IMDb रेटिंग
6.5/10
7 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अवांछित गर्भावस्था वाली एक विवाहित महिला अमेरिका में ऐसे समय में रहती है जहां वह कानूनी गर्भपात नहीं करवा सकती है और मदद पाने के लिए उपनगरीय महिलाओं के एक समूह के साथ काम करती है.अवांछित गर्भावस्था वाली एक विवाहित महिला अमेरिका में ऐसे समय में रहती है जहां वह कानूनी गर्भपात नहीं करवा सकती है और मदद पाने के लिए उपनगरीय महिलाओं के एक समूह के साथ काम करती है.अवांछित गर्भावस्था वाली एक विवाहित महिला अमेरिका में ऐसे समय में रहती है जहां वह कानूनी गर्भपात नहीं करवा सकती है और मदद पाने के लिए उपनगरीय महिलाओं के एक समूह के साथ काम करती है.
- पुरस्कार
- 1 जीत और कुल 5 नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
If you are looking for an entertaining movie mostly, you will be disappointed probably, but if you have an open mind and appreciate the input that movies can and do provide for expanding one's understanding of life's great challenges, then you should not be disappointed. That along with this review's headline is my conclusion, upfront.
Firstly, the IMDb synopsis and especially the storyline further below it will provide you sufficient information to decide if you want to see this movie. I was swayed mostly by the three lead actors whose names usually will make me consider watching the movies in which they perform, namely Sigourney Weaver, Chris Messina and the lead actor also, Elizabeth Banks. It is not any of those three's best performances, in my opinion, but the characters they play and their situation or the circumstances depicted may be the factors that made me immerse myself in the period, 50 years ago, and especially in the battle they fought, the one for women's right to an abortion. I've been, in principle, always a supporter of the cause and for the rights. The movie gave however something more than justification, it gave me the feeling that made my reasons for supporting the cause more human and definitely more real. I can only imagine how this movie will make women viewers feel, as I am but a man. I'm serious because the story was a serious one and still the fight for those rights are serious today, in America without a doubt.
In June of this year, 2022, America got a shot to its perceived rights, well they were not so 'acquired' anymore, when the Supreme Court overturned the defining 1973 landmark decision we all know as Roe vs Wade. It was a setback that justifiably angered most women and anyone really supportive of the needed rights. I will repeat the word 'need' and 'needed' because it was what this movie allowed me to appreciate with greater sensitivity. The story of the women in the movie is no different than the actual circumstances that existed then, exist today and always will. The story paints that picture well enough, not like a photograph but perhaps like a Van Gogh painting might to the discerning eye.
It may or not change some minds, but it's the best source for a getting a perspective called for, one beyond simply believing in a principle but understanding a need. The movie was released in Oct-2022 after the Dobbs case proceedings, the one the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in June 2022; it was fair timing for the release which many, I read, wanted released sooner, not that it would have made a difference. The movie however reinforced the ensuing political debates before US midterm elections. Movies such as this one are part of what makes cinema a valued art, even when it's not Oscar material. After seeing the movie online, I was compelled to write a review; I would be thrilled if it convinced anyone, one would be good, to watch it in turn.
Firstly, the IMDb synopsis and especially the storyline further below it will provide you sufficient information to decide if you want to see this movie. I was swayed mostly by the three lead actors whose names usually will make me consider watching the movies in which they perform, namely Sigourney Weaver, Chris Messina and the lead actor also, Elizabeth Banks. It is not any of those three's best performances, in my opinion, but the characters they play and their situation or the circumstances depicted may be the factors that made me immerse myself in the period, 50 years ago, and especially in the battle they fought, the one for women's right to an abortion. I've been, in principle, always a supporter of the cause and for the rights. The movie gave however something more than justification, it gave me the feeling that made my reasons for supporting the cause more human and definitely more real. I can only imagine how this movie will make women viewers feel, as I am but a man. I'm serious because the story was a serious one and still the fight for those rights are serious today, in America without a doubt.
In June of this year, 2022, America got a shot to its perceived rights, well they were not so 'acquired' anymore, when the Supreme Court overturned the defining 1973 landmark decision we all know as Roe vs Wade. It was a setback that justifiably angered most women and anyone really supportive of the needed rights. I will repeat the word 'need' and 'needed' because it was what this movie allowed me to appreciate with greater sensitivity. The story of the women in the movie is no different than the actual circumstances that existed then, exist today and always will. The story paints that picture well enough, not like a photograph but perhaps like a Van Gogh painting might to the discerning eye.
It may or not change some minds, but it's the best source for a getting a perspective called for, one beyond simply believing in a principle but understanding a need. The movie was released in Oct-2022 after the Dobbs case proceedings, the one the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in June 2022; it was fair timing for the release which many, I read, wanted released sooner, not that it would have made a difference. The movie however reinforced the ensuing political debates before US midterm elections. Movies such as this one are part of what makes cinema a valued art, even when it's not Oscar material. After seeing the movie online, I was compelled to write a review; I would be thrilled if it convinced anyone, one would be good, to watch it in turn.
This movie should be shown in ALL schools as part of the required curriculum. It's not a fancy, flashy, big budget production. It's a modest movie that tells a great story. A very important one. And it does a mighty fine job at doing that too. Sure, we all know those times existed not that long ago in our history but most people don't know what it was REALLY like... what those women went through, how difficult it was, how expensive, etc. This movie felt like it told the story the right way. With a lot of compassion. It's not here to make a ton of money, it's just here to enlighten and spread a message. The acting from Banks and Weaver is the usual/expected top notch, no surprises there, with Banks sometimes telling an entire story with just a slight shift on her face. This is not a fast action packed movie and I see that a lot of people complained about that which I don't understand. It felt like it had plenty of intensity in it for me and it kept me watching from beginning to end. There was always something interesting and new happening. Sure, there were a couple of plot holes (abortion advertisements at a bus stop in the 50's??) but they needed to get the story across so I get it.
Overall this was an excellent movie. Please enjoy it responsibly!
Overall this was an excellent movie. Please enjoy it responsibly!
Call Jane is a must watch. Not necessarily because it is the best film around, but because it is so vitally important given the state of the world today.
It is hard not to be very emotionally stirred by this tale of courageous women taking control of their own bodies and their futures in the face of oppression.
The central performance from Elizabeth Banks is very engaging, playing a character that it is easy to sympathise with and connect to.
The story is engaging and well told, if not overly flashy.
I do think certain elements of the film could have been explored and developed more, and it could have been a bit more punchy in parts.
But still, given the state of the world and the ridiculous oppression of women's bodies, it is hard to ignore the importance of a film like this.
It is hard not to be very emotionally stirred by this tale of courageous women taking control of their own bodies and their futures in the face of oppression.
The central performance from Elizabeth Banks is very engaging, playing a character that it is easy to sympathise with and connect to.
The story is engaging and well told, if not overly flashy.
I do think certain elements of the film could have been explored and developed more, and it could have been a bit more punchy in parts.
But still, given the state of the world and the ridiculous oppression of women's bodies, it is hard to ignore the importance of a film like this.
The right to choose was settled until it wasn't! Who would have thought that another "Call Jane" movement would be necessary in 2023?
The film while not perfect get the message across that women were not in control of their own bodies, could not terminate a pregnancy even when medically necessary and the woman's life was in danger. One of the opening scenes has Elizabeth Banks as Joy, pregnant with congestive heart trouble and a hospital board of men voting no on terminating her pregnancy because she might live through it. I almost forgot how dire the situation was back when abortion was illegal in my lifetime. The pill had just become available and has been life changing for women. The film does a good job portraying that time. What a travesty that women's rights have been taken away in more than half of America. I would not have ever predicted that we could regress but we have. It is a tragic state of affairs.
Termination is everyone woman's right. It is a private decision. Laws against women, doctors, pharmaceutical companies, and culpability against anyone willing to help girls and women access to medical help are despicable.
I recommend this film for everyone.
The film while not perfect get the message across that women were not in control of their own bodies, could not terminate a pregnancy even when medically necessary and the woman's life was in danger. One of the opening scenes has Elizabeth Banks as Joy, pregnant with congestive heart trouble and a hospital board of men voting no on terminating her pregnancy because she might live through it. I almost forgot how dire the situation was back when abortion was illegal in my lifetime. The pill had just become available and has been life changing for women. The film does a good job portraying that time. What a travesty that women's rights have been taken away in more than half of America. I would not have ever predicted that we could regress but we have. It is a tragic state of affairs.
Termination is everyone woman's right. It is a private decision. Laws against women, doctors, pharmaceutical companies, and culpability against anyone willing to help girls and women access to medical help are despicable.
I recommend this film for everyone.
Couldn't really tell what it's going to be about at the start; takes time to reveal itself and in the process I started to lose interest in it. You do get it's the 60's with the dialogue and scenery, the ideologies too; but it the movie doesn't really focus on convincing you of the era and instead on telling you the story instead.
It's pretty slow paced and I wasn't really sucked into it for the first half, opening act is promising then quickly starts to get dull at times and just felt like it was lagging to get to the point to address what the movie was going to actually be about. It took time to actually start. About an hour or so in it starts to find it's groove and turns a little more upbeat. It was very believable with great acting throughout which made it touching, though I don't know if that makes up for the lack of zeal it has. Once the point is made though it feels like they were adding unnecessary points to develop plot which it didn't really need to get to the end of the story. I think the movie could've had a much shorter run time and still gotten the same level of emotion and notion across. For the most part the great acting is what kept me interested and elevated the film.
The film should've been better, I still think it's a pretty decent movie especially if you wait it out, and it might be a movie based in the 60's but it's been released at a time when it's message is still relevant, just unfortunate it's still a topic we have to discuss this many years later. Not so much has changed in six decades that the characters and message the movie is advocating for are still very familiar in this age.
It's pretty slow paced and I wasn't really sucked into it for the first half, opening act is promising then quickly starts to get dull at times and just felt like it was lagging to get to the point to address what the movie was going to actually be about. It took time to actually start. About an hour or so in it starts to find it's groove and turns a little more upbeat. It was very believable with great acting throughout which made it touching, though I don't know if that makes up for the lack of zeal it has. Once the point is made though it feels like they were adding unnecessary points to develop plot which it didn't really need to get to the end of the story. I think the movie could've had a much shorter run time and still gotten the same level of emotion and notion across. For the most part the great acting is what kept me interested and elevated the film.
The film should've been better, I still think it's a pretty decent movie especially if you wait it out, and it might be a movie based in the 60's but it's been released at a time when it's message is still relevant, just unfortunate it's still a topic we have to discuss this many years later. Not so much has changed in six decades that the characters and message the movie is advocating for are still very familiar in this age.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाCall Jane is based on the true story of a network of activists who helped provide underground abortions in 1960 and 70s Chicago. These activists called themselves "Jane," or "the Jane collective." People seeking abortions were told to "call Jane." That said, the characters in Call Jane are not based on specific people.
- गूफ़The film is set in 1968. In a scene early on in the film, in which Gwen is picking up Joy, a house in the background has solar panels.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in The View: Sigourney Weaver/Elizabeth Banks (2022)
- साउंडट्रैकSilent Island
Written by Darla Hood and Ronnie Buck
Performed by Modesto Duran & Orchestra
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Call Jane?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $5,12,770
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $2,44,469
- 30 अक्टू॰ 2022
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $7,36,893
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 1 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें