Quick

Couldn't see more than 30 min. Bored me too much. Too confusing and not interesting at all... Can not understand how anyone liked it. There is nothing else to be said about it! Just a bad movie.

My kind of movie with human realism and a story without visual effects. Human relations and dedication at its best

And Its the story about the alleged serial killer thomas quick...again... a charade of judicial and psyciatric blunder that have bred a lot of sadness and fright in the foremost swedish society, but also here in norway. do admit a murder and youll get pills, and even more pills if it coincides with our theories. time it well and admit 8,10,or 30 murders, that will gain a lot of benzodiazepines....over many years

when films like these are made i feel soo sorry for all the families that have lost and never found their dear ones due to crime, and my heart really bleeds for them, as well as it bleeds for mr råstam, who made shockingly good journalism at his best.

the story delves over a relative short timespan, but gives a thorough introduction to the quick case and the obsessive and narcisistic besserwissers within surtain parts of sweedish psyciatry and policing.( i know there are people that dont like this) and the worst part of it all is that there have never been investigated any other suspects or theories, and its basiclly acknowledged that the true suspect will never be found.

its as usual a good sweedish film production, good acting a good story, though with a lot of flashing back which can be a bit confusing. its hard to make an ending to stories like this, but i think its quite an honour to the journalist and the journalism.

its a 9 from the grumpy old man, i had low expectations so im pleasantly surprised. its a recommend

The best thing about this film is that it is very well documented, the worst thing is that it is quite long. I don't know if one thing is related to the other, I think not, the scenes of the family history and the disease should have been summarized a little more.

Despite this, I quite liked the subject, a learning experience that makes you think, this case came to light due to the persevering work of these journalists. How many cases of this type will exist today? Probably more than we would like.

Jonas Karlsson and David Dencik, Hannes and Quick in the movie, the two main actors, are fantastic in their role. The difficult thing for me, at times, is getting used to Hannes's strange family, totally distanced, for this reason the scene in which Quick gives Hannes a hug seemed most touching to me, while his wife reacts in a very distant way. It must be that I like psychology and the ways of acting of each person.

The story is exciting and has quite strong parts, how could this have happened? Well, it did and it's almost unbelievable. I recommend it, without a doubt!

Putting miscarriage of justice on screen is no easy task. Bureaucracy and law is usually not as entertaining as shooting gangsters, wars or superheroes. However, Mikael Håfström pulls this off in a very good manner with help from two well-crafted acting performances from David Dencik and Jonas Karlsson. It's, without a doubt, Håfström's best achievement since his Oscar nominated Evil (2003).

The movie portrays how Thomas Quick was manipulated into confessing over 30 murders; thereafter convicted for eight of them. Even though the focus of the film is on Quick, it's not an understatement to say that the film manages to display how essential journalism is in modern day society. Had it not been for Hannes Råstam, an investigative journalist with a brilliant mind, this story might have never seen the light of day. It is also a reminder of why it's important that we hold people working for the justice system, police force and health care to very high standards. If one is interested in law, psychology, human behaviour and/or journalism - this is a must watch.

The uncovering of this drama has led to numerous documentaries and books being written about the case. It is a legal scandal without comparison in Swedish judicial history; a case which should interest people outside of its borders. Watch it, now.