एक बूढ़ी चीनी अप्रवासी एक साहसिक कार्य में बह जाती है, जहां वह अकेले ही दुनिया को बचा सकती है, अन्य ब्रह्मांडों की खोज कर सकती है जो उसके जीवन से जुड़ सकते हैं.एक बूढ़ी चीनी अप्रवासी एक साहसिक कार्य में बह जाती है, जहां वह अकेले ही दुनिया को बचा सकती है, अन्य ब्रह्मांडों की खोज कर सकती है जो उसके जीवन से जुड़ सकते हैं.एक बूढ़ी चीनी अप्रवासी एक साहसिक कार्य में बह जाती है, जहां वह अकेले ही दुनिया को बचा सकती है, अन्य ब्रह्मांडों की खोज कर सकती है जो उसके जीवन से जुड़ सकते हैं.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- 7 ऑस्कर जीते
- 398 जीत और कुल 379 नामांकन
Narayana Cabral
- Security Guard
- (as a different name)
सारांश
Reviewers say 'Everything Everywhere All at Once' is a divisive film, lauded for its imaginative storytelling and strong performances, especially from Michelle Yeoh and Jamie Lee Curtis. Many appreciate its deep themes and exploration of family and identity. However, some find it overly complex, confusing, and reliant on absurd humor. Pacing, length, and narrative coherence are frequent criticisms, though its bold creativity is widely acknowledged.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Firstly I should say I thought the actors did put in some very good performances and I can see why they were nominated although as to whether they deserved to beat some of their competitors is another matter.
I have to say I found this film to be tedious and almost unenjoyable to watch. It feels like a film made for the TikTok generation - no overall coherence with nuggets of scenes rammed together. Is this a film I would ever bother watching again - absolutely not.
Yes it is different - in much the same way The Artist was (and who talks about that film anymore?) but that doesn't make it good. It aims for a profound message whilst its style is overwhelmingly superficial. It's a film with little artistic merit or dare I say beauty (I am talking about the scenes and cinematography here not the actors) and it definitely did not move me except to pray it was going to finish.
In short it barely ticks the boxes of what I'd consider to be essential criteria for a great movie. Maybe this is the first of a new wave of this type of film and I am not getting it but when it had finished I felt pretty much nothing.
I have to say I found this film to be tedious and almost unenjoyable to watch. It feels like a film made for the TikTok generation - no overall coherence with nuggets of scenes rammed together. Is this a film I would ever bother watching again - absolutely not.
Yes it is different - in much the same way The Artist was (and who talks about that film anymore?) but that doesn't make it good. It aims for a profound message whilst its style is overwhelmingly superficial. It's a film with little artistic merit or dare I say beauty (I am talking about the scenes and cinematography here not the actors) and it definitely did not move me except to pray it was going to finish.
In short it barely ticks the boxes of what I'd consider to be essential criteria for a great movie. Maybe this is the first of a new wave of this type of film and I am not getting it but when it had finished I felt pretty much nothing.
Unfortunately, it is not as fun as I was waiting. I can't understand all th hype honestly. It looked like my childhood games, where someone would say a piece of a story, then another one completes it. Not funny, just random. The drama didn't catch me either. I may have smiled one time along the whole movie. My girlfriend slept. The film has its moments and its great a indie film is grabbing attention, but please see with low expectations. If this is the best film ever, I just want to quit cinema. Or probably people are seeing only marvel movies. Actually, Wandavision is way better. Nice film, just not the best ever like everybody is saying.
I FINALLY sat down to finish watching this movie. I had started it when it first came out to stream and turned it off about 20 minutes in, I found it so boring.
But, last night I decided to sit down and finish watching it to see if it lived up to all of the hype and Oscar accolades...to me, it didn't.
Don't get me wrong, I do feel Mechelle Yeoh did a great job with this very complicated role, so perhaps she deserved it...but the rest of them, ehhhhhh maybe, maybe not so much.
This movie TOTALLY lost my husband, he just couldn't keep up with the different story-lines in different dimensions, and the fast-pace of jumping around from dimension to dimension often game me the "what in the world is going on" feeling. I get it....everything all at once, but sometimes way too much.
This movie, for me, didn't make sense at all until the last 20 minutes or so when, at that point finally, the writers basically spoon-fed the viewer the meaning of the movie, because (in my own personal opinion) even they knew people wouldn't get it on their own.
As for Jamie Lee Curtis, I also think she deserved her Oscar for this one. Hers was also a pretty complicated character in oh so many ways and a huge departure from many roles she has played.
So was this an Oscar worthy movie....eeeehhhh, not so much. Were there good performances? Yes. Was this an original movie? Yes, I can appreciate that too.
Was it over-hyped? Most definitely.
But, last night I decided to sit down and finish watching it to see if it lived up to all of the hype and Oscar accolades...to me, it didn't.
Don't get me wrong, I do feel Mechelle Yeoh did a great job with this very complicated role, so perhaps she deserved it...but the rest of them, ehhhhhh maybe, maybe not so much.
This movie TOTALLY lost my husband, he just couldn't keep up with the different story-lines in different dimensions, and the fast-pace of jumping around from dimension to dimension often game me the "what in the world is going on" feeling. I get it....everything all at once, but sometimes way too much.
This movie, for me, didn't make sense at all until the last 20 minutes or so when, at that point finally, the writers basically spoon-fed the viewer the meaning of the movie, because (in my own personal opinion) even they knew people wouldn't get it on their own.
As for Jamie Lee Curtis, I also think she deserved her Oscar for this one. Hers was also a pretty complicated character in oh so many ways and a huge departure from many roles she has played.
So was this an Oscar worthy movie....eeeehhhh, not so much. Were there good performances? Yes. Was this an original movie? Yes, I can appreciate that too.
Was it over-hyped? Most definitely.
Starting with what I did enjoy about this movie.
1. The setting of this movie was indeed a more accurate representation of an Asian American household. The family dynamics sounds about right. I like that Asians are getting more spotlight.
2. The concept/theme of this movie is rather novel and therefore interesting. Although I think it could have been played out much more sophisticatedly.
3. The parent-child relationship is well portrayed. The perceived lack of validation from parents felt by the child, the poorly communicated love of the parent, the process of gaining awareness and emotional growth for both the parent and child is inspiring.
Things I didn't like 1. It is a very bizarre movie, you could even say chaotic. It's as if they tried to combine every single meaningless detail together and gave up filtering out what's actually worth or necessary to the main plot. Tried too hard to make it funny/original/emotional/relatable that it ends up being neither of those things very well.
2. The movie is also unnecessarily long.
Those two points combined makes this movie just a long, confusing, and sometimes boring mess. The novelty makes it watchable/bearable, but to me, it's nothing more than that.
1. The setting of this movie was indeed a more accurate representation of an Asian American household. The family dynamics sounds about right. I like that Asians are getting more spotlight.
2. The concept/theme of this movie is rather novel and therefore interesting. Although I think it could have been played out much more sophisticatedly.
3. The parent-child relationship is well portrayed. The perceived lack of validation from parents felt by the child, the poorly communicated love of the parent, the process of gaining awareness and emotional growth for both the parent and child is inspiring.
Things I didn't like 1. It is a very bizarre movie, you could even say chaotic. It's as if they tried to combine every single meaningless detail together and gave up filtering out what's actually worth or necessary to the main plot. Tried too hard to make it funny/original/emotional/relatable that it ends up being neither of those things very well.
2. The movie is also unnecessarily long.
Those two points combined makes this movie just a long, confusing, and sometimes boring mess. The novelty makes it watchable/bearable, but to me, it's nothing more than that.
Ok, the movie contains a lot, a lot. It contains impressive action, drama, SF, humor as well as numerous incredible scenes and shots. I give him a big plus for his incredible originality and idea. However, for me personally, the film was a little too much, to put it that way. In the context of the Oscars, it's also incredible to me that the film picked up so many important awards. Is this the best movie of the year?! Reading numerous reviews and comments, it's clear to me that I'm in the minority and that's why I'm surprised by all the hype surrounding the film. For some, this is even one of the best films ever made. Due to these expectations, I have to admit that the film did not impress me at all. It's not a problem for me to admit that it's up to me and that I can't understand the magnitude of the film, which will obviously be a cult classic tomorrow. But I am surprised that such a strange film won over so many people.
Burning Qs With 'Everything Everywhere ...' Stars
Burning Qs With 'Everything Everywhere ...' Stars
Michelle Yeoh joins co-stars Jamie Lee Curtis, Stephanie Hsu, and Ke Huy Quan, and directors Dan Kwan and Daniel Scheinert to reveal which actor had everyone laughing the most on set, and more.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाAll the VFX for this film were done by 9 people, including the two directors, with the majority of the shots being done by a core group of 5 people. None of the VFX team went to school for VFX. They were all friends who taught themselves with tutorials they found online for free.
- गूफ़At around 5:50 various items of equipment and crew including the boom mic operator can be seen in the reflections of the launderette dryer glass doors.
- भाव
Waymond Wang: [subtitles] So, even though you have broken my heart yet again, I wanted to say, in another life, I would have really liked just doing laundry and taxes with you.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटWhispering voices speak throughout the end credits, seemingly coming from random universes, in random directions.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनJenny Slate's character was originally referred to as 'Big Nose' in the theatrical release. Due to associations with Jewish stereotypes, the character's name was changed to 'Debbie the Dog Mom' in the credits for the digital and DVD/Blu-Ray releases.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Jimmy Kimmel Live!: Chris Pine/Ke Huy Quan/Wallows (2022)
- साउंडट्रैकLife Can Be So Delicious
Written by Daniel Kwan, Ryan Lott and Daniel Scheinert
Performed by Sunita Mani and Aaron Lazar
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Everything Everywhere All at Once?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Todo En Todas Partes Al Mismo Tiempo
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- 400 National Way, सिमी वैली, कैलिफोर्निया, यूएसए(IRS Building)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $1,43,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $7,71,91,785
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $5,01,305
- 27 मार्च 2022
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $14,28,04,136
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 19 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें