Kill Ratio

The story line is very poor and so as the actions. It seems as the hero is having super power who can never be defeated. Acting is ok and the camera work is zero.

Oh well ... B-movie action. I mean one should know what to expect right? I guess so. But this Die Hard in a Hotel bargain bin thing really doesn't cut it. The main actor really does not have enough charisma to carry the whole movie. The story is simple enough, there is also action involved, so I guess there are a few things that be put on the plus side of the equation.

There's a bit of nudity and a lot of action. There's also a lot of CGI, that tries hard to look as real as possible. But short from going "bang bang", the shots fired from guns are obviously not real. Now I know, I shouldn't have time to judge that ... but what else was I going to do?

Did not expect much in the first place before watching 'Kill Ratio'. It sounded interesting, but it did look like a not very well made, ridiculous and by the numbers film with not particularly good actors. Saw 'Kill Ratio' anyway out of curiosity, being intrigued by the idea and having been a lot of low-budget films recently (most not very good to put it lightly).

'Kill Ratio' turned out to be more or less, make that exactly even, what was expected. Except worse. It started off pretty well, giving off the sense that maybe the film won't be bad and be better than it seemed. This didn't stay for long though and it is something of a shame. After the opening, the film went down south catastrophically very quickly and never recovered or improved. Actually got pretty much worse as it progressed.

On a visual level, 'Kill Ratio' looked shoddy. Drab and simplistic, with haphazard editing, far from slick photography and very artificial-looking and overused to the point of abuse effects/CGI.

The sound/soundtrack are intrusive and obvious and the direction has no sense of atmosphere or pacing, nothing to be thrilled by and nothing much engaging.

Script is awkward-sounding and ponderous, with lines that do make one cringe. A lot of it is gibberish and juvenile, with a stilted improvisatory feel that shouldn't have made it past draft stages.

On top of that, the story goes through the motions with no tension, suspense or thrills, a lot of intelligence-insulting ridiculousness, implausibility and pacing so dull that it makes a reasonably short length much longer. The action sequences are more preposterous and by the numbers than they are thrilling or fun, a big problem for a film so heavy on this aspect. The terrible way they look also hinder them.

Characters are basically every stereotype in the book it seems and are one-dimensional caricatures with no likeability or development and with the inability to behave logically. The acting is very poor all round with a very uncharismatic lead for one.

In summary, bad film in almost every way. 2/10 Bethany Cox

One of the best action films of the year 2019, but wait it was out in 2016. Why has it took three years for this great action film to go on general release. If you're going to have an action hero make sure he's got the looks and a great sense of humour, Tom Hopper ticks all the boxes. Great support from Amy Huberman, real chemistry between the two actors made the film a great watch. The storyline a policital coup set in a hotel, the feel of the film and the characters grip you straight away, you know you're in for a good night. Lets have more films like this then the hollywood trash.

camera-work and sound OK. Character buildup - zero. Sound effects in fight scenes - exaggerated.

big plus: gratuitous nudity.

heavy on the stereotypes - rude Russian generals, Hero American cold-blooded CIA, emotional eastern European women.

and why are these people speaking English 90% of the time but sometimes they do speak whatever the hell their language is supposed to be?