36 समीक्षाएं
The topics of systemic racism, police brutality and the Black Lives Matter movement are supremely important (especially in today's America), which is why I was so disappointed in this weak and slanted documentary about the "brutal arrest" of Austin school-teacher Breaion King. Police incidents boil down to the human beings involved, their backgrounds, perceptions and subsequent actions/reactions.
This would have been an excellent opportunity to explore those by profiling both King AND Officer Richter, to solid context for understanding the issue and finding a solution to it. Instead director Kate Davis choose to go to great lengths placing King in the warmest light possible for cheap shock value. The result is an emotionally manipulative profile featuring iPhone videos of her daughter's ballet recital, tearful stories of her struggles of being raised by and then being a single-parent, and the most out-of-context news coverage possible.
On top of this, (while unfortunate,) the arrest video clearly shows a suspect trying to get out of a ticket, being uncooperative, and playing up the scene for any cameras present. In response, the Officer is compelled to escalate in order to do his job, and did so in a calm, respectful tone of voice without his gun, tazer, baton or punches. A cop asking you to stay in your car, or put your feet inside (to close the door) is not unreasonable. But trying to frustrate a cop so much that he won't write you a ticket IS unreasonable. As a relatively mild misunderstanding, this was an opportunity for both sides to LEARN, to tamp down fear on both sides, and create a better bridge of understanding.
Instead of elevating the conversation, the director does harm to her own cause and sets us back on this important issue. First: It will be quickly dismissed by Blue Lives Matter supporters for what it is: a propaganda piece with an (unfortunate) but not brutal ordinary traffic stop with a difficult suspect. Second: it lends credence and legitimizes right-wing docs like "Obama's America" (2012) by saying all docs are political.
This is a disturbing trend in "Documentaries" these days: Heavy-handed, thinly-sourced, and purposefully unbalanced clearly intended to sway viewers based on a political agenda. Documentaries have the potential to become the new "investigative journalism," for the short attention span audiences of today, educating the electorate, and pulling people out of their bubbles. If you strongly believe your 'side' is right, showing the entire truth should bear that out. Save the fact-picking for historical dramas.
This would have been an excellent opportunity to explore those by profiling both King AND Officer Richter, to solid context for understanding the issue and finding a solution to it. Instead director Kate Davis choose to go to great lengths placing King in the warmest light possible for cheap shock value. The result is an emotionally manipulative profile featuring iPhone videos of her daughter's ballet recital, tearful stories of her struggles of being raised by and then being a single-parent, and the most out-of-context news coverage possible.
On top of this, (while unfortunate,) the arrest video clearly shows a suspect trying to get out of a ticket, being uncooperative, and playing up the scene for any cameras present. In response, the Officer is compelled to escalate in order to do his job, and did so in a calm, respectful tone of voice without his gun, tazer, baton or punches. A cop asking you to stay in your car, or put your feet inside (to close the door) is not unreasonable. But trying to frustrate a cop so much that he won't write you a ticket IS unreasonable. As a relatively mild misunderstanding, this was an opportunity for both sides to LEARN, to tamp down fear on both sides, and create a better bridge of understanding.
Instead of elevating the conversation, the director does harm to her own cause and sets us back on this important issue. First: It will be quickly dismissed by Blue Lives Matter supporters for what it is: a propaganda piece with an (unfortunate) but not brutal ordinary traffic stop with a difficult suspect. Second: it lends credence and legitimizes right-wing docs like "Obama's America" (2012) by saying all docs are political.
This is a disturbing trend in "Documentaries" these days: Heavy-handed, thinly-sourced, and purposefully unbalanced clearly intended to sway viewers based on a political agenda. Documentaries have the potential to become the new "investigative journalism," for the short attention span audiences of today, educating the electorate, and pulling people out of their bubbles. If you strongly believe your 'side' is right, showing the entire truth should bear that out. Save the fact-picking for historical dramas.
- thethomasboy
- 16 फ़र॰ 2018
- परमालिंक
This is a great example of people not taking responsibility for their actions.1. She sped 2. She tried to avoid being pulled over 3. She took an attitude with the cop and didnt listen to his orders. 4. She immediately goes to the police brutal excuse as she cries out for a black cop.
Now, I definitely believe the officer could have handled it better. But to make this specific case the basis for this argument is weak.
Now, I definitely believe the officer could have handled it better. But to make this specific case the basis for this argument is weak.
- dominicdeschambault
- 2 दिस॰ 2018
- परमालिंक
While the producers of Traffic Stop tried to use this incident to show the police as evil and the arrested black woman as unjustly mistreated, watching the actual dash cam video from the police cruiser, one can clearly see the woman refusing to follow instructions and then resisting arrest for no good reason. She wasn't mistreated. All she had to do was follow the lawful instructions of the police officer and she would have been sited for a traffic violation and then on her way. What happened to her was her own doing and no documentary filler of her teaching school or going to church will change that. However, it is also apparent that the officer quickly lost patience with the woman who was refusing to cooperate.
It was interesting that her probing dialog with the transportation officer taking her to jail seemed designed to gather material for the documentary. Her actions from start to finish weren't normal and after the arrest almost seemed calculated. Was this planned in advance or just a spur of the moment decision to get something on the police. Whatever the reason, the documentary comes off as one-sided and transparent. Not worthy of your time. How did it ever get nominated for an Oscar? Oh, right. It's Hollywood were no anti-social behavior goes unrewarded.
It was interesting that her probing dialog with the transportation officer taking her to jail seemed designed to gather material for the documentary. Her actions from start to finish weren't normal and after the arrest almost seemed calculated. Was this planned in advance or just a spur of the moment decision to get something on the police. Whatever the reason, the documentary comes off as one-sided and transparent. Not worthy of your time. How did it ever get nominated for an Oscar? Oh, right. It's Hollywood were no anti-social behavior goes unrewarded.
- hknakna-204-45166
- 17 फ़र॰ 2018
- परमालिंक
Most of this film is made of footage of our victim and what a normal helpful person she is, by the end when you have her and young kids frolicking in slow motion you know you are in the land of Hollywood fantasy.
There have been cases of police brutality which lead to people being killed where the victims did less to the police than our victim does here. And I had a friend get arrested for behaving in a lesser manor than our victim does here after a traffic stop.
They do show the video of the incident--it seems they show it mostly without editing though you can't tell for sure. The officer is shown explaining what happened after we see it for ourselves and his account matches what we saw--unlike our victim saying "he's lying."
The question here is why does this seemingly nice normal woman--who has a relative who is a police officer--immediately rudely question and disobey the cop from the very start. There is nothing shown here to indicate that because she is black she immediately, maybe even just and valid reasons for behaving this way and being in a state of fear and distrust of police from the start. It's also worth noting that though she swears and continues to fight and kick even when put in the car on her own, while non of the police ever raise their voices or use any racial slurs--even while talking to themselves.. There seems to be nothing in her own past to show police racially mistreating her or her family or friends or that there is any thread of violence or crime that affects her.
The best scene in the film is a conversation she has--from police video--with another officer who takes her in to be arrested. It's a fascinating conversation more so than anything in the after-the-fact interviews with her or any point the film is trying to make. In the conversation it's clear that both, her and the cop, have racial bias and lack information about the other side.
It just seems like the filmmaker wants to portray our victim as saintly almost, but she does so without ever having out victim explain her own illogical actions when confronted. If she has a relative who is a cop it's especially baffling the way she behaves and that she doesn't at some point say, hey my relative is in your shoes.
There could be another point here or one the film accidentally makes, she complains that if you google her all that comes up is video of the incident and this case, though she still has her normal job and life, so how much real impact has it had on her life other than, as she says, photos of her when she was a model no longer pop up first.
There is no talk about if she spent any time in jail for this incident--I assume she didn't as otherwise they'd certainly mention it as it would ad to their case of cop vs. regular citizen who just happens to be black.
So she is to be pitied because her old modeling pictures don't come up now? Is that tragic? I suppose this could or may work best as a film showing how not to behave when you encounter a cop as even a relatively minor incident like this will haunt you through the media and internet long after whatever happened matters to you anymore.
There have been cases of police brutality which lead to people being killed where the victims did less to the police than our victim does here. And I had a friend get arrested for behaving in a lesser manor than our victim does here after a traffic stop.
They do show the video of the incident--it seems they show it mostly without editing though you can't tell for sure. The officer is shown explaining what happened after we see it for ourselves and his account matches what we saw--unlike our victim saying "he's lying."
The question here is why does this seemingly nice normal woman--who has a relative who is a police officer--immediately rudely question and disobey the cop from the very start. There is nothing shown here to indicate that because she is black she immediately, maybe even just and valid reasons for behaving this way and being in a state of fear and distrust of police from the start. It's also worth noting that though she swears and continues to fight and kick even when put in the car on her own, while non of the police ever raise their voices or use any racial slurs--even while talking to themselves.. There seems to be nothing in her own past to show police racially mistreating her or her family or friends or that there is any thread of violence or crime that affects her.
The best scene in the film is a conversation she has--from police video--with another officer who takes her in to be arrested. It's a fascinating conversation more so than anything in the after-the-fact interviews with her or any point the film is trying to make. In the conversation it's clear that both, her and the cop, have racial bias and lack information about the other side.
It just seems like the filmmaker wants to portray our victim as saintly almost, but she does so without ever having out victim explain her own illogical actions when confronted. If she has a relative who is a cop it's especially baffling the way she behaves and that she doesn't at some point say, hey my relative is in your shoes.
There could be another point here or one the film accidentally makes, she complains that if you google her all that comes up is video of the incident and this case, though she still has her normal job and life, so how much real impact has it had on her life other than, as she says, photos of her when she was a model no longer pop up first.
There is no talk about if she spent any time in jail for this incident--I assume she didn't as otherwise they'd certainly mention it as it would ad to their case of cop vs. regular citizen who just happens to be black.
So she is to be pitied because her old modeling pictures don't come up now? Is that tragic? I suppose this could or may work best as a film showing how not to behave when you encounter a cop as even a relatively minor incident like this will haunt you through the media and internet long after whatever happened matters to you anymore.
- kjhott-78228
- 5 फ़र॰ 2021
- परमालिंक
I was excited to watch this but within the first 10 minutes could already distinguish this was not a true documentary, rather a political view and biased storytelling. Using the old trick of emotional attachment was way too obvious.. Breaion's own recounts and commentary of her own life became a 30 minute boasting party of "look how great and wonderful I am". All relatablity to her as a person went out the window with her arrogance. I left feeling... not pity towards her, not anger toward Law Enforcement like she wanted but rather a greater disconnect to her life and story than before. It's a documentary and for that I found watching the footage from the incident the most interesting thing about the film. However, I was highly disappointed in the lack of unbiased storytelling and would have appreciated Breaion taking ownership and accountability for at least one of her actions..I wanted to and would have related more to a person who can show me they aren't perfect yet are still good. When someone claims and attempts to show their life as all good and they do no wrong, it's unrelatable. Sad to give this such a low rating!
- katiebaker-62198
- 20 फ़र॰ 2018
- परमालिंक
Although anyone can enjoy and be impacted by this film, as a defense attorney, it really spoke to me, and I am glad this documentary was produced. It is about a traffic stop for speeding that turned violent. What made it unique was how it humanized the person who was stopped, a 112-pound schoolteacher named Breaion King, showing her life and personality, and hopefully will cause an incident of excessive use of force by an officer, combined with potential racial factors that may have influenced the incident, to be brought home to the viewer in a more meaningful way. I think the film highlights all the more why video recordings - both in-car and body-worn cameras - are extremely important and should be required by law.
- apollack11
- 12 फ़र॰ 2018
- परमालिंक
- phoenixbolt
- 15 फ़र॰ 2018
- परमालिंक
I watched the first 3 minutes and I didn't see any big problem with what the police officer did. She was asked to step back in the car. She was hesitant and began with excuses why not to. Then the officer saw she was lying (had no wallet to go to the store) and he became suspicious.
He asked for driver license several times and she argued and didn't comply. He then tells her to get out of the car, and she resisted.
BTW, this is actually how majority of these so-called abuse cases. They don't comply with lawful orders and resits arrest, and then complain the cop uses force.
Why did we need the background sob story building up to this? Totally useless for this story. and where was the cop interview?
There are definitely unjustified abuses, but from what I have seen they are rare.
He asked for driver license several times and she argued and didn't comply. He then tells her to get out of the car, and she resisted.
BTW, this is actually how majority of these so-called abuse cases. They don't comply with lawful orders and resits arrest, and then complain the cop uses force.
Why did we need the background sob story building up to this? Totally useless for this story. and where was the cop interview?
There are definitely unjustified abuses, but from what I have seen they are rare.
- MovieCriticOnline
- 26 फ़र॰ 2018
- परमालिंक
This was an example of someone who felt they should get away with speeding. Nothing more than that. All her background info was soft focused bio, it didn't in anyway explain why she acted like an a-hole when she was caught speeding?
I disliked her and her complete over reaction to being caught. Yeah i get it, she wanted to get away with it. Comparing herself to Trayvon was wholly pathetic.
It was clear that the person was evading the cop and not cooperating. The cop acted unprofessionally after his patience wore thin.
- tylerjnewman
- 20 फ़र॰ 2018
- परमालिंक
- Astaroth22
- 16 जुल॰ 2020
- परमालिंक
** FIRST- It should be noted that the officer involved was found to have claimed "RESISTED ARREST!" against citizens, more than any other officer in that locality. He was later fired for AGAIN making false claims in another one of his arrests that got physical. Sadly, those reviewing this documentary SHORT watched and reviewed AFTER already deciding what side they were on.
THE DOCUMENTARY- This is a 30 minute doc! A short.is not an investigation of everything. This case has been investigated and the officer was fired for MULTIPLE INCIDENTS besides King's. This was a 30 minute "Story in the life of ......" this woman, which is why there are more shots of her raking leaves in her yard and talking than video footage of the incident.. Ms. KING and all the police cam video have been seen and analyzed to DEATH. This film short was about addressing the PERSON not the crime! If you don't care about Ms. KING or you hate her (as a"black woman with crocodile tears") then , sure -you will think this 30 minutes is a waste.
**But , AGAIN, it's a short about a PERSON who was at the center of a police brutality incident - not a 30 minute doc on POLICE BRUTALITY. **
I rate this doc high as a case study of an INDIVIDUAL involved in a high profile case. The doc address Ms. Kings own underlying issues with race and color and being judged by people. She has SENSITIVITIES and "issues " that a viewer could argue made her question and challenge this officer when he stopped her. If the makers of this doc had been trying to protect Ms. King, they wouldn't have purposely added that she has everything from race insecurities to "daddy issues" (her father was verbally abusive and demeaning). The documentary also shows footage of King -after being grabbed and body slammed- asking why she was arrested, where her car would go, if there are cameras to show what the officer did.....all while she rocks forward and appears wound up and irratic. This also, could have been removed from the doc if the makers were trying to create a 100% FLATTERING piece -it wasn't.. The film makers wanted the viewer to decide. To ask- "if she's so hurt , why isn't she crying more? Why isn't she asking for a doctor? Why is she lobbing 100 questions at ANOTHER cop- when she just got beaten for doing that in the first place?!" ** This doc-short purposely leaves the door open for the viewer to judge the PERSONALITY of Ms. King in the video versus her in her life AS SHE DESCRIBES HERSELF. The police video is there, of course. It shows that Ms.King was NOT RESISTING ARREST or trying to get out of a traffic ticket. She was just questioning nearly EVERYTHING the officer said (while also cooperating with certain things like showing her ID ). It was as if she resented being told what to do. Not nice. But also not resisting arrest or "reprehensible behavior "- as one reviewer here claimed.
Ms. King is heard asking question after question- then challenged the officer on why she had to put her feet back into her car. For this , she was viciously grabbed and body slammed. Later, the officer lies to an arriving supervisor and is heard saying the Ms. King took a "haymaker" swing punch at him and he HAD TO TAKE HER DOWN.But the video shows the officer yanked her out of her seat belt and out of the car to assault her.....for being shrill and irritating.
There is also footage of another cop telling Ms.King that her situation occurred because police are afraid of blacks due to THEIR violent behavior. The irony of a 112lbs black woman being BEATEN, cuffed, and arrested by police for being irritating and mouthy , THEN being told that it happened because her RACE is violent- is part of what makes this 30 minute film thought provoking.
**Sadly, after reading the reviews here- there still seems to be a lack of understanding of the problem and how serious it is for cops to BRUTALIZE certain people for being mouthy (while certain race higher income brackets routinely snark at cops for inconveniencing them ("I pay YOUR salary!"). Police brutality is NOT just about black males being beaten or killed. And it's dangerous , in light of the criminal histories and presence of guns, knives, or drugs in cases of black MALEE being beaten by police - to make police misconduct about BLACK MALES as THE victims. As, a cop says to Ms.King while she is cuffed..."Blacks are more violent.". This fact is centered around black MALE behavior. Letting black males OWN police brutality is a great way to aid COPS in dismissing claims that THEY are the bruts.
Ultimately, this doc wanted to present this PERSON. It did so in the arty, poetic way that documentary SHORTS often do- not just this one! Short films don't have time for the hardcore , investigational stuff. EXAMPLE : A documentary on Child prostitutes will cover the men involved, follow the money, investigate parents, poverty , tourists, drugs. A documentary SHORT may be 15 minutes out of 30 minutes showing child prostitutes playing with toys or crying. This is a DOCUMENTARY SHORT!!! And a good one.
THE DOCUMENTARY- This is a 30 minute doc! A short.is not an investigation of everything. This case has been investigated and the officer was fired for MULTIPLE INCIDENTS besides King's. This was a 30 minute "Story in the life of ......" this woman, which is why there are more shots of her raking leaves in her yard and talking than video footage of the incident.. Ms. KING and all the police cam video have been seen and analyzed to DEATH. This film short was about addressing the PERSON not the crime! If you don't care about Ms. KING or you hate her (as a"black woman with crocodile tears") then , sure -you will think this 30 minutes is a waste.
**But , AGAIN, it's a short about a PERSON who was at the center of a police brutality incident - not a 30 minute doc on POLICE BRUTALITY. **
I rate this doc high as a case study of an INDIVIDUAL involved in a high profile case. The doc address Ms. Kings own underlying issues with race and color and being judged by people. She has SENSITIVITIES and "issues " that a viewer could argue made her question and challenge this officer when he stopped her. If the makers of this doc had been trying to protect Ms. King, they wouldn't have purposely added that she has everything from race insecurities to "daddy issues" (her father was verbally abusive and demeaning). The documentary also shows footage of King -after being grabbed and body slammed- asking why she was arrested, where her car would go, if there are cameras to show what the officer did.....all while she rocks forward and appears wound up and irratic. This also, could have been removed from the doc if the makers were trying to create a 100% FLATTERING piece -it wasn't.. The film makers wanted the viewer to decide. To ask- "if she's so hurt , why isn't she crying more? Why isn't she asking for a doctor? Why is she lobbing 100 questions at ANOTHER cop- when she just got beaten for doing that in the first place?!" ** This doc-short purposely leaves the door open for the viewer to judge the PERSONALITY of Ms. King in the video versus her in her life AS SHE DESCRIBES HERSELF. The police video is there, of course. It shows that Ms.King was NOT RESISTING ARREST or trying to get out of a traffic ticket. She was just questioning nearly EVERYTHING the officer said (while also cooperating with certain things like showing her ID ). It was as if she resented being told what to do. Not nice. But also not resisting arrest or "reprehensible behavior "- as one reviewer here claimed.
Ms. King is heard asking question after question- then challenged the officer on why she had to put her feet back into her car. For this , she was viciously grabbed and body slammed. Later, the officer lies to an arriving supervisor and is heard saying the Ms. King took a "haymaker" swing punch at him and he HAD TO TAKE HER DOWN.But the video shows the officer yanked her out of her seat belt and out of the car to assault her.....for being shrill and irritating.
There is also footage of another cop telling Ms.King that her situation occurred because police are afraid of blacks due to THEIR violent behavior. The irony of a 112lbs black woman being BEATEN, cuffed, and arrested by police for being irritating and mouthy , THEN being told that it happened because her RACE is violent- is part of what makes this 30 minute film thought provoking.
**Sadly, after reading the reviews here- there still seems to be a lack of understanding of the problem and how serious it is for cops to BRUTALIZE certain people for being mouthy (while certain race higher income brackets routinely snark at cops for inconveniencing them ("I pay YOUR salary!"). Police brutality is NOT just about black males being beaten or killed. And it's dangerous , in light of the criminal histories and presence of guns, knives, or drugs in cases of black MALEE being beaten by police - to make police misconduct about BLACK MALES as THE victims. As, a cop says to Ms.King while she is cuffed..."Blacks are more violent.". This fact is centered around black MALE behavior. Letting black males OWN police brutality is a great way to aid COPS in dismissing claims that THEY are the bruts.
Ultimately, this doc wanted to present this PERSON. It did so in the arty, poetic way that documentary SHORTS often do- not just this one! Short films don't have time for the hardcore , investigational stuff. EXAMPLE : A documentary on Child prostitutes will cover the men involved, follow the money, investigate parents, poverty , tourists, drugs. A documentary SHORT may be 15 minutes out of 30 minutes showing child prostitutes playing with toys or crying. This is a DOCUMENTARY SHORT!!! And a good one.
So a cop does a traffic stop, lady does not follow directions and fights them the whole time and we have a documentary about her? She was in the wrong and the officer was doing their job. This is trying to get people riled up about something that didn't happen in this case. And she needs to stop referring to herself in the 3rd person.
- jennrotman-504-89837
- 25 मई 2018
- परमालिंक
- alanperkins-39535
- 10 जून 2020
- परमालिंक
Any reasonable person knows the topic is a real issue. And there are moments where we get to see the perspective of both a cop and the driver without it being wrapped in all of the emotional overdrive and posturing that oozes out of the rest of the film.
With a different case this same format might have worked really well. This specific traffic stop's footage doesn't tell the story that needs to be told. It might actually serve to convince people in the opposite direction. Instead I have to wonder if the production team watched the dash cam footage. Did they edit it in believing they knew what it portrayed? Or were they so blinded by passion for the topic that they felt Breaion's life story would cause us to excuse her choices?
Either way, it's sloppy. Hopefully future filmmakers take more care to ensure the dashcam footage matches the story they build.
With a different case this same format might have worked really well. This specific traffic stop's footage doesn't tell the story that needs to be told. It might actually serve to convince people in the opposite direction. Instead I have to wonder if the production team watched the dash cam footage. Did they edit it in believing they knew what it portrayed? Or were they so blinded by passion for the topic that they felt Breaion's life story would cause us to excuse her choices?
Either way, it's sloppy. Hopefully future filmmakers take more care to ensure the dashcam footage matches the story they build.
- sean-48013
- 24 फ़र॰ 2018
- परमालिंक
- Horst_In_Translation
- 15 मार्च 2018
- परमालिंक
Cops have a VERY tough job. People dont seem to understand this. They deal with criminals everyday, some running from them, sometimes shooting at them, etc etc...Why didn't this lady obey the officer's orders? She broke the law, tried to pretend that she didn't see the cop, was walking away, disobeyed orders, multiple times, resisted arrest, multiple times, and now is complaining? Did the officer use more force than necessary after sh broke the law multiple times? Yes. But why didn't she just follow orders and obey the law?? Also,she was cussing up a storm, and you teach children???? I would never let her teach my child. OBEY THE COP'S ORDERS, ALWAYS, and things like this will not happen. Then on the way to the jail, a cop speaks the truth, and says 99% of the time the black community is the one causing problems, not listening to the cops orders. Sad but true.
What is this "documentary" trying to solve? How is this helping anything? Its not, unless people START LISTENING AND OBEYING THE COPS ORDERS. PERIOD.
What is this "documentary" trying to solve? How is this helping anything? Its not, unless people START LISTENING AND OBEYING THE COPS ORDERS. PERIOD.
- pensacolacomputer
- 24 मार्च 2018
- परमालिंक
In every state in the US, and in every country in the world, you have to produce a drivers licence if behind the wheel of a car and stopped by law enforcement on a public road. Refusing to produce one based on lack of a warrant means you are nothing ore than an idiot and do not know what a warrant is.
- random-70778
- 21 जुल॰ 2020
- परमालिंक
- fssd-61546
- 1 सित॰ 2024
- परमालिंक
I thought we were going to see video of cops doing wrong.....and instead I saw a video of a teacher that wanted to talk back to police, then be resistant to commands....then resist and fight. When you don't follow commands........you get forced.
- dgray-01694
- 3 मार्च 2021
- परमालिंक
Re HBO's 2017 documentary "Traffic Stop"... Unsure as to the lesson intended by the filmmaker, I was near-immediately backed away from the set, astonished by the foolishness, self-consumption, and danger-inducing behavior exhibited by this woman. Her relentless, upswelling refusals to simply comply with the officer's repeated standard requests precipitously raised the heat on what could have clearly been a routine, mutually courteous stop. HBO's misguided effort to elevate this woman's inane and dangerous behavior will stun any average "street-wise" citizen. Contrary to their secondarily evident intent to posit a charge against police brutality, the "Traffic Stop" documentary far better provides a quick-learning tool for exhibiting to young drivers precisely how NOT to behave when stopped and addressed by police. This young woman has clearly never considered the degree to which it is vital that police determine there exists a safe and weapons-free situation before relaxing their level of concern. It is not possible for us, at first contact, to comprehend the many issues with which an officer may be contending. Mutual courtesy and regard - and quiet, clearly observable, demonstrated compliance - when stopped by police will near always secure a pleasant and safe day for all.