never believe us".Richard Arlen who played Johnny March gave a sensitive performance as the amnesiac soldier and no, I won't provide a spoiler how it resolves in the end.He meets all of the relatives of the dead U.S. soldiers his commanding officer advised he served with in the hope of establishing his true identity.I was glad to see this on Youtube for the first time especially as I was born in 1946 about the time this film was made when some great WW11 post war stories were being produced.7/10.

Postwar drama about a soldier with amnesia trying to figure out who he is by visiting the families of four different soldiers. It's enjoyable enough, pleasant even despite the heavy themes of war and death. It moves along at a leisurely pace and most of the people in it talk in low tones. The cast is good and the script about as well as could be expected for a low budget B picture of its kind. Give it a look if you've got nothing better to do.

A man who gave all and lost everything :when you return from WW2 and you suffer from amnesia ,what does life lay in store for you?

There are four possible identities, thus the movie is roughly divided into four parts; the film does not pass over in silence the sufferings the amnesiac soldier leaves in his wake: the scene in the restaurant where friends seem to recognize Sally 's husband , the little boy (young Bobby Driscoll ,a child actor who was also featured in the excellent 'the Sullivans") who needs a father so bad ....the fourth part restores balance:The soldier ,who delivers a superb speech , comes to the rescue of the old couple about to sell their house because dad cannot stand the place where his dead son used to live (a deeply moving performance by Sarah Padden as the mother who would like to keep memories of this house so much).

In my book ,the third part in Chicago is less gripping and there's a slight sag in the tension and emotion in "Johnny March's" search ; but by the segment in the Anderson 's house, it's back for good. And the denouement is not what one expects : besides ,considering Johnny's childhood, it's thoroughly plausible.

The following year ,Joseph Mankiewicz would do "somewhere in the night" with an amnesiac in search of his past ;the budget was bigger ,but it was a film noir whereas "identity unknown" is a simple drama.