IMDb रेटिंग
5.8/10
1.6 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA teacher learns that her boyfriend is actually the prince of a small country called St Ives.A teacher learns that her boyfriend is actually the prince of a small country called St Ives.A teacher learns that her boyfriend is actually the prince of a small country called St Ives.
Donna Anita Quinn
- The Countess
- (as Donna Anita Nikolaisen)
Stephen Blind
- Guest at the royal ball
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Christopher Livingstone
- Royal ball Guest
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Jersey girl Sara DeMarco is a sweet, outgoing grade school teacher. She's been going out with Daniel for a year although she doesn't know anything about his family. He brings good news of his book getting published and then he proposes to her. The biggest surprise is that he's actually a prince and the heir to the throne of the small country of St Ives. His parents are not happy to have the commoner. Not only is she too casual with the help. Daniel would have to abandon his claim to the throne to marry her. When reminded of this, the sister Princess Fiona becomes much more supportive since she is next in the line of succession.
Sure this is Hallmark but I can't excuse weak work just for that. This is weak. On the positive side, Fiona Gubelmann is bubbly cute although bordering on annoying. She fits the role well and for the first half, this works well enough following the formula. It's a fun, often repeated Prince Charming fantasy. They don't have the cash to stage the needed extravagance. It's a poorer version of Downton Abbey. The problem starts with the manufactured stakes. There is no rooting interest for him to be King. He doesn't want it and she doesn't really want it for him. Other than tradition, there is nothing holding them to the throne. It should be his decision and it's actually annoying to have her decide for him. It's played as a great sacrifice but in reality, it's nothingness. It's telling that there is no villain in the movie because there are no stakes. The throne has to be something better to be an actual stake.
Sure this is Hallmark but I can't excuse weak work just for that. This is weak. On the positive side, Fiona Gubelmann is bubbly cute although bordering on annoying. She fits the role well and for the first half, this works well enough following the formula. It's a fun, often repeated Prince Charming fantasy. They don't have the cash to stage the needed extravagance. It's a poorer version of Downton Abbey. The problem starts with the manufactured stakes. There is no rooting interest for him to be King. He doesn't want it and she doesn't really want it for him. Other than tradition, there is nothing holding them to the throne. It should be his decision and it's actually annoying to have her decide for him. It's played as a great sacrifice but in reality, it's nothingness. It's telling that there is no villain in the movie because there are no stakes. The throne has to be something better to be an actual stake.
This was a mediocre "royal" romance for me, which is too bad because it had a lot going for it. I enjoyed the cast with one exception the royal sister Fiona, I thought she was over played. My other big complaint was how the prince was written, it wasn't the actor as I have seen him in other things...including Reign, it was more the script which didn't give him many lines and had him appearing to be supportive but only in the privacy of just the two of them...silent when it really mattered. "Danny"/Daniël really needed a fire light under him. Do you love this girl or not?!?!?!
That annoyed me so much I couldn't enjoy the film.
New Jersey school teacher has a relationship with Danny the writer, only to discover when he proposes that he is a prince and heir to the thrown...but wait if he marries a commoner he can't be king unless his parents change the rules.
That annoyed me so much I couldn't enjoy the film.
New Jersey school teacher has a relationship with Danny the writer, only to discover when he proposes that he is a prince and heir to the thrown...but wait if he marries a commoner he can't be king unless his parents change the rules.
A shame that they thought St Ives was Irish... well, all the staff have Irish accents!
Poorly constructed opinion of the English people as usual, although it also mocked the American lead making her out as rather stupid and cumbersome and her parents as oafish. Rather disappointing story, but a sweet concept.
Royally Ever after was a cute movie. It's nowhere near as horrible as other reviews state. I rather enjoyed it. It's your typical happy ever after Hallmark movie. You know what to expect from them and in the end, the hero and heroine always end up together. Was this inspired by Harry and Meghan? Yes and no. The commoner marrying royalty theme has been a common theme in romance novels and movies for decades. At least this movie was filmed in Ireland instead of a cheesy sound stage. The cinematography was great and the acting was decent. It you're looking for something light and flirty, this movie is a great choice.
Why make movies that make the American "commoner" seem so dumb and the "English" like they have broomsticks up them?
Coffee? Yes we have it in UK.
Coffee? Yes we have it in UK.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाFilmed at Markree Castle, Collooney, Ireland
- गूफ़For her duplicity in getting Sarah to call off her engagement to Danny, Princess Fiona could have been charged with interfering with the proper succession of a monarch and could, therefore, have been committing treason.
- कनेक्शनReferences Cinderella (1950)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Realmente para siempre
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें