[go: up one dir, main page]

    कैलेंडर रिलीज़ करेंटॉप 250 फ़िल्मेंसबसे लोकप्रिय फ़िल्मेंज़ोनर के आधार पर फ़िल्में ब्राउज़ करेंटॉप बॉक्स ऑफ़िसशोटाइम और टिकटफ़िल्मी समाचारइंडिया मूवी स्पॉटलाइट
    TV और स्ट्रीमिंग पर क्या हैटॉप 250 टीवी शोसबसे लोकप्रिय TV शोशैली के अनुसार टीवी शो ब्राउज़ करेंTV की खबरें
    देखने के लिए क्या हैसबसे नए ट्रेलरIMDb ओरिजिनलIMDb की पसंदIMDb स्पॉटलाइटफैमिली एंटरटेनमेंट गाइडIMDb पॉडकास्ट
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter पुरस्कारअवार्ड्स सेंट्रलफ़ेस्टिवल सेंट्रलसभी इवेंट
    जिनका जन्म आज के दिन हुआ सबसे लोकप्रिय सेलिब्रिटीसेलिब्रिटी से जुड़ी खबरें
    मदद केंद्रयोगदानकर्ता क्षेत्रपॉल
उद्योग के पेशेवरों के लिए
  • भाषा
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
वॉचलिस्ट
साइन इन करें
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
ऐप का इस्तेमाल करें
  • कास्ट और क्रू
  • उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं
  • ट्रिविया
  • अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल
IMDbPro

Being the Ricardos

  • 2021
  • UA 13+
  • 2 घं 11 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
6.5/10
46 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
Nicole Kidman and Javier Bardem in Being the Ricardos (2021)
Follows Lucy and Desi as they face a crisis that could end their careers and another that could end their marriage.
trailer प्ले करें1:48
14 वीडियो
48 फ़ोटो
Period DramaShowbiz DramaBiographyDrama

लुसी और देसी एक संकट का सामना करते हैं जो उनके करियर को समाप्त कर सकता है और दूसरा जो उनकी शादी को समाप्त कर सकता है.लुसी और देसी एक संकट का सामना करते हैं जो उनके करियर को समाप्त कर सकता है और दूसरा जो उनकी शादी को समाप्त कर सकता है.लुसी और देसी एक संकट का सामना करते हैं जो उनके करियर को समाप्त कर सकता है और दूसरा जो उनकी शादी को समाप्त कर सकता है.

  • निर्देशक
    • Aaron Sorkin
  • लेखक
    • Aaron Sorkin
  • स्टार
    • Nicole Kidman
    • Javier Bardem
    • J.K. Simmons
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • IMDb रेटिंग
    6.5/10
    46 हज़ार
    आपकी रेटिंग
    • निर्देशक
      • Aaron Sorkin
    • लेखक
      • Aaron Sorkin
    • स्टार
      • Nicole Kidman
      • Javier Bardem
      • J.K. Simmons
    • 669यूज़र समीक्षाएं
    • 189आलोचक समीक्षाएं
    • 60मेटास्कोर
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
    • 3 ऑस्कर के लिए नामांकित
      • 13 जीत और कुल 61 नामांकन

    वीडियो14

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 1:48
    Official Trailer
    Watch the Trailer
    Trailer 1:48
    Watch the Trailer
    Watch the Trailer
    Trailer 1:48
    Watch the Trailer
    Teaser Trailer
    Trailer 1:18
    Teaser Trailer
    Being The Ricardos
    Trailer 1:48
    Being The Ricardos
    Being The Ricardos
    Trailer 1:18
    Being The Ricardos
    How the Cast of 'Being the Ricardos' Became the Cast of "I Love Lucy"
    Clip 3:41
    How the Cast of 'Being the Ricardos' Became the Cast of "I Love Lucy"

    फ़ोटो48

    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    + 43
    पोस्टर देखें

    टॉप कलाकार99

    बदलाव करें
    Nicole Kidman
    Nicole Kidman
    • Lucille Ball
    Javier Bardem
    Javier Bardem
    • Desi Arnaz
    J.K. Simmons
    J.K. Simmons
    • William Frawley
    Nina Arianda
    Nina Arianda
    • Vivian Vance
    Tony Hale
    Tony Hale
    • Jess Oppenheimer
    Alia Shawkat
    Alia Shawkat
    • Madelyn Pugh
    Jake Lacy
    Jake Lacy
    • Bob Carroll
    Linda Lavin
    Linda Lavin
    • Older Madelyn Pugh
    Ronny Cox
    Ronny Cox
    • Older Bob Carroll
    John Rubinstein
    John Rubinstein
    • Older Jess Oppenheimer
    Clark Gregg
    Clark Gregg
    • Howard Wenke
    Nelson Franklin
    Nelson Franklin
    • Joe Strickland
    Jeff Holman
    Jeff Holman
    • Roger Otter
    Jonah Platt
    Jonah Platt
    • Tip Tribby
    Christopher Denham
    Christopher Denham
    • Donald Glass
    Brian Howe
    Brian Howe
    • Charles Koerner
    Ron Perkins
    Ron Perkins
    • Macy
    Baize Buzan
    Baize Buzan
    • Mary Pat
    • निर्देशक
      • Aaron Sorkin
    • लेखक
      • Aaron Sorkin
    • सभी कास्ट और क्रू
    • IMDbPro में प्रोडक्शन, बॉक्स ऑफिस और बहुत कुछ

    उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं669

    6.546.2K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    सारांश

    Reviewers say 'Being the Ricardos' delves into Lucille Ball and Desi Arnaz's intricate relationship and career struggles in the 1950s. It highlights political and personal crises, 'I Love Lucy' production drama, and their marriage. Nicole Kidman and Javier Bardem receive acclaim for their performances. However, some critique the pacing, and flashbacks. Historical accuracy and casting choices are debated. Despite these issues, many value its insight into iconic figures and the entertainment industry.
    यूज़र की समीक्षाओं के टेक्स्ट से AI द्वारा जेनरेट किया गया

    फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं

    6moonspinner55

    "It might have been Lucy in 'All About Eve'...and she would have blown the doors off the place!"

    As TV's "I Love Lucy" reaches 20 million households a week in the US in the early 1950s, it's star, Lucille Ball, is fighting Communist affiliation rumors started by columnist Walter Winchell; she's also fighting with husband and co-star Desi Arnaz about his lack of marital attention and is about to reveal to the television audience that both she and her TV-counterpart, Lucy Ricardo, are "expecting". Although this handsomely-produced portrait of the legendary actress is an entertaining one, there are a myriad of timeline issues and anachronisms within the film which "I Love Lucy" purists are bound to be troubled by. There's also a hurdle in buying Javier Bardem as Desi Arnaz (Bardem has Desi's Cuban-accented voice--and his flirtatious charms--down, but he's too old for the role). Kidman fares better as Lucy, proving her naysayers wrong and giving a wry, tough, courageous performance. Lucy's off-camera relationship with Vivian Vance (played by Nina Arianda) is curiously edgy despite reports throughout the years these two were the best of friends; meanwhile, codger William Frawley (J. K. Simmons) is shown to be irascible yet cogent and sharp in place of the heavy drinker Arnaz went out on a limb to have cast. I didn't care for the documentary-like framing device of the show's creators discussing the series in the present day (there's enough flashbacks and flash-forwards happening here); however, when writer-director Aaron Sorkin gets down to business, he delivers some terrifically tasty behind-the-scenes action. **1/2 from ****
    5aarpcats

    Sorkin wrings the love out of Lucy

    IMDB where getting over a hundred votes for a movie by big name Hollywood talent gets the review deleted. Am I right, IMDB? Is that how A listers keep you paying to see bombs like this one?

    If this movie wins Oscars, it will be the "Shakepeare In Love" of 2022. I know it and the 119 people who upvoted my review (before it disappeared) know it. So why does it keep disappearing, IMDB?

    Bad casting is the least of the problems in this Sorkin polemic on the 1950s. But it is the bad casting where I will start.

    First, it isn't "ageism" to be so distracted with an actress's bad plastic surgery that a show becomes unpleasantly jarring. Kidman is so frozen that all she can do is stare into the camera when she makes a point. No matter how well Kidman mimics Ball's husky voice, she looks like a doll wearing a mask. It's okay when she's playing Lucille Ball in a serious script read, but it completely falls apart when she plays Lucille Ricardo. Kidman's own features are so robotically flat, that she looks like she's an animated drawing mimicking a human mimicking a the world's most famous comedienne.

    To the other miscasting issue, Javier is an older, masculine Spaniard who lacks the litheness and charm of the boyish Desi Arnaz. The scenes of him doing a very bad imitation of Cuban English with Desi as a young man are as jarring to the Spanish ear as the idea of Jackie Gleason suddenly appearing as sexy young Paul Newman in a remake of "HUD." (He can't even sing "BABALU" for Cuban Pete's sake!!!!!)

    Third, Sorkin's standard "rata tat tat" dialogue performed by two people who are both uncomfortable with their accents makes the chatter between Lucy and Desi at times unbearable. It's stilted and uncomfortable. It's also full of exposition, which is the hallmark of very lazy writing. These two people were trailblazers, but they were real people. That Sorkin wants to use them as a metaphor might work, if he would stop beating us over the head with what he wants us to know. He should just let the story, which is remarkable, tell itself.

    Last, yes. I know Lucie Arnaz did a video defending the casting and Sorkin. And i might take that the endorsement Sorkin's fans want it to be, if she had disclosed in that video that Arnaz and her brother were principal investors in the film. Kidman may have "crawled up in" Lucie's mother's head, but Lucie paid her to be there.

    Who wasn't miscast? Nina Arianda shines as Vivian Vance and J. K. Simmons becomes drunk Bill Frawley. Linda Lavin owns the screen as the aged Madelyn Pugh. They make me really want to love this film, but I don't.

    Do you love Lucy? Watch the many "Lucy" series and then read the many biographies written about the two actors. You won't have to waste your time with Sorkin's ego trip, and you might learn something.

    Lucille Ball and Desi Arnaz deserve better than being Aaron Sorkin's object lesson. I wanted a movie about real people, not a sideways lecture from wannabe professor Sorkin.
    6hughjman

    Casting but not acting problems

    Nicole Kidman is great BUT her upper face doesn't move and that's very distracting. In close-ups, it's especially jarring. Javier Bardem is wonderful BUT he's 20 years too old for Desi at that time and that's very distracting. ("The Social Network" is a great movie but it wouldn't have worked with Zuckerberg played by a 40 year old.) These two factors kept me at an emotional distance.

    Everyone else is very good. The music got on my nerves as it was it was too overly dramatic in places. This wasn't the Titanic going down.

    The script is just okay, but it's an interesting story even if timelines are conflated. I sort of feel Sorkin doesn't "get" comedy writers, which I also felt with "Studio 60."

    Javier Bardem doing "Cuban Pete" was really, really great and fun, one of my favorite moments - but again, wrong age for Desi. Would have been amazing if he were the right age, and if NK could move her face. Not being snide here.
    6tdwillis-26273

    Bad Sreenplay and Miscasting

    I have been a fan of the "I LOVE LUCY" show since I was a kid in the 70's, watching the re runs.

    Over the years I have picked up the occasional tid bits of information about them, but never really went looking. I was eager to watch this movie, and admittedly did learn a lot.

    What was missing for me, was the emotional attachment that I was very surprised I did not feel towards the movie characters considering the fond feelings and memories I have towards the original people.

    I felt like Nicole Kidman just lacked something that Lucille Ball had.

    I dont know if it was her acting as much as it was a screenplay that didn't quite reach the depth of, or really capture, the obviously intense time during that particular week of their lives. The movie did show a few flashbacks to give the audience a chance to connect and understand the characters more deeply but for me it did not do that. It only left me feeling more disengaged. Both of them, I am positive, had interesting and incredible lives, just by the lone fact of the time period they lived in. Everyone who lived during that time has a shared understanding that we , as later generations just dont get. The sreenplay fails to fully make the audience FEEL what that timeframe in our history felt like, and todays generations cant really emotionally connect without understanding THAT first. For me, That was the first step backwards. Without Kidman bringing to life, Lucy, I was emotionally absent.

    As usual, I am in the minority again about my opinion of the actor Bardem. I actually think he did better than Kidman in bringing his character to life. In fact, it was both male actors (Bardem as Desi and Simmons playing Fred) that blew the 2 main female leads, (kidman as Lucy and Arianda as Ethel)out of the water.

    It was an okay movie. A little stiff, a little unemotional. And it did make me really crave for someone to step up and write a great mini series about Desi and Lucy. Because I dont think you have a chance of capturing them in a 2 hour movie.

    And of course, maybe hire an unknown yet exceptional actress to play Lucy. There are plenty to choose from.
    6blanche-2

    totally inaccurate

    Either I know more about Lucille Ball and Ricky Ricardo than their children do, or their children, being investors in this film, didn't care what Aaron Sorkin wrote.

    Of course, there is such a thing as dramatic license - okay. However, this went above and beyond. I will cite a few things here, but by no means ALL:

    Ricky and Lucy didn't meet the way as shown in the film. Lucille showed up at a rehearsal to say hello to the director of whatever movie Ricky was doing, and she was a mess from her previous film, all as shown. When she came back another time, Ricky didn't realize it was the same woman. When he did, he said, "That's a hunk of woman!"

    Immediately before the filming of episode 68 ("The Girls Go Into Business") of I Love Lucy (which did not include fixing Fred up with a woman), Desi Arnaz, instead of his usual audience warm-up, told the audience about Lucille and her grandfather. Reusing the line he had first given to Hedda Hopper in an interview, he quipped:

    "The only thing red about Lucy is her hair, and even that is not legitimate."

    Lucille Ball was 31 when she made the Big Street at RKO, not 39. RKO had suspended her when she refused to be billed fourth in a film. Her good reviews for The Big Street brought a better offer from MGM.

    What was the deal with mentioning Judy Holliday? Holliday wasn't around, even on Broadway, until the mid-40s and didn't make a splash in film until circa 1949. She was no rival to Lucille Ball.

    Jean Arthur and Barbara Stanwyck were sought for The Big Street; Runyon insisted on Ball.

    Aaron Sorkin's script is a muddled mess, combining the Communist scare and little Ricky's birth, which happened in two different years. The result for me anyway is that they both got lost amid Lucy's staging of one scene in the show, which was episode 22, not 37.

    Also, in real life, Lucille Ball was referred to as Lucille, not Lucy.

    Regarding the performances, I thought Nicole Kidman had the voice and personality down flat. As far as her face being frozen, I'm not sure that much makeup was necessary. Bardem looks nothing like Arnaz, so why the pressure to have Kidman look exactly like Lucy? She had the hair, the eyes, the voice, the essence. A little less makeup would have been fine.

    I know people say she was miscast because they wanted a lookalike. Debra Messing would have been fine for the "I Love Lucy" part but she is not the actress that Kidman is. Bardem was excellent. J. K. Simmons and Nina Arianda were fabulous as Fred and Ethel. Actually the whole cast was excellent and totally wasted.

    इस तरह के और

    Lucy and Desi
    7.7
    Lucy and Desi
    Bombshell
    6.8
    Bombshell
    The Eyes of Tammy Faye
    6.6
    The Eyes of Tammy Faye
    Bali
    6.5
    Bali
    The Trial of the Chicago 7
    7.7
    The Trial of the Chicago 7
    A Few Good Men
    A Few Good Men
    The Tender Bar
    6.7
    The Tender Bar
    वन नाइट इन मयामी...
    7.1
    वन नाइट इन मयामी...
    West Side Story
    7.1
    West Side Story
    The Politician: An Insider's Account of John Edwards's Pursuit of the Presidency and the Scandal That Brought Him Down
    हाउस ऑफ़ गुची
    6.6
    हाउस ऑफ़ गुची
    Spencer
    6.5
    Spencer

    कहानी

    बदलाव करें

    क्या आपको पता है

    बदलाव करें
    • ट्रिविया
      Prior to filming, Lucie Arnaz (daughter of Lucille Ball and Desi Arnaz) had told writer/director Aaron Sorkin that it was okay to make Lucille stubborn and headstrong in the movie, as this was how she was in real life. After seeing the movie, Arnaz released a video on her YouTube Channel on 17 October 2021, in which she called the movie "freaking amazing." She complimented Sorkin for making a great movie that really captured the time period and had wonderful casting. She also said that Nicole Kidman "became my mother's soul." She also said that Javier Bardem didn't look like her dad but, "he has everything that dad had. He has his wit, his charms, his dimples, his musicality."
    • गूफ़
      The movie portrays Lucy's contract at RKO being dropped after her performance in The Big Street (1942) and has RKO's head of production state that at 39 years old she should try radio. In reality Lucy was only 31 when "The Big Street" was released in 1942. Her contract was not dropped by RKO, but rather bought out by MGM, who was impressed by her performance. While working for MGM, Lucy became a redhead. She remained under contract to them until 1946. Additionally, Lucy did not seek out radio until 1948 while concurrently working in movies as a freelance actress.
    • भाव

      Lucille Ball: I am the biggest asset in the portfolio of the Columbia Broadcasting System. The biggest asset in the portfolio of Philip Morris Tobacco, Westinghouse. I get paid a fortune to do exactly what I love doing. I work side by side with my husband, who's genuinely impressed by me. And all I have to do to keep it is kill every week for 36 weeks in a row. And then do it again the next year.

    • कनेक्शन
      Featured in The Late Show with Stephen Colbert: Javier Bardem/Gang of Youths (2021)
    • साउंडट्रैक
      She Could Shake the Maracas
      Written by Lorenz Hart, Richard Rodgers

      Produced by Michael Andrew

      Performed by Javier Bardem with The Michael Andrew Orchestra

    टॉप पसंद

    रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
    साइन इन करें

    अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल17

    • How long is Being the Ricardos?Alexa द्वारा संचालित

    विवरण

    बदलाव करें
    • रिलीज़ की तारीख़
      • 21 दिसंबर 2021 (भारत)
    • कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
      • यूनाइटेड स्टेट्स
    • भाषा
      • अंग्रेज़ी
    • इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
      • Lucy and Desi
    • फ़िल्माने की जगहें
      • RMS Queen Mary - 1126 Queens Highway, लाँग बीच, कैलिफोर्निया, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका(Ricky's club interior)
    • उत्पादन कंपनियां
      • Amazon Studios
      • Escape Artists
      • Big Indie Pictures
    • IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें

    तकनीकी विशेषताएं

    बदलाव करें
    • चलने की अवधि
      2 घंटे 11 मिनट
    • रंग
      • Color
      • Black and White
    • ध्वनि मिश्रण
      • Dolby Digital
    • पक्ष अनुपात
      • 2.39 : 1

    इस पेज में योगदान दें

    किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
    • IMDb जवाब: डेटा भरने में मदद करें
    • योगदान करने के बारे में और जानें
    पेज में बदलाव करें

    एक्सप्लोर करने के लिए और भी बहुत कुछ

    हाल ही में देखे गए

    कृपया इस फ़ीचर का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए ब्राउज़र कुकीज़ चालू करें. और जानें.
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    ज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करेंज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करें
    सोशल पर IMDb को फॉलो करें
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    Android और iOS के लिए
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    • सहायता
    • साइट इंडेक्स
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb डेटा लाइसेंस
    • प्रेस रूम
    • विज्ञापन
    • नौकरियाँ
    • उपयोग की शर्तें
    • गोपनीयता नीति
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, एक Amazon कंपनी

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.