उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं

Looks like I'm one of the few who likes this film, so I had to drop a note. I admit it's almost too understated. But I like that approach, not having everything spelled out. The story is deep between the lines, at least until the confrontation. There's almost too much exposition for me in that moment, since they had already established such a sideways manner of presentation. Like "Night Eats The World" (which I also liked) I think the post-apocalyptic setting creates viewer expectations, and the film never has any intention of going down those avenues. I enjoyed having my expectations thwarted,in this case. About 20 minutes in I realized it wasn't going to be the film I had assumed, and just went along with it. I get why many people didn't like it, but it doesn't deserve that awful rating. It's not an action flick, it's not suspense or thriller. It a post-apocalyptic love story. And the cinematography is spectacular.

I Think We're Alone Now is not the typical post-apocalyptic film most audiences are used to seeing.

After looking at the gorgeous poster and watching half the trailer to this movie, my interest grew. The further I looked into the project and the more I learned about the cast and crew involved, I was hooked.

The film is directed by Reed Morano and stars Peter Dinklage and Elle Fanning. The story follows a seemingly lone survivor of a mysterious apocalypse that stumbles upon a young girl. Throughout the film the two talk and bond, living in this quiet world Morano builds for his characters.

Dinklage's acting was quiet and subtle, very rarely talking and communicating in glances. Fanning's character is loud and full of energy. The two have great chemistry. The film's romance is similar to Lost in Translation but isn't executed as well. Throughout the film it seems they are close, but never really romantic, just surviving. If it was built upon more, execution would be better.

The cinematography in the film is spectacular. Morano's past in cinematography shines in this project. The atmosphere is built upon with the film relying on natural lighting. This has an amazing effect on the environment, giving it life and making it seem real.

There are downsides to this movie. About two thirds of the way into the movie, it seems to take a total shift in the mood and story. The ending seemed like it didn't belong, ripped out of a mid-two thousands teen dystopian book. While the ending didn't ruin the film, it still left me unsatisfied.

While the runtime of this film is just over an hour and thirty minutes, it takes its time. If you're going into this expecting a fast pace movie with quick dialogue and fast results, this movie isn't for you. If you're a fan of character studies and long, interrupted takes, you'll more than likely enjoy this movie.

Overall, I Think We're Alone Now is an experience that I haven't had in a theater in a while. It's different than most of the films in theaters this year which is refreshing. It teaches people the importance of a strong and satisfying ending and how not to do that, but also how to set up an effective and interesting universe Check it out.

Peter Dinklage is a national treasure. I became a fan of his through his performance in Game of Thrones and I've really come to enjoy his acting. He is the reason that I Think We're Alone Now is decent and worth a watch. I am a fan of post-apocalyptic stories in general so that contributed to my enjoyment.

However, this movie does have some flaws. The plot is slow moving, has weird abrupt tonal changes, unanswered question/plot holes and the final act is just weird. They shoehorn in a side plot that becomes a huge part of the ending and it just felt off to me. Plus I can't articulate just why, but I think the title of this movie is stupid. I guess it just doesn't fit in with the actual story, plus it makes everyone think of that song of the same name.

Recommended to fans of post-apocalyptic movies who enjoy strong acting. Not recommended to watchers looking for action or adventure movies.

I was able to see a sneak preview of I Think We're Alone Now at "The Female Gaze" Film Festival in NYC. I had high expectations for the cinematography in this movie by Reed Morano and they exceeded all of them. The lighting was gorgeous and the set design was spot on.

While there isn't a lot of action or answers that one might be looking for in a post apocalyptic flick, you get all the story telling you need out of the nuanced performances by Peter Dinklage and Elle Fanning who share an undeniable chemistry.

The trouble with that movie is easy explained - top cast and top acting (Peter Dinklage, Elle Fanning) vs. a slow story with a badly executed "twist".

All in all watchable but with that scenario and those fine actors I Think We're Alone Now had the potential to be a new classic on the post-apocalyptic genre front, but the plot is very slow and especially the final act feels forced and rushed and not well thought thru (and its kinda cliche).

Anyway, all in all a rather ambivalent experience but still watchable - for fans of the genre and/or the actors.

Its a slow paced movie and although its categorized as sci-fi, don't expect aliens or such things. Watching this movie feels like you're given parts of the story and not the whole thing which leaves a lot of questions but makes you think about the story and the people rather than just numbingly staring at the screen.

Cinematography: top! Actors: top Music: loved it!

Story: ???

I wanted to like this movie more than I do. Great performances by the whole cast, and I liked how they approached the post-apocalyptic wasteland concept in a more benign way. Production quality seemed decent enough as well.

What I didn't like:

• The audio. Subtitles are basically a requirement. The audio levels are terrible: the dialog is barely audible at twice the volume I normally watch movies at. The soft and mumbled dialog throughout, although fits the atmosphere, made it that much harder to understand really Any of the actors speak. When you think you finally have the volume level ok in the near silent dialog scenes, they suddenly cut to high volume music that blasts your ears. Possibly the strongest example of a 'volume-up/volume-down' movie I've seen and it was frustrating me throughout the movie.

• Slow and meandering, both plot-wise and pacing-wise. Not a whole lot happens in this movie. A number of arbitrary scenes of them simply living their everyday lives in the empty city and doesn't really add anything to the story. Many of the shots moved very slow and took what seemed like forever to play out, with a few done entirely in slow-mo. I found myself skipping ahead 10 seconds at a time in parts and not missing anything of importance. Not sure if they were trying to go for a more artistic look or build a sense of stagnation/boredom in their basically empty world, it felt more like they were padding the run-time in my opinion.

• The ending. I don't want to spoil anything but it felt like the writers ran out of ideas and didn't know how to end it, so they threw in some completely random 'twist' out of left-field that had nothing to do with anything up to that point in the movie prior. You'll probably be left with a puzzled look on your face thinking, "...What?"

It still held my attention for the most part and it was a bit of a different take on the apocalypse-type movie. I might recommend watching it if you are a Peter Dinklage fan or have nothing else to watch, but I wouldn't schedule a movie night with friends around this or anything.

There's not a lot of backstory or dialogue in this flick but Peter Dinklage managed to grab our attention with great acting. To communicate with subtlety is worth watching. I feel like it's something we can all learn from.

Can't say this flick gives something new to the genre of post-apocalypse, but it definitely can give you something good to watch and some fresh ideas to mull over.

First of all "I Think We're Alone Now" is it's cast. Both main characters are well-written and amasingly played, chemestry between them is belivable and thier motives are queit understandable. It's interesting enough to watch how these two pollar opposite characters interelate in each joint scene.

Another peculiar fact about this movie is that it feels like a director's monologue about loneliness with or without people around and ability to handle significant loss in your life. Each character here has it's own way of managing such tragedy as a death of someone they knew. And I found it amasing that the idea of being honest to oneself is the most important moral direction for the main characters.

Also I wanna add that the sound accompaniment is great. Intense and dreadful, when it should be. It helps to feel the movie deeply.

If You are ok with something slow-burning but dramatic and thoughtful, You better give it a go, I'm convinced you won't be disappointed.

I Think We're Alone Now is yet another post-apocalyptic film that finds Del (Peter Dinkage) keeping his home town swept and tidy after everyone else has suddenly died from an unspecified event. Dinkage is great as usual conveying volumes with just a look. Into this well kept world comes Grace (Elle Fanning) a free spirit who has been travelling the wasteland in search of companionship. After this initial meeting what follows is 60 minutes of tedium. The characters bury bodies and basically just look for things to do. Well acted boredom is still boredom. Then, the film ends with a plot twist that has virtually no connection to anything that came previously. It is as baffling as it is stupid. Having Del wake up and realize it was all a dream would have made more sense.

Better than I expected. Post-post-apocalyptic. Quiet. Slow. Kinda reminded me of The Quiet Earth (but not quite as good). Has a twist about 2/3rd of the way through but isn't terrible as some poeople report. If you don't mind thinking about things you might like this.\

Good movie for the right hemisphere of your brain. Don't expect explanations. Expect atmosphere, character and subtle tensions. If you need car chases and explosions, move along. If you are able to put yourself into a character's place and try to see the world like they do, it's a rewarding watch.

Had all the makings of a great film, good actors and music, tense eerie atmosphere but then trudges along slowly before getting to a badly constructed ending that feel tacked on like the writer got bored too and just wrote the first thing that came to mind to get it finished... Disappointing

So the movie is really enjoyable ,, the plot isn't that original ,, and idea like that tends to be predictable, however in here there was a thrill and mystery covering the first half of the movie ,, even though it got slow in some parts it picked up really quick until it peaked in a steady rate.

The script was tight and strong,, again even though there was some dull empty scenes ,, but i think it was all necessary to build up the character of Del.

Cast wise, the duo of Peter Dinklage and Elle Fanning was spectacular ,, i mean in the whole movie there were only 4 actors , yet the movie turned out alright .

100% Recommended .

I love Peter Dinklage. I think he's a great actor. Elle Fanning is good too. Paul Giamatti is a classic. What the hell were they doing in this sorry assed waste of time? I'm sure that the director made it clear to them what he was going for, but unfortunately, he did not convey it to the rest of us. Forgive me if I'm thick, but this has no plot, no redemption and no where to go. If you have to spend any money on this - DON'T. It's a free effort by someone who had a little to spend and decided to waste it. This flick sucks!!!

I wasn't expecting so few to happen and at the same time so many surprises. It's original, smart, sensible.

Peter Dinklage is just perfect in this taciturne character.

Really loved it!

I realize that after acting in an incredible ensemble cast ala GoT it is a daunting task to follow, that being said Peter Dinklage was great in The Station Agent long before his turn as everyone's fave Lannister. In "Alone Now" opposite Elle Fanning, Dinklage does his damnedest to draw you in to his post-apocalyptic idealized hometown but with so little to work with and several confusing montage scenes set to Rush blaring from the screen, plus a ludicrous third act that goes nowhere, I can't imagine what the end game was here. Unremarkable in every way and not worth your time.

Great to see a film where it's all about the acting and not an explosion a minute.

I wish they would speak up though; the atmospheric music is so loud, and all of their dialogue is so quiet and so mumbled.

This is rated a 5.7 on IMDb right now??? Somehow this film has so far evaded its due audience. I Think We're Alone Now isn't a great film, but it's certainly somewhat unique, and in my view much better than your average modern film. One thing that separates this work from most is that the characters, as bizarre as they are, seem far more human than most film characters. They're not just your standard stereotypical modern characters, for the most part they resemble more realistic people. The film works as a fairly deep and somewhat piercing meditation, and it's a character driven piece for the most part.

If you've seen a lot of films, I recommend a viewing of this. For more seasoned viewers, this film will at least bring something a little fresh. It's not a typical or generic type of story. In fact most of the questions about the story you have in the film will be left unanswered by the end. Really though, what does that matter? You and I don't even really understand how we are here right now, me writing this, you reading it. The North American and UK audience has mostly lost the ability to enjoy or even relate to a good meditative film, or even most character driven films these days. That however is not a problem for most true lovers of film. Despite its reputation as an underwhelming film by the viewing majority, it's worth a look for most film lovers. This is a somewhat unique meditation, and a very worthy one for many. It's not mind blowing or anything, but it is what I would call a truly good piece of artistic filmmaking.

7/10.

Could have worked as a 30 min short story, instead it's a long padded out film with lots of slow motion shots and scenes that don't do anything.

The supposed twist was poorly done and mostly meaningless. Overall disappointing and forgettable.

I had this one ready for a rainy day. It didn´t rain today but i decided to watch it anyway. My wife went to sleep early on (no gunfire or car chases) but I found it had a slow burning charm. Not a lot of character development (what you see at the start is what you see at the end) and not a lot of dialogue either but still a rather pleasant way to spend a couple of hours. I had expected a 4 and got a 7(ish). So I cannot complain.