IMDb रेटिंग
6.6/10
18 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA female assassin leaves a trail of bodies behind her as she seeks revenge.A female assassin leaves a trail of bodies behind her as she seeks revenge.A female assassin leaves a trail of bodies behind her as she seeks revenge.
- पुरस्कार
- 7 जीत और कुल 14 नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I'm feeling very underwhelmed by this film despite being a great fan of the best of Korean cinema. It's been well advertised of late, but don't fall for any possible hype on the movie posters. I don't even think the title makes sense for this movie.
The biggest problem is that this film is simply too close a homage to the classic French film Nikita, and it's not unfair to say a blatant steal. If you've never seen Nikita then you'll likely enjoy this, otherwise you'll be slumped in your chair for the duration. As there has already been a US remake and TV series based on Nikita, most will already know the premise, further denting its value.
Basically think of 4-5 core characters and themes in Nikita, and you'll find their mirror in this film. Run the two side by side and they are probably the same. Some of the scenes should had a copyright watermark from Luc Besson in the corner they were that alike.
The greatest selling point is the action, with a handful of exceptionally well choreographed and filmed scenes that will leave you applauding, especially the opening run in. Hollywood should take a look in. I haven't been excited and amazed watching action scenes for a long while.
Beyond that, there's little to write home about. Story is a copy, the acting is rarely challenging (although our lead is very good) and the dialogue is so so. Shame really.
The twists and turns are unexciting, and are quite frankly poor and unchallenging. There's little good to say there.
Saying all that, our lead has a young child who steals the scenes whenever she's there, so that's a small saving grace and release valve from all the rest.
Disappointing, but still very watchable for the action scenes if little else. If you do want to watch a great alternative Korean film this year, then I would very much recommend The Handmaiden, watch that instead of this.
The biggest problem is that this film is simply too close a homage to the classic French film Nikita, and it's not unfair to say a blatant steal. If you've never seen Nikita then you'll likely enjoy this, otherwise you'll be slumped in your chair for the duration. As there has already been a US remake and TV series based on Nikita, most will already know the premise, further denting its value.
Basically think of 4-5 core characters and themes in Nikita, and you'll find their mirror in this film. Run the two side by side and they are probably the same. Some of the scenes should had a copyright watermark from Luc Besson in the corner they were that alike.
The greatest selling point is the action, with a handful of exceptionally well choreographed and filmed scenes that will leave you applauding, especially the opening run in. Hollywood should take a look in. I haven't been excited and amazed watching action scenes for a long while.
Beyond that, there's little to write home about. Story is a copy, the acting is rarely challenging (although our lead is very good) and the dialogue is so so. Shame really.
The twists and turns are unexciting, and are quite frankly poor and unchallenging. There's little good to say there.
Saying all that, our lead has a young child who steals the scenes whenever she's there, so that's a small saving grace and release valve from all the rest.
Disappointing, but still very watchable for the action scenes if little else. If you do want to watch a great alternative Korean film this year, then I would very much recommend The Handmaiden, watch that instead of this.
Was in my radar for a long time. Saw this recently. The plot may look n sound like La Femme Nikita n various films on female assassin turned rogue but check out the brutal action sequences. The film moves at a good pace, the screenplay is captivating with lots of twists n turns. Forget bah all those things. Such films r seen for the action sequences.
The motorcycle ninja fight scene in this movie is again replicated in John Wick: Chapter 3 - Parabellum which is also a terrific action entertainer.
'The Villainess (2017)' contains some of the craziest action-sequences in recent cinema, primarily because of the frenzied and ferocious nature of the camera itself. It is used as a tool to put you right in the centre of the violence, often literally putting you in the P.O.V. of our protagonist, and never strays further than a few feet away from any of the killing. As such, there is a claustrophobic and relentless feel to each and every such scene, which don't cut away until away until our lead has finished her dirty-work. Because of this, we don't get to rest until our hero does, instead being breathlessly whisked along from brutal but balletic beat to beat. All of the neck-slicing, blood-spilling, body-piling action feels guttural, given a visceral and grimy sense that only one person can survive. This runs counter to most high-concept pictures of the kind, where glossy, clean framing and shiny, pain-free choreography paint a picture of violence that doesn't really hurt and death that doesn't really matter. While death is depicted as similarly cold and callous here, each life that is taken feels painful and we're always on edge for the few people we care about. It's in both the tight and precise but scrappy and explicit fight-choreography, and subsequent blood-letting, and the down-and-dirty camera-work that the picture finds its footing as an 'in-the-trenches' and 'honest' depiction of despicable work, revenge in high-numbers shown from right up-close and watched with gritted teeth. The strongest of sequences are the opening first-person fight and a phenomenal sword-crossing motorbike chase. Both of these use impressive long-takes and hidden camera-cuts to appear as fluid as possible, with the former being an apparent 'one-shot' until its final moments. The use of small digital cameras allows the frame to go places it wouldn't normally be able, with the audience being transported into a one-on-god-knows-how-many battle or even through the wheels of a moving bike seamlessly, and it allows for a very intimate relationship with the lead and her struggle to survive. The only time a combat scene falls slightly short is in the feature's final movement, with some ever-so-slightly dodgy green-screen sky-replacement honestly looking pretty hokey and reducing the effect of the entire segment. Still, what was achieved on its relatively low budget is undeniably impressive and equally exciting. What isn't as exciting are its slower segments and convoluted, though completely understandable, plot. The contrast of its balls-to-the-wall action with its rather domestic, though still out-there and thematically appropriate, story is quite heavy and isn't always balanced too well. There are times where it feels as though the piece has switched gears entirely, with its initial intentions then coming crashing back down onto its new pace just as you're settling into it. This is conceptually appropriate but it does take you out of the film. As does the contrived plot-device used to inject tension and a proper antagonist in the latter half of the second act. This 'twist' feels as though it comes from nowhere, without the explanation afforded to other sequences of less importance, and is handled with confusion even within the narrative. Still, it doesn't ruin the plot and begins to inject some decent pacing back into the piece. It just feels like most of the picture is, or was trying to be, set-up for this moment but it happens too late for that to be the case, or for it to work successfully. On the whole, there isn't anything that isn't enjoyable about the picture. The eclectic, energetic and exciting action-sequences are a sight to behold and the flick plays with some intriguing themes, as well as having an appropriately 'strange', if slightly generic, story. It is always entertaining, even if it loses its drive and isn't quite as pacy as you'd expect. 6/10
"The Villainess" is a movie with a bravura opening and ending sequence, and a middle which reveals its filmmaker has no idea how to do anything other than bravura sequences. The whole movie couldn't have been like that, apparently - especially not at the idiotic two-hour plus length that it goes on for.
The movie has flashbacks that really add nothing, plastic surgery makeovers that also add nothing except confusion, and a bad guy who changes for no reason I could discern.
It also doesn't evince any sympathy for its protagonist. You want to see her kick butt, sure - but she only does that at the beginning and end of the movie, really. Other than that, you don't care, and I was never really sure who the main bad guy was.
This is a movie that was basically made to be cut up into clips and watched on Youtube, saving everyone's time. Don't bother trying to sit through the whole thing.
The movie has flashbacks that really add nothing, plastic surgery makeovers that also add nothing except confusion, and a bad guy who changes for no reason I could discern.
It also doesn't evince any sympathy for its protagonist. You want to see her kick butt, sure - but she only does that at the beginning and end of the movie, really. Other than that, you don't care, and I was never really sure who the main bad guy was.
This is a movie that was basically made to be cut up into clips and watched on Youtube, saving everyone's time. Don't bother trying to sit through the whole thing.
There's no denying The Villainess has some amazingly inventive and filmed action scenes liberally sprinkling its lengthy running time. Whether they are enough to justify the film's reputed 4 minute standing ovation when presented at the Cannes Film Festival, I'm not sure. The Point Break remake had some exciting action scenes and stunts too and yet they're aren't too many disputing the contention, that it was very much a dud of a film.
Speaking of remakes I'm kind of amazed there doesn't seem to be any formal acknowledgement or credit that The Villainess, like John Badham's 1993 The Assassin (also known as Point of No Return), is a remake of Luc Besson's 1990 film La Femme Nikita. There's simply no repudiating it. Badham's movie gave credit to Besson's and said it was a remake. But strangely writer/director of The Villainess, Jung Byung-gil said he was inspired by La Femme Nikita, whilst giving no onscreen credit (that I could see). In my little corner of the world that's what we generally call "ripping people off".
Any way if you know the plots to the previous films, you'll know the basic storyline of The Villainess. Namely, that a young woman is taken and trained by a shadowy facility associated with South Korea's intelligence agency, into being a sanctioned assassin. The differentiating feature with The Villainess, is the almost infuriatingly complicated back story we are given about Sook-hee, the woman concerned. It is made unnecessarily complex in the long first act, by excessive flash-backing, where we are even given flashbacks, within flashbacks. At times things become nearly incoherent. I actually breathed a sigh of relief during the second act, when Sook-hee goes outside the training school on her first mission and the narrative becomes for a time, more traditionally linear in style, with far less flash backs. Complicating matters further is that the 20 year old Sook-hee we see onscreen almost appears more dangerous than the older trained up Sook-hee we see later. In the somewhat absurd, but dazzlingly choreographed opening , she eliminates a whole rival gang on different storeys of a building, a la The Raid. Yet later, both her and an associate female assassin have trouble with a couple of dudes they're supposed to terminate. There are head-scratching inconsistencies like this right through The Villainess.
Kim Ok-vin in the lead role as Sook-hee is very good, as is her onscreen daughter, Eun-hye, played by Kim Yeon-woo, who is very appealing, as a cute 3-year old. Kim Seo-hyung as Kwon-sook, the head of the training school, also succeeds in a finely tuned ambiguous role, whereby we are never sure of where her loyalties ultimately lie.
The conclusion which follows another hideously kinetic, wholesale gang slaughter and freeway bike and bus chase, very reminiscent of that seen in The Matrix Reloaded, is both thrilling, yet still somewhat confusing, whilst leaving the door ajar for a possible sequel no doubt. To be honest I don't think I'd be interested in it, unless I could be guaranteed that Jung Byung-gil had improved upon his story-telling abilities.
Speaking of remakes I'm kind of amazed there doesn't seem to be any formal acknowledgement or credit that The Villainess, like John Badham's 1993 The Assassin (also known as Point of No Return), is a remake of Luc Besson's 1990 film La Femme Nikita. There's simply no repudiating it. Badham's movie gave credit to Besson's and said it was a remake. But strangely writer/director of The Villainess, Jung Byung-gil said he was inspired by La Femme Nikita, whilst giving no onscreen credit (that I could see). In my little corner of the world that's what we generally call "ripping people off".
Any way if you know the plots to the previous films, you'll know the basic storyline of The Villainess. Namely, that a young woman is taken and trained by a shadowy facility associated with South Korea's intelligence agency, into being a sanctioned assassin. The differentiating feature with The Villainess, is the almost infuriatingly complicated back story we are given about Sook-hee, the woman concerned. It is made unnecessarily complex in the long first act, by excessive flash-backing, where we are even given flashbacks, within flashbacks. At times things become nearly incoherent. I actually breathed a sigh of relief during the second act, when Sook-hee goes outside the training school on her first mission and the narrative becomes for a time, more traditionally linear in style, with far less flash backs. Complicating matters further is that the 20 year old Sook-hee we see onscreen almost appears more dangerous than the older trained up Sook-hee we see later. In the somewhat absurd, but dazzlingly choreographed opening , she eliminates a whole rival gang on different storeys of a building, a la The Raid. Yet later, both her and an associate female assassin have trouble with a couple of dudes they're supposed to terminate. There are head-scratching inconsistencies like this right through The Villainess.
Kim Ok-vin in the lead role as Sook-hee is very good, as is her onscreen daughter, Eun-hye, played by Kim Yeon-woo, who is very appealing, as a cute 3-year old. Kim Seo-hyung as Kwon-sook, the head of the training school, also succeeds in a finely tuned ambiguous role, whereby we are never sure of where her loyalties ultimately lie.
The conclusion which follows another hideously kinetic, wholesale gang slaughter and freeway bike and bus chase, very reminiscent of that seen in The Matrix Reloaded, is both thrilling, yet still somewhat confusing, whilst leaving the door ajar for a possible sequel no doubt. To be honest I don't think I'd be interested in it, unless I could be guaranteed that Jung Byung-gil had improved upon his story-telling abilities.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाDirector Byung-Gil Jung uses some never-before used cameras, some extremely small to achieve the look of the movie and give the viewer the impression that they are experiencing everything first hand.
- गूफ़The bottle of Châteaux Margaux in the restaurant scene rotates on the table whilst no-one is drinking or touches it.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in MsMojo: Top 10 Best Female Revenge Movies of All Time (2022)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is The Villainess?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $27,741
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $4,238
- 27 अग॰ 2017
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $87,37,458
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 4 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें