उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं

Love Beatrix Potter's truly charming and beautifully illustrated stories, there are some talented actors on board and have a soft spot for family films. Wasn't all that enamoured by the trailers and advertising, which dampened my expectations a little but saw it anyway as 'The Tale of Peter Rabbit' is one of my favourite Beatrix Potter stories.

Found 'Peter Rabbit' to be much better than expected. It is not perfect and there are better family films out there, but it was hugely entertaining and charming that is ideal for kids and adults. It has endured, and will continue to endure, the wrath of those expecting a straight up adaptation of the story. Understandable, as the title and advertising made it seem as if it was going to be with a modern twist. This is misleading, it is not a straight up adaptation and wasn't trying to be from my personal perspective (more of a modern day follow-up) which is very likely to be wrong. It is best judged as a standalone, on that front there is a lot to enjoy.

Oh, and the allergy bullying controversy does seem as if it has been blown out of proportion for a scene that was over very quickly and didn't seem that insensitive or distasteful, or at least to me.

Sure, 'Peter Rabbit' does have the odd joke that is a little too repetitive, a notable one being with Pigling Bland. Some of the second half is predictable where it is easy to see where it's all going to go, some of the supporting characters are underused (there could have been more of Jeremy Fisher and Jemima Puddle Duck for examples) and maybe there could have been less narration. Regarding the last point though, it is delivered beautifully by Margot Robbie and captures the storybook nature of some of the storytelling very well.

However, even with the witty modern setting, the quaint nature of Potter's stories is intact and loved the affectionate references to other Potter characters in other stories of hers and it even includes the style of her illustrations at points.

'Peter Rabbit' manages to be enormously entertaining, a vast majority of the jokes do hit the mark and they are very funny to hilarious. Especially the scene-stealing cockerel, Mrs Tiggy Winkle and the electric fence and Peter's sisters, while the very physical and increasingly violent comedy that Domhnall Gleeson is given to do is a lot of fun and didn't feel gratuitous, cartoonish or mean-spirited.

It's not just about the comedy. There is a heart too with well-meaning messaging and the whole stuff with Peter's parents and past was very heartfelt. There is a natural charm with the character interaction, and the relationship between Thomas and Bea is very sweet. All the characters engage, the soundtrack is suitably peppy, everything goes at a lively pace and can find little if any fault with the cast. Gleeson makes Thomas more than just a standard clichéd archetype that he appears to be at first and manages the difficult physical comedy and the difficult task of interacting in real life with nothing with ease. Rose Byrne is effortlessly charming without being sugary or without substance, her chemistry with Gleeson and the animals is sweet. James Corden is a likeable Peter and Robbie and Daisy Ridley are particularly colourful of the supporting voice cast. Didn't recognise Sam Neill.

The visual look of 'Peter Rabbit' is one of its biggest pleasures. It is very colourful and picturesque with beautiful photography, that is never garish or flat, and there is a seamless blending of CGI and live-action. The CGI itself is simply great and is so well blended that one can't tell that it's CGI.

Overall, very enjoyable and much better than expected. 8/10 Bethany Cox

Despite all the positive outcry from viewers on IMDb, the fact is English author Beatrix Potter would be dismayed with how they have handled her beloved characters. Mishandling the cast of characters by placing them in a mediocre story about a slapstick war between Peter Rabbit and Mr. McGregor's grandson. That isn't to say the film wasn't enjoyable. It was not without some good heart, the characters were amusing, the effects for the animal characters were spectacular, most of the humor was good and the performances by the cast was splendid. This is one of those things that feel so "sacred" it should not be taken and meddled with. Peter Rabbit is one of those properties that hold dear to the hearts of many and it should stay that way. Had the filmmakers sticked to the original tales, the appeal would have been more massive. The film doesn't contain much to go into deeply to critique for the plot is as basic as Peter Rabbit can get. That said, there isn't much to expect from a film like Peter Rabbit other than shutting your brain off to be entertained. This is why this reviewer is giving the film 6 stars for it's entertainment value and quality of the effects. Another positive aspect to mention is the gorgeous setting and background landscapes. All in all, this film had so much potential to be something special by Beatrix Potter's standards. An unfortunate missed opportunity.

Brought my kids who had read the Peter Rabbit books before and they love the show. Jokes and plots are simple for kids to understand.

If you've seen the trailers, then you know what you're getting into. For those who are going to watch this due to nostalgia, this isn't based on the Beatrix Potter books. They borrow the names of the animals and Bea herself (and the love interest isn't even named after her real life husband). This movie is a rough and tumble comedy more akin to the 3 Stooges than anything resembling a heart-warming child's movie. If anything, I would rate this more of a PG-13 vs PG since I wouldn't bring any small child to watch this due to promotion of misbehavior, theft, rudeness, bullying, and destruction of property.

As an adult, I enjoyed it for what it was. The animation was very seamless and well done. The love story was bit over the top, but fine for a romantic comedy. And I did laugh at various points in the movie.

While Peter Rabbit does have a twist from the original content, it's certainly a family adventure, full of fun characters & great visual effects, while still sticking to some of it's roots.

"Peter Rabbit" (PG, 1:33) is a shocking movie to contemplate. It's shocking to think that it took more than a century for the mischievous bunny of British scientist, illustrator and writer Beatrix Potter's early 20th century children's books to get the big screen treatment. Ah, but it was well worth the wait.

In this live-action adaptation, the CGI Peter is voiced by James Corden. He leads his complicit, but more cautious little sisters, Flopsy (Margot Robbie), Mopsy (Elizabeth Debicki) and Cottontail (Daisy Ridley), along with their clumsy cousin, Benjamin (Colin Moody), on regular raids into the garden of mean old Mr. McGregor (an unrecognizable Sam Neill). Peter is not just mischievous, he's selfish and reckless, often tempting danger in his pursuit of his ill-gotten vegetables. McGregor is in a constant battle with Peter, but just when it looks like the Old Man may have finally gotten the upper hand, he keels over.

The country estate then passes to the meticulous and ambitious London department store supervisor, Thomas McGregor (Domhnall Gleeson). Thomas travels into the country to fix up the place so he can sell it and finance his dream of opening his own toy store. He soon finds himself in his own cat and mouse... er, human and rabbit... game with Peter. Doing her best to protest Peter from Thomas (much as she did with Peter's late great uncle) is next-door neighbor and animal lover Bea (Rose Byrne). As Thomas starts to fall for Bea, their blossoming relationship complicates his attempts to be rid of Peter once and for all.

"Peter Rabbit" is a fun family film. The battles between the McGregor men and Peter get kind of mean-spirited at times, but the violence is mostly of the cartoon variety. The script by Will Gluck (who also directs) and Zareh Nalbandian is mostly well-written and cleverer than your average anthropomorphic animal tale. The voice cast is very good, Byrne's winning presence naturally enhances enjoyment of the film and the usually serious Gleeson proves surprisingly adept at comedy, especially the physical kind. Peter's personality and imperfections remind me of Surly Squirrel in the "Nut Job" movies, but Peter's a little bit sweeter. In the end, despite some uneven storytelling, Peter learns some lessons, as do the main live-action characters, and Movie Fans get a pretty enjoyable hour and a half at the movies. "B+"

Peter Rabbit is a story I grew up with so I had to see this movie. I had no expectations. I don't think I've laughed throughout an entire movie like I did watching this on a very long time. People commenting about the allergy scenes need to lighten up! -- and that's coming from someone with allergies -- that put a damper on my life practically daily. Seriously, it's such a minor part of the movie, laugh, don't laugh, and move on. The movie has many good messages: knowing when to fess up and admit you did wrong (imagine that! Accountability!), making apologies (woah, again with owning up to your actions!), the impotance of friends and family, and more! Also, a great cast and a fabulous soundtrack.

I went into the theatre with no expectations and not having read nor heard of the children's books. And I'm glad I did.

Peter Rabbit was a hoot... My kids loved it and that is what's important. It was funny, endearing and well-done. My expectations were very low and I left pleasantly surprised. There were a few low/slow points and my kids started to loose interest, but overall, it was very enjoyable.

I came home to read other IMDB reviews and was surprised at some of the hate. Most of which came from people who hold the old stories in such high regard. I have come to learn that if you are going to make a children's movie nowadays, you have to make it a bit more modern. A bit faster paced, better animation, funnier characters, quick-witted, a little more action with a few more surprises, etc. If you don't, it won't hold the attention of today's kids.

It breaks my heart that my kids don't have much interest in Charlie Brown, Winnie the Pooh, Sesame Street, and some others I grew up with. But when you compare it to all the other stuff out now, you just can't compare. They won't watch it long. I don't blame people for being upset that the new Peter Rabbit may not follow the story and animation of the old, but I do appreciate they took the story and characters and updated it to something mine will watch and love.

Beatrix Potter's books are known for being quaint, quintessentially English children's stories. The Hollywood adaptation ignores this for a brash comedy that misses the point of the books. Worst of all is the main character was turned from a mischevious youngster to a sociopath who's actively trying to kill someone. There were the occasional jokes that made me chuckle like the Rooster (Will Reichelt). But the film was an obnoxious, cynical cash grab that took away the charm of Potter's work. Watch the '90s animated series instead.

Peter Rabbit is one of my favorite kid's movie of the year so far. It's an adorable film that is perfect for the whole family. I love this film because of the acting and CGI.

Peter Rabbit follows Peter Rabbit, Flopsy, Mopsy, Cotton Tail and Benji as they get into mischief by taking vegetables from the garden next door. They take the vegetables from Mr. McGregor who tries desperately to get them out of their garden by using explosives and even an electric fence. The rabbits hang out with loveable characters like Bea. She helps the rabbits by giving them shelter when it rains and helps them get food.

Throughout the movie, we see great acting from all the actors and voice actors in the film. I love how Domhnall Gleeson acts like a soulless man with the rabbits who he is trying to kill, but with Bea, he acts like in he's love. I found that Mr. McGregor (Domhnall Gleeson) really does seem to be in love with Bea. I also like how the voice actors portray the rabbits. Each one of them has a personality that is well portrayed in their voices and actions. For example, Cotton Tail is a memorable character because of how wild and reckless she is. The way Daisy Ridley voices her shows how wild she can be.

The CGI in this film is extraordinary. The animals look so realistic. If you really focus on the rabbits, you can see the individual hairs on them. You can also see it on the pig character that hangs out with the rabbits. During a fight sequence with Peter and Mr. McGregor, they actually look like they are fighting and not like he is fighting a fake bunny.

I rate this movie 5 out of 5 stars and recommend it to ages 7 to 12.

Reviewed by Carla P., KIDS FIRST! Film Critic.

Enjoyable family film. 'Peter Rabbit' does nothing to set the world alight, though does all that's needed to be a film that most will have a good time watching. James Corden performs ably as the lead, with Rose Byrne supporting adeptly.

This film tells the story of a group of rabbits who tries to take over their neighbour's garden.

The first two of three minutes look rather cute, but very soon I really detest those rabbits to the core. The rabbits are horrible, violent aggressors who keep on doing heinous acts to humans. The crooked acts are at times even lethal. Forcing someone to ingest an allergen is definitely not funny, in fact downright vicious. How can people find these acts funny? What if children imitate these lethal acts, thinking it's fun? This film glorifies bullies and aggressors. "Peter Rabbit" is a deplorable, absolutely horrid film that deserves universal condemnation.

This is a very cute hybrid live action animated hybrid film (live action with CG characters inserted in)

But it could have been much better with better casting, in general I don't think Domhnall Gleeson should play villains he always overacts as a villain he did in the Rey trilogy and he did so here as well

Then you have the star of the film... Peter Rabbit which for whatever reason was cast as the world's most famous talentless man, James Corden. You don't hear Peter Rabbit you just hear the horrendous voice talent of James Corden and worse yet they even have him sing at the end of the film as just a reminder of how talentless he is (seriously, why does he sing all the time when he is such a horrendous singer?)

If they had done a better job casting McGregor and Peter Rabbit then this film would have been far more enjoyable and would have probably been more of a success.

This is not for Beatrix Potter fans, but it is a funny movie! And the music is good too! My almost 10 year old daughter was laughing out loud - a lot! Me, I just love Rose Byrne, so I was happy too!

'PETER RABBIT': Three and a Half Stars (Out of Five)

A CGI animated/live-action kids film, based on the classic stories by Beatrix Potter, about a rebellious rabbit causing mischief for a new farmer. The movie was directed by Will Gluck (who's also helmed such hit youth comedy flicks as 'EASY A', 'FRIENDS WITH BENEFITS' and the 2014 'ANNIE' remake), and it was scripted by Gluck and Rob Lieber. It stars Domhnall Gleeson, Rose Byrne and Sam Neill (in live-action roles), as well as the voices of James Corden (in the title role), Daisy Ridley, Margot Robbie and Elizabeth Debicki. The movie has received mostly positive reviews from critics (unlike it's trailer), and it's also a hit at the Box Office as well. I enjoyed it much more than I thought I would.

After years of feuding between a mischievous rabbit, named Peter Rabbit (Corden), and an old farmer, named Mr. McGregor (Neil), the farmer suddenly dies due to a lifetime of bad (non-vegan) eating habits. Peter and his friends think they finally have the home, and garden they love, to themselves. Then Mr. McGregor's son, Thomas (Gleeson), inherits the land and moves in. A new bitter rivalry quickly emerges between Peter and the new farmer. It's complicated though, by a beautiful animal lover who lives next door, named Bea (Byrne), which Peter and Thomas both desperately want the affection of.

I found the film to be a lot more amusing than I thought it would be; I wouldn't say it's funny exactly, but it's definitely amusing. The animation is beautiful, and the animal characters are really lovable and cute. Peter is of course obnoxiously mischievous, and Thomas McGregor is a little too unlikable as well, but the film really does play like a live-action cartoon (the type that I used to watch a lot as a kid). I don't think it's probably that faithful to the classic kids' stories though, although I don't remember them that well, but I think the film is probably a good enough modern (live-action) update. I don't usually enjoy most kids' movies either, but I had a good enough time watching this one. I think it probably helps to be an animal lover though, like I am.

My friend and I went - we don't even have kids, we just remembered the books from when we were little. There were a few times that all of us (it was a weekday so there were pretty much just adults there) burst out laughing! The only people who wouldn't like this are the ones who have to have raunchy sex or highly violent scenes to keep them happy.

It was a cute story that they told using the familiar characters and if you like London there is some great shots in there, too!

I won't go into the eye-roll moment with the blackberries. They may as well complain that Peter has no pants.

This movie is seriously funny. There are so many parts where I couldn't stop laughing. I'm an adult man and this may be my favorite movie.

Ignore negative reviews about the bullying scene. I mean the rabbits are mortal enemies of the gardener so yeah they are going to do whatever it takes. People need to stop being so sensitive about the whole allergy issue.

This movie will make you laugh, cry, and wish you could watch it again. Take your kids, take your mom, take a stranger..... they'll laugh too !!!

Quite enjoyable Beatrix potter would have hated it but why shot in Australia with very little English content except a bit of a sop to the lakes and no northern accents maybe should enjoy Skippy remake in Yorkshire using the orgreave pit for the mine shaft .Sean bean should be the male lead and Lesley sharp the female lead.shots could include York station as a representative sample of an Australian station.could use bramhope house as an example of a poor Australians residence.could use occasional glimpse of Australia to remind everyone that it is australian

Like so many these days, evidently the holders of the rights to Beatrix Potter's books believe in "Anything for a buck."

This is a total travesty and rape of one the best loved characters in Literature. One can't help but wonder if many of the high reviews given this rip off are written by people who've never read the books or even heard of them. And the producers, writers, directors, and animators are guilty of a crime against literature.

Peter has undergone a complete personality transplant and the story is a lame, pure generic 2018 mishmash. What's next? Winnie the Pooh in a car chase movie?

BRA-VO. This is a BRILLIANT film, very sweet and heartfelt. Not sure why there has been so many bad reviews and a lot of self-righteous comments--but they need to check their politics at the door, and for goodness sake--just have fun, people. Can't we just enjoy it? Why does it have to be so complicated? I can think of a million other things that are much worse--than this Peter Rabbit film, which by the way, there is nothing wrong with Peter Rabbit 3.0. Go see it. You're going to love it, as much as I would've felt the original author would have too, as this is based on her tale for kids, but it is technically a sequel--as you will understand when you see it. First off, they are rabbits, and rabbits are mischievous by nature, when they are bored or there is food at stake. They are also a bit affectionately demanding and territorial as they felt with Bea. Within the context of the film, rabbits don't understand what the implications of allergic reactions could be for humans--they are, yes, rabbits. The humor is just hilarious, and it works well coming from farm animals. This is CGI/A vs. real live humans. It kept me engaged throughout. I saw this one with my daughter and we both laughed so much and so hard -- isn't this what it is all about? a positive experience? One that brings you closer with those you are with? I cried, I laughed, I cried so hard I laughed, and laughed so hard I cried -- and this is how I rate/gauge film I watch -- by how it moves me and the positivity it inspires in me; it felt good to be reminded that I was still human. I just loved, loved, loved this film. I recommend it. This one will definitely make it into my collection once it is released in media format -- and not many make it in. The soundtrack is super amazing too--I can't stress that enough. They hit it on the head with this one. A TRUE STORY OF HUMBLENESS AND REDEMPTION. Your heart will melt into a big puddle--hands down. No one is paying me to write this--I give it 10 Gold stars. I want to see Peter win next year at the Oscars. A TOTAL GEM.

Do I have to emphasise that you have to suspend your disbelief? We have animated animals (CG) mixed up with real actors. Now do not go around looking for depth in this. It's a kids movie, you have a setup, you have two groups fighting over Rose Byrne (who can blame them? Exactly) and you have a lesson that can be learned at the end.

If you accept that, you can have a lot of fun. The movie is really about the kids and the fun they ought to have. Get along for the ride, don't judge the acting too harshly and enjoy

The movie's C.G.I. is incredibly near perfect; a 10/10. When holding an animal, you could not tell it was not real. Even the movie, Roger Rabbit, had a sense of fakeness, but this Peter Rabbit, 2018 movie, has done such an incredible work, that nowhere in the movie do you get a sense that the animals are not real. The 2/10 comes from the message. The woman says that all animals have a natural claim to all gardens and homes, because they were here first. Yet, she does not allow the animals to poop, urinate and damage her home. Also, a 2/10 is due to the musical arrangement. Instead of a steady theme throughout the movie, you hear about 10 different genres, from classical to rap, causing irritation to the ears and finger fatigue as you often hit the mute button.

Finally, yes, it is worth seeing just for the CGI, but if you spend money on it, you lose.