IMDb रेटिंग
6.8/10
61 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
एक विमान दुर्घटना के बाद आर्कटिक में फंसे एक व्यक्ति को यह तय करना होगा कि उसे अपने अस्थायी शिविर की सापेक्ष सुरक्षा में रहना है या एक घातक ट्रेक पर जाना है।एक विमान दुर्घटना के बाद आर्कटिक में फंसे एक व्यक्ति को यह तय करना होगा कि उसे अपने अस्थायी शिविर की सापेक्ष सुरक्षा में रहना है या एक घातक ट्रेक पर जाना है।एक विमान दुर्घटना के बाद आर्कटिक में फंसे एक व्यक्ति को यह तय करना होगा कि उसे अपने अस्थायी शिविर की सापेक्ष सुरक्षा में रहना है या एक घातक ट्रेक पर जाना है।
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- पुरस्कार
- 5 कुल नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
For a film with such a simple story and such little dialogue, 'Arctic' is successful at holding your attention throughout thanks to its compelling and well-told storyline. I initially thought this film was based on a true story - not sure why - but the fact I did probably shows how authentic and realistic 'Arctic' feels. It's a proper survival story without any Hollywood gloss.
The cinematography in 'Arctic' is excellent, capturing the stunning Arctic landscapes perfectly. It looks great and the bleak setting really adds to the mood of the film. Mads Mikkelsen is once again very impressive as the main (and for the most part only) character in the film.
'Arctic' is definitely worth watching - an all-round very good survival film that benefits from the simplicity of its plot. Well-made, well-acted and has no trouble in holding your attention from start to finish.
The cinematography in 'Arctic' is excellent, capturing the stunning Arctic landscapes perfectly. It looks great and the bleak setting really adds to the mood of the film. Mads Mikkelsen is once again very impressive as the main (and for the most part only) character in the film.
'Arctic' is definitely worth watching - an all-round very good survival film that benefits from the simplicity of its plot. Well-made, well-acted and has no trouble in holding your attention from start to finish.
Patient, persistent & poignant in just the right doses, and powered by Mads Mikkelsen's effortlessly evocative performance, Arctic is one of the best films about a man stranded in the wilderness that's crafted with restraint, told with finesse & is incessantly captivating from start to finish. A promising debut for its first-time filmmaker, and another impressive addition to the Danish actor's oeuvre.
It's not every movie that can manage to feel bleak and hopeless, and yet at the same time be inspiring and beautiful - but "Arctic" pulls off that difficult and unusual combination superbly. It's a very simple story, and the basic plot has been done before. Mads Mikkelsen plays the lone survivor of a plane crash in the Arctic. He's set up the shell of the plane as a makeshift survival camp, he fishes and he eats them raw, and he falls asleep and wakes up and does it again. I have to confess that the beginning of the movie was a bit of a weak point for me. It started too abruptly. There was no introduction to the character Mikkelsen was playing, no explanation of how long he had been in this situation. The movie simply opens - and he's just there. I would have liked a little bit more information than that. But Mikkelsen's portrayal of this character did draw me into the story. There's little in it that's particularly exciting - it's just the very real and raw struggle of this man to survive; it's a testimony to the human will to survive even seemingly impossible situations. The movie picks up a bit of a spark with the introduction of a second character - a young woman who survives the crash of what I assume was a helicopter sent to rescue Overgard (Mikkelsen's character's name.) She's badly injured, and Overgard becomes her nurse and companion, desperately trying to keep her alive, and finally deciding that he needs to try to hike out of this situation, dragging the young woman on a sled behind him.
The rugged barrenness of the Arctic landscape (this was filmed in Iceland) is beautiful and haunting - and it definitely adds to the hopeless feeling of the movie. Mikkelsen does a good job as Overgard. For a movie with very little dialogue between the only two characters, I thought there was a wonderful sense of that mysterious thing called chemistry between Mikkelsen and Icelandic actress Maria Thelma as the woman Overgard commits to saving. You can catch elements of other movies that influenced this story. I had thoughts of both "Alive" and "127 Hours" as I watched this. You can add pretty much any other survival type movie you can think of. So this isn't particularly original or unique, and I have to confess that a part of me really didn't want to like this for some reason. And yet it drew me in. It kept my attention. I wanted to see how this was going to end up. Mikkelsen's character - sacrificing so much and caring so much about the life of this young woman - was, indeed, inspiring.
As the beginning of the movie was rather abrupt, so too was the end of the movie. The ending was too sudden, and we learned nothing of the ultimate fate of the two characters. I've also seen so-called "survivalists" criticizing the decisions Overgard made - but not everyone is a survivalist. Perhaps Overgard simply wasn't, and made the best decisions he could in the face of impossible circumstances for which he wasn't really prepared. This is a good movie. I'd rate it as a 7/10.
The rugged barrenness of the Arctic landscape (this was filmed in Iceland) is beautiful and haunting - and it definitely adds to the hopeless feeling of the movie. Mikkelsen does a good job as Overgard. For a movie with very little dialogue between the only two characters, I thought there was a wonderful sense of that mysterious thing called chemistry between Mikkelsen and Icelandic actress Maria Thelma as the woman Overgard commits to saving. You can catch elements of other movies that influenced this story. I had thoughts of both "Alive" and "127 Hours" as I watched this. You can add pretty much any other survival type movie you can think of. So this isn't particularly original or unique, and I have to confess that a part of me really didn't want to like this for some reason. And yet it drew me in. It kept my attention. I wanted to see how this was going to end up. Mikkelsen's character - sacrificing so much and caring so much about the life of this young woman - was, indeed, inspiring.
As the beginning of the movie was rather abrupt, so too was the end of the movie. The ending was too sudden, and we learned nothing of the ultimate fate of the two characters. I've also seen so-called "survivalists" criticizing the decisions Overgard made - but not everyone is a survivalist. Perhaps Overgard simply wasn't, and made the best decisions he could in the face of impossible circumstances for which he wasn't really prepared. This is a good movie. I'd rate it as a 7/10.
A great movie about resilience and our hypothetical ability to survive in a hostile environment. The film is captivating: you will be cold, you will be scared, you will be hungry, you will be exhausted, even within the cushioned armchair of your favorite movie theater. And Mads Mikkelsen is excellent, as usual.
After his plane crashes in the frozen Arctic, the solo pilot initially decides to stay with his plane. However, after a rescue attempt fails he is left with a badly injured person to care for, and she needs medical attention urgently. He decides to set out, with his patient, for the nearest likely source of help.
Great survival drama. Well told story by a writer-director, Joe Penna, who clearly respects the intelligence of his audience. No spoon-feeding of information, no easy outs, no unnecessary scenes. Good character engagement as we follow the adventures of the two stranded people, see their efforts to get to where they're going and will them on. The resourcefulness of Mads Mikkelsen's character helps too as you don't want all that effort and ingenuity wasted.
On that note, Mads Mikkelsen is great in the lead role. There's not much dialogue but he brings an unspoken empathy to his character, as he cares for the second person. That's one of the great things about the movie too, as it also makes you wonder what you would do in a similar situation.
Great film.
Great survival drama. Well told story by a writer-director, Joe Penna, who clearly respects the intelligence of his audience. No spoon-feeding of information, no easy outs, no unnecessary scenes. Good character engagement as we follow the adventures of the two stranded people, see their efforts to get to where they're going and will them on. The resourcefulness of Mads Mikkelsen's character helps too as you don't want all that effort and ingenuity wasted.
On that note, Mads Mikkelsen is great in the lead role. There's not much dialogue but he brings an unspoken empathy to his character, as he cares for the second person. That's one of the great things about the movie too, as it also makes you wonder what you would do in a similar situation.
Great film.
Mads Mikkelsen Braves the Elements in 'Arctic
Mads Mikkelsen Braves the Elements in 'Arctic
Mads Mikkelsen and director Joe Penna share what it was like braving the extreme cold while shooting their survival tale in Iceland.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाOvergard's ID photo shows a younger Mads Mikkelsen. It is the same photo used in the TV show Hannibal to show a young Hannibal Lecter.
- गूफ़The helicopter seen in the crash scene is a Bell 407. However, the wreck is of an MBB Bo 105.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in The Story Behind 'Arctic' (2019)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Arctic?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
- Is this film going to get a UK release (Cinema or DVD/Blu Ray Home release)?
- What language was the young woman's name written in on her ID? What does that translate to in English?
- Why does he keep setting his watch timer?
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Sinh Tồn Ở Bắc Cực
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $20,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $24,10,795
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $50,878
- 3 फ़र॰ 2019
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $41,65,776
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 38 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें