द लॉर्ड ऑफ़ द रिंग्स: द रिंग्स ऑफ़ पावर
ओरिजिनल टाइटल: The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power
मिस्टी पर्वत की सबसे गहरी गहराइयों से लेकर लिंडन के राजसी जंगलों तक, नुमेनोर के द्वीप साम्राज्य से, नक्शे के सबसे दूर तक पहुंचने के लिए, ये क्षेत्र और पात्र विरासत बनाते हैं जो उनके जाने के ... सभी पढ़ेंमिस्टी पर्वत की सबसे गहरी गहराइयों से लेकर लिंडन के राजसी जंगलों तक, नुमेनोर के द्वीप साम्राज्य से, नक्शे के सबसे दूर तक पहुंचने के लिए, ये क्षेत्र और पात्र विरासत बनाते हैं जो उनके जाने के बाद लंबे समय तक जीवित रहेंगे.मिस्टी पर्वत की सबसे गहरी गहराइयों से लेकर लिंडन के राजसी जंगलों तक, नुमेनोर के द्वीप साम्राज्य से, नक्शे के सबसे दूर तक पहुंचने के लिए, ये क्षेत्र और पात्र विरासत बनाते हैं जो उनके जाने के बाद लंबे समय तक जीवित रहेंगे.
- 7 प्राइमटाइम एमी के लिए नामांकित
- 19 जीत और कुल 62 नामांकन
एपिसोड ब्राउज़ करें
सारांश
Reviewers say 'The Rings of Power' receives mixed reactions for its stunning visuals, intricate world-building, and ambitious storytelling. Critics point to deviations from Tolkien's lore, weak writing, and inconsistent pacing. Fans express disappointment in character portrayals and plot changes. Some viewers appreciate the fresh take and potential to expand Middle-earth. The show's production quality, special effects, and cinematography are often praised, while the script and character development draw less favorable remarks. Overall, it is seen as visually impressive but narratively uneven.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
As a Lord of the Rings fan, I was eagerly awaiting the origin stories of Middle-earth. Of course, I have high expectations after Lord of the Rings, which is close to perfection in terms of time and fiction. Because they have a considerable budget and opportunities, that's why I gave my points by watching the first episode right away. Although it is the beginning part, I can say that I liked the first part very much. The character of Galadriel could have been more strong, but she is still successful. We will warm up to the characters better over time.
Characters: 8 Story: 10 Decor and venue: 10 Costume: 10 Music: 10.
Characters: 8 Story: 10 Decor and venue: 10 Costume: 10 Music: 10.
A pleasant surprise, the cinematography is impeccable, the characters quite well done, the plot looks like a link between the stories of the First Age, the Silmarillion and the stories of the Lord of the Rings of the Third Age, the rhythm of narration is pleasant albeit a bit slow. If the outcome of the series will be to narrate how Sauron forged the Rings of Power, it will definitely be something to watch. Until this moment, I think that in general terms, at least the first chapter delivers. I think enough to be cautiously optimistic about what the next 7 episodes might turn out to be. I must add, again that I am pleasantly surprised.
We all know liberties were taken with this series so my review is not based on faithfulness to the source material.
A lot of the marketing for this show led people to fear it would be woke. I didn't see anything like that. I wasn't rolling my eyes or cringing at any virtue signalling.
The pace is a little rough in parts but since it's the beginning of the series I almost expect a little dawdling. There's a lot going on, things to be set up and introduced etc...
The characters and the story is engaging though, the cinematography was well done, and the score seemed to fit... so I'm honestly excited to see where this series goes.
Definitely give this a shot and decide for yourself.
A lot of the marketing for this show led people to fear it would be woke. I didn't see anything like that. I wasn't rolling my eyes or cringing at any virtue signalling.
The pace is a little rough in parts but since it's the beginning of the series I almost expect a little dawdling. There's a lot going on, things to be set up and introduced etc...
The characters and the story is engaging though, the cinematography was well done, and the score seemed to fit... so I'm honestly excited to see where this series goes.
Definitely give this a shot and decide for yourself.
NOTE - after finishing the series I downgraded my rating to a 3.
Ok So where to begin. I gave it a 2.5 stars or a 5 out of 10 because I don't want to seem like I am review bombing. I notice the positive reviews seem very general whilst the mediocre and bad reviews seem much more specific, which I find telling. Yes the Cinematography is great and most of the production values are also very good, though some are off key as well. After two episodes I have little idea where the plot is going and the scene writing seems very weak. The dwarves are pretty well represented but all the humans except the one lead female seem like idiots. The Harfoots/halflings are kinda cool. The elves seem very poorly represented and very off key on so many levels. So yes, I have read just about everything JRR wrote himself, but I don't mind some adaptation for TV/Film either, but this really seems to miss Tolkien's tone. Most of the Elves just don't look or act like.. well...Elves...Period. That's a big problem. Sorry but it is. Many are miscast. Elrond? Come on. No dis to the actor, just wildly miscast and badly written. Most of the Elves are poorly written and directed, and they are the backbone of the story here. I like the actress playing Galadriel, but the way her character is written is ridiculous and not very engaging or likable. It seems everyone making entertainment content from classics wants it to be something it isn't. They would have been better off making a different show that was original or based on something they actually wanted to be somewhat faithful to in their representation. Instead it feels like a rip off.
Most of the dynamic and action based scenes have way too close in camera work and are jolting and unclear. And they jump back and forth too quickly between story lines so it is hard to get invested. Written for people with really short attention spans perhaps? The CGI is ok but I honestly don't see where they spent all the $ unless it was in a critic payoff slush fund. Or perhaps most of the critics are not really familiar with the source work at all and don't know the stories and tone that this is supposed to be based off of.
I had trouble getting through both episodes. Honestly, most of the adult characters seem whiney, immature and kind of stupid. Many of these folks are already classic adult developed characters at this point in the timeline, not the whelps they seem to be here. Again, very poor writing and character development. I am struggling to like or care about anyone in the show, though I do like Arondir & Nori.
I will probably keep watching the show for the visuals and the pastime but it seems like it should be so much more than it is. I really don't mind creative license to fill in the plot development if it's well done. It just seems like it is not well done here. They could make things up that match the gist and tone of Tolkien's second age, but instead it almost seems like a completely different world/story which is not how they presented the show in the lead up marketing campaign. I mean they have been hawking this thing mercilessly for months and months like the second coming of Tolkien. And really building on that point, It seems like they used the name to capture an easy audience when they did not have enough of the rights, or the desire to do a solid adaptation. Seems like a marketing gimmick. Meanwhile Amazon has bought and tied up the rights to many fine 20th Century SciFi and Fantasy works by the top talent of the time and then failed to bring them to market. The works of Roger Zelazny and Marion Zimmer Bradley are two great examples of fantastic properties that they have bought and then let languish, where they could be first to the table in high value adaptations of the Chronicles of Amber, or the Darkover stories just to name a few. Instead they went for the easy name recognition and then made a visual spectacle with little real substance. What a shame, and a squandering of both opportunity and a ridiculous amount of $.
I could say more but I don't want to just rag on the show. I know many fine people put their talent and hard work into it, and taken as a stand alone perhaps it is not so bad. Unfortunately for everyone except people who just take whatever they are given, it was not presented as a stand alone, but rather and important adaptation of Tolkien's work, which it clearly is not.
If you don't care about Tolkien much or any continuity of the world building or tone, then one can watch it as reasonably entertaining eye candy I suppose, in an entertainment world that is long on content but short on quality.
I wrote this to inform not to simply be critical.
Cheers.
Ok So where to begin. I gave it a 2.5 stars or a 5 out of 10 because I don't want to seem like I am review bombing. I notice the positive reviews seem very general whilst the mediocre and bad reviews seem much more specific, which I find telling. Yes the Cinematography is great and most of the production values are also very good, though some are off key as well. After two episodes I have little idea where the plot is going and the scene writing seems very weak. The dwarves are pretty well represented but all the humans except the one lead female seem like idiots. The Harfoots/halflings are kinda cool. The elves seem very poorly represented and very off key on so many levels. So yes, I have read just about everything JRR wrote himself, but I don't mind some adaptation for TV/Film either, but this really seems to miss Tolkien's tone. Most of the Elves just don't look or act like.. well...Elves...Period. That's a big problem. Sorry but it is. Many are miscast. Elrond? Come on. No dis to the actor, just wildly miscast and badly written. Most of the Elves are poorly written and directed, and they are the backbone of the story here. I like the actress playing Galadriel, but the way her character is written is ridiculous and not very engaging or likable. It seems everyone making entertainment content from classics wants it to be something it isn't. They would have been better off making a different show that was original or based on something they actually wanted to be somewhat faithful to in their representation. Instead it feels like a rip off.
Most of the dynamic and action based scenes have way too close in camera work and are jolting and unclear. And they jump back and forth too quickly between story lines so it is hard to get invested. Written for people with really short attention spans perhaps? The CGI is ok but I honestly don't see where they spent all the $ unless it was in a critic payoff slush fund. Or perhaps most of the critics are not really familiar with the source work at all and don't know the stories and tone that this is supposed to be based off of.
I had trouble getting through both episodes. Honestly, most of the adult characters seem whiney, immature and kind of stupid. Many of these folks are already classic adult developed characters at this point in the timeline, not the whelps they seem to be here. Again, very poor writing and character development. I am struggling to like or care about anyone in the show, though I do like Arondir & Nori.
I will probably keep watching the show for the visuals and the pastime but it seems like it should be so much more than it is. I really don't mind creative license to fill in the plot development if it's well done. It just seems like it is not well done here. They could make things up that match the gist and tone of Tolkien's second age, but instead it almost seems like a completely different world/story which is not how they presented the show in the lead up marketing campaign. I mean they have been hawking this thing mercilessly for months and months like the second coming of Tolkien. And really building on that point, It seems like they used the name to capture an easy audience when they did not have enough of the rights, or the desire to do a solid adaptation. Seems like a marketing gimmick. Meanwhile Amazon has bought and tied up the rights to many fine 20th Century SciFi and Fantasy works by the top talent of the time and then failed to bring them to market. The works of Roger Zelazny and Marion Zimmer Bradley are two great examples of fantastic properties that they have bought and then let languish, where they could be first to the table in high value adaptations of the Chronicles of Amber, or the Darkover stories just to name a few. Instead they went for the easy name recognition and then made a visual spectacle with little real substance. What a shame, and a squandering of both opportunity and a ridiculous amount of $.
I could say more but I don't want to just rag on the show. I know many fine people put their talent and hard work into it, and taken as a stand alone perhaps it is not so bad. Unfortunately for everyone except people who just take whatever they are given, it was not presented as a stand alone, but rather and important adaptation of Tolkien's work, which it clearly is not.
If you don't care about Tolkien much or any continuity of the world building or tone, then one can watch it as reasonably entertaining eye candy I suppose, in an entertainment world that is long on content but short on quality.
I wrote this to inform not to simply be critical.
Cheers.
Currently, there isn't much to enjoy here and though the directors have attempted to emulate the movies (which is clear to see for all), they have overdone it with the dialogue without providing much substance.
Dialogue within the series lacks rich ideas and it's sense of adventurism is tied up often in an over poetic substrata.
The CGI was acceptable in some parts though mostly transparent. For example, using CGI rats instead of the real thing was lazy and tacky.
Whatever this series is based on is clearly non existent because the direction and the ideas laid do not seek a sense of Tolkien atmosphere. The casting is good, though sometimes, they should have rethought who they employ. Lenny Henry was pretty decent but the rest need to be rethought for the most part.
I'm wondering what the billion was spent on. Hopefully we see more of that later on. But for now, it's not looking good.
If you're creating a sense of fantasy, you still need to make it realistic in the sense of the world it is built in. And that hasn't happened.
This show looks more fan fiction than official.
Dialogue within the series lacks rich ideas and it's sense of adventurism is tied up often in an over poetic substrata.
The CGI was acceptable in some parts though mostly transparent. For example, using CGI rats instead of the real thing was lazy and tacky.
Whatever this series is based on is clearly non existent because the direction and the ideas laid do not seek a sense of Tolkien atmosphere. The casting is good, though sometimes, they should have rethought who they employ. Lenny Henry was pretty decent but the rest need to be rethought for the most part.
I'm wondering what the billion was spent on. Hopefully we see more of that later on. But for now, it's not looking good.
If you're creating a sense of fantasy, you still need to make it realistic in the sense of the world it is built in. And that hasn't happened.
This show looks more fan fiction than official.
Renewed, Canceled, or Ending?
Renewed, Canceled, or Ending?
Check out our list of renewals and cancellations to see if your favorite show made the cut.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाAmazon's original pitch for the television rights to J.R.R. Tolkien's 'The Hobbit' and 'The Lord of the Rings' novels was to make the series a new adaptation of the latter (effectively a retelling of दी लार्ड ऑफ दी रिंग्स: फैलोशिप ऑफ दी रिंग (2001), दी लार्ड ऑफ दी रिंग्स: दी टू टॉवर्स (2002) and दी लार्ड ऑफ दी रिंग्स: रिर्टन ऑफ दी किंग (2003)), but the Tolkien estate rejected this proposal. Amazon finally obtained the rights under the conditions that the series be distinct from Peter Jackson's earlier adaptations, and that they couldn't contradict anything that Tolkien had previously written. Early ideas that were proposed included prequel stories featuring characters such as Aragorn, Gimli and Gandalf, but the showrunners preferred to focus on important untold events from the novels' lore rather than simple side stories, so they settled with the studio that the series would take place during the books' Second Age. Since they didn't have the rights to Tolkien's 'The Silmarillion', 'Unfinished Tales' and 'The History of Middle-earth' (which explore the First and Second Ages), they checked the Lord of the Rings novels and appendices for passages about any references to the Second Age in which they could set their story. They consulted with the estate and several Tolkien lore experts (including grandson and novelist Simon Tolkien) about the inclusion of new characters and plot elements.
- गूफ़The dubbing credits for several languages mistakenly list King Durin III as "Durin II".
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटThe opening titles is a musical sequence of matter forming various shapes, based on the "Music of the Ainur" creation myth from J.R.R. Tolkien's "The Silmarillion".
- कनेक्शनFeatured in The Critical Drinker: The Rings of Power - War For A Fandom (2022)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
"The Rings of Power" Cast Through the Years
"The Rings of Power" Cast Through the Years
See the cast of "The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power" in all their most iconic roles from Morfydd Clark in Saint Maud to Benjamin Walker in Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, and more.
- How many seasons does The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power have?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
- Will Galadriel, Elrond, and Gandalf appear in this series?
- Does this feature stories from The Silmarillion?
- Why do some of the elves have short hair in this series?
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- ऑकलैंड, न्यूज़ीलैंड(series 1)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें