[go: up one dir, main page]

    कैलेंडर रिलीज़ करेंटॉप 250 फ़िल्मेंसबसे लोकप्रिय फ़िल्मेंज़ोनर के आधार पर फ़िल्में ब्राउज़ करेंटॉप बॉक्स ऑफ़िसशोटाइम और टिकटफ़िल्मी समाचारइंडिया मूवी स्पॉटलाइट
    TV और स्ट्रीमिंग पर क्या हैटॉप 250 टीवी शोसबसे लोकप्रिय TV शोशैली के अनुसार टीवी शो ब्राउज़ करेंTV की खबरें
    देखने के लिए क्या हैसबसे नए ट्रेलरIMDb ओरिजिनलIMDb की पसंदIMDb स्पॉटलाइटफैमिली एंटरटेनमेंट गाइडIMDb पॉडकास्ट
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter पुरस्कारअवार्ड्स सेंट्रलफ़ेस्टिवल सेंट्रलसभी इवेंट
    जिनका जन्म आज के दिन हुआ सबसे लोकप्रिय सेलिब्रिटीसेलिब्रिटी से जुड़ी खबरें
    मदद केंद्रयोगदानकर्ता क्षेत्रपॉल
उद्योग के पेशेवरों के लिए
  • भाषा
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
वॉचलिस्ट
साइन इन करें
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
ऐप का इस्तेमाल करें
वापस जाएँ
  • कास्ट और क्रू
  • उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं
  • ट्रिविया
  • अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल
IMDbPro
The Thirteenth Guest (1932)

उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं

The Thirteenth Guest

35 समीक्षाएं
7/10

Thirteen for Dinner!

THE THIRTEENTH GUEST (Monogram, 1932), directed by Albert Ray, from the novel by Armitage Trail, is an acceptable 70 minute programmer murder mystery that stands very well on its own merits. Starring Ginger Rogers and Lyle Talbot, both of whom would be reunited once more under Ray's direction in A SHRIEK IN THE NIGHT (Allied, 1933), another mystery thriller, THE THIRTEENTH GUEST ranks the better of the two, in spite of its current lack of television broadcasts in comparison to the frequent revivals of A SHRIEK IN THE NIGHT during the early years of cable TV during most of the 1980s. As with A SHRIEK IN THE NIGHT, THE THIRTEENTH GUEST includes no underscoring, with the exception of a Johannes Brahms composition, "Academic Festival Overture," heard during its opening screen credits.

The story begins with a young woman (Ginger Rogers) coming out of a taxi which stops in front of 122 Old Mill Road, and asking the driver to wait for her. She enters the house, which has stood vacant for thirteen years. Noticing the abandoned estate still has telephone service and electric lights, she finds and opens the envelope which reads, "To be handled to my daughter, Marie Morgan, on her 21st birthday." Envisioning the dinner party that was to have taken place 13 years ago, by which her father had died and the mysterious thirteenth guest had never arrived, the girl, after hearing a noise, suddenly screams. The cab driver leaves to notify the police. Called to the case are Captain Ryan (J. Farrell MacDonald, Hollywood's resident cop), and Gump (Paul Hurst), his stooge detective. Ryan summons Phil Winston (Lyle Talbot), a private investigator and womanizer whose catch phrase is "Ah, you go to the devil," (the frequent remark used by Talbot in A SHRIEK IN THE NIGHT). Winston finds the girl in question, apparently Marie Morgan, whose cause of death was electrocution, although there are no wires found connected to the seat where she was sitting. While going through the usual channels of investigation, and finding out that Morgan Sr. had written a will leaving a fortune to the 13th guest, John Barksdale (Robert Klein), is also found dead through electrocution. More mystery follows when a hooded mystery man wearing a black cloak is seen (by the avid movie viewer) stalking about the mansion behind the walls pulling a switch that electrocutes any his victims as well as the arrival of Marie Morgan (Ginger Rogers), very much alive, leaving more questions to be answered as to who was that other girl who was killed earlier? Who is this person with the intentions of murdering the former thirteen dinner guests one by one? Is the killer one of the thirteen guests? And what does the slip of paper found reading 13-13-13 mean?

The supporting cast in this production includes: James Eagles as Bud Morgan, Marie's brother; Erville Alderson as Uncle John Adams; Frances Rich as Marjorie Thornton; Ethel Wales as Joan Thornton; William B. Davidson as Captain Browne; Eddie Phillips as Thor Jensen; and Phillips Smalley as Dick Thornton.

While THE THIRTEENTH GUEST is a low-budget production, it was obviously a profitable little item for Monogram because of several imitators in later years, along with the studio's very own 1943 remake, retitled THE MYSTERY OF THE THIRTEENTH GUEST, starring Helen Parrish, Dick Purcell and Tim Ryan in the Rogers, Talbot and MacDonald roles. It's been noted that Monogram frequently revived THE THIRTEENTH GUEST in theaters over the years due the strength of the popularity of its leading star, Ginger Rogers, who was by then just a featured performer. Concentrating more on its creepy atmosphere and unusual occurrences to keep the action going and audiences guessing, the movie does takes time for humor, intentional or otherwise, compliments of Paul Hurst as a comical stupid cop, who could be, at times, more annoying than amusing; as well as one scene which finds the wealthy members of the family being sent to jail and sharing the cell with an assortment of people beneath their class, in other words, low-lifes.

THE THIRTEENTH GUEST, an interesting curio for some and a yawner for others, once considered a "lost" film, was formerly available on video cassette through several distributors, including Matinée Classics and Video Dimensions. Video transfers from each are satisfactory, although picture restoration is evident. Be aware DVD prints from Alpha Video doesn't include original 1932 opening titles, actually a latter 1940s reissue print credited by Equity Studios instead of Monogram. (**1/2)
  • lugonian
  • 24 अक्टू॰ 2003
  • परमालिंक
7/10

The Thirteenth Guest

  • Scarecrow-88
  • 1 अप्रैल 2009
  • परमालिंक
6/10

the Hooded Terror strikes again and again...

This poverty row thriller has a similar storyline to "The Cat and the Canary" - haunted house, frightened heiress, a disguised killer, secret passages etc. Ginger Rogers and Lyle Talbot, who plays Phil Winston were not a romantic couple in this film (although they did date briefly in real life) until the last five minutes - he being very keen on solving the murders.

The film starts imaginatively with a clutching hand pulling down each title card. Marie Morgan (or Lela) (Ginger Rogers) arrives at her old family home - one that hasn't been occupied for 13 years to find a telephone has been installed!!! After reading a cryptic message left by her father, she remembers back to a dinner party of 13 years before. The thirteenth guest did not arrive. When her father died he left the bulk of his estate to the 13th guest who never came forward. Thirteen years later the police are called to view a girls body, they believe has been electrocuted.

There is a "hooded terror" roaming and controlling the house through an "electrified" phone - when people answer it, a lever is pushed and the victim dies. It seems that the killer wanted the police to believe that Marie was the victim but it is really an unknown woman who has had a complete facial reconstruction to look like Marie. Then the family lawyer is found dead. Winston is convinced one of the original guests is the killer and invites them all to his apartment to show them that Marie is very much alive!!!

This is a pretty good film with lots of twists and turns. Being a pre- code some of the comments are surprising. Eddie Philips being referred to as Marie's brother's "boyfriend". When Paul Hurst as a bumbling detective looks down at his shoes, realises that they are on the wrong feet and then says "Well, you told me to tail her" everyone laughs!!

Recommended.
  • kidboots
  • 8 फ़र॰ 2009
  • परमालिंक
6/10

A haunted house, an unlucky number

A very young Ginger Rogers stars in "The Thirteenth Guest," a 1932 film also starring Lyle Talbot. Thirteen years earlier, a dinner party took place in an old house, but the 13th guest never appeared. Now the owner of the house is dead and left his estate to this 13th guest. Someone is murdering the original party guests and putting each dead body in his or her original seat at the table.

Rogers plays Marie Morgan, whom we think has been murdered early on. It turns out that it was someone else whose face was altered to look like hers. Detective Phil Winston (Talbot) investigates the situation.

This is a good haunted house mystery, but unfortunately suffers from a terrible print and bad sound. Nevertheless it's fun to see Ginger and Talbot, both of whom are very good. If you can tolerate the print, you'll enjoy it.
  • blanche-2
  • 29 मई 2008
  • परमालिंक

Two Courses

  • tedg
  • 13 नव॰ 2004
  • परमालिंक
6/10

If it weren't for Ginger Rigers this would have been long lost to the ages

A Ginger Rogers movie from 1932 that played well into the 1940's on her name alone.

The story concerns the deaths thirteen years after a dinner party where the host died and the 13th guest never showed up. The mystery concerns attempts of persons to unlock the mystery of the will read at that fateful dinner party.

The movie is old time and not bad. The dialog is mostly well done and the acting and direction is more realistic then one would expect from an independent production. Interestingly two of the characters are all but named as gay lovers, something that I find incredible simply because I've never seen this listed in a gay friendly histories of Hollywood and Hollywood films.(Then Again I haven't really looked) I liked it I didn't love it. Its not a bad time passer but its not something you want to search out, but its not something to turn off if you see it late at night.

Frankly even though its an average thriller I have no doubt that it would have disappeared had Ginger not been it.
  • dbborroughs
  • 12 अप्रैल 2008
  • परमालिंक
5/10

Average Whodunit

A young woman named Marie Morgan (Ginger Rogers) arrives at night at a presumably vacant old house, and is quickly murdered by person unknown. A private detective named Phil Winston (Lyle Talbot) proceeds to investigate, with the help of an annoyingly grumpy cop and his bumbling sidekick.

As the whodunit plot moves along, various characters reveal the backstory, involving a rich old man who invites thirteen guests to a dinner party at which time he will announce who inherits his estate; problem is the old man dies at the dinner without revealing his secret.

The main problem is a script that is so convoluted that it's almost impossible to figure out the puzzle's solution. Once known, the solution is not remotely believable, and there are significant plot holes. Still, there's enough suspense to keep the viewer watching despite a substandard script. Dialogue comes across as stiff and stilted at times but there are a few good lines.

Before the killer's identity is known, this person appears in a few scenes wearing bizarre garb that covers his/her body completely; the costume makes the person look a little like spider man. The film's prod design is cheap looking. Most of the action takes place indoors and mostly at night.

Casting is acceptable except for the presence of Lyle Talbot who just doesn't have the mystery persona of someone like Sidney Toler or Warner Oland. Indeed, if the film had been made as a Charlie Chan thriller, I think it would have been better.

For all its faults, "The Thirteenth Guest" is worth watching once, owing to adequate suspense in a spooky old house with hidden rooms and a masked killer. Overall, it's an average whodunit for the era in which it was made.
  • Lechuguilla
  • 25 दिस॰ 2015
  • परमालिंक
6/10

Unlucky Number.

  • rmax304823
  • 19 जून 2014
  • परमालिंक
5/10

"At the sound of the gong, the time will be......"

A millionaire Morgan invited 12 of his family members to his house for a dinner party (but only 11 showed up), but the host died in the middle of the event. Thirteen years later the house remains boarded up when Morgan's daughter Mary arrives, but is killed by a mysterious person walking in the house. Captain Ryan calls in investigator Phil Winston to help solve the case. Winston and Ryan suspect the family lawyer Barksdale, but later he is found murdered in the house. The two believe that one of the people invited to the party is the killer and question all the family members, but later Mary Morgan reappears and Winston finds out someone hired a woman to impersonate her in order to get her inheritance. Winston has to make sure all of the family members are watched, in order to make sure the real Mary Morgan doesn't become a victim. I was slightly disappointed by the movie considering it struggled to flow smoothly in terms of direction and script. Talbot was playing the role as if to get some scout from MGM to notice him. The rest of the cast (including Rogers) played their roles to the typical Old Dark House mystery movie stereotype. The film seemed to appear to be the first of a series with Talbot's character. It should have been better. Rating, 5.
  • Mike-764
  • 19 जन॰ 2005
  • परमालिंक
6/10

An agreeable little cheap mystery

Monogram Pictures was a very low-budget studio that specialized in cheap and exciting films. They were NOT a studio to make operettas or Shakespeare--that's for sure. Some of there films hold up well after all of these years--many of them don't. I have not yet seen a Monogram film I would consider great but they were often quite fun. Fun, cheap and entertaining is how I would describe "The Thirteenth Guest". While the film has many plot holes and problems, the overall film is pretty good for a B-movie. The film is one of those ridiculously impossible and complex murder films that is fun to watch but dumb when you actually think about it. Only in this sort of film or a Charlie Chan film (many of which were also made by Monogram) film would do.

The film begins with a lady being horribly electrocuted by some maniac--though who did it is uncertain. Oddly, instead of the police heading the investigation, they ask a private detective (Lyle Talbot) to run things--a plot element that makes not one bit of sense. Eventually, Talbot and the police learn that the murder (and subsequent murders) are probably related to a weird dinner that had happened many years earlier. The man who threw the dinner party was very rich and he died during the dinner! His will incredibly stated that the thirteenth guest to arrive would inherit his fortunate--but only twelve show. His wife was odd, as she left the house and the room where the rich guy died exactly as it was during the party--and the killer would then prop the bodies of each victim in their original seats from the party!! Weird stuff alright and the killer turns out to be the one who looked like a killer the first time I saw them! Make of that what you will.

A nice fast-paced plot with some cool murders cannot completely undo the ridiculousness of it all as well as some plot problems. Other than having a private citizen lead the investigation, there is a plastic surgery angle that makes no sense as well as some overly obnoxious suspects--too obnoxious to be real. Worth watching (especially since it's in the public domain) but not one to rush out to see--unless you are dying to see Ginger Rogers in one of her earliest roles (though, unfortunately, her acting and character are both a bit rough).
  • planktonrules
  • 25 अक्टू॰ 2010
  • परमालिंक
5/10

THE THIRTEENTH GUEST (Albert Ray, 1932) **

  • Bunuel1976
  • 8 फ़र॰ 2007
  • परमालिंक
10/10

A classic "old house" mystery!

This is one of Roger's & Talbot's earliest film and, by far the best of the "13th Guest" films" (several remakes were done).

At a dinner party many years ago, 13 people were invited, but only 12 showed up. The host died at the table, and the house was closed up for many, many years. Then, the bodies of the people who attended that dinner party started turning up in that abandoned house, sitting in the same chairs they occupied so long ago.

It turns out they are being murdered by a black-cloaked figure who just MIGHT have been one of dinner guests. He peers out thru a secret viewing hole, and cackles insanely after he murders someone.

A very, very eerie film!
  • Norm-30
  • 22 जून 1999
  • परमालिंक
7/10

an early talkie Who-dunnit

minor spoiler Ginger Rogers in one of her VERY early roles. She hadn't yet turned into the shrew that tormented Fred Astaire in all their dance films. Sound and picture quality are pretty rough, but as we see from the TRIVIA section, as it is now in public domain, anyone can make a (crappy) copy and sell it for profit. She arrives at a dark, dirty house, late at night, and finds an envelope marked "to be opened on Marie's 21st birthday". A shot rings out, and her taxi driver goes for the cops. The adventure begins. They bring in investigator Phil Winston (Lyle Talbot, in one of HIS early roles. ) We hear the history of the family and the house from the local policeman. I thought it was odd that even though they found the dead chick sitting in a chair, they knew right off that she had been electrocuted, in spite of the fact that the doctor says "enough to kill her but not enough to leave any marks." I would have thought that an autopsy would have necessary to find that... but I'm not a physician. The whole story revolves around a dinner party where they invited thirteen guests, but the thirteenth guest never showed up. Along the way, another girl shows up and looks JUST like the first girl found d-e-d dead. Not a bad film, but some things move pretty slowly. It's a Monogram shortie, at 69 minutes. Not bad who-dunnit, but a few cracks in the woodwork, so don't take it too seriously. And being pre-code, there are a couple naughty references in here if you pay attention.

Directed by Albert Ray, a prolific actor, director, writer, who had started in silents, and moved into talkies. He died quite young at 46, but I haven't been able to find the cause of death.
  • ksf-2
  • 22 अक्टू॰ 2014
  • परमालिंक
5/10

By B-movie standards, not bad

  • vert001
  • 26 जन॰ 2016
  • परमालिंक
6/10

The Thirteenth Guest review

Thirteen years after a dinner party at which a mysterious thirteenth guest failed to show, the other diners are being murdered. An early Ginger Rogers murder mystery which is pretty much worth watching only for her. She plays an heiress who finds herself the target of a mystery killer who claims his victims by having them answer a call on a phone he's rigged with a few thousand volts. Lyle Talbot is the handsome but bland hero with an annoying habit of patronising Rogers' character by repeatedly referring to her as 'little girl.'
  • JoeytheBrit
  • 17 अप्रैल 2020
  • परमालिंक
6/10

Who is killing anyway???

Typical thirties movie made by Monogran Pictures with Ginger Rogers in good shape and beauty like ever starring this mystery about a young girl who has an inheritance from his father who was afraid about your daughter's security, so he decides to give his money after she turns twenty one years old, when she is ready, the lawyer invites her to goes to old father's house to hear the will, but nobody came, although a hidden man try to kill her, so police department are in charge to investigate this case, funny and silly story told a dozen times, the movie has some importance by Gingers Roger's presence and some funny characters whose in some points of the movie stolen the show!!!

Resume:

First watch: 2017 / How many: 1 / Source: DVD / Rating: 6
  • elo-equipamentos
  • 26 जून 2017
  • परमालिंक
5/10

"Every man and his dog knows the story..."

Years ago there was a dinner at an old dark house with thirteen guests invited. Only twelve showed up. Flash forward to the future and murders are being committed at that same house with the original twelve guests. Something about an inheritance. Honestly it's a confusing old creaker. It's never as much fun as you would hope from this type of movie. Notable for being an early Ginger Rogers film and for being based on the only other novel by the guy who wrote Scarface. It's watchable enough I suppose but very dry and a bit of a chore at times. Avid fans of the period and genre will likely enjoy it more.
  • utgard14
  • 12 अप्रैल 2023
  • परमालिंक
7/10

A macabre banquet table

This good Monogram mystery gets more than a bit macabre at times with shots of corpses sat down at a dinner table. The very same table that 13 years earlier had been the setting of a family banquet held at the reading of a will. A banquet with 13 place settings but with one unoccupied seat due to a mystery guest who never arrived. Now at the same table sits a young woman who seems to be remembering the people at that banquet and the positions in which they sat. In her hand she holds a note that is giving her the clue of 13-13-13.

This is an unusual variation of a typical 1930s mystery plot of an heir to a will who comes into their inheritance after some years of waiting. Marie Morgan turns 21 years of age and is about to inherit. She is surrounded by a family that loathe each other. Her only friend among them is her affectionate brother she calls Bud. There seems to be a conspiracy to kill off members of the family after they have been lured to an old abandoned house where that 13 year old banquet took place.

The plot involves a false identity and a bakerlite phone which can somehow conduct electricity and a hooded murderer who emits a scary scream when they kill. There is an entertaining scene of an upper crust family all dressed in their finery being taunted by their downbeat cellmates. It's interesting to see Ginger Rogers in one of her early mystery roles before she found A-picture stardom. And there is some slightly risque pieces of Pre-Code humor among the movie's many good comic sequences.
  • greenbudgie
  • 9 मार्च 2021
  • परमालिंक
4/10

One may be the loneliest number, but I'll take it over thirteen any day.

  • mark.waltz
  • 30 मार्च 2016
  • परमालिंक
7/10

The 13th Guest

Marie Morgan (Ginger Rogers) who has been lured to an old abandoned house by a false note from a friend, and is in jeopardy although she doesn't yet realize it. Thirteen years ago there was a dinner party, to which the 13th guest failed to arrive.

Now the master of the manor has died and left the bulk of his estate to this 13th guest, but nobody knows who this person might be, and somebody is murdering the remaining guests and placing their dead bodies at the table, each in the same seat he or she occupied at that other party 13 years ago.

The thirteenth Guest is one nifty and fun mystery with a grand idea, and though rather convoluted at times, it moves briskly with some energy, good humour, and some good characterisations - liked the family's verbal bite at each other, and Marjorie's one liners are good. The house and the hooded killer are creepy. This is much punchier than its remake in 1943.
  • coltras35
  • 19 फ़र॰ 2025
  • परमालिंक
4/10

Who doesn't want Ginger to inherit?

Were it not for the presence of future superstar Ginger Rogers in the lead, no one would remember The Thirteenth Guest. But I suppose for that very reason it was remade by Monogram in the next decade with absolutely no one truly memorable in the film. I will say the remake had very few deviations in plot from the original.

Ginger plays two roles in this film, an heiress and someone who is given plastic surgery to look like her. The lookalike is killed and the method of execution is part of the gimmick of this whole movie. In any event the real Ginger shows up with results similar to what happens in Laura though not as dramatic.

Ginger comes from a family of greedy relatives. It's only a question of which ones are trying to keep her from inheriting. Even at that there's another plot twist I won't reveal.

For fans of Ginger Rogers who want to see all her movies.

\
  • bkoganbing
  • 26 मई 2014
  • परमालिंक
10/10

Pretty Ginger Rogers In A Haunted House!

Lovely young Ginger Rogers arrives at her long ago abandoned family manor on her twenty-first birthday to meet her lawyer so that she can find out about her inheritance. She finds out about foul play and murder instead! Obviously, someone in her family is trying to do away with her. But just who's trying to do it? Everyone is a suspect, including Rogers herself. Lyle Talbot is the private investigator who rounds up the entire family and tries to sort things out. J. Farrell MacDonald is the police sergeant who is confounded by it all. Paul Hurst is his nitwit sidekick. Everyone has some good lines and often the comebacks are hilarious. There's a part near the end of the film where Hurst's shoes are on the wrong feet, which is an absolute howl if you understand the reason why. Nice, creepy looking house is the perfect setting for pretty Rogers to be menaced in. There's plenty of cobwebs to contrast with Miss Rogers' who looks very cute in her costumes. Low-budget, but doesn't really seem to be because one gets involved in the puzzling mystery. You may have to see "The Thirteenth Guest" twice to fully understand it. It is a very intricate murder mystery which ultimately does make sense.
  • MarcoAntonio1
  • 3 अग॰ 2005
  • परमालिंक
6/10

Ginger Rogers plays a young heiress in this "shocking" mystery.

The owner of an Estate invited thirteen guests to dinner to reveal the inheritors of his will. The thirteenth guest never arrived and the host passed away without revealing their identity. The house has been boarded up for years exactly as it was that night when Miss Morgan on the eve of her 21st birthday is invited to the house.

This is such a fun little mystery with Ginger Rogers starring as Miss Morgan and Lyle Talbot as the private investigator and playboy Phil Winston. There are sliding panels and a cackling hooded figure who is luring and then electrocuting individuals amongst the original twelve guests using a metal phone.

Based on the novel by Armitage Trail (of Scarface fame), this is well worth the watch by classic film fans and mystery fans as it keeps your guessing as to the identity of the hooded figure.
  • cgvsluis
  • 16 मार्च 2024
  • परमालिंक
5/10

Even Ginger and Lyle couldn't help

The 1943 version The Mystery of the Thirteenth Guest has better production and direction. This version with it's stilted dialog and poor editing is rather slow and disjointed.
  • kyivguy
  • 21 दिस॰ 2021
  • परमालिंक
7/10

Has a few good things going for it!

  • JohnHowardReid
  • 8 दिस॰ 2017
  • परमालिंक

इस शीर्षक से अधिक

एक्सप्लोर करने के लिए और भी बहुत कुछ

हाल ही में देखे गए

कृपया इस फ़ीचर का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए ब्राउज़र कुकीज़ चालू करें. और जानें.
IMDb ऐप पाएँ
ज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करेंज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करें
सोशल पर IMDb को फॉलो करें
IMDb ऐप पाएँ
Android और iOS के लिए
IMDb ऐप पाएँ
  • सहायता
  • साइट इंडेक्स
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • IMDb डेटा लाइसेंस
  • प्रेस रूम
  • विज्ञापन
  • नौकरियाँ
  • उपयोग की शर्तें
  • गोपनीयता नीति
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, एक Amazon कंपनी

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.