Outward Bound

Although modern audiences will probably guess what is happening before the characters on the screen do, "Outward Bound" is still a pioneering film thematically, in the way it bends and breaks the reality of what we are seeing. Leslie Howard is a little too theatrical in his talkie debut, but Dudley Digges scores points by playing the Examiner in a quite unorthodox way. An intriguing movie from start to finish. *** out of 4.

Massive stage hit was an early talkie starring Leslie Howard as a man who finds himself on a ship that is "outward bound." Stunning dialog and beautiful cinematography help this allegorical tale of passengers stranded onboard a mysterious ship. A huge stage hit in London and New York, Outward Bound was am ambitious talkie for 1930 and features some wonderful performances (a bit stagy, but wonderful) from Howard as well as the great and underrated Alison Skipworth. Also good are Douglas Fairbanks Jr., Beryl Mercer, Helen Chandler, Alec P. Francis, Dudley Digges, and Montagu Love. Lyonel Watts is a bit much as the vicar. This was remade in the late 40s as Between Two Worlds, starring John Garfield and Eleanor Parker.

Leslie Howard always seemed to be wasted in blah film roles and its nice to see him here in a worthy role. And Skipworth is a total delight in any film you can catch her in...... Here she plays a most unusual part, and plays it beautifully. All her little hmmms and gutteral sounds add fathoms to the dialog. And note her first name is misspelled in the opening credits.

Outward Bound (1930)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. and Helen Chandler play lovers who commit suicide and then find themselves on an ocean liner with various other characters. None of them are quite sure where the boat is going but soon they learn that they're all dead and heading to Heaven or Hell. This film was based on a well known play, which was suppose to have been very good but it doesn't translate to the screen very well. The film opens up with over a minute of notes from the studio asking people not to laugh at the story and to take it seriously so you have to wonder if the studio itself was worried about the movie. The film is all dialogue, which naturally could kill the film and it partially does. The dialogue whenever the characters are just sitting around talking about typical things is quite boring and doesn't contain anything interesting. Whenever the people are talking about life and death then it comes to life somewhat but the film eventually goes on way too long. There are a few nice twists at the end but the actual ending is a letdown but I'm not sure if it was changed from the original play. Fairbanks Jr., and Chandler deliver fine performances as does the rest of the cast including Leslie Howard as a drunk. The film was later remade as Between Two Worlds with John Garfield.

The chirons at the beginning of 1930's "Outward Bound" tell us in aching detail how Sutton Vane's play took the London stage by storm. It subsequently was done on Broadway not once but twice (the second time was some years after this film), and the film uses three of the play's original cast: Leslie Howard, Beryl Mercer and Dudley Digges. The film was remade in 1944 as "Between Two Worlds" and the plot was changed slightly to reflect World War II.

"Outward Bound" is the story of several people on board ship, but none of them knows the reason for being there or where they're going. Finally they figure out that they are all dead and face the judgment of The Examiner (Digges) who arrives to tell them their fate. Heaven and hell are really the same place, it turns out, and those going to the less desirable place merely have some things to work on before heading upward. Two people, however, will not be leaving the ship - that's the suicide couple (Douglas Fairbanks Jr. and Helen Chandler) who, like the purser, are "halfways" and must stay on the ship for eternity.

The film is very bizarre looking, in a good way, very foggy, with an amorphous skyline when the outside of the ship (a toy boat) is shown. The atmosphere is appropriately dark and eerie. The problem with "Outward Bound" is two-fold. The acting is melodramatic and very stagy; also, the actors don't have the talkie "rhythm" down yet, so they sound very stilted. Leslie Howard, who in the film takes the part played on stage by Alfred Lunt, gives no indication that he will become a great film star - his performance is for the stage and terribly hammy. Interestingly, both he and Fairbanks Jr. not long after this movie would give wonderful performances, Howard in "The Petrified Forest" and Fairbanks in "Love is a Racket." Fairbanks in particular had a remarkably modern acting technique, but not in "Outward Bound." Strangely enough, as with "Between Two Worlds," there is something compelling and sympathetic about most of these characters. Perhaps it's a fascination we have with the afterlife, but the story does hold together, and we do care what happens to the "good guys" on the ship. I admit to liking "Between Two Worlds" better, especially the suicide couple plot, which is better handled in the latter film.

"Outward Bound" today is an interesting artifact but worth seeing, especially if you can follow it up with "Between Two Worlds."

One film is a mesmerising surreal experience whereas the other is an unbelievable overacted ridiculous compilation of cliches. Surprisingly it's OUTWARD BOUND that's the better film.

Despite what some people have said, OUTWARD BOUND is nothing like a filmed stage play. It is hampered by being made using Warner's cumbersome restrictive Vitaphone system but apart from that it has a fantastically atmospheric almost dreamlike quality which is exactly what such a story needs.

BETWEEN TWO WORLDS' style is just wrong for this type of picture. Yes it's filmed better, the story and characters are more fully developed but by trying to make it realistic, normal and natural, the premise comes across as ridiculous. For this to work, it can't be realistic, it can only be credible within a mysterious dreamworld where everyone is acting really weirdly - like they do in the original.

The acting in the older film is purposefully strange - after all they've just discovered that they're dead. Considering that it was his first film, Leslie Howard is superb and strangely believable as the tortured, troubled soul. John Garfield playing the same role in the remake however seems to think he's in a New York gangster flick and his cynical 1940s hard-boiled reporter is one of the most clichéd performances I've ever seen. That's the other problem with the 'new' version: everyone is a stereotypical caricature. The baddies are over the top nasty, the lovers are sickeningly sweet and as for the 'comedy vicar'! Worst of all is Sara Allgood as a dear little old Irish lady - I feel sorry for Garfield - eternity in the fires of hell almost seem preferable to having to live with her for ever.

It's understandable why the story had to be changed for the remake. Attitudes had changed hugely since the 1920s so it would not have made sense for the 1940s young couple to kill themselves for the same reason as their earlier incarnations. Being made in the middle of the Second World War again influenced that film's mood. Death then was a familiar visitor to us then so one can understand the over sentimental approach which was particularly appealing to a war ravaged world.

Although OUTWARD BOUND is more interesting with its moody, slightly stoned feel, the somewhat hammy remake has one significant advantage - the perpetually lacklustre Helen Chandler is replaced by Eleanor Parker. Not only is she a million times better as an actress, she is stunningly beautiful and a pretty face really does make an imperfect film more watchable.

The theme of ferrying the dead through the final judgment to the afterlife was actually done much better in the excellent BBC tv show, LIFE ON MARS / ASHES TO ASHES but nevertheless it's fascinating to see how such a theme was presented in the past.