उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं

This is an average psycho thriller. A pretty psycho woman targets a recently separated father. The cast is fairly likable and the lead actress is pretty and quite effective. The story could have been flushed out a bit more. Mainly some more explanation for the wackoness. Usually Lifetime reveals some reason or history for the villain's actions. Here it seems glossed over. It seemed rather dumb that the mother appeared without any weapon at the end. About average for the "wrong --" series of television movies.

Maybe I'm old fashioned but when I see a film advertised with a star I like to see the star in that film. So I was attracted to the film because of Michael Madsen, this generations' Robert Mitchum. His breakout role in "Reservoir Dogs" (1992) was followed by "The Getaway" (1994), "Wyatt Earp" (1994), "Species" (1995), "Frankie the Fly" (1996), and then the two "Kill Bill" films.

Madsen shows up once in the first hour, with about 5 lines. He plays a swim coach. In the next hour he shows up a few more times and has a few more lines.

So if you're like me an attracted to the film because Madsen is the star, avoid this film. Even if you're not interested in Madsen, the film can be avoided

As film fodder goes this is pretty diabolical from an acting and directorial perspective. How some of the 'actors' ever got the job is one of life's mysteries as you wouldn't see anything more wooden even if you studied an IKEA wardrobe. Characters were almost laughably stiff delivering excruciating well worn tropes. I only gave this calamity any stars at all for the unintended laughter it induced and for the goofy finale.

The acting and production was without fault. However the story line was somewhat boring. Too much bad behavior. An ending that saw no real sense of justice. An awful story line spoiled any sense of wanting to watch.

I can't believe I watched this. I guess I did because it's like watching a comedy and the terrible acting just kept me laughing.

Horrible horrible excuse of a movie. You can't even call this stuff "acting. They must have been desperate at Lifetime to fill in some space. If you think you have any intelligence at all, stay away from this movie.

Does this dramatic suspense have a psycho? Of course. Is she anywhere in the above image? No! Jamie must be too sinister to show up in pictures. :) The blown-up image of the man is actually the main teen girl's (Lisa) swim coach, played by Michael Madsen of Thelma & Louise. He comes in handy as her motivator, keeping her mind straight amidst her parents separation and her dad's new off-kilter neighbor. But the psycho, Jamie, is another story altogether, and it is her role that makes Lisa and everyone else in this movie stay constantly alert.

Character Development/Writing Quality: Good. . .until the final moment, which made no sense at all. The next to last scene is well done, but the wrapping up if it is not handled properly as we jump to an impossible next scene.

Values: The broken marriage is not abandoned as Lisa's parents commit to therapy and doing what they can to keep their family unit together. The husband is heavily seduced by Jamie, but outside of a small kiss, does not allow her to use him, insisting he "cannot do this".

Content (sex, language & violence): No sex. Minimal mild language. Violence: a surprising scene when someone is suddenly hit by a car, someone's throat is slashed, someone is choked. We don't get enough of Lisa and Tim's perspectives on these as the director keeps us with Jamie during these intense moments instead.

Scare Factor/Suspense: Jamie is the kind of psycho that makes herself obvious. Within minutes of anybody meeting her, her instability is easy to detect. She's upfront, in your face, no holding back crazy. So, not so much suspense as watching her fly off the handle at Lisa's friends, at Lisa's mother, at anyone who dares speak to Lisa, outside of her dad, of course, whom Jamie is bent on making her own. So, the psycho role is a bit different here because we can tell that Jamie is off her rocker from the start, and so can Lisa, even if it takes her a little bit. Tim, the father, takes a bit longer to detect the wack job because she is on her best behavior for him, hoping to win him over and take him away from his estranged wife. So the new kind of psycho is refreshing--she's loud, over-imaginative about what's really happening, and relentless. The film gives us a lot of smart characters too. Lisa is quite intuitive and does a good job at staying afloat, even when things get hard. Penny, Lisa's best friend, upon meeting Jamie, instantly voices, out loud, in front of Jamie, how off she is. This was a good move as the writer gave us some smart characters throughout. Lisa's mom is another character who refuses to take any baloney from her. It would have been nice to see a build up of Jamie, why she is this way, for instance, for how long. There's a brief mention about her parents, but not enough to help us understand what happened, or why. Another strong aspect of the film lies within Cristine Prosperi (Lisa), who is phenomenal at playing a teen, portraying her hurt over her parents slip and her remorse over isolating herself from her friends in a natural convincing way. She's the kind of pal you'd want, or the kind of daughter that you'd love to have. It's refreshing to see how maturely she handles all of the strangeness with Jamie. Overall, a pretty good movie with a likeable MC and a dangerous villain played by Ahslynn Yennie in a memorable way, though solidly insane and obviously so.

If you like lifetime films, this one is definitely for you. It's got it all! Great corny characters, psycho stalker with amazingly glorious tropes and lines, cool set up and fun twisty ending. It's the perfect film to just sit back and be entertained by (you don't have to think too hard to get it). I loved the main girl in this - she is the ideal combo of gorgeous and scary for an enticing villain that you want to see more and more of. I really like this "Wrong" series - please keep 'em comin Lifetime!

Interesting concept that could in theory happen to anyone. Stalking is scary. This isn't Oscar material but the crazy lady is really convincing. Got me wondering if she really is a nut or a great actress. Probably the latter. :)

Dumb characters. Dumb acting. Dumb story line. The so called coach looks like he's in a disguise, the boyfriend is a stalking creep and the obsessed neighbour couldn't act her way out of a paper bag!!

These are dark movies not enjoyable creepy man or woman hacker putting cameras in their victims homes.all are real high end areas more unbelievable than Hallmark crazy fantasy movies .

This may have been a good watch. However, all the actors and actresses appear they are on some sort of speed. Meth. Coke, etc...I quit watching after around 15 minutes or so of this garbage.

Super knock off version of The crush and fatal attraction. Lifetime 90s and 80s film had way better story lines and quality actors and actresses. This new stuff, IT'S LIKE SCRIPTED REALLY TV NOW. 👎👎👎

I know this is a life time movie that is predictable,boring with no action but oh my gosh the acting was terrible. the only person i believe was a little decent was the crazy girl but the dad,daughter etc.. was horrible

The story is fast paced, as Jamie screams her way through various situations trying to get the reluctant husband to give in to her whims, the mother and daughter are threatened in the end as the resourceful Jamie takes control at the sanitarium, the end leaves you hanging for a sequel, this type of ending is a common end for lifetime TV movies. But generally a good entertaining movie.

All I can say about this film, is there must be a factory in America that churns films out at an alarming rate. Only plus factor, is there were two British actors in the film, but they added nothing to the production.