IMDb रेटिंग
6.3/10
28 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
ट्वीडी के खेत से भागने के बाद, जिंजर को पूरे झुंड के लिए एक शांतिपूर्ण द्वीप अभयारण्य मिल जाता है. लेकिन मुख्य भूमि पर पूरी मुर्गी जाति को एक नए खतरे का सामना करना पड़ता है, और जिंजर और उसकी... सभी पढ़ेंट्वीडी के खेत से भागने के बाद, जिंजर को पूरे झुंड के लिए एक शांतिपूर्ण द्वीप अभयारण्य मिल जाता है. लेकिन मुख्य भूमि पर पूरी मुर्गी जाति को एक नए खतरे का सामना करना पड़ता है, और जिंजर और उसकी टीम इसमें सेंध लगाने का फैसला करती है.ट्वीडी के खेत से भागने के बाद, जिंजर को पूरे झुंड के लिए एक शांतिपूर्ण द्वीप अभयारण्य मिल जाता है. लेकिन मुख्य भूमि पर पूरी मुर्गी जाति को एक नए खतरे का सामना करना पड़ता है, और जिंजर और उसकी टीम इसमें सेंध लगाने का फैसला करती है.
- 1 BAFTA अवार्ड के लिए नामांकित
- 1 जीत और कुल 9 नामांकन
Thandiwe Newton
- Ginger
- (वॉइस)
Zachary Levi
- Rocky
- (वॉइस)
Bella Ramsey
- Molly
- (वॉइस)
Imelda Staunton
- Bunty
- (वॉइस)
Lynn Ferguson
- Mac
- (वॉइस)
David Bradley
- Fowler
- (वॉइस)
Jane Horrocks
- Babs
- (वॉइस)
Romesh Ranganathan
- Nick
- (वॉइस)
Daniel Mays
- Fetcher
- (वॉइस)
Nick Mohammed
- Dr. Fry
- (वॉइस)
Julia Sawalha
- Ginger
- (वॉइस)
- …
David Brooks
- Burly Guard
- (वॉइस)
Dan Williamson
- Van Driver
- (वॉइस)
Tom Doggart
- 2D Narrator
- (वॉइस)
- …
Sam Fell
- 2D Animated Boy
- (वॉइस)
- …
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
The film was amusing enough (lots of slapstick humour) and I enjoyed the fun details in the animations, e.g. A hot air balloon disguised as a cloud, and the factory "eye register" including a night-shift worker with very bloodshot eyes..
That being said, the storyline felt unoriginal and became flat halfway through; it was too obvious what was going to happen. Chat GPT could have written it - and given many industries' overreliance on AI, it wouldn't surprise me if that were the case.
I also have to agree with some other reviewers that the personality of main characters was watered down, especially Rocky. The original Rocky's bragging bravado was a big driving force and source of parody in the first film. The sequel's endless slapstick humour and flat characters didn't do enough for me.
That being said, the storyline felt unoriginal and became flat halfway through; it was too obvious what was going to happen. Chat GPT could have written it - and given many industries' overreliance on AI, it wouldn't surprise me if that were the case.
I also have to agree with some other reviewers that the personality of main characters was watered down, especially Rocky. The original Rocky's bragging bravado was a big driving force and source of parody in the first film. The sequel's endless slapstick humour and flat characters didn't do enough for me.
Not as good as the first one as the setting is a lot more fantastical and silly, but it still has the Aardman charm and style with goofy looking characters and inventive contraptions. The plot clearly shows its inspiration from classic films and whilst being a bit too long, it has lots of humour, jokes and wacky adventures to keep it entertaining. The different voice actors aren't as good and the modern pop song at the start felt out of place, but the animation is great (if less hand-made) and full of vibrant colours and it has those little touches which make it something special.
Overall score = 7/10.
Overall score = 7/10.
Say what you want about the man but Mel Gibson is sorely missed, that was one of many mistakes this movie made. Flat, boring, pretty, but not fun. The original stands as a childhood favorite that I've watched with my kid many times but nugget of whatever, will be forgotten in a week. Yet another in a long list of agenda filled Netflix blunders. When will they learn? (Side note about Netflix as a production company: finally canceling my subscription after ANOTHER price hike, removing Christmas movies around the holidays, while other services put them behind pay walls is just a greedy, disgusting practice imo, streaming is out of control and people are finding alternatives)
The stop motion is always on point. Impressive, when you think about how much time goes into it.
If you work really hard, you can probably scrape together some respect for the production, but that might be the only feeling you can evoke. The voice acting isn't great, and not just because the original actors are missing. There's a strange disconnect between the animation and the acting, it feels insincere and forced.
The story is nothing new, and it should have been. It should have broke new ground just as the original did. It really feels like they put no effort into creating an original plot and just clung to the coat tales of the first film. Seems like a bad choice.
I want to write something positive about it but I don't really know what that could be. I guess Bella Ramsey was good casting. I'm only giving it 5 stars because I appreciate the time it takes to make stop motion.
If you work really hard, you can probably scrape together some respect for the production, but that might be the only feeling you can evoke. The voice acting isn't great, and not just because the original actors are missing. There's a strange disconnect between the animation and the acting, it feels insincere and forced.
The story is nothing new, and it should have been. It should have broke new ground just as the original did. It really feels like they put no effort into creating an original plot and just clung to the coat tales of the first film. Seems like a bad choice.
I want to write something positive about it but I don't really know what that could be. I guess Bella Ramsey was good casting. I'm only giving it 5 stars because I appreciate the time it takes to make stop motion.
Aardman Animations, personally, is a hit or miss for me as in the past, they have created some great works like Wallace & Gromit, Shaun the Sheep and so forth. But at the same time, they have made some pretty mediocre or pretty bad works too. "Chicken Run" is one of my favorite stop-motion movies as I really like the characters, the animation, and the narrative. With this sequel coming out after many years, it was entertaining but it was a bit underwhelming.
Throughout, the stop-motion animation, character models, and colors are amazing as Aardman continues to provide great clay animation. Aardman always provides some great animation and the models, colors, sound designs, and the movements are all excellent. We get to see the same characters from the previous movie and it was fun to see them communicate, move around and observe their actions throughout. The voice performances from the cast members were solid as they provided some good voice works, although a few voice performances weren't great. The soundtrack is pretty good and there are some decent humor moments that I chuckled at.
With the narrative continuing from the previous movie, the narrative explores some new concepts and territories within the setting and characters and there are some aspects that were interesting but some not so much. Certain new concepts that were explored I felt weren't strong enough and at times, it really feels like a rehash of the first movie. On the characters, there are new characters that are introduced but unfortunately, none of the new characters weren't really interesting since they felt a bit dull and kind of annoying at times. Because this is a new cast, I personally felt while the original characters are still fun, the chemistry and energy of what made them fun from the first movie felt a bit lacking. The soundtrack is okay and there are some solid dialogue moments while being a bit clunky.
Despite my gripes, I still was interested to see where the movie goes and for what it is, it's a decent sequel. Overall, it is entertaining and it's nice to see the characters again, but I wish it could have been better.
Throughout, the stop-motion animation, character models, and colors are amazing as Aardman continues to provide great clay animation. Aardman always provides some great animation and the models, colors, sound designs, and the movements are all excellent. We get to see the same characters from the previous movie and it was fun to see them communicate, move around and observe their actions throughout. The voice performances from the cast members were solid as they provided some good voice works, although a few voice performances weren't great. The soundtrack is pretty good and there are some decent humor moments that I chuckled at.
With the narrative continuing from the previous movie, the narrative explores some new concepts and territories within the setting and characters and there are some aspects that were interesting but some not so much. Certain new concepts that were explored I felt weren't strong enough and at times, it really feels like a rehash of the first movie. On the characters, there are new characters that are introduced but unfortunately, none of the new characters weren't really interesting since they felt a bit dull and kind of annoying at times. Because this is a new cast, I personally felt while the original characters are still fun, the chemistry and energy of what made them fun from the first movie felt a bit lacking. The soundtrack is okay and there are some solid dialogue moments while being a bit clunky.
Despite my gripes, I still was interested to see where the movie goes and for what it is, it's a decent sequel. Overall, it is entertaining and it's nice to see the characters again, but I wish it could have been better.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाIf viewed closely during the film's final shot, an imposter chicken in the form of the nefarious penguin Feathers McGraw from the second Wallace & Gromit short, "Wrong Trousers," can be seen.
- गूफ़Despite being remarried, Melisha still goes by the name 'Mrs Tweedy'. As made clear in the first film, this is her married name that she got from her previous husband as opposed to being a maiden name. However, some women keep their previous surname when they marry or re-marry.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटThere is an image of two chickens in collars with happy faces riding a sky glider behind the duration of the credits until the "Songs" section where it fades to black.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in AniMat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: Ginger Snapped (2020)
- साउंडट्रैकMy Sweet Baby
Written by Josh Crocker, John Crocker and Charlotte Jane
Produced by Josh Crocker
Paloma Faith appears courtesy of RCA Records/Sony Music UK
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 38 मि(98 min)
- रंग
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें