Silent Zone

I can't even believe that I paid $5 for this movie. The fights are terrible, the "bleeding" is even worse, and the acting is really bad!! The make-up is really bad too...one part in the beginning was a woman who got bit on the face and it looked like she dipped her face in dirt or rocks. The availability of vehicles for the all too hurried escape time after time was really really bad. I get it that everyone wants to make the perfect zombie movie but it's ridiculous that the "hero" is some guy who blames and blames everyone else because something didn't go to plan as he would of liked. I love zombie movies but this one isn't good at all.

Okay, I have to be honest-when my friends and I sat down to watch Silent Zone, we fully expected a disaster. We're big fans of watching B-movies together, the kind where the plot's a mess, the acting's rough, and the fun comes from laughing at how bad it is. We grabbed snacks, got comfortable, and were ready for some low-budget, post-apocalyptic nonsense. But here's the thing... Silent Zone actually surprised us. And not in a "so bad it's good" way, but in a "wait, this is actually kind of decent?" way.

Sure, the setup is classic B-movie fare. It's the usual post-apocalyptic world, a deadly outbreak, desperate survivors, and the struggle to find safety. Nothing new there. But somewhere along the way, the film actually hooked us. The tension was solid, and there were at least three twists that none of us saw coming. Not groundbreaking stuff, but just clever enough to keep us invested. The story might be familiar, but it never felt lazy. In fact, it felt like the filmmakers were actually trying, which is more than I can say for a lot of movies in this genre.

The characters? Surprisingly good. We went in expecting cardboard cutouts, but they had depth. By the end, we actually cared about what happened to them. And yeah, I'll admit it-I got a little emotional in the final act, which is not what I thought would happen when I hit play.

And Matt Devere? Never heard of him before this, but wow. That guy has a seriously cool voice. The kind of voice that makes you pay attention. He brought this calm, tough energy to his role, and honestly, it really worked. No idea why I haven't seen him in more stuff, but he definitely stood out here.

By the end, we all looked at each other like, "That was actually good, right?" Maybe it's because we went in with zero expectations, but Silent Zone turned out to be a solid, enjoyable movie. It's not just a film to make fun of-it's one that's actually worth watching.

Everything that needs to be in a film of this genre is present in Silent Zone: a simple plot, intense action, hordes of the undead, and a mad scientist.

However: The acting is bad, the dialogue is dull, and the fight scenes are so poorly executed that I actually laughed out loud at times. The director clearly didn't have an armorer on set. The way the actors handle firearms is comical, and the amount of muzzle flash is ridiculously unrealistic. The tension of traveling through the remnants of civilization is nonexistent. The characters don't fit together, they are underdeveloped, and they left no impression on me.

To sum up: The framework of this film could serve as a starting point for writing a script for any movie in this genre. Silent Zone is a failure only because it didn't have enough funding.

In a post apocalyptic world, that's ravaged by zombies or in this case they are called ferals, the dead has taken over. A teen and her guardian fight for survival as they face off with relentless dangers from the living and the dead. Loyalty comes into play as the young teen is growing into maturity. Good zombie flick filled with a good story and tension. I recommend it, the acting was good. The movie was long but I wanted more as I was watching. I didn't want it to end. Overall good premise, from all involved. It's not a great movie, but I was thoroughly satisfied from start to finish. Bring on part two.

I finally caught Silent Zone, and while it's not the kind of film that's going to redefine the post-apocalyptic horror genre, it does enough right to keep you watching. It's one of those movies that doesn't try to be flashy or groundbreaking but instead leans into the tension and grit of survival-and for the most part, it works.

The setup is pretty straightforward. Years after a brutal outbreak has wiped out most of civilization, survivors Cassius and Abigail have learned how to stay alive by keeping their heads down and trusting no one. Their fragile routine gets thrown off when they encounter a pregnant woman. It's a moral dilemma that forces them to risk their own safety to find her a place of refuge. From that point, it becomes a tense road movie, where the threats come not just from the infected but from other desperate survivors.

What the film does well is build tension. You're never quite sure when something terrible is going to happen, and it creates this constant sense of unease. The infected are genuinely creepy, and the encounters with other survivors-who are often just as dangerous-add a layer of unpredictability. There's always this looming sense that things could go bad at any second, and that definitely kept me invested.

The performances also deserve some credit. The actors bring enough emotional depth to make you care about their struggle. You can feel the fear and the weariness in them, especially during the tougher moral moments when they're deciding whether to trust strangers or keep moving. That said, while the cast is solid, the characters themselves feel a little thin at times. There are moments when I wanted to know more about their pasts or what drives them beyond just survival. The film hints at deeper emotions but doesn't quite dig deep enough to make the characters feel fully fleshed out.

Visually, the movie is decent but nothing to write home about. The wasteland setting is bleak and unforgiving, which suits the story, but there's a kind of generic feel to it. It's the kind of landscape you've seen in plenty of other post-apocalyptic films, and I found myself wishing for just a bit more visual personality. The action sequences are engaging and well-paced, but there were moments when I felt like they leaned too much on standard tropes-running, hiding, close calls. It's effective but also a little predictable.

That kind of sums up the whole film. Silent Zone doesn't do much wrong, but it doesn't really stand out either. It plays it safe, which isn't necessarily bad, but it means the movie is more of a solid watch than an unforgettable experience. I never felt bored, but I also never felt blown away. It's competent, tense, and has some emotional beats that land well, but I couldn't shake the feeling that it could have pushed a little harder, dug a little deeper.

Still, if you're in the mood for a straightforward survival thriller with enough tension to keep you on edge, it's worth a watch. It doesn't try to be more than what it is, and in a way, I respect that. Just go in with tempered expectations, and you'll probably come away satisfied, if not overly impressed.