45 समीक्षाएं
For me, this comes a close second to "Underworld" in Sternberg's films: the twists and turns of the melodramatic plot become ultimately a little too much for me to swallow (a twist too far?), and I found some of the camera devices simply distracting, but even so the film is more or less won by virtue of the impressive acting from all concerned. Betty Compson (who was soon to receive a well-deserved Oscar nomination for her role in the part-talkie "The Barker") stands out as the fragile, cynical girl who has "had too many good times" already but allows herself to believe in the possibility of redemption; Baclanova is memorable as the petty officer's deserted wife, while George Bancroft is a cheerful, callous but not unkindly Colossus of a stoker. The weary, sensitive features of Gustav von Seyffertitz, in a small role as the threadbare Bible-basher who ministers to this godless 'flock', also make a strong impression. The film is almost all atmosphere, but it is atmosphere well-done.
- Igenlode Wordsmith
- 10 दिस॰ 2009
- परमालिंक
One of the less obvious differences between sound and silent pictures, is that whereas in a sound picture the director will set up a scene, prep the actors and then call action, in a silent the director could (and usually would) continue to direct even while the cameras were rolling. Of course it's hard to tell how much this difference affected the finished product in real terms. However, with a director like Joseph "von" Sternberg, who demanded a complete (and indeed tyrannical) control over every aspect of the image, the ability to carry on shouting at his cast and crew right through the take was probably a considerable bonus in fine-tuning his elaborate visual style.
With Docks of New York being a late silent, it has more or less as much fluidity of movement and camera angle as your average sound flick. However there is an extreme complexity in the movement of a kind that you only really saw in Sternberg's silents. Take for example those lengthy dolly shots through the bar, with extras moving across the shot as the camera goes in or out. Those movements across the screen look haphazard, but they are carefully timed to complement the camera movement and give a rising tide of franticness. To arrange everyone so precisely there must have been almost as much activity behind the camera as in front of it. You could do a shot like that in a talkie, but it would require copious reheasing, and I don't think that's something they tended to bother with in the early sound era, what with the all the other obstacles they had to overcome. It's certainly true that Sternberg used to spend most of his set-up time sorting out the lighting schemes, rather than giving any detailed priming to his cast.
Sternberg's layered patterns of movement not only add to the aesthetic quality of this picture, but they enhance its atmosphere. The barroom scenes in particular have a spectacularly chaotic feel to them. The fact that every edge of the room is filled by a mass of moving bodies makes it impossible to figure out the size and layout of the place. But for all his visual lavishness, Sternberg himself admitted to caring little about stories, and as a result the narrative gets a little lost amidst all the shadows. This is even given the fact that Docks of New York is overburdened by intertitles.
Sternberg had also yet to fully develop his stylised and dappled lighting patterns that can be seen in his talkies. Here that's a good thing, because it means his camera shows the actors up a little better. And there are some fine performances here worth capturing. George Bancroft gives a superbly realist turn, looking every inch the rough but basically good-hearted stoker. Betty Compson is also nicely subtle, in a slow and measured performance with plenty of under-the-surface emoting. An honourable mention should go to Clyde Cook, who plays Bancroft's buddy Steve. Cook was an Australian slapstick comic, once the star of his own shorts but by this time doing supporting work in features. He is perhaps a little too clownish for the sombre tone of Docks of New York, but entertaining to watch and capable of a spot of straight acting when the occasion demands.
The oevre of Herr Sternberg can generally be summed up as pretty to look at but dramatically unengaging. As a silent picture, where the director can put his all into the image without having to worry about the business of dialogue, Docks of New York is just that little bit prettier to look at. And yet as one lacking in a strong narrative drive it is also that little bit more dramatically unengaging. It's a shame, because this is potentially one of the most poignant tales he ever dealt with. Bancroft and Compson recognise this, and play it appropriately, but the director remains a hard-boiled cynic who knows a few camera tricks.
With Docks of New York being a late silent, it has more or less as much fluidity of movement and camera angle as your average sound flick. However there is an extreme complexity in the movement of a kind that you only really saw in Sternberg's silents. Take for example those lengthy dolly shots through the bar, with extras moving across the shot as the camera goes in or out. Those movements across the screen look haphazard, but they are carefully timed to complement the camera movement and give a rising tide of franticness. To arrange everyone so precisely there must have been almost as much activity behind the camera as in front of it. You could do a shot like that in a talkie, but it would require copious reheasing, and I don't think that's something they tended to bother with in the early sound era, what with the all the other obstacles they had to overcome. It's certainly true that Sternberg used to spend most of his set-up time sorting out the lighting schemes, rather than giving any detailed priming to his cast.
Sternberg's layered patterns of movement not only add to the aesthetic quality of this picture, but they enhance its atmosphere. The barroom scenes in particular have a spectacularly chaotic feel to them. The fact that every edge of the room is filled by a mass of moving bodies makes it impossible to figure out the size and layout of the place. But for all his visual lavishness, Sternberg himself admitted to caring little about stories, and as a result the narrative gets a little lost amidst all the shadows. This is even given the fact that Docks of New York is overburdened by intertitles.
Sternberg had also yet to fully develop his stylised and dappled lighting patterns that can be seen in his talkies. Here that's a good thing, because it means his camera shows the actors up a little better. And there are some fine performances here worth capturing. George Bancroft gives a superbly realist turn, looking every inch the rough but basically good-hearted stoker. Betty Compson is also nicely subtle, in a slow and measured performance with plenty of under-the-surface emoting. An honourable mention should go to Clyde Cook, who plays Bancroft's buddy Steve. Cook was an Australian slapstick comic, once the star of his own shorts but by this time doing supporting work in features. He is perhaps a little too clownish for the sombre tone of Docks of New York, but entertaining to watch and capable of a spot of straight acting when the occasion demands.
The oevre of Herr Sternberg can generally be summed up as pretty to look at but dramatically unengaging. As a silent picture, where the director can put his all into the image without having to worry about the business of dialogue, Docks of New York is just that little bit prettier to look at. And yet as one lacking in a strong narrative drive it is also that little bit more dramatically unengaging. It's a shame, because this is potentially one of the most poignant tales he ever dealt with. Bancroft and Compson recognise this, and play it appropriately, but the director remains a hard-boiled cynic who knows a few camera tricks.
- Grapeape-2
- 12 फ़र॰ 1999
- परमालिंक
It's the fine directing and good performances that really make the film worth watching. The story is interesting enough, covering one night ashore in the life of ship stoker, Bill Roberts (George Bancroft), and the mysterious beauty he meets (Betty Compson). Bancroft is all masculinity as Roberts, a man who won't let anything or anyone stand in the way of what he wants. He meets his match, though, in Compson, who is all sex appeal as Mea, the seductive but troubled blonde with a dark past. These two are backed up with good supporting performances from the rest of the cast, the only exception being Olga Baclanova, who hams it up more than necessary. Director Josef Von Sternberg handles the ensemble cast well, giving each character importance. He also does a good job of portraying and letting us experience the seedy life they live. Nonetheless, some of the main characters aren't fleshed out enough for us to understand their actions. The film also tries too hard at times to be shocking and edgy. All in all, it's not the best film ever, but it has enough good qualities to be enjoyable.
- km_dickson
- 8 सित॰ 2005
- परमालिंक
Of course, no waterfront in the world was ever as deliciously seedy as set designer Hans Dreier's in this amazingly atmospheric and evocative masterpiece of late silent cinema. The story is rather tawdry, cheapish even, but plots are very rarely the point of a movie anyway, and Josef von Sternberg has made the perfect film out of next to nothing.
'The Docks of New York' is about a rough and ready stoker, Bill (George Bancroft), on leave for the night. He goes to the Sandbar and gets into a brawl with Hymn-Book Harry (the ever sleazy Gustav von Seyffertitz), and on the way back saves a young girl, Mae the tough kookie (Betty Compson) from drowning herself. Slowly they sorta kinda fall in love and he marries her on the spur of the moment, but what will they do the next morning when Bill is supposed to sail off again? The most astonishing thing about 'The Docks of New York' is its subtlety. We have no heroes or simplified villains here, just people who have had a hard time all their lives and are reluctant to be redeemed. The concept of love in this sneering, loud-mouthed environment is completely alien. "I hope you have better luck than me", says Olga Baclanova's character to Mae on her way to the slammer, "but I doubt it". It is Baclanova who says on the subject of decency that she was decent "before I got married".
It goes without saying that the film is acted as naturalistically as anything we see today, that Compson & Bancroft absolutely shine as the unlikely lovers, grittily played and with no sentimentality. The lighting is superb, photography stupendous, direction acute, and the edition you are most likely to see looks fabulous.
'The Docks of New York' is about a rough and ready stoker, Bill (George Bancroft), on leave for the night. He goes to the Sandbar and gets into a brawl with Hymn-Book Harry (the ever sleazy Gustav von Seyffertitz), and on the way back saves a young girl, Mae the tough kookie (Betty Compson) from drowning herself. Slowly they sorta kinda fall in love and he marries her on the spur of the moment, but what will they do the next morning when Bill is supposed to sail off again? The most astonishing thing about 'The Docks of New York' is its subtlety. We have no heroes or simplified villains here, just people who have had a hard time all their lives and are reluctant to be redeemed. The concept of love in this sneering, loud-mouthed environment is completely alien. "I hope you have better luck than me", says Olga Baclanova's character to Mae on her way to the slammer, "but I doubt it". It is Baclanova who says on the subject of decency that she was decent "before I got married".
It goes without saying that the film is acted as naturalistically as anything we see today, that Compson & Bancroft absolutely shine as the unlikely lovers, grittily played and with no sentimentality. The lighting is superb, photography stupendous, direction acute, and the edition you are most likely to see looks fabulous.
Sternberg, still silent, signs an interesting melodrama for the picturesque realism with which tries to portray the docks' nightlife of New York City. Almost centenary this is also an interesting film for those who like to watch cinema from a historical perspective. Not entirely convincing as a realistic expression of port life at the time (there is too much spectacle in the virility of sailors and too much glamor in the figure of prostitutes) yet it is a document that expresses a moralistic mentality in the way these socially disadvantaged environments were looked at. An interesting work, although not exactly essential or striking in the director's career.
- ricardojorgeramalho
- 22 नव॰ 2022
- परमालिंक
Docks of New York (1928) is a prime example of the power of silent film at its height. After 1928, the medium would be crushed underneath the rise of sound technology, which was a shame considering how technically dazzling and sophisticated they had become by the latter half of the 1920s.
The film is a character study of a rough stoker and a suicidal woman. The two fall in love after he rescues her from an attempt to take her own life, though there is a chance they may be separated by the stoker's aversion to commitment and responsibility. The characters are all flawed, compelling people, each one brought to life with subtle performances from the leading actors. The atmosphere is appropriately seedy and dark, with chiaroscuro lighting and crowded spaces. It's a slow film, one that will not please those who prefer more plot or action, but it is worth your time, showcasing silent cinema at its loftiest heights. It is films like Docks of New York which make one wish the silent era had lingered on a little while longer.
The film is a character study of a rough stoker and a suicidal woman. The two fall in love after he rescues her from an attempt to take her own life, though there is a chance they may be separated by the stoker's aversion to commitment and responsibility. The characters are all flawed, compelling people, each one brought to life with subtle performances from the leading actors. The atmosphere is appropriately seedy and dark, with chiaroscuro lighting and crowded spaces. It's a slow film, one that will not please those who prefer more plot or action, but it is worth your time, showcasing silent cinema at its loftiest heights. It is films like Docks of New York which make one wish the silent era had lingered on a little while longer.
- MissSimonetta
- 16 जन॰ 2016
- परमालिंक
The Docks Of New York (1928) :
Brief Review -
A temporary love of one night changes the life permanently. Josef Sternberg's most skilled work. The Docks Of New York may not drive you crazy with eternal love segments or overdramatic romance or too much of philosophy of married life but it has a sublime impact coming from the quick done story. A blue-collar worker on New York's depressed waterfront finds his life changed after he saves a woman attempting suicide. Without falling in love they get married the same night and don't give much importance to the future, however, they do realise the responsibility and ethics once forever. Unlike other silent films of same time this one is far more advanced in acting section. George Bancroft and Betty Compson give performances that make you forget that you are watching a silent film. Such is the Power of theirs acts that they make the characters look talkative and alive even without sound. The credit for the same should go to the intertitles as they are brilliantly written. Not to forget the great cinematography catching the right frame, correct angles and perfect facial expressions of the actors. A film with a positive message and positive theme never feels bad or dull at all and if it gives the right message without spoiling that positivity then there is nothing more to ask for. It all comes together very well and that's exactly what happens with The Docks Of New York. Probably, this is Josef von Sternberg most skilled work i have seen. His crafting of the subject and storytelling details in such a short runtime are damn impressive. The only thing it lacks is the repeat value because there is no extreme romance and no generous scenes so once you finish watching it, you know everything about it. There is nothing much to enjoy in the second viewing. Nevertheless, it's a great film, no doubts.
RATING - 7/10*
By - #samthebestest
A temporary love of one night changes the life permanently. Josef Sternberg's most skilled work. The Docks Of New York may not drive you crazy with eternal love segments or overdramatic romance or too much of philosophy of married life but it has a sublime impact coming from the quick done story. A blue-collar worker on New York's depressed waterfront finds his life changed after he saves a woman attempting suicide. Without falling in love they get married the same night and don't give much importance to the future, however, they do realise the responsibility and ethics once forever. Unlike other silent films of same time this one is far more advanced in acting section. George Bancroft and Betty Compson give performances that make you forget that you are watching a silent film. Such is the Power of theirs acts that they make the characters look talkative and alive even without sound. The credit for the same should go to the intertitles as they are brilliantly written. Not to forget the great cinematography catching the right frame, correct angles and perfect facial expressions of the actors. A film with a positive message and positive theme never feels bad or dull at all and if it gives the right message without spoiling that positivity then there is nothing more to ask for. It all comes together very well and that's exactly what happens with The Docks Of New York. Probably, this is Josef von Sternberg most skilled work i have seen. His crafting of the subject and storytelling details in such a short runtime are damn impressive. The only thing it lacks is the repeat value because there is no extreme romance and no generous scenes so once you finish watching it, you know everything about it. There is nothing much to enjoy in the second viewing. Nevertheless, it's a great film, no doubts.
RATING - 7/10*
By - #samthebestest
- SAMTHEBESTEST
- 17 जन॰ 2021
- परमालिंक
- SnoopyStyle
- 5 जुल॰ 2015
- परमालिंक
Film that tells a story to which could have been extracted much more benefit. aesthetically very influenced by the German expressionist movement. The result is a cold movie that does not leave much memory. Even some point are not clear enough such as the reasons why the girl protagonist tries to commit suicide. It seems a training of Von Sternberg, (not to be confused with Von Stroheim) -Too much German "Von" aristocratic in Hollywood those days- Anyway this movie looks like an essay for his farther works.
- pacolopezpersonal-22057
- 18 अग॰ 2017
- परमालिंक
There are quite a few strengths that make this silent melodrama work so well. It has a well-crafted story that moves at a good pace and efficiently uses each minute of screen time. It is very well-acted, especially by George Bancroft and Betty Compson. Compson's performance, in particular, deserves much more praise and recognition than it has received, either at the time or now. Finally, the dockside atmosphere is interesting and convincing, besides being an integral part of the story.
Bancroft has a role that is particularly well-suited to him, and he does a fine job in the part. Compson has a challenging role, since she must make her character attractive yet lonely and miserable, and somewhat disreputable yet completely sympathetic, for the story to work. She gives an excellent performance in every respect, and Bancroft plays off of her character quite well. There are some fine moments in which their characters' rough edges contend with their own gentler and nobler instincts. Thus the unlikely attachment between the two not only works well, but draws you in and makes you care about them quite a bit.
The supporting cast gives good performances as well, with Olga Baclanova especially good in a role that is essential to the story. Mitchell Lewis is suitably brutish as the heavy, and Clyde Cook is quite believable as Bancroft's nervous pal.
Josef von Sternberg also tied together all of these strengths in an efficient and effective package, making every scene count and making you feel as if you were there on the docks with the characters. It's a fine melodrama by any standard, and is well worth seeing for anyone who enjoys silent movies.
Bancroft has a role that is particularly well-suited to him, and he does a fine job in the part. Compson has a challenging role, since she must make her character attractive yet lonely and miserable, and somewhat disreputable yet completely sympathetic, for the story to work. She gives an excellent performance in every respect, and Bancroft plays off of her character quite well. There are some fine moments in which their characters' rough edges contend with their own gentler and nobler instincts. Thus the unlikely attachment between the two not only works well, but draws you in and makes you care about them quite a bit.
The supporting cast gives good performances as well, with Olga Baclanova especially good in a role that is essential to the story. Mitchell Lewis is suitably brutish as the heavy, and Clyde Cook is quite believable as Bancroft's nervous pal.
Josef von Sternberg also tied together all of these strengths in an efficient and effective package, making every scene count and making you feel as if you were there on the docks with the characters. It's a fine melodrama by any standard, and is well worth seeing for anyone who enjoys silent movies.
- Snow Leopard
- 17 अग॰ 2004
- परमालिंक
It was great to see the old New York of the '20's in this movie, only though it's just in a couple of establishment-shots. It still looked so much different of course, with a totally different skyline, without as many and such high skyscrapers as there are this present day.
The build-up of the movie and its drama is done very well. It has a sort of dark and depressing, dirty atmosphere, which suits the movie its time period and themes. The story also all enhances this. I really liked the story, also not in the least that it isn't just another standard written love-story. I also liked how tings came together at the end. The movie really reached a right and satisfying conclusion. The movie however as a whole is a bit too short though perhaps to let all of its drama work out as effective as it perhaps could had. Nevertheless the themes in the movies still work out efficient enough and shows that "The Docks of New York" was a quite edgy and unusual movie for its time.
The movie gets mostly carried by its two main leads, played by George Bancroft and Betty Compson. Both are such compelling characters, greatly and charismatically portrayed by the two main actors, each in their own way. But a complaint would be that's hard at times to always care for the characters. Bill Roberts is one tough hard guy that smacks things around and punches people in the face. And Mae also obviously has some issues and a dark past.
The movie was professionally directed and with some excellent camera-work, that also uses some early moving shots. This also really added up to the movie its quality and atmosphere.
A great unique little film from the silent era!
9/10
http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
The build-up of the movie and its drama is done very well. It has a sort of dark and depressing, dirty atmosphere, which suits the movie its time period and themes. The story also all enhances this. I really liked the story, also not in the least that it isn't just another standard written love-story. I also liked how tings came together at the end. The movie really reached a right and satisfying conclusion. The movie however as a whole is a bit too short though perhaps to let all of its drama work out as effective as it perhaps could had. Nevertheless the themes in the movies still work out efficient enough and shows that "The Docks of New York" was a quite edgy and unusual movie for its time.
The movie gets mostly carried by its two main leads, played by George Bancroft and Betty Compson. Both are such compelling characters, greatly and charismatically portrayed by the two main actors, each in their own way. But a complaint would be that's hard at times to always care for the characters. Bill Roberts is one tough hard guy that smacks things around and punches people in the face. And Mae also obviously has some issues and a dark past.
The movie was professionally directed and with some excellent camera-work, that also uses some early moving shots. This also really added up to the movie its quality and atmosphere.
A great unique little film from the silent era!
9/10
http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
- Boba_Fett1138
- 7 नव॰ 2007
- परमालिंक
Josef von Sternberg is a director not very well known among the normal audience. He is a legend to be learned thoroughly.
The movie is about a ship worker called Bill. He has just one night to spend ashore. He finds a young lady, Mae, trying to commit suicide in the sea. He helps her and takes to the near by bar. Later Bill asks her to marry him on an instant. The bar then gets ready for the wedding at that night. The rest you should watch and enjoy!.
It is hard to believe that the entire movie was shot on a Hollywood sound stage. The set was so perfect to be made up. Josef von Sternberg is always an expert at it.
If you are a movie freak, this movie should be added to the watch list. A worth watch.
#KiduMovie
The movie is about a ship worker called Bill. He has just one night to spend ashore. He finds a young lady, Mae, trying to commit suicide in the sea. He helps her and takes to the near by bar. Later Bill asks her to marry him on an instant. The bar then gets ready for the wedding at that night. The rest you should watch and enjoy!.
It is hard to believe that the entire movie was shot on a Hollywood sound stage. The set was so perfect to be made up. Josef von Sternberg is always an expert at it.
If you are a movie freak, this movie should be added to the watch list. A worth watch.
#KiduMovie
- jboothmillard
- 8 अप्रैल 2017
- परमालिंक
There were three main reasons for seeing 'The Docks of New York', there is always at least one main reason for me that draws me into watching any film. One was my high appreciation for silent films. Two was the idea for the story, which did sound fantastic. Three was Josef von Sternberg, who did many good and above films with one of his regular stars being Marlene Dietrich. His best films, with 'Shanghai Express', 'The Devil is a Woman' and 'The Scarlet Empress' being a few examples, are wonderful even.
For me, 'The Docks of New York' is up there as nearly one of Sternberg's best. As well as one of his most overlooked, though it is regarded highly by many today it is still underseen. It is a real shame that 'The Docks of New York' was a flop at the time, and it was nothing to do with its quality. It was in my view to do with timing, which was not fair to 'The Docks of New York'. Releasing it at the same time as the more ground-breaking 'The Jazz Singer' (despite that film being more historically significant for being the first talkie, this for me is the better film) was a bad and near-suicidal move.
Perhaps the film could have been longer which would have allowed a few of the plot developments to breathe more.
Other than that, 'The Docks of New York' is near-essential viewing and highly recommended if one wants to see what the fuss about Sternberg is about. His direction is typically accomplished and passionately engaged with the material, making a seedy setting look stunning which is not always easy to do. One of the greatest things about 'The Docks of New York' is how it looks, one of the most beautiful looking late silent films to exist in my view. The setting is seedy yet handsome and the cinematography is both luminous and atmospheric, the best imagery looking stunning.
Just as good is the highly effective use of light and shadow, which was a common distinctive thing in Sternberg's films. Absolutely loved the attention to visual detail in this film. The music is haunting enough and at least fits. The story is simple but never dull, thanks to some nice twists and turns that keeps one guessing without losing cohesion and the great chemistry between the leads. Which has tension and one can feel the attraction between them. Just as they do feel the uncompromising grit of the story's atmosphere. It is melodramatic yes but doesn't go overboard on the suds.
All the cast do great, with Olga Baclanova being especially classy in support. George Bancroft has a swaggering intensity but the most challenging role belongs to Betty Compson, and along with Sternberg and the production values her searing performance is the heart, driving force and shining light of the film.
Concluding, really great. 9/10
For me, 'The Docks of New York' is up there as nearly one of Sternberg's best. As well as one of his most overlooked, though it is regarded highly by many today it is still underseen. It is a real shame that 'The Docks of New York' was a flop at the time, and it was nothing to do with its quality. It was in my view to do with timing, which was not fair to 'The Docks of New York'. Releasing it at the same time as the more ground-breaking 'The Jazz Singer' (despite that film being more historically significant for being the first talkie, this for me is the better film) was a bad and near-suicidal move.
Perhaps the film could have been longer which would have allowed a few of the plot developments to breathe more.
Other than that, 'The Docks of New York' is near-essential viewing and highly recommended if one wants to see what the fuss about Sternberg is about. His direction is typically accomplished and passionately engaged with the material, making a seedy setting look stunning which is not always easy to do. One of the greatest things about 'The Docks of New York' is how it looks, one of the most beautiful looking late silent films to exist in my view. The setting is seedy yet handsome and the cinematography is both luminous and atmospheric, the best imagery looking stunning.
Just as good is the highly effective use of light and shadow, which was a common distinctive thing in Sternberg's films. Absolutely loved the attention to visual detail in this film. The music is haunting enough and at least fits. The story is simple but never dull, thanks to some nice twists and turns that keeps one guessing without losing cohesion and the great chemistry between the leads. Which has tension and one can feel the attraction between them. Just as they do feel the uncompromising grit of the story's atmosphere. It is melodramatic yes but doesn't go overboard on the suds.
All the cast do great, with Olga Baclanova being especially classy in support. George Bancroft has a swaggering intensity but the most challenging role belongs to Betty Compson, and along with Sternberg and the production values her searing performance is the heart, driving force and shining light of the film.
Concluding, really great. 9/10
- TheLittleSongbird
- 16 जुल॰ 2020
- परमालिंक
The Docks Of New York was made in 1928, a year after The Jazz Singer introduced sound into the movies. The Docks Of New York is a good film, it is an interesting story that is somewhat simple and easy to follow.
This film is most of all beautifully shot. Shots that come to mind are the close up of the water as we see the reflection of a woman jumping into the sea. The shot then blurs, which is similar to a shot that appears nearer the end of the film. A point of view shot from the girl as she tries to thread a needle. The shot blurs, representing the tears filling her eyes and maybe even representing her thinking back to her suicide attempt. This is a beautiful scene and we truly feel for the characters. Altogether, this is a good film, not one of the best from the silent era, but one that is definitely worth a watch
This film is most of all beautifully shot. Shots that come to mind are the close up of the water as we see the reflection of a woman jumping into the sea. The shot then blurs, which is similar to a shot that appears nearer the end of the film. A point of view shot from the girl as she tries to thread a needle. The shot blurs, representing the tears filling her eyes and maybe even representing her thinking back to her suicide attempt. This is a beautiful scene and we truly feel for the characters. Altogether, this is a good film, not one of the best from the silent era, but one that is definitely worth a watch
- sean-ramsden
- 26 अप्रैल 2020
- परमालिंक
... and it's not even the very last. It was released in September 1928, the same month that the 75% talkie "The Singing Fool" pretty much propelled the film industry into the sound era. Like "The Last Command", I'm not sure this film could have been succesfully translated into a sound film. As usual director von Sternberg is focused on the sumptuous visuals, and he makes striking a match on a cracked plaster wall in a dingy flop house room a thing of beauty.
The story involves the ship of stoker Bill Roberts (George Bancroft) coming into port in New York, and with him having the night for leave. He sees a woman leap off the dock into the water, attempting suicide. He rescues her and takes her up to his room where Lou (Baclanova) and the inn proprietor revive her. Later he exhorts her to join him in the riotous Sandbar tavern where they impulsively marry - It technically is not legal as there is no license. When the new day dawns, Bill is due back on the ship if he wants to go OR he can stay ashore with Mae. Complications ensue.
What makes this a masterpiece lies in the remarkable details of the production: Josef von Sternberg's superb direction, a brilliant script by Jules Furthman, marvelous cinematography by Harold Rosson, and a terrific cast of very strong performers. If you consider that this film runs a little more than 75 minutes, one of the great achievements is that you can feel (upon reflecting) that you know more about the characters and details of the story than were actually presented in the film itself. The characters are the kind of hardbitten, scuffed up by life but resilient types we might meet, and love, in a Warner Brothers precode.
I'd highly recommend this one. It is a perfect silent film in just about every way.
The story involves the ship of stoker Bill Roberts (George Bancroft) coming into port in New York, and with him having the night for leave. He sees a woman leap off the dock into the water, attempting suicide. He rescues her and takes her up to his room where Lou (Baclanova) and the inn proprietor revive her. Later he exhorts her to join him in the riotous Sandbar tavern where they impulsively marry - It technically is not legal as there is no license. When the new day dawns, Bill is due back on the ship if he wants to go OR he can stay ashore with Mae. Complications ensue.
What makes this a masterpiece lies in the remarkable details of the production: Josef von Sternberg's superb direction, a brilliant script by Jules Furthman, marvelous cinematography by Harold Rosson, and a terrific cast of very strong performers. If you consider that this film runs a little more than 75 minutes, one of the great achievements is that you can feel (upon reflecting) that you know more about the characters and details of the story than were actually presented in the film itself. The characters are the kind of hardbitten, scuffed up by life but resilient types we might meet, and love, in a Warner Brothers precode.
I'd highly recommend this one. It is a perfect silent film in just about every way.
I didn't know anything about George Bancroft 48 hours ago, but after watching him star in two films in as many days, I'm impressed enough to seek out more of his work. Betty Compson was also terrific in a film that I can't easily fit in any category. I set out to watch it for the cinematography which puts it in the proto-noir category but I quickly found myself interested in what the actors were doing in the shadows and fog of this silent film. Unfortunately the story itself was something out of a Laurel & Hardy comedy but without the slapstick and jokes to help us suspend our disbelief. But you'll probably enjoy it, it's better than your average date movie.
What a good film and what good condition this film is in. The story is simple enough but delivered so well by a great cast.
Seaman(George Bancroft) gets shore leave for the night and goes looking for some fun. He saves a lady(Betty Compson) and is overwhelmed by her. One thing leads to another and he ask her out. From there all kinds of things happen. One of those things is love.
I was very impressed by Bancroft and Compson. They really seemed like they were living their parts rather than acting them out. Betty Compson was such a beautiful woman. That combined with her acting talent, I am surprise that she wasn't a big silent film star. I have never heard of her before.
I would recommend this film to all film lovers, silent and sound.
Seaman(George Bancroft) gets shore leave for the night and goes looking for some fun. He saves a lady(Betty Compson) and is overwhelmed by her. One thing leads to another and he ask her out. From there all kinds of things happen. One of those things is love.
I was very impressed by Bancroft and Compson. They really seemed like they were living their parts rather than acting them out. Betty Compson was such a beautiful woman. That combined with her acting talent, I am surprise that she wasn't a big silent film star. I have never heard of her before.
I would recommend this film to all film lovers, silent and sound.