सम्राट पृथ्वीराज

Please dont get fooled by getting patriotic with the great samrat's name.

The movie, music, dialogues, action sequences, thrills, acting, aura, grandeur everything is very below average. The makers have just spoiled the samrat. Bad movie making overall. I suggest to watch on TV or OTT rather.

Sameer lodaya

The biggest problem with the movie is the powerful thump of the SAMRAT which was totally missing

When it come to historic or war fiction movies we have seen big canvas like jodha Akbar padmavat Bahubali and many more so our exceptions becomes very high and it is very difficult to make a film above all this cults

Akshay failed to deliver an extra ordinary performance and aggression of SAMRAT miss chhillar was not promising..Sonu Sood came out very well with his softness..the movie started with a powerful fight scene but then gradually became dull..technically there was no problem but prosthetics were pathetic specially Akshay with hurted eyes..not a single scene gave the effect or feel of SAMRAT..songs were totally boring and sad..till the end I was waiting for a power punch action or scene but i couldn't find it

the director is of old school daily soaps where betting on him for such a great venture was yashrajs biggest mistake

But of course it is not that bad in compare to box office results.

First is wrong casting,they should cast young and energetic actor like Vicky kaushal. Akshay Kumar is old and you can see that white hairy chest who is representing 26 years young king isn't it funny also he is the actor who make 4 movie in one year,so he didn't work hard for this role, I mean by just wearing king clothes and fake moustache and doing the same rowry Rathore acting and expecting people to watch their movie by doing some emotional religious drama to promote the movie is shameful. When you watch movie there were so many flaws in movie. Story and directions could have been better and they haven't justified the real glory,you can feel that lack of dedications. Actrees is new so no expression on her face while acting and how can we expect chemistry between 25 year young actress with 55 years old actor.

It's been a while since I had been so frustrated and mindblown on how bad a film was, and to say I felt that level of disappointment with this "period biopic" is an understatement. Filled with awful writing, piss poor performances, and cartoonish action sequences, "Samrat Prithviraj" has nothing to offer. Neither does the film be accurate historically, nor does it make it a lot more entertaining. The background score is bland, Obnoxious and overpresent, and actively takes away from the enjoyment of the film. Yeah it's a period piece, where Prithviraj totally kills someone who actually was alive after even Prithvi' own death!

Pretty much summed up in the title.

It's a movie made to cash in on the hyper nationalism wave. And to do that there are many historical inaccuracies in the film which are aimed at demonising and vilifying a community.