उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं

This is a low budget film but I don't give extra or less marks based on this I try and judge every film within the same criteria.

The premise is fairly simple revolving around a mega pharma corp, a woman with a conscience who needs to be silenced and 2 unlikely heroes.

Overall the premise is fine, nothing new and pretty generic for this type of thriller. I guess the selling point is the 2 unlikely heroes of a homeless guy and a prostitute.

Cool concept, sure, convoluted, absolutely.

It does however in a strange way pass if you don't think about it too much.

The photography is decent enough and captures that sterile corporate sci fi setting switching to more real gritty texture " On the streets ".

This is where it gets jarring and falls down, the acting is all over the place. Some of the wooden acting passes as it suits the environment i.e wooden scientist.

If this followed through consistently it would have worked, however the performances cross from wooden acting to over acting to strange character acting which is often at the wrong times, this becomes jarring and uncomfortable to watch.

I know its low budget but this is where some can make it work and others try to achieve too much under the limitations.

There is also a plethora of different characters that are pointless and unnecessary, This takes away the focus from the " better characters ".

There is a few times when it feels like it's coming together but then, bosh it Jarrs you out of it all.

So we end up with a pretty generic plot with a slight hero twist with average to god awful acting, Good cinematography on the whole but with Jarring and convoluted moments.

You can't make a low budget blockbuster all the bells and whistles type film without it looking weak.

Ive seen many brilliant Indy low budget films and the brilliance tends to be in the simplicity of which this is the antithesis to that concept

4/10 I'd pass unless you want to check out a low budget film because its a low budget film.

Weak dialogue, weak filming, cast isn't good, low budget film

Not sure how this got ratings of 6.5. Pace goes on and off like some shot are by one director and some by other . And lot of logical errors too. We got lot of similar movies , good ones. This one is not good.

I will watch almost anything to the end to get it a chance to get better. This doesn't. Awful film.

Notice for every bad review it's a generic bot 10/10? These ratings are so misleading.

This is simply terrible. 5 minutes of viewing will tell you that. I'm 45 minutes in and its a miracle I've lasted this long. The script is terrible, the acting is shocking, the plot although a great subject matter has been poorly executed.

Its a rather boring movie without any special effects,no use of music to try to spice it up,its slow and rather uninspiring acting,it looked actually very amaterish and simple,from the script to the acting. Waste of time and energy to watch this.

I should have made this review one star. It is BAD. So bad it is goo... nope, it is terrible in every way. The music is even incongruous with the scenes. It literally hurt me to watch this.

Terrible acting , terrible dialogue, terrible everything geeeeez !!!!

Many flaws and inconsistencies in the story. Very amateur level Have no idea how this could have gotten 6.3, it's a 2-4 outa 10.

A story that starts with a man (Damien Chinappi) who's been through his own termmoil and decides to end his life until a young woman is being attacked so he intervines.

The man who later finds out an old employer has been kidnapped sets out to find why.

This story is further hardened with drama involving a company that researches science technology of the body involving a great break through that could help and destroy given power to the group or individual.

Director Harley Wallen presents a real threat through his next entry, even him being a character that also becomes a pawn of greed. Erika Hoveland gives her performance as a sympathetic yet driven to make a difference and stands by her morals.

A well placed cast and gives the right feel to each of them without giving them a jolt of hype or a fast pace for the audience.

Right from the get go the acting is bad. The evil board director has terrible lines and no delivery. The music is like elevator music on tranquilizers. They try to sync the music with the action and it becomes distracting overkill. For example, the "good girls" doing something for the suicidal dude. The music was so bad I thought it was a commercial. Oh and the bad girl keeps showing up with a coffee for him for saving her life? The plot is so thin you can see the B movie VPL. Speaking of the suicidal dude, who is he? A hero, a main character? He keeps showing up being the lovable loser who secretly does good, but his character is like a wet brown paper bag on the sidewalk. How this is a 7.2 rating is beyond me. I stopped watching at 20 minutes. I am starting to question the integrity of IMBD

A very classic and old style gun action movie, I thought it is Sci-Fi but it's not.

Poor acting combined with bad direction and a week script.... not worth your time...

Script,director,photography and acting is awful. I don't know why I've watched this for 58 minutes.

I'm so pissed of by the movie as it shows a basic story line of kidnapping. While any other got a lot of twists, surprise, this one drive me like 'we are the basic one'. So boring. The flow is so slow, the act for action just so no no. It looks like the film from a school project. I'm so surprised with the rating. Do not get fooled.

Simply put - just terrible everything... I didn't feel about writing more but....so, mo matter if low budget or indie or whatever - just terrible everything, just terrible everything and so on...

With no action sequence .average thriller draging climax

Movie focused more on kidnapping rather than generic revolution theme based story. It should have a good tempo for a kidnapping drama, but unfortunately it trails many times and wrapped up at the end with leaving loose point for next sequel. Casting of Corey (Damien Chinappi) is totally miss fitted. Others are just okay. A good story losing its grip by poor screenplay and bad presentation. Otherwise it would be a good thriller. Don't judge with poster because inner material is not enjoyable. Only watch on your own.

For an obviously low budget movie I found this to be quite enjoyable to watch and I really don't understand all the low ratings here. It's as if some kind of smear campaign has been mounted against this movie. On the other side we see some 10/10 ratings on here that are a bit optimistic, maybe trying to compensate for the absurd low ratings. IMHO the acting is pretty decent, all the lead actors perform well and manage to convey their personalities with enough depth to be convincing. Some of the support cast could have done better as there was some under- or overacting from time to time which sometimes broke the spell of the movie. The camera work doesn't leave much to be desired, considering this is a low budget movie, but could have had a better angle in certain scenes. The only thing that really has some holes is the script but nothing major that takes any credibility away from the story overall (other than it being a sci-fi action flic). With a nice twist at the end. So, a reasonably original story with a good overall performance. Decent enough acting and well enough edited to keep you engaged for the duration. Not at the level of a Hollywood blockbuster but good enough to be considered a low budget Indy cracker and something I'd recommend watching, it's a good waste of time.

This is a great action thriller, with wonderful performances by Mel Novak, Vida Ghaffari, Yan Birch and Richard Tyson!

I admit the quality of the movie is not good. It's almost the same quality of a student made film. But what the hell, I guess I still kinda enjoyed the story.

The movie had a pretty good story line but without good actors it has no legs to stand on. I understand it had a low budget but again, the acting was almost painful to watch at times.

The movie's story line was quite catchy. That is why I started watching this. But the execution was too poor and acting was not a bit praiseworthy. It's not about the budget! I saw a lot of low budget movies those became masterpiece for it's making, camera work and obviously direction. For example, all time hit '12 Angry Men' is a movie where in a single room the whole movie was captured. Definitely a low budget movie, but in appeal it crossed the borders of decades. Not by any means this movie 'Eternal Code' can get 3.0+ rating. I gave 3.0 just because of its story only. Nothing else.