IMDb रेटिंग
4.7/10
16 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
एलियंस के पृथ्वी पर उतरने के दो साल बाद, सिडनी के बचे हुए लोग अपनी जान बचाने के लिए एक युद्ध में लड़ते हैं.एलियंस के पृथ्वी पर उतरने के दो साल बाद, सिडनी के बचे हुए लोग अपनी जान बचाने के लिए एक युद्ध में लड़ते हैं.एलियंस के पृथ्वी पर उतरने के दो साल बाद, सिडनी के बचे हुए लोग अपनी जान बचाने के लिए एक युद्ध में लड़ते हैं.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
Zac Garred
- Dennis
- (as Zachary Garred)
Eliza Matengu
- High Female Elder
- (as Eliza D'Souza)
- …
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Talk about milking the action scenes; of the 128 minute runtime of this well-funded B-movie, half is many unnecessarily long, dragged out and pointless action scenes, that are also poorly choreographed.
The other half is the most convoluted and basic-as-it-gets cliched story, from a frustratingly derivative screenplay. There are more plot and technical issues than running-time minutes. If you take every popular sci-fi like Star Wars, Star Trek etc, and throw them in a blender, this is the story you would get.
It's a shame, because the although overused and mostly dated S/VFX, alongside some excellent prosthetic costumes, and for the most part some adequate acting (how the heck did Ken Jeong end up in this?), this film had tons of potential. I never saw the first one, which apparently was much worse than this one, but who if funding this sinking ship? And there's going to be a part 3?! Are the Australian tax write-off's for lost revenue that amazing?
Had writer and director Luke Sparke at least consulted a seasoned sci-fi writer, there'd be hope for a cohesive story that would have continuity - and be exciting. Maybe he'll figure that out for part 3. And please stop that annoying, unfitting and overbearing non-stop score on your next film, I wanted to stick pencils in my ears to stop the pain. It's a very generous 5/10 from me.
The other half is the most convoluted and basic-as-it-gets cliched story, from a frustratingly derivative screenplay. There are more plot and technical issues than running-time minutes. If you take every popular sci-fi like Star Wars, Star Trek etc, and throw them in a blender, this is the story you would get.
It's a shame, because the although overused and mostly dated S/VFX, alongside some excellent prosthetic costumes, and for the most part some adequate acting (how the heck did Ken Jeong end up in this?), this film had tons of potential. I never saw the first one, which apparently was much worse than this one, but who if funding this sinking ship? And there's going to be a part 3?! Are the Australian tax write-off's for lost revenue that amazing?
Had writer and director Luke Sparke at least consulted a seasoned sci-fi writer, there'd be hope for a cohesive story that would have continuity - and be exciting. Maybe he'll figure that out for part 3. And please stop that annoying, unfitting and overbearing non-stop score on your next film, I wanted to stick pencils in my ears to stop the pain. It's a very generous 5/10 from me.
When I see reviews like this I get really suspicious about the legitimacy of the reviews on IMDB. Yes, I know its an Aussie movie and support the Australian film industry and everything. But to have crew members or friends come and put up reviews which are just not accurate is lying to people. The movie has great special effects, really amazing. No complaints there. But that's about all it has going for it. The story is so disjointed and incongruent, it just doesn't flow. One minute people are in one place, and the story skips and you're like "did I just miss something?". There's also notable continuity errors. An example is one of the actors gets splashed by 'clear' alien blood, then in the next shot its a blue/black colour. I don't believe this is just a case of 'its not your taste in movies', I'm a big sci-fi fan, it's just some people didn't do their job well on this movie - mainly the screen writers. There's other good Aussie movies out at the moment which are far better made, like 'Dry' or 'The Furnace' - I'd recommend them over this.
This isn't 10 stars nor is i 1 star - so ignore those reviews. If you saw the first movie then you are getting nothing better than that. The acting is quite poor as is the camera work. Just know it's 2 hours and a bit and it never quite gets any good at all.
Australians can make impressive movies (go see The Dry) but this one is a bit embarrassing and shouldn't be in cinemas, should have gone straight to Netflix
Australians can make impressive movies (go see The Dry) but this one is a bit embarrassing and shouldn't be in cinemas, should have gone straight to Netflix
I honestly question the truth behind some of these reviews. Very apparent that they don't match the film once you watch it.
Bad acting, uninteresting storyline and just tries too hard.
I walked out.
I'm not going to rate this highly just because I should support local talent. Let's call an apple and apple and a sub par movie a sub par movie.
Not good.
Bad acting, uninteresting storyline and just tries too hard.
I walked out.
I'm not going to rate this highly just because I should support local talent. Let's call an apple and apple and a sub par movie a sub par movie.
Not good.
I am a little apprehensive about the authenticity of the reviews on this page. This is an honest user review with no affiliation to the film.
This movie is action-packed with some incredible CGI and was, overall, relatively entertaining. The story-line was not fantastic but okay, by all standards a typical alien invasion must-save-the-world-at-all-costs vibe. However, it was unfortunately let down by some very sub-par acting (unfortunately by some of the main characters), some bad script and so much flashing/CGI/chaos during war scenes that it was sometimes hard to keep up with what was going on (perhaps deliberate to create drama but sometimes felt overdone).
Overall, I would say that this was an improvement on the first film (particularly in terms of CGI and overall production quality) but still lacked in its choice of actors and script.
This movie is action-packed with some incredible CGI and was, overall, relatively entertaining. The story-line was not fantastic but okay, by all standards a typical alien invasion must-save-the-world-at-all-costs vibe. However, it was unfortunately let down by some very sub-par acting (unfortunately by some of the main characters), some bad script and so much flashing/CGI/chaos during war scenes that it was sometimes hard to keep up with what was going on (perhaps deliberate to create drama but sometimes felt overdone).
Overall, I would say that this was an improvement on the first film (particularly in terms of CGI and overall production quality) but still lacked in its choice of actors and script.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाDirect sequel to the Australian film Occupation (2018).
- गूफ़In the first aviation combat scene, RAAF F/A-18 Hornets engage, but leave their formation and Navigation lights illuminated. No Combat aircraft ever goes into Combat with all of its lights illuminated in such a manner. They would point them out for a gunner to track down easily.
- भाव
[first lines]
Amelia Chambers: [narrating] It's been two years since their mothership arrived out of nowhere, sending thousands of unmanned drones to wreck havoc across every country on the planet. Millions of us died. What came next was the real test. An invasion force, hellbent on destroying what was left of humanity.
- कनेक्शनFollowed by Occupation Rainfall: Chapter 2
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Occupation: Rainfall?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $3,43,414
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 8 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें