अपनी मूल यात्रा के कुछ दशकों बाद, मैरी पोपिन्स, जादुई नानी, बैंक्स के भाई-बहनों और माइकल के बच्चों को उनके जीवन के कठिन समय में मदद करने के लिए वापस आती है.अपनी मूल यात्रा के कुछ दशकों बाद, मैरी पोपिन्स, जादुई नानी, बैंक्स के भाई-बहनों और माइकल के बच्चों को उनके जीवन के कठिन समय में मदद करने के लिए वापस आती है.अपनी मूल यात्रा के कुछ दशकों बाद, मैरी पोपिन्स, जादुई नानी, बैंक्स के भाई-बहनों और माइकल के बच्चों को उनके जीवन के कठिन समय में मदद करने के लिए वापस आती है.
- 4 ऑस्कर के लिए नामांकित
- 24 जीत और कुल 112 नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I am 43 and as a Generation X'er, I am skeptical by nature and am normally not inclined to introducing new actors into iconic roles. I loved Julie Andrews as Mary Poppins and now, Emily Blunt has made me fall in love with Mary Poppins all over again!!! When we left the theater, my husband and I felt like we had just left the Magic Kingdom - it is a magical movie experience! Worth every dollar to see on the big screen!! I couldn't be more pleased with Mary Poppins Returns. She is "practically perfect in every way". Emily Blunt has stage presence, the songs are pleasing and the story is extremely touching. (I watched Saving Mr. Banks and for those who don't get why Mary Poppins came back, missed the entire point of Mary Poppins, Saving Mr.Banks and Mary Poppins Returns.) We all need a Mary Poppins moment to remind us of what truly matters in life. So if you want to Trip a Little Light Fantastic, find out Where the Lost Things Go, and be reminded with a childlike heart There is Nowhere to Go But Up, then please see this movie and feel the magic!
I found this movie to be quite enjoyable. It's not quite as good as the original but it holds it's own. Emily blunt as Mary Poppins is amazing. I think Julie Andrews would be pleased. I guess my only disappointment is the lack of memorable songs. But that's okay....it's hard to capture that magic twice. Twas a great effort. The cameo got me in tears. I love Dick Van Dyke.
I thought that the film was very enjoyable, however, even though I've been cautioned not to I cannot help but compare this film to the original 1964 film with Julie Andrews and Dick Van Dyke. There's so much to like in the 1964 film.
As a parent, I've seen a million kids movies a million times each, but I would never contemplate watching this again.
The writers seemingly went out of their way to mimic the original, only it was a pale imitation in every way.
The acting wasn't great, but many roles were poorly cast too.
And the music was completely forgettable. I couldn't wait for each song to end.
Pointless subplots, ridiculous plot holes, wasted talent.
Avoid this one. You'll thank me later.
The writers seemingly went out of their way to mimic the original, only it was a pale imitation in every way.
The acting wasn't great, but many roles were poorly cast too.
And the music was completely forgettable. I couldn't wait for each song to end.
Pointless subplots, ridiculous plot holes, wasted talent.
Avoid this one. You'll thank me later.
Have finally caught up with this and enjoyed it thoroughly. The only reason I've not scored it higher is for the song in the Music Hall, too sleazy for Mary Poppins and a flatness and wordiness of some of the other songs. But others were light hearted and catchy and beautifully done. I never liked the Mary Poppins books, she lied and was way too weird. I enjoyed the Julie Andrews/Disney version, much more likeable. Emily Blunt based her Mary much more on the book but happily also managed to make her more likeable. I just wish someone would help Disney song writers realise that people enjoy good melodies and don't need loooong songs that are too wordy. Plus when doing a movie for children keep it clean and good. The sleaziness of that 1 particular song was so out of step with Mary and the whole tone of her story.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाDick Van Dyke was offered four options for his dance scene, each with a varying degree of difficulty. He insisted on performing the hardest dance routine and refused any help from fellow cast members while filming the scene. The resulting dance scene was so well received that there were reports of audiences applauding during screenings to see the old actor dance so well for his age.
- गूफ़The gaslights used in the movie are all naked flames. By the 1930s, gaslights used mantles, which gave off a lot more light for less gas and didn't smoke the glass covers. Also, gaslights were largely controlled by clockwork (still used in historic areas today in London and other European cities), so the leeries' main job would have been maintenance: mantle replacement and winding the clockwork rather than daily lighting/dousing.
- भाव
Mary Poppins: [singing to Georgie, Anabel, and John] Nothing's gone forever, only out of place.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटThere is a special thanks to Jay Leno in the credits. According to Lin-Manuel Miranda, "I asked about this when I saw that! Apparently there is a car sound effect from the 1930's that they could not replicate, and someone realized Jay Leno had the car they needed to record the sound effect."
- कनेक्शनFeatured in AniMat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: Avatar: The Live-Action Bender (2018)
- साउंडट्रैक(Underneath the) Lovely London Sky
Music by Marc Shaiman
Lyrics by Scott Wittman, and Marc Shaiman
Performed by Lin-Manuel Miranda
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- El regreso de Mary Poppins
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- City of London, इंग्लैंड, यूनाइटेड किंगडम(Bank/Threadneedle Street)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $13,00,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $17,19,58,438
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $2,35,23,121
- 23 दिस॰ 2018
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $36,25,29,106
- चलने की अवधि
- 2 घं 10 मि(130 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें