उपन्यास और फिल्म टाइम आफ टाइम के आधार पर, कार्यकारी निर्माता केविन विलियमसन (द वैम्पायर डायरीज़) इस समय के दौरान एक रोमांचक बिल्ली-और-चूहा वाला एडवेन्चर प्रस्तुत करते हैं जिसमें प्रसिद्ध विज... सभी पढ़ेंउपन्यास और फिल्म टाइम आफ टाइम के आधार पर, कार्यकारी निर्माता केविन विलियमसन (द वैम्पायर डायरीज़) इस समय के दौरान एक रोमांचक बिल्ली-और-चूहा वाला एडवेन्चर प्रस्तुत करते हैं जिसमें प्रसिद्ध विज्ञान कथा लेखक एचजी वेल्स को आज के मैनहट्टन में जैक द रिपर की तलाश में ले जाया जाता है, और ... सभी पढ़ेंउपन्यास और फिल्म टाइम आफ टाइम के आधार पर, कार्यकारी निर्माता केविन विलियमसन (द वैम्पायर डायरीज़) इस समय के दौरान एक रोमांचक बिल्ली-और-चूहा वाला एडवेन्चर प्रस्तुत करते हैं जिसमें प्रसिद्ध विज्ञान कथा लेखक एचजी वेल्स को आज के मैनहट्टन में जैक द रिपर की तलाश में ले जाया जाता है, और ये एक ऐसी दुनिया है जिसकी उन्होंने कभी कल्पना भी नहीं की थी.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
The film starred Malcolm McDowell and Mary Steenburgen. McDowell was very successful in conveying the Victorian manners that one would expect from H. G. Wells--the British author who wrote science fiction classics and championed science as the key to a Utopian society. He also was very convincing in his portrayal of a nineteenth century man confronting the technological advances of the late twentieth century. While Freddie Stroma brings a certain charm to the television role, he comes up short in these two areas.
Genesis Rodriguez plays the role of Jane Walker, the modern American woman whose life is disrupted by Wells. She fits the role fairly well. But her characterization (as well as Stroma's) is handcuffed by the script.
As is common these days, the pilot launches pall mall into the story with barely a moment of character development, hoping to hook viewers on the action. This shortchanges the story and the viewers' understanding of the characters. Also, the writing advances the plot so quickly that it fails to establish the authenticity of the characters' motivations or emotions. The viewer is asked to bounce form one action scene to the next without time to consider or feel.
The way that Wells--and the man he chases--so quickly adapt to the surroundings of 21st century New York City with barely a question strains credulity. Modern Americans are incredulous at Wells' invention, despite the fact that modern technology advances so quickly, but Wells supposedly accepts and understands the modern miracles around him like someone who had already read books from 2017.
Despite the fact that the sci-fi aspects of the story have been minimized, the romance and suspense aspects of the story may suffice to make this an interesting show. Hopefully, the script's pace will slow enough for the characters to become more than names or titles, allowing the audience to become more emotionally invested.
As far as these low reviews? I mean I wouldn't watch a werewolf movie and give it a 1 because I don't like werewolves. We have to have a clue about these things and what we are going to watch. Otherwise someone should include in their review about maybe an old western that they hate old westerns before handing out a 1. I've seen some bad shows, for people to give this show such a poor rating is sad and I'm curious what makes their brain tick. I'm wondering if they know it's a show about time travel to a point with character we know about, what could the problem with plot be? Ok Hitchcock, your so much more qualified than a department at a major studio lmao who've had success at supreme level. Does that mean you have to like everything, no. But cmon, don't complain about the plot of this show when anyone with a clue understands the made complete and total sense. Don't psycho-analyze everything Freud. Or you will never be able to sit back and enjoy any show
Yes we are all different, but the show proved fantastic for what it was intended to be. It's a shame it never got a chance to get to far in depth or allow plot to develop but the show itself was great and the plot was so incredible it's unbelievable.
Indeed, to be fair, there have been some horrible adaptations, of Wells stories. Thankfully, this is not one of them. Certainly, it by no means adhere's to the facts of Well's life or strictly speaking his stories as written but so what?
The fact is this is a well made series that's a mix of thriller and sci fi action. Viewed from this perspective its extremely enjoyable. The characterizations have depth, the sci fi elements meld into a Wells- ian centric universe and the action is well paced and enjoyable. I especially like how the series writers have creatively blended elements of H.G. Wells life and literature and the Jack The Ripper murder mystery.
Sure its a far fetched yarn but its still engaging stuff.I really like this series and plan to keep watching. Seven out of ten from me.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThis series is based on Time After Time (1979). Director/writer Nicholas Meyer had no involvement with the series.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Conan: Adam Scott/Génesis Rodríguez/The Vamps (2017)
टॉप पसंद
- How many seasons does Time After Time have?Alexa द्वारा संचालित