एक महिला अपने रूढ़िवादी यहूदी समुदाय में लौटती है जिसने उसे बचपन की एक महिला दोस्त के प्रति आकर्षण के लिए छोड़ दिया था. एक बार वापस, उनका जुनून फ़िर से जागता है और वे विश्वास और कामुकता की स... सभी पढ़ेंएक महिला अपने रूढ़िवादी यहूदी समुदाय में लौटती है जिसने उसे बचपन की एक महिला दोस्त के प्रति आकर्षण के लिए छोड़ दिया था. एक बार वापस, उनका जुनून फ़िर से जागता है और वे विश्वास और कामुकता की सीमाओं को एक्स्प्लोर करते हैं.एक महिला अपने रूढ़िवादी यहूदी समुदाय में लौटती है जिसने उसे बचपन की एक महिला दोस्त के प्रति आकर्षण के लिए छोड़ दिया था. एक बार वापस, उनका जुनून फ़िर से जागता है और वे विश्वास और कामुकता की सीमाओं को एक्स्प्लोर करते हैं.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- पुरस्कार
- 5 जीत और कुल 36 नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
The editing left much to be desired-scenes are awkwardly edited where you can see it's a different take of the same scene. Many of the edits simply appeared ham-handed and amateur.
Continuity also seems an issue; the progress of the story is chunked out, like skipping around chapters in a book. The screenplay lacks the dialog which would convey the depth of the story and it's characters.
The actors are quite good but not able to fill all the missing bits of good filmmaking. The score was musically fine but seems to have been written for a different movie. The pacing too, is slow and awkward like much of this film.
The Rachels handled what little they had to work with well. The sex scene was interesting and respectfully shot but again, the editing sucked all the life out of this love story.
Though I think this film was a missed opportunity, the potential for a well-written and directed sequel could fix what didn't work in this outing.
I really wanted to like it but kinda didn't.
I thought the acting, story and direction were superb. I'm really surprised more people have not found this film to be as fantastic as I did. The current IMDb rating of 6.6 seems extremely low to me. Many critics loved it, as did I. Disobedience I suppose is not a film for everyone. Overthinking can easily get in the way of this one. Just sit back and watch this subtle and beautiful film and think about it later. As the Buddha is often credited with saying, "Think less, observe more.".
I'm pretty sure many people got so offended by certain things in the film that they missed nearly all of the rich and beautiful depth that this film actually has. Sometimes the most clever truths are not so obvious, especially to the distracted mind. Scientists at this point have actually even proven the very narrow focus of the average human mind.
In my view most of the greatest pieces of art in history are the pieces that challenge the way you/we look at things. This is definitely that kind of film. This is not just another piece of entertainment like much of the regurgitated and/or meaningless trash movies of our day. This truly is a beautiful piece of art; And to those of you who watched it and missed this fact...too bad for you. More than anything else, this film is about human choice, and sadly for many, that is a very scary subject. Far too scary for some to honestly deal with. May we All hope for a today filled with greater clarity. For those of you that thought this film was good, but not that good, I challenge you to watch it again without overthinking it while watching it. Shhh...just watch and listen. 8.5/10.
Rachel Weisz and Rachel McAdams do a great job playing the two childhood friends (Ronit and Esti) who meet again years later, only to discover that their feelings for each other haven't changed. Alessandro Nivola plays the young rabbi husband (Dovid) of Rachel McAdams character (Esti), and portrays him beautifully.
I encourage you to see it. I doubt that you'll regret it.
The complexity of the two leading lady roles must have drawn an abundance of female actresses and the two Rachels are close to perfect.
The Q&A was particularly revealing.
The young and very witty director shone at the Q&A.
This was his first English language film from this Spanish speaking Chilean director and for him to put together a smooth running evenly paced film with such complexity is very illustrative of his talent and abilities.
As to which female role is the supporting role I am not sure. They are both very good roles.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThroughout the movie Esti Kuperman (Rachel McAdams) is shown wearing a wig. This wig is called a sheitel and is worn by some Orthodox Jewish married women in order to conform with the requirement of Jewish law to cover their hair.
- गूफ़In the scene where there are prayers in the house of mourning ("Shiva") the men and women are seen as intermingling. However, in a very orthodox Shiva service there would be complete separation of the genders - indeed, in a small house, such as the one depicted, they would be in separate rooms.
- भाव
Ronit Krushka: Esti, do you think I should go back early?
Esti Kuperman: No... no. No, I don't think you should leave at all.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Amazing Movies You Missed This Spring (2018)
- साउंडट्रैकThe Last Beat
Written by Matthew Herbert
Performed by Matthew Herbert (as Herbert)
Published by Soundslike Music
All rights administered by Bucks Music Group Limited
Courtesy of Accidental Records
(c) 2001 Accidental
टॉप पसंद
- How long is Disobedience?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Desobediencia
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $60,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $34,98,782
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $2,37,393
- 29 अप्रैल 2018
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $80,03,180
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 54 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1