शानदार, ब्रश और आकर्षक, डॉ बुल अंतिम कठपुतली मास्टर है क्योंकि वह मनोविज्ञान, मानव अंतर्ज्ञान और उच्च तकनीक डेटा को जोड़ती है ताकि यह पता चल सके कि जुआरियों, वकीलों, गवाहों और आरोपी को क्या ... सभी पढ़ेंशानदार, ब्रश और आकर्षक, डॉ बुल अंतिम कठपुतली मास्टर है क्योंकि वह मनोविज्ञान, मानव अंतर्ज्ञान और उच्च तकनीक डेटा को जोड़ती है ताकि यह पता चल सके कि जुआरियों, वकीलों, गवाहों और आरोपी को क्या टिकता है।शानदार, ब्रश और आकर्षक, डॉ बुल अंतिम कठपुतली मास्टर है क्योंकि वह मनोविज्ञान, मानव अंतर्ज्ञान और उच्च तकनीक डेटा को जोड़ती है ताकि यह पता चल सके कि जुआरियों, वकीलों, गवाहों और आरोपी को क्या टिकता है।
- पुरस्कार
- 2 कुल नामांकन
एपिसोड ब्राउज़ करें
सारांश
Reviewers say 'Bull' garners mixed sentiments. Many commend Michael Weatherly's performance and the show's unique premise. Positive feedback highlights engaging plots, good writing, and interesting characters. However, some criticize inconsistencies in character development, particularly for Dr. Bull. Complaints also arise about formulaic episodes and unrealistic legal portrayals. Viewers note dissatisfaction with the show's evolving tone and focus, feeling it lost initial charm and became predictable. Despite these issues, many still find 'Bull' enjoyable and worth watching.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
So interestingly, several of these reviews talk about real science while watching a make believe show about make believe people, events and stories. If they want real science crack open a book.
THIS is a fantastic show (all of it is make believe) about fake drama and fake courtrooms. It is a great way to spend 45 minutes or so forgetting the real troubles of your life and practicing a little escapism. Despite the hokey way some of the stories are portrayed this is a good show and should be watched. I look forward to watching the other seasons.
THIS is a fantastic show (all of it is make believe) about fake drama and fake courtrooms. It is a great way to spend 45 minutes or so forgetting the real troubles of your life and practicing a little escapism. Despite the hokey way some of the stories are portrayed this is a good show and should be watched. I look forward to watching the other seasons.
Dr. Jason Bull (Michael Weatherly) is an expert trial jury consultant. He and his band of loyal misfits replicate jurors to generate winning strategies. His team includes his former brother-in-law prosecutor Benny Colón (Freddy Rodríguez), neurolinguistics expert Marissa Morgan (Geneva Carr), former NYPD detective Danny James (Jaime Lee Kirchner), hacker Cable McCrory (Annabelle Attanasio), and fashion stylist Chunk Palmer (Chris Jackson).
This is a solid network show. It's a standard legal procedural with a charismatic lead. It lasted six seasons which is a good run for most shows although I do wonder if it had a few more good years in it. The show ran into controversy with one of its recurring actors. They rely heavily on the personal charms of Weatherly and the issue ran directly at that main pillar. There is inevitable decline with any show and there is no way of knowing how much can be attributed to what. It's a case of a good, not great show that survived a controversy but not really. In the end, it's a good meat and potatoes TV procedural.
This is a solid network show. It's a standard legal procedural with a charismatic lead. It lasted six seasons which is a good run for most shows although I do wonder if it had a few more good years in it. The show ran into controversy with one of its recurring actors. They rely heavily on the personal charms of Weatherly and the issue ran directly at that main pillar. There is inevitable decline with any show and there is no way of knowing how much can be attributed to what. It's a case of a good, not great show that survived a controversy but not really. In the end, it's a good meat and potatoes TV procedural.
''Bull'' doesn't reflect the cynical, violent vibe we usually get in 2010s shows. By its spirit, it belongs to early 00s or late 90s. With the shows of that era, it shares both its strenghts and its weaknesses.
The strenghts are idealism, friendship, romance and heartwarming optimism. And the weaknesses are its overly formulaic episodes and rather simple solutions to complicated problems.
I would say that the strenghts overcome weaknesses. It is a contemporary blast from the past, but one that makes you feel good and think about morality and humanity.
The strenghts are idealism, friendship, romance and heartwarming optimism. And the weaknesses are its overly formulaic episodes and rather simple solutions to complicated problems.
I would say that the strenghts overcome weaknesses. It is a contemporary blast from the past, but one that makes you feel good and think about morality and humanity.
Its more like Person of interest meets Boston Legal. They have started off a great idea. I hope that it will get better as they go. As for now, the story line is acceptable but everyone except Michael Weatherly seems to be a bit lost. If they could change at least a couple of the supporting actors to somebody who can pull the character off that would make a huge difference. For now, i will keep watching the series. This is also the first time i am writing a review on IMDb. I couldn't stand the show being rated really low and a huge effort has been made and it is interesting and not like what people make it out to be. I urge that people take a view before going through the reviews and not watching it. Maybe you will like it, maybe you wont but you wont know unless you actually watch it.
The show goes on and on about what a genius Dr. Bull is with psychology and jury science and then every single case is won by his investigators finding evidence. It's just another run-of-the-mill court drama show that throws psychology terms around like glitter to make it look flashier.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाIn December 2018, the New York Times reported that Eliza Dushku was allegedly fired from her role on Bull after confronting Michael Weatherly regarding "jokes" about rape, spanking, and threesomes that he told her or directed toward her on the set. His behavior set the tone for other cast and crew members, who also started to make harassing comments to Dushku. Though Dushku cooperated in a mediation process with CBS, the company tried to sabotage her story: Mark Engstrom, the chief compliance officer at CBS, supplied to investigators some filming outtakes that he thought would be damning to Dushku because they showed her using curse words. Instead, this strategy backfired on CBS, because the outtakes clearly showed some of the instances of harassment and verified Dushku's version of events. Engstrom and other CBS executives were unable to recognize what he saw on the outtakes as harassment; the Times reported that the investigation determined that the company's failure to recognize the instances of harassment caught on tape was a symptom of larger problems at CBS. After that, CBS paid Dushku a $9.5 million settlement in return for her silence. Dushku honored that agreement; the New York Times discovered the story not from Dushku but from their research into the larger investigation into CBS's handling of sexual harassment in the wake of Les Moonves's firing.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How many seasons does Bull have?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें