The Monkey King 3

"The Monkey King 3" takes a slightly different approach compared to its predecessors. While still maintaining elements of action and adventure, the film shifts its focus towards romance and human emotions. This change might be polarizing for fans who were expecting a more action-packed and faithful adaptation of the source material. However, it offers a fresh perspective and allows for character development in unexpected ways. One of the notable aspects of the film is its attempt to address themes of gender identity and inclusion. The introduction of a female character into the mix adds an interesting dynamic to the group and sparks discussions about gender roles and expectations. While the film's exploration of these themes is commendable, it's worth noting that the execution might not satisfy everyone, and some viewers might find it overly simplified or contrived.

Overall, "The Monkey King 3" is a departure from its predecessors in terms of tone and focus. Its blend of fantasy, romance, and character-driven storytelling, along with its impressive visual effects, makes it a fascinating addition to the series. However, it's important to approach this film with an open mind, as it diverges from the traditional interpretation of the "Journey to the West" narrative. Fans of fantasy films with a touch of romance and a willingness to explore new dimensions of well-known characters might find this installment intriguing.

I usually do not watch this kind of films, but this series is exceptional! It is entertaining and I really loved the sound tracks :) The story line was really good as well, with continuous liveliness. As 'Monkey King3' focuses on relationship of characters and detailed story line, yes, it is bit less entertaining than 'Monkey King1&2', but its cinematic quality is higher than previous ones. This film was like a gift set to me :)

From a coarse comedy gradually transitions to a semi-finished film industrial product, which rely on dialogue of figures in the film to explain what is happening now. Based on this, all the disputes and criticism about adaptation and casting are could be ignored. What's more, as the only actor that performing seriously in the film, it seems that Aaron Kwok is in a inopportune filming site, such as when the Monkey King, a mighty mythological figure in ancient times, discussing that whether the abortion is reasonable with other ordinary people...

I already can accept the second movie to differ from the first one. But, the third movie is even more differ. I don't know if it was intentional or not, but as a trilogy, your movies need to have a visual handsign to make them have red string to one another. These trilogy in another hand, feel disconnected.

As for this trilogy, the 2nd movie is better than the 3rd movie. This statement coming from someone who still think Donnie Yen's first installment as the best.

I don't understand what happened to the downgrade. Is it so hard for the director to make his production consistent?

I heard the 2nd movie had the same CGI studio of Lord of The Ring and The Hobbit to worked on the project. I think this movie couldn't get that studio back and it ended up in lesser quality.

The tonal shift of somber, but humorous 2nd film to this full on soap opera comedy blew my mind in the bad way.

Nothing special on this film and too much CGI using , this is when China got CGI ,China have a lot of location that very extraordinary but they choose to using CGI