Charlie Charlie

Some awful acting made worse by terrible editing. Girls screaming when they see their boyfriend dead in the sauna, then nonchalantly walks into another room as if that scene never happened. They play a ouiji like game for about 10 seconds after talking about it for ten minutes.

Film does not explore 7 sins in any way. Somehow the trailer we saw made it look better than it is.

Loosely put together, nonsensical waste of the £100 budget. Its too long as well, cannot believe we tolerated it. Sizemores small part was embarrassing. The Only redeeming quality of this movie is the stunning girls and nudity.

This movie was awful! The acting was horrendous and the plot was terrible! It should classified as a comedy, definitely not a horror. I could only stand to watch 30 minutes of this BS

Oh god. No. Once we watched Bonan the Barbarian with my wife for fun. That had a more developed plot and more developed acting in it.

I watch trash for fun. That's something we do with a couple of university friends, we load up the most trashy garbage, you know, Megalodon vs Stegosaurus, whatever, have a couple of beers and laugh our butts off. Anything that has Eric Roberts, The Hoff or Lorenzo Lamas in it is quite a safe bet.

Oh, but this is a new level of bad. I was not expecting this. Oh God. The actresses would probably keep more of their dignity if they acted in some kind of S/M porn. Even that is better.

The worst movie I've ever had the misfortune of seeing. The script is like it was written by a 5 year old. The acting budget must have been under a tenner for all of them. Will any of these main actors ever get work again. I doubt it. The plot is lame and has no interesting parts to it. A junior school project would be better produced than this.

Please, please don't waste your time watching this garbage.

Absolutely terrible film.

The plot was poorly strung together and the acting was terrible. Seriously, why would someone be terrified in one shot, then be completely fine in the next?

I understand this is a low budget film, but one would think, with the amount of effort that goes into one or two gory scenes, that they would at least make an effort at maintaining the quality with the non-lethal injuries, or at least partially hide them to disguise the lower quality instead of having characters walking around with a thin layer of fake blood painted on them and having the unmarked skin clearly visible underneath.

Honestly, I think they realised how poor the film was and just decided to disguise it with putting in a tonne of nudity. Pretty sure that it was used as a filler too in an attempt to make it seem like more was happening, or to make the runtime longer to hide the lack of plot.