Pearson

Think show needed a second season. Sometimes, people put too much emphasis on some nielsen rating. How does that determine what makes a good show? I personally feel this show was excellent. It had a good storyline and it was a show that addressed something that is a critical issue for people. What is the point of having diversity on television if they don't speak to the issue that matters? The writers should make up and get to writing season two. The staff is great. Gina Torres and crew act great. This isn't a direct spin off of suits, it is nice to see some cameos from the original series. You won't be disappointed.

I really enjoyed the first season. Thought it was better than Suits. So tired of networks canceling before a show gets its legs. Great actors. Good story line, characters. Second season would have been great!

I really don't get why it has a low rating it's actually one of the best spinoff I've ever seen. Jessica was my favourite character on suits and she delieveres here with iconic one liners. It has so many twists and gives you scandal and how to get away with murder vibes.

Gina Torres is amazing.... I don't mind is derived from Suits, I was glad, thinking it will be the same style - interesting, smart dialogues, sparkling... But this one is so boring...so predictable...corruption in city administration...who wants to see 10 episodes about that???

I am sorry, I like very much Gina Torres, but if the 3-rd episode will be as dull as the first 2, I will stop seeing "Pearson". Can't they bring somehow "Mike" back, to make a kick-ass team with "Jessica "? Anywhere , but public administration...

This show is missing anything that grips me and makes me want to keep watching. There's not enough interesting character buildup, the interactions are flat, like everyone is just reading lines, and there are no zany or interesting characters that instantly make you like them or at least be interested in them (like Louis Litt). Big fail, sorry.