समुद्र की गहराई की खोज करते समय, एक शोध दल को कई खतरों का सामना करना पड़ता है, जिसमें एक खतरनाक खनन अभियान भी शामिल है.समुद्र की गहराई की खोज करते समय, एक शोध दल को कई खतरों का सामना करना पड़ता है, जिसमें एक खतरनाक खनन अभियान भी शामिल है.समुद्र की गहराई की खोज करते समय, एक शोध दल को कई खतरों का सामना करना पड़ता है, जिसमें एक खतरनाक खनन अभियान भी शामिल है.
- पुरस्कार
- 3 जीत और कुल 5 नामांकन
Shuya Sophia Cai
- Meiying
- (as Sophia Cai)
Sergio Peris-Mencheta
- Montes
- (as Sergio Peris Mencheta)
Lele Dai
- Beautiful Tourist
- (as Dai Lele)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I wanted to like this, I really did, it has everything, giant creature, Statham, shark, but this is just so boring.
The problem is, it hits every cliché. Annoying kid, paint by the number villain, a predictable plot. Unlikable characters who all behave like cartoon characters.
I liked the first movie and was looking forward to the sequel, but the irritating characters and lazy [;it just didn't do it for me.
I don't mind popcorn movies where you park your brain at the door, but they are usually fun. I think that is the problem here, it just was not fun. Statham is the best thing about this movie, he always turns in a reliable performance. The rest of the cast are so forgettable, in the end I was cheering for the shark.
If I want a good shark movie, I will watch Jaws.
The problem is, it hits every cliché. Annoying kid, paint by the number villain, a predictable plot. Unlikable characters who all behave like cartoon characters.
I liked the first movie and was looking forward to the sequel, but the irritating characters and lazy [;it just didn't do it for me.
I don't mind popcorn movies where you park your brain at the door, but they are usually fun. I think that is the problem here, it just was not fun. Statham is the best thing about this movie, he always turns in a reliable performance. The rest of the cast are so forgettable, in the end I was cheering for the shark.
If I want a good shark movie, I will watch Jaws.
Personally, I was surprised that Jason Statham decided to make a sequel to the Meg. Most likely because I did not think the Meg was his type of movie. Not exactly Crank on water or anything. The film is an obvious cash cow but worth the money. No need to put any thought into how stupid this movie its cause it's met to be the opposite of smart. Its entertaining as hell and does not slow down long enough for me to point out the plot holes and the science mistakes. A perfect Tie-in to Shark Week. I went into this baby knowing that I was going to like it and I came out loving every minute of it. It's not met to be Shakespeare but it's definitely a fun experience.
My Rating reflects expectations. If this was touted as a edge of your seat thriller with cutting edge CGI and unexpected twists and turns, it'd be a 2. But this was always going to end up the campy, overacted, completely implausible, CGI riddled cheese-fest that it is. And it absolutely delivered on that expectation.
It has Plot holes so big you could swim a megladon through, hilarious foreshadowing via dialogue (if they say something won't happen, its going to happen,) and a decent smattering of quips, giggle/smirk inducing lines, and the requisite action scenes.
It ticked all the boxes for expectations - and exceeded it in areas like "completely unrealistic technology," "inaccurate animal behaviour" and "Implausible physics/hydrodynamics." But that just added to the fun.
For the naysayers - expecting more quality/realism/etc from this movie is like expecting a Fast and the Furious movie to be extolling the virtues of bicycles.
Its a fun, lighthearted, and "laugh at the ridiculousness" sort of flick and that's worth a passing grade.
It has Plot holes so big you could swim a megladon through, hilarious foreshadowing via dialogue (if they say something won't happen, its going to happen,) and a decent smattering of quips, giggle/smirk inducing lines, and the requisite action scenes.
It ticked all the boxes for expectations - and exceeded it in areas like "completely unrealistic technology," "inaccurate animal behaviour" and "Implausible physics/hydrodynamics." But that just added to the fun.
For the naysayers - expecting more quality/realism/etc from this movie is like expecting a Fast and the Furious movie to be extolling the virtues of bicycles.
Its a fun, lighthearted, and "laugh at the ridiculousness" sort of flick and that's worth a passing grade.
So I can get the words to describe such an amazing story created by a boy or girl from an elementary school!!!
Bravo !!! Yeaaayyyyy amazing!!
Go and see I recommend!!!!
I don't want to see this movie alone !
I give a 4 star become of the effort of the team who work in this movie The special effects and the rendering, the actors and actress get 2 stars and the best of the best is the history behind this movie!
I see the movie until the end and I have to say that in 1980 shark movies put a very nice sound effects .... Keep moving forward??? No please do not make any other movie like this pleaseeee !!!
Bravo !!! Yeaaayyyyy amazing!!
Go and see I recommend!!!!
I don't want to see this movie alone !
I give a 4 star become of the effort of the team who work in this movie The special effects and the rendering, the actors and actress get 2 stars and the best of the best is the history behind this movie!
I see the movie until the end and I have to say that in 1980 shark movies put a very nice sound effects .... Keep moving forward??? No please do not make any other movie like this pleaseeee !!!
A bunch of separate script scenarios thrown together. Editing is terrible. Characters you dont know anything about due to no introduction and without explanation. Plot holes. The story doesnt evolve seamlessly. And what happened to shark carnage? I love jason statham movies. A d i love shark movies. But its just more of JS usual movie types that this time just wasnt that good. The underwater scenes were getting good but its like they just didnt know what to do with it. While there was some fun to it i dont think it was worth the money spent at a theatre. Wait for it to come out on streaming. Sorry.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाJason Statham was disappointed by the lighter tone and lack of bloodshed in this film.
- गूफ़(at around 57 mins) You cannot just breathe all the air out of your skull and be able to free swim the 25,000 feet below sea level wearing no suit.
- भाव
Jonas Taylor: See you later, chum.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटImages of Voidikolia beach in the Municipality of Pylos-Nestoras, District of Messinia, Greece have been digitally altered for use in this motion picture.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनMainland China version runs 119 minutes, about 4-minute longer than other versions.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Half in the Bag: Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny (2023)
- साउंडट्रैकUnder Pressure
Written by Brian May, Freddie Mercury, David Bowie, John Deacon, Roger Taylor
Performed by Queen, David Bowie
Courtesy of EMI
Under licence from Universal Music Operations Ltd & Hollywood Records, Inc. & Courtesy of RZO Music
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- The Meg 2: The Trench
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $12,90,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $8,26,00,317
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $3,00,02,735
- 6 अग॰ 2023
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $39,78,00,317
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 56 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें