IMDb रेटिंग
6.6/10
20 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अप्रैल 1940. दुनिया की निगाहें उत्तरी नॉर्वे के एक छोटे से शहर नारविक पर टिकी हैं, जो हिटर की युद्ध मशीनरी के लिए आवश्यक लौह अयस्क का स्रोत है. दो महीने के भयंकर युद्ध के बाद, हिटलर को अपनी ... सभी पढ़ेंअप्रैल 1940. दुनिया की निगाहें उत्तरी नॉर्वे के एक छोटे से शहर नारविक पर टिकी हैं, जो हिटर की युद्ध मशीनरी के लिए आवश्यक लौह अयस्क का स्रोत है. दो महीने के भयंकर युद्ध के बाद, हिटलर को अपनी पहली हार का सामना करना पड़ता है.अप्रैल 1940. दुनिया की निगाहें उत्तरी नॉर्वे के एक छोटे से शहर नारविक पर टिकी हैं, जो हिटर की युद्ध मशीनरी के लिए आवश्यक लौह अयस्क का स्रोत है. दो महीने के भयंकर युद्ध के बाद, हिटलर को अपनी पहली हार का सामना करना पड़ता है.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- पुरस्कार
- 3 जीत और कुल 3 नामांकन
Mathilde Holtedahl Cuhra
- Bjørg
- (as Mathilde Cuhra)
Billy Campbell
- British Consul George L.D. Gibbs
- (as Ollie Campbell)
Magnus Dugdale
- Giles Romilly
- (as Magnus Dugdale Lyseng)
Isak Bakli Aglen
- Corporal Larsen
- (as Isak Aglen)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
A small form of World War 2 movie from Norway that has a different story from the real history of the battlefield where Hitler was first defeated. It focuses on the story of innocent civilians in Narvik who suffer the karma of the German-British war. Whereas Germany did its best to protect its citizens in times of war. While the British continued to attack the city until there were many victims. Which is different from the image of other movies in the past, and although we know at the end that Germany has lost But this isn't the real ending. There are more profound stories and great tragedies after that. Which the film ends with the facts very perfectly and is at the heart of this whole story.
Yes, it could have done so much more and gone way beyond. But I don't know if that would mean "better". There were plenty of spaces for more facts, arcs, narratives and things to be explored. But I think the fact that they weren't there was by design. Actually the movie made me cry and care about the characters in the end. So I think this is "mission accomplished" isn't it. It has that straightforward cold hearted but yet gentle and beautiful touch of morality and love that Nordic war movies always seem to have. The last 30 minutes are really worth it. And pay attention to the kid, the protagonist couple's kid.
Here comes another important and interesting movie about the Hitlerian occupation in Norway during the Second World War. It shows accurately how the Nazi and the Norwegian opposition wanted to defend their territory.
The locations were beautiful and the costumes created with authentically.
It's a touching story and I don't want to spoil any details here. I just recommend to check it out on Netflix. The main actors did a good job and the director too. The combat scenes are well executed with good special effects.
The Norwegian locations are beautiful and they are just perfect to turn there this documentary.
7/10.
The locations were beautiful and the costumes created with authentically.
It's a touching story and I don't want to spoil any details here. I just recommend to check it out on Netflix. The main actors did a good job and the director too. The combat scenes are well executed with good special effects.
The Norwegian locations are beautiful and they are just perfect to turn there this documentary.
7/10.
This movie deserves 5 stars. It is watchable from beginning to end, but won't bring you anything more and forgettable with little to no value to talk about with those who have watched it too.
The battle for Norway of course was a note worthy, but seldom spoken of part of history as far as the timeline during the Second World War. This movie did little justice to bring any change to that.
The acting was fine from many of the main charactures, namely Kristine Hartgen, who played Ingrid Tofte. On an equal note, some of the acting seemed to be done by members taken from an after work/school acting club i.e. At least they knew not to look directly at the camera.
I can also say the cinematography was beautiful and location settings were superb. Unfortunately, where so many movies with great effects and stunning shots fall short, the story. The plot is the same as so many films which have come before, it is almost a clichè; likely so that they have something to begin filming with as quickly as possible and quite frankly, with a story line so unoriginal, you would think they might be able to get it right, or at least create it in such a way you can admire the finer details they put in. Not here though.
On a plus, which does deserve credit, the Germans were German, the Norweigens were Norweigen, the British were British and the French were French.
So, if you have found yourself scrolling for an eternity, mindlessly trying to find something to watch and about to give up, consider giving this movie a go... or don't, you will have missed nothing.
The battle for Norway of course was a note worthy, but seldom spoken of part of history as far as the timeline during the Second World War. This movie did little justice to bring any change to that.
The acting was fine from many of the main charactures, namely Kristine Hartgen, who played Ingrid Tofte. On an equal note, some of the acting seemed to be done by members taken from an after work/school acting club i.e. At least they knew not to look directly at the camera.
I can also say the cinematography was beautiful and location settings were superb. Unfortunately, where so many movies with great effects and stunning shots fall short, the story. The plot is the same as so many films which have come before, it is almost a clichè; likely so that they have something to begin filming with as quickly as possible and quite frankly, with a story line so unoriginal, you would think they might be able to get it right, or at least create it in such a way you can admire the finer details they put in. Not here though.
On a plus, which does deserve credit, the Germans were German, the Norweigens were Norweigen, the British were British and the French were French.
So, if you have found yourself scrolling for an eternity, mindlessly trying to find something to watch and about to give up, consider giving this movie a go... or don't, you will have missed nothing.
While looking at what others said on here I found one outstanding and very comprehensive review. I completely agree with everything said by Erik_Surewaard and hope he won't mind me quoting part of his to make up the word count. I strongly recommend reading Erik's comments in full.
If I read quite some of the other user reviews, I see many complaints about the movie being too focussed on the story of one family. This instead of on the battle itself. And I can partially agree with those comments. But to use this as the main argument for giving this movie an IMDd rating of only somewhere between 1 to 4 stars, is totally unjustified. This is like saying that "Titanic" is a bad movie because it focusses to much on a love story between two people...
I personally think that "Narvik" succeeded pretty well considering its relative meagre production budget of 'only' 63.2 million Norwegian Kroner, equalling around 6.4 million US$. So before drawing conclusions, let's first take a look at a comparable... For instance "Das Boot" - a WW2 movie that was made in germany over 40 years ago - had a budget of 15 million US$. And mind you, those are 1981 dollars! So it seems that a budget of 6.4 million is peanuts if you want to make a WW2 movie.
If I read quite some of the other user reviews, I see many complaints about the movie being too focussed on the story of one family. This instead of on the battle itself. And I can partially agree with those comments. But to use this as the main argument for giving this movie an IMDd rating of only somewhere between 1 to 4 stars, is totally unjustified. This is like saying that "Titanic" is a bad movie because it focusses to much on a love story between two people...
I personally think that "Narvik" succeeded pretty well considering its relative meagre production budget of 'only' 63.2 million Norwegian Kroner, equalling around 6.4 million US$. So before drawing conclusions, let's first take a look at a comparable... For instance "Das Boot" - a WW2 movie that was made in germany over 40 years ago - had a budget of 15 million US$. And mind you, those are 1981 dollars! So it seems that a budget of 6.4 million is peanuts if you want to make a WW2 movie.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe release of the movie was postponed for two years. First due to the 2019 Corona virus, and later on due to the war in Ukraine in 2022. The Covid pandemic delayed filming. And the producers didn't want to release a war movie, just as the war broke out in Ukraine. The filming of the movie was finished in 2021.
- गूफ़Throughout the movie, the sound from explosions can be heard instantaneously, even when they occur a long distance away. Bangs would be delayed in such cases, as sound travels at roughly 340 meters per second.
However, there is no evidence to support this claim. There are very few times in the film when 'distant' explosions happen. These seem appropriately timed with the sound. Examples of times when this allegedly happens is needed to support the claim.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Narvik: Hitler's First Defeat?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- NOK 8,02,00,000(अनुमानित)
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $66,57,347
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 48 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.00 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें